Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Idioma
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi ; 45(1): 111-115, 2022 Jan 12.
Artigo em Zh | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35000316

RESUMO

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a kind of invasive malignant tumor originated from pleural tissue. The incidence of MPM is not high in the population, but the prognosis is very poor. The median survival time is only about 12 months. Pemetrexed combined with platinum is the first-line chemotherapy regimen recommended by the current guidelines. The use of bevacizumab will further prolong the survival of chemotherapy. Once resistance happened, no anti-tumor treatment has been confirmed to achieve survival benefits. Therefore, there is no recommended standard second-line MPM regimen in international and domestic guidelines, including National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines. Vinorelbine, gemcitabine and other monotherapy regimens are commonly used in clinical practice, but the median progression free survival (PFS) is only about 3 months. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIS) have been proved to have a significant inhibitory effect on tumor growth in a variety of malignant tumors, and their efficacy is related to the expression of programmed death-ligand 1(PD-L1). In unresectable MPM, programmed death 1 (PD-1)/PD-L1 inhibitors have been used in a series of clinical studies in the first-line, second-line and above treatment. Some of the results have been cited and recommended by international guidelines, but the overall efficacy improvement is still limited. This review summarizes the latest clinical studies and researches in the field of MPM treatment and predicts the directions and prospect of improving the therapeutic effect in the future.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Pulmonares , Mesotelioma Maligno , Mesotelioma , Neoplasias Pleurais , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamento farmacológico , Mesotelioma/tratamento farmacológico , Pemetrexede/uso terapêutico , Pleura , Neoplasias Pleurais/tratamento farmacológico , Prognóstico
2.
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi ; 42(9): 771-776, 2020 Sep 23.
Artigo em Zh | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32988161

RESUMO

Objective: Recently, increasing number of lung cancer patients benefit from immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, the data of Chinese small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients is limited. This study aims to analyze the response and survival data of ICIs treatment in SCLC and to explore the predictive biomarkers. Methods: Forty-seven SCLC patients who received ICIs treatment from Peking University Cancer Hospital from May 2017 to September 2019 was recruited. Clinical characteristics including sex, age, smoking status, ICIs strategy, PD-L1 expression and therapeutic efficacy were collected to explore the clinical predictive biomarkers for SCLC ICIs treatment. Results: Among the 47 patients, 18 (38.3%) cases were partial repose (PR), 11 (23.4%) were stable disease (SD), 18 (38.3%) were progressive disease (PD), and the objective response rate (ORR) was 38.3%, disease control rate (DCR) was 61.7%, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.3 months. ICIs monotherapy accounts for 27.7%, the ORR was 15.4%, DCR was 53.8%, median PFS was 2.7 months. Combined therapy accounts for 72.3%, the ORR was 47.1%, DCR was 64.7%, median PFS was 5.4 months. Fourteen (29.8%) patients received ICIs as the first line treatment, their ORR was 85.7%, DCR was 100%, median PFS was 9.1 month. The ORR was not related to the age, sex, body mass index (BMI), smoking status and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression (P>0.05). The ORRs were higher in patients underwent PD-L1 monotherapy (P=0.001), combined therapy (P=0.002) and received ICIs as the first line treatment (P<0.001). Log-rank analysis indicated that the PFS of female patients were 12.0 months, significantly longer than 4.4 months of male patients in ICIs treatment (P=0.038). Patients who received PD-L1 monotherapy, combined treatment, or ICIs as the first line treatment had longer PFS than their counterparts, though no statistical significant was observed (P>0.05). Cox multivariate analysis showed that, the gender was not an independent predictor for PFS in ICIs treatment (HR=3.777, 95%CI=0.974~30.891, P=0.054). Conclusions: Immunotherapy is an effective treatment strategy for SCLC. Patients who receive combined ICIs treatment, first line ICIs treatment and PD-L1 treatment may get greater benefits. PD-L1 expression cannot predict the response and PFS in SCLC ICIs treatment.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos Imunológicos , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Carcinoma de Pequenas Células do Pulmão , Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/uso terapêutico , Biomarcadores Tumorais , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Humanos , Imunoterapia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamento farmacológico , Masculino , Carcinoma de Pequenas Células do Pulmão/tratamento farmacológico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA