Second primary squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity - a retrospective cohort study of therapeutic procedures and oncological outcome.

OBJECTIVES: In the presented study, the occurrence rates of second primary oral carcinomas and their prognostic relevance were analyzed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients with surgically treated oral squamous cell carcinomas within the years 2010 and 2022 in our department were included in this retrospective cohort study. Two groups were designed including patients with second primary carcinomas and patients with local tumor recurrences. Occurrence rates, tumor stages and applied therapies were assessed. Primary outcome was overall survival in dependence of the index tumor. Secondary outcomes were overall survival in dependence of local recurrences or second primary tumors. RESULTS: An overall number of 908 patients was included in the analysis. 98 patients (10.8%) developed a second primary oral squamous cell carcinoma. Patients with second primary tumors presented significantly (p < 0.001) better overall survival in dependence of the index tumor compared to patients suffering from local recurrences. There was no significant difference in overall survival (p = 0.4) in dependence of the date of second primary tumor or local recurrence. Patients with second primary tumors were more likely to receive surgery-based therapy compared to patients with local recurrences who more frequently received definitive radiotherapy. CONCLUSION: Our data indicates different clinical courses in terms of therapy and survival of patients suffering from second primary tumors compared to patients with local tumor recurrences. This may be due to a more aggressive biology of local recurrences and earlier detection of second primaries due to oncological follow-up of the index tumor. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The differentiation of local tumor recurrences and second primary tumors is of clinical relevance, as applicable therapies and resulting prognosis may differ significantly.

Infants With Trigonocephaly Treated With Fronto-Orbital Remodelling and Endocortical Positioning of Resorbable Plates-A Retrospective Cohort Study Including 101 Patients.

PURPOSE: Fronto-orbital remodeling is the gold standard for surgical treatment of metopic synostosis in many craniofacial centers. For fixation, resorbable materials are widely used. Because of swelling during resorption, the positioning of the plates can be relevant. Therefore, the goal of this study was to investigate whether there are limitations to endocortical positioning of resorbable plates. METHODS: In this retrospective study, all patients with metopic craniosynostosis resulting in trigonocephaly, who were treated with a standardized fronto-orbital remodeling and endocortical positioning of resorbable plates, between February 2012 and December 2019 were included. The endpoint of this study was the postoperative complications that can be attributed to the material used. RESULTS: A total of 101 patients, who were treated at our unit, could be included with a male predominance, 81 (80.2%) boys versus 20 (19.8%) girls. Surgery was performed at a median age of 9 months (±2.56). No complications were seen related to resorbable plates. All patients of our study population were categorized as Whitaker classification I and II. CONCLUSION: This study shows that the risk level in using endocortical resorbable plates positioned on the inner surface of the bone is low. From an aesthetic point of view, we could not detect any disadvantage.

Comparing the Influence of Surgical and Conservative Therapy on Quality of Life in Patients with Early-Stage Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw-A Prospective Longitudinal Study.

Background and Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of surgical and conservative, non-surgical treatment on general health-related (QoL) and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) in patients suffering from AAOMS stage I MRONJ. Materials and Methods: In the course of this prospective clinical study, QoL and OHRQoL using QLQ-C30 and QHIP G14 questionnaire were longitudinally assessed in N = 174 prospectively enrolled patients with indication of treatment of MRONJ stage I over a period of 12 months. Patients received conservative or surgical treatment. The measurement time points were preoperatively (T0), 12 weeks (T1), 6 months (T2) and 1 year after operation (T3). Results: For OHRQoL, no significant (p > 0.05) differences were found between both treatment groups for all timepoints (T0-T3). In the surgical treatment group, OHIP scores of T1, T2 and T3 were significantly lower than baseline measures (T0) (T0-T1 (2.99, p = 0.024), T0-T2 (5.20, p < 0.001), T0-T3 (7.44, p < 0.001)). For conservative treatment group OHIP, scores of T2 and T3 were significantly lower than baseline measures (T0) (T0-T2 (9.09, p = 0.013), T0-T3 (12.79, p < 0.001)). There was no statistically significant effect of time on QLQ-C30 scores in both groups (surgical treatment: F(3, 174) = 1.542, p < 0.205, partial η2 = 0.026; conservative treatment: F(3, 30) = 0.528, p = 0.667, partial η2 = 0.050). QLQ-C30 scores turned out to be significantly lower in the non-surgical group at T1 (p = 0.036) and T3 (p = 0.047) compared to the surgical treatment group. Conclusions: Surgical and conservative treatment of MRONJ stage I significantly improves patients' OHRQoL. Surgical treatment is superior to conservative treatment of MRONJ stage I regarding general QoL. Therefore, surgical treatment of MRONJ stage I should not be omitted for QoL reasons.

