Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 128
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Allergy Clin Immunol ; 149(1): 422-431.e5, 2022 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34674855

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Emerging research suggests health effects in offspring after parental chemical exposures before conception. Many future mothers are exposed to potent chemicals at work, but potential offspring health effects are hardly investigated. OBJECTIVE: We sought to investigate childhood asthma in relation to mother's occupational exposure to cleaning products and disinfectants before conception. METHODS: The multicenter Respiratory Health In Northern Europe/Respiratory Health In Northern Europe, Spain and Australia generation study investigated asthma and wheeze starting at age less than 10 years in 3318 mother-offspring pairs. From an asthma-specific Job-Exposure Matrix and mothers' occupational history, we defined maternal occupational exposure to indoor cleaning agents (cleaning products/detergents and disinfectants) starting before conception, in the 2-year period around conception and pregnancy, or after birth. Never-employed mothers were excluded. Exposed groups include cleaners, health care workers, cooks, and so forth. Associations were analyzed using mixed-effects logistic regression and ordinary logistic regression with clustered robust SEs and adjustment for maternal education. RESULTS: Maternal occupational exposure to indoor cleaning starting preconception and continuing (n = 610) was associated with offspring's childhood asthma: odds ratio 1.56 (95% CI, 1.05-2.31), childhood asthma with nasal allergies: 1.77 (1.13-2.77), and childhood wheeze and/or asthma: 1.71 (95% CI, 1.19-2.44). Exposure starting around conception and pregnancy (n = 77) was associated with increased childhood wheeze and/or asthma: 2.25 (95% CI, 1.03-4.91). Exposure starting after birth was not associated with asthma outcomes (1.13 [95% CI, 0.71-1.80], 1.15 [95% CI, 0.67-1.97], 1.08 [95% CI, 0.69-1.67]). CONCLUSIONS: Mother's occupational exposure to indoor cleaning agents starting before conception, or around conception and pregnancy, was associated with more childhood asthma and wheeze in offspring. Considering potential implications for vast numbers of women in childbearing age using cleaning agents, and their children, further research is imperative.


Assuntos
Asma/epidemiologia , Detergentes , Desinfetantes , Exposição Materna , Exposição Ocupacional , Lesões Pré-Concepcionais/epidemiologia , Adulto , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Gravidez , Sons Respiratórios , Adulto Jovem
2.
Occup Environ Med ; 79(3): 155-161, 2022 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34413158

RESUMO

AIM: The biological mechanisms of work-related asthma induced by irritants remain unclear. We investigated the associations between occupational exposure to irritants and respiratory endotypes previously identified among never asthmatics (NA) and current asthmatics (CA) integrating clinical characteristics and biomarkers related to oxidative stress and inflammation. METHODS: We used cross-sectional data from 999 adults (mean 45 years old, 46% men) from the case-control and familial Epidemiological study on the Genetics and Environments of Asthma (EGEA) study. Five respiratory endotypes have been identified using a cluster-based approach: NA1 (n=463) asymptomatic, NA2 (n=169) with respiratory symptoms, CA1 (n=50) with active treated adult-onset asthma, poor lung function, high blood neutrophil counts and high fluorescent oxidation products level, CA2 (n=203) with mild middle-age asthma, rhinitis and low immunoglobulin E level, and CA3 (n=114) with inactive/mild untreated allergic childhood-onset asthma. Occupational exposure to irritants during the current or last held job was assessed by the updated occupational asthma-specific job-exposure matrix (levels of exposure: no/medium/high). Associations between irritants and each respiratory endotype (NA1 asymptomatic as reference) were studied using logistic regressions adjusted for age, sex and smoking status. RESULTS: Prevalence of high occupational exposure to irritants was 7% in NA1, 6% in NA2, 16% in CA1, 7% in CA2 and 10% in CA3. High exposure to irritants was associated with CA1 (adjusted OR aOR, (95% CI) 2.7 (1.0 to 7.3)). Exposure to irritants was not significantly associated with other endotypes (aOR range: 0.8 to 1.5). CONCLUSION: Occupational exposure to irritants was associated with a distinct respiratory endotype suggesting oxidative stress and neutrophilic inflammation as potential associated biological mechanisms.


Assuntos
Asma Ocupacional , Doenças Profissionais , Exposição Ocupacional , Adulto , Asma Ocupacional/induzido quimicamente , Asma Ocupacional/epidemiologia , Criança , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Inflamação , Irritantes/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doenças Profissionais/epidemiologia , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos
3.
Indoor Air ; 31(6): 1952-1966, 2021 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34151461

RESUMO

Moisture-damaged buildings are associated with respiratory symptoms and underlying diseases among building occupants, but the causative agent(s) remain a mystery. We first identified specific fungal and bacterial taxa in classrooms with moisture damage in Finnish and Dutch primary schools. We then investigated associations of the identified moisture damage indicators with respiratory symptoms in more than 2700 students. Finally, we explored whether exposure to specific taxa within the indoor microbiota may explain the association between moisture damage and respiratory health. Schools were assessed for moisture damage through detailed inspections, and the microbial composition of settled dust in electrostatic dustfall collectors was determined using marker-gene analysis. In Finland, there were several positive associations between particular microbial indicators (diversity, richness, individual taxa) and a respiratory symptom score, while in the Netherlands, the associations tended to be mostly inverse and statistically non-significant. In Finland, abundance of the Sphingomonas bacterial genus and endotoxin levels partially explained the associations between moisture damage and symptom score. A few microbial taxa explained part of the associations with health, but overall, the observed associations between damage-associated individual taxa and respiratory health were limited.