Clinical outcome and prognostic factors in recurrent oral squamous cell carcinoma after primary surgical treatment: a retrospective study.

OBJECTIVES: Survival for patients with recurrent oral squamous cell carcinoma is usually poor, and the most effective treatment has not yet been clearly defined. The present study evaluates the outcome in radiotherapy-naïve patients after recurrence of oral squamous cell carcinoma with respect to different treatment modalities including surgery, radiation, chemoradiation, and palliative treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, we included all patients with primary oral squamous cell carcinoma who received exclusively surgical therapy between 2010 and 2020 and who suffered from locoregional recurrence in their follow-up. Patients with previous adjuvant therapy were excluded from this protocol. Clinical and pathological parameters were collected and statistically evaluated. Survival analysis was performed according to Kaplan-Meier. The primary endpoints were overall and progression-free survival in dependance of treatment strategy for recurrent tumors. RESULTS: Out of a total of 538 patients with surgically treated primary oral squamous cell carcinoma, 76 patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean follow-up was 38 ± 32 months. Patients who received surgically based therapy had a significantly better outcome in terms of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) (DFS p < 0.001; OS p < 0.001). The presence of regional metastases and a short disease-free interval (DFI) between primary and recurrent cancer were significant predictors for adverse outcomes (DFI p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: We recommend primary surgical therapy for radiotherapy-naïve patients with recurrent oral squamous cell carcinoma, supplemented by risk-adapted adjuvant therapy. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Surgical therapy continues to play a central role in the treatment of radiotherapy-naïve patients with recurrent oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Reconstruction in early squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity-Do free flaps improve oncological outcome?

BACKGROUND: Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) ranks on position 14 in global cancer analysis and makes up to 38 % of all head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. While surgery is accepted as first-line treatment of early tumors, the reconstructive approach is not standardized. Therefore, we evaluated the concept of ablative tumor removal and microvascular reconstruction in terms of oncological safety and surgical morbidity for early OSCCs. METHODS: 262 patients received ablative tumor surgery with neck dissection together with microvascular reconstruction between 2010 and 2020. General clinical data was analyzed descriptively with regard to surgery time, duration of tracheotomy and hospitalization. RESULTS: Estimated 5-year overall and progression-free survival was 85 % and 77 % respectively with no significant difference between stage I or II cancer patients. Tracheotomy was performed in 131 patients (50 %). 19 patients (7.3 %) were temporarily dependent to a gastric feeding tube. Flap loss occurred in 9 patients (3.4 %). DISCUSSION: In a standardized setting, mean surgery time could be reduced constantly. We propose consistent tumor ablation, combined with elective neck dissection and microvascular reconstruction in early oral squamous cell carcinoma. The presented concept leads to excellent oncological and functional results with acceptable morbidity and short surgery times.

Surgical Treatment of Carcinomas of the Oral Minor Salivary Glands-Oncological Outcome in Dependence of Tumor Entity and Therapeutic Strategies.

The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical outcomes of three types of minor salivary gland carcinomas (adenoid-cystic carcinomas (ACC), adeno carcinomas not otherwise specified (AC-NOS), and mucoepidermoid carcinomas (MEC)) after primary surgical therapy. A retrospective cohort study was designed and patients with cancer of the minor oral salivary glands treated in our department in the years 2011 to 2022 were included. Clinicopathological data were evaluated to compare overall survival and progression-free survival between the entities. Eighty-one patients were included. The rates of cervical metastases were 38.9% for ACC, 25% for MEC, and 9.1% for AC-NOS. ACC exhibited significantly higher rates of local and systemic disease recurrence (p = 0.02), and the presence of neck node metastases was confirmed as an independent prognostic factor for progression-free survival (p = 0.014). Treatment success in terms of oncological outcome varied significantly between the different entities and implies different treatment regimens for each tumor entity.

Comparison of Antero-Lateral Thigh Flap and Vastus Lateralis Muscle Flap for the Treatment of Extensive Scalp Defects-A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Free flap reconstruction is the standard of care for extensive defects of the head and neck area. In this study, two types of free flaps, the antero-lateral thigh flap (ALT) and the vastus lateralis muscle flap, were compared. The primary endpoint was flap success, secondary endpoints were complication rates, hospitalization and surgery time. Cases with defect situations of the scalp and consecutive microvascular free flap reconstructions using either ALT flaps or vastus lateralis muscle flaps between 2014 and 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Indications, perioperative handling and outcomes were compared. Twenty patients were included in the analysis. Ten patients (50%) received a free flap reconstruction using an ALT flap and ten patients (50%) received a vastus lateralis flap. A simultaneous two-team approach was possible in each case and the flap success rate was 100% with the need for one successful anastomosis revision. The mean defect size in our cohort was 147 ± 46 cm2. There were no significant differences in surgery time, duration of hospitalization or complication rate between both cohorts. Both free flaps, the ALT and the vastus lateralis flap, are suitable for the closure of large scalp defects. They provide high success rates, short surgery times without the need for patient repositioning and low donor-site morbidity. The vastus lateralis muscle flap bares the advantage of being perforator-independent and allows for the preparation of long vessels for anastomosis if needed while baring the disadvantage of a prolonged period of healing via granulation or the need for secondary surgery in terms of covering by split-thickness skin grafts which may interfere with necessary adjuvant treatment in oncological patients.

Impact of Salvage Surgery on Health-Related Quality of Life in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Prospective Multi-Center Study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with recurrent oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) have limited treatment options. Salvage surgery offers potential curative therapy. The need for extensive ablative surgery together with microvascular reconstruction implies invasive and painful treatment with questionable functional outcome. To address the impact of salvage surgery on the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of patients suffering from recurrent OSCC, a multi-center prospective analysis was initiated. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with recurrent OSCC from 2015 to 2022 at two German cancer centers were included. Interdisciplinary tumor board decisions determined surgery as the only curative treatment modality. HRQoL, was assessed via a EORTC questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer-EORTC: QLQ-C30 and QLQ-H&N35) in dependence of the recurrent tumor stage. Patients completed the questionnaires once before surgery (baseline) and then every 3 months during follow-up or up to the end of treatment. RESULTS: In total, 55 patients were included. The mean follow-up period was 26.7 ± 19.3 months. Global health status showed superior mean scores after 12 months (60.83 ± 22.58) compared to baseline (53.33 ± 26.41) in stage 1 and 2 recurrent tumors. In advanced recurrent tumors' mean scores for global health showed only minor positive differences after 12 months (55.13 ± 22.7) compared to baseline (53.2 ± 25.58). In terms of the mouth pain, mean scores were lower after salvage surgery in small recurrent tumors after 12 months (20.37 ± 17.73) compared to baseline (41.67 ± 33.07; Wilcoxon two-sample signed-rank test p = 0.028). In advanced recurrent tumors, a significant reduction in mean scores was detected 3 months after salvage surgery (29.7 ± 22.94) compared to baseline (47.76 ± 25.77; Wilcoxon two-sample signed-rank test p = 0.003). Up to 12 months, swallowing function was evaluated inferior compared to baseline independent of tumor stage (Mean score recurrent stage I/II: 12-months 48.15 ± 27.57, baseline 28.7 ± 22.87; stage III/IV: 12-months 49.36.42 ± 27.53; baseline 30.13 ± 26.25). CONCLUSION: Improved HRQoL could be obtained in advanced recurrent OSCC after salvage surgery despite reduced swallowing function. In small recurrent tumors, overall, HRQoL was superior to baseline. Salvage surgery positively affected pain burden. For advanced recurrent tumors, important pain relieve could be observed as soon as 3 months after surgery.

Free-Flap Reconstruction in Early-Stage Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Oral Cavity-A Prospective Monocentric Trial to Evaluate Oncological Outcome and Quality of Life.

Surgery is generally accepted as standard treatment in oral cancer, but the reconstructive procedures remain a matter of debate. The aim of this study was to evaluate oncological outcome and quality of life following surgical resection and free-flap reconstruction in patients with early oral squamous cell carcinoma. The presented trial was performed as a prospective, single-center observation study. Inclusion criteria were primary surgery in early-stage oral squamous cell carcinoma with free-flap reconstruction. Endpoints were overall and progression-free survival and quality of life up to 24 months after surgery. Twenty-six patients were included. Overall survival was 100% and progression-free survival was 92.3% in a maximum follow-up time of 21 months. Global quality of life showed no significant alteration after surgery. Patients reported a significant reduction in pain (p = 0.048) and a decreasing impairment of speech one year after surgery (p = 0.021). Free-flap reconstruction is a safe procedure that results in excellent oncological outcome and quality of life. Functional outcome is of high relevance in early-stage tumors of the head and neck and may mostly be affected by reconstructive procedures. Therefore, a prospective evaluation to explore success and the effects of surgical therapy is highly warranted.

Comparison of Different Antibiotic Regimes for Preventive Tooth Extractions in Patients with Antiresorptive Intake-A Retrospective Cohort Study.

In the present study, the impacts on success rates between three different antibiotic regimes in patients receiving preventive tooth extraction during/after antiresorptive treatment were compared. For the retrospective analysis, we enrolled patients who had undergone tooth extraction from 2009 to 2019 according to the specified preventive conditions under antiresorptive therapy. Three antibiotic regimens were distinguished: (Group 1) intravenous for 7 days, (Group 2) oral for 14 days, and (Group 3) oral for 7 days of application. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw at 12 weeks after surgery. A total of 760 patients and 1143 extraction regions were evaluated (Group 1 n = 719; Group 2 n = 126; Group 3 n = 298). The primary endpoint showed no significant difference in the development of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw between the groups studied (Group 1 n = 50/669 (7%); Group 2 n = 9/117 (7%); Group 3 n = 17/281 (6%); p = 0.746). Overall, the success rate was 93% after intervention when preventive measures were followed. With the same success rate, a reduced, oral administration of antibiotics seems to be sufficient regarding the possible spectrum of side effects, the development of resistance and the health economic point of view.

Osteoradionecrosis of the Jaw-Comparison between Bone and Soft Tissue Injury and Their Influence on Surgical Outcomes-A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Surgical therapy of osteoradionecrosis of the jaw (ORN) is challenging and requires treatment of the affected hard and soft tissue. To understand how tissue injury after irradiation influences surgical outcomes, the objective of this study was to find out whether (a) bone-related, (b) soft tissue-related, and (c) treatment-related parameters influence the surgical success of patients with ORN. A total of 175 patients (324 lesions) were included in this retrospective, single-center study. All patients were diagnosed with ORN and underwent surgical therapy. The primary outcome was complete soft tissue recovery (mucosa/skin) and the absence of symptoms 3 months after surgery. At the time of follow-up, 58% of patients (189 of 324 lesions) had intact intraoral or extraoral soft tissue. The extent of bone destruction had no effect on treatment success, whereas soft tissue injury due to fibrosis (OR: 0.344; CI 0.142-0.834; p = 0.01818) and xerostomia (OR: 0.163; CI 0.064-0.419; p = 0.00016) increased the probability of treatment failure. Soft tissue reconstruction with a microvascular graft improved therapeutic success compared to local wound closure (OR: 2.998; CI 1.371-6.555; p = 0.006). Thus, for the treatment of ORN, it is extremely important to pay attention not only to the extent of bone destruction but especially to soft tissue defects. Because the extent of soft tissue injury is a predictor for therapeutic success, it should influence the choice of surgical treatment.

Full-Thickness Tumor Resection of Oral Cancer Involving the Facial Skin-Microsurgical Reconstruction of Extensive Defects after Radical Treatment of Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Advanced tumors of the head and neck are challenging for the treatment specialist due to the need to synergize oncological and functional requirements. Free flap reconstruction has been established as the standard of care for defects following tumor resection. However, depending on the affected anatomic subsite, advanced tumors may impose specific difficulties regarding reconstruction, especially when full-thickness resection is required. This study aimed to evaluate reconstructive strategies and oncological outcomes in patients with full-thickness resection of the oral cavity. A total of 33 patients with extensive defects due to squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity were identified. Indications, reconstructive procedures, and clinical outcome were evaluated. Thirty-two patients (97%) presented locally advanced tumors (T3/T4). Complete tumor resection was achieved in 26 patients (78.8%). The anterolateral thigh flap was the most frequently used flap (47.1%), and the primary flap success rate was 84.8%. The cohort demonstrated a good local control rate and moderate overall and progression-free survival rates. Most patients regained full competence regarding oral alimentation and speech. Full-thickness tumor resections of the head and neck area may be necessary due to advanced tumors in critical anatomic areas. In many cases, radical surgical treatment leads to good oncological results. Free flap reconstruction has been shown to be a suitable option for extensive defects in aesthetically challenging regions.

Influence of Preventive Tooth Extractions on Quality of Life in Patients with Antiresorptive Intake-A Prospective Longitudinal Study.

BACKGROUND: To find out whether preventive tooth extractions in patients on antiresorptive therapy have a direct impact on the patients' overall quality of life (QoL); Methods: QoL using the five-level version of the EuroQol Group's EQ-5D instrument (EQ-5D-5L) was longitudinally assessed in N = 114 prospectively enrolled patients with indication of preventive tooth extraction over a period of 12 months. Patients were stratified as high-risk (malignant disease with bone metastasis or multiple myeloma, with monthly high-dose antiresorptive therapy delivered intravenously [bisphosphonate] or subcutaneously [denosumab]) and low-risk/osteoporosis patients (weekly low-dose antiresorptive therapy administered orally [bisphosphonate] or half-yearly subcutaneously [denosumab]). The measurement time points were 4 weeks preoperatively (T0), 2 months (T1) and 1 year postoperatively (T2), respectively. RESULTS: EQ-5D-5L index scores fell in a range from -0.21 to 1.00 in the low-risk group to 0.15 to 1.00 in the high-risk group. The t-test comparing the baseline index scores of both groups showed EQ-5D-5L index score in the low-risk group (0.708 ± 0.292) to be significantly smaller (p = 0.037) than in the high-risk group (0.807 ± 0.19). ANCOVA showed no significant differences in EQ-5D-5L index scores between the groups at T1 and T2. CONCLUSIONS: Preventive tooth extractions in patients undergoing antiresorptive treatment have no negative effect on QoL. Therefore, if indicated, preventive tooth extraction should not be omitted. Patient-oriented outcome measures are important to obtain a good risk-benefit balance for patient-specific treatment.

Treatment delay and tumor size in patients with oral cancer during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: We set out to investigate how the ongoing coronavirus pandemic affected the size of tumors and the duration of treatment delay in patients with surgically treated oral squamous cell carcinoma. METHODS: Patients with surgically treated oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma were assessed retrospectively and divided into two groups depending on when they had first presented at our clinic. Patients presenting from 2010 to 2019, that is, before COVID-19 onset (n = 566) were compared to patients presenting in 2020 (n = 58). RESULTS: A total of 624 patients were included. Treatment delay was significantly longer in 2020 (median = 45 days) versus 2010-2019 (median = 35 days) (p = 0.004). We observed a higher pathological T classification in 2020 (p = 0.046), whereas pathological N classification was unchanged between groups (p = 0.843). CONCLUSIONS: While extraordinary efforts continue to be made in the context of the pandemic, it is imperative that this does not lead to significant disadvantages for many people with oral cancer.

Prospective feasibility analysis of salvage surgery in recurrent oral cancer in terms of quality of life.

OBJECTIVES: The goals of the present study were to prospectively analyze salvage surgery with microvascular reconstruction in recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity (OSCC) in terms of oncological outcome and quality of life. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 2012 to 2015, 28 patients underwent salvage surgery due to recurrent OSCC or second primary OSCC without the option of curative re-irradiation. Endpoints were disease-specific survival and progression-free survival after 12 months. The survival was estimated by using the Kaplan-Meier blotting. Quality of life data (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer - EORTC: QLQ-C30 and QLQ-H&N35) was assessed at baseline and subsequently every 3 months up to one year. RESULTS: Estimated 1-year-survival was 68.4% and progression-free survival was 38.5%. Overall quality of life was significantly reduced three months after salvage surgery [baseline (mean 64.15) versus time 1 (mean 53.04); p = 0.002]. However, the patients experienced a recovery within the first year [baseline (mean 64.15) versus time 4 (mean 70.33); p = 0.176]. Furthermore, the sensation of pain is significantly reduced after salvage surgery [baseline (mean 47.53) versus time 2 (mean 31.25); p = 0.036]. Microvascular reconstruction success rate was 93.1%. CONCLUSION: Salvage surgery is a curative treatment option in recurrent and intensively pretreated OSCC. Microvascular reconstruction is feasible with acceptable morbidity and high success rates. Quality of life can be preserved. Further studies combining checkpoint inhibition with salvage surgery are justified.

Outcome of heavily pretreated recurrent oral squamous cell carcinoma after salvage resection: A monocentric retrospective analysis.

PURPOSE: The goals of the present study were to analyze survival data of patients who received salvage surgery due to recurrent oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) of the oral cavity with curative intent, and to investigate the feasibility of microvascular flap reconstruction in a heavily pretreated patient cohort. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 32 patients who received salvage surgery due to recurrent OSCC were included. The cohort was analyzed in regard to relevant clinical and pathological features. Survival was estimated by using Kaplan-Meier analysis and verified in a multivariate Cox regression model. RESULTS: All patients recovered well from surgery. The most common severe complication was free flap failure in 7 patients (24.1%). R0-resection was achieved in 16 patients (50%). Univariate Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the estimated overall survival and disease-free survival of all patients after 24 months were 37.8% and 30.9%, respectively. Multivariate testing identified R1-resection was the only independent predictor of treatment failure. CONCLUSION: Salvage surgery is the only potential curative treatment option in recurrent OSCC. Microvascular reconstruction is feasible in heavily pretreated patients, but it is associated with a higher free flap failure rate. Recurrent OSCC in heavily pretreated patients shows different biological behavior. Further prospective clinical and molecular studies are needed to develop a better molecular understanding of recurrent OSCC and the best and safest individual therapeutic strategy.