Assuntos
Poluição do Ar em Ambientes Fechados , Poeira , Exposição Ambiental/estatística & dados numéricos , Fungos , Humanos , Instituições Acadêmicas , Estudantes
4.
Thorax ; 75(4): 313-320, 2020 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32098862

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have reported an association between weight increase and excess lung function decline in young adults followed for short periods. We aimed to estimate lung function trajectories during adulthood from 20-year weight change profiles using data from the population-based European Community Respiratory Health Survey (ECRHS). METHODS: We included 3673 participants recruited at age 20-44 years with repeated measurements of weight and lung function (forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1)) in three study waves (1991-93, 1999-2003, 2010-14) until they were 39-67 years of age. We classified subjects into weight change profiles according to baseline body mass index (BMI) categories and weight change over 20 years. We estimated trajectories of lung function over time as a function of weight change profiles using population-averaged generalised estimating equations. RESULTS: In individuals with normal BMI, overweight and obesity at baseline, moderate (0.25-1 kg/year) and high weight gain (>1 kg/year) during follow-up were associated with accelerated FVC and FEV1 declines. Compared with participants with baseline normal BMI and stable weight (±0.25 kg/year), obese individuals with high weight gain during follow-up had -1011 mL (95% CI -1.259 to -763) lower estimated FVC at 65 years despite similar estimated FVC levels at 25 years. Obese individuals at baseline who lost weight (<-0.25 kg/year) exhibited an attenuation of FVC and FEV1 declines. We found no association between weight change profiles and FEV1/FVC decline. CONCLUSION: Moderate and high weight gain over 20 years was associated with accelerated lung function decline, while weight loss was related to its attenuation. Control of weight gain is important for maintaining good lung function in adult life.


Assuntos
Índice de Massa Corporal , Peso Corporal/fisiologia , Estilo de Vida , Obesidade/epidemiologia , Testes de Função Respiratória/métodos , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , União Europeia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Volume Expiratório Forçado/fisiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Obesidade/diagnóstico , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Prospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores Sexuais , Capacidade Vital/fisiologia , Aumento de Peso/fisiologia , Redução de Peso/fisiologia , Adulto Jovem
5.
Clin Exp Allergy ; 50(5): 567-576, 2020 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32159892

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cleaning is associated with an increased risk of asthma symptoms, but few studies have measured functional characteristics of airway disease in cleaners. AIMS: To assess and characterize respiratory symptoms and lung function in professional cleaners, and determine potential risk factors for adverse respiratory outcomes. METHODS: Symptoms, pre-/post-bronchodilator lung function, atopy, and cleaning exposures were assessed in 425 cleaners and 281 reference workers in Wellington, New Zealand between 2008 and 2010. RESULTS: Cleaners had an increased risk of current asthma (past 12 months), defined as: woken by shortness of breath, asthma attack, or asthma medication (OR = 1.83, 95% CI = 1.18-2.85). Despite this, they had similar rates of current wheezing (OR = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.65-1.32) and were less likely to have a doctor diagnosis of asthma ever (OR = 0.62, 95% CI = 0.42-0.92). Cleaners overall had lower lung function (FEV1 , FVC; P < .05). Asthma in cleaners was associated with less atopy (OR = 0.35, 95% CI = 0.13-0.90), fewer wheezing attacks (OR = 0.40, 95% CI = 0.17-0.97; >3 vs ≤3 times/year), and reduced bronchodilator response (6% vs 9% mean FEV1 -%-predicted change, P < .05) compared to asthma in reference workers. Cleaning of cafes/restaurants/kitchens and using upholstery sprays or liquid multi-use cleaner was associated with symptoms, whilst several exposures were also associated with lung function deficits (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Cleaners are at risk of some asthma-associated symptoms and reduced lung function. However, as it was not strongly associated with wheeze and atopy, and airway obstruction was less reversible, asthma in some cleaners may represent a distinct phenotype.


Assuntos
Asma , Doenças Profissionais , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Asma/diagnóstico , Asma/etiologia , Asma/fisiopatologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doenças Profissionais/diagnóstico , Doenças Profissionais/fisiopatologia , Testes de Função Respiratória
6.
Am J Ind Med ; 63(1): 44-50, 2020 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31692020

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Exposure to disinfectants among healthcare workers has been associated with respiratory health effects, in particular, asthma. However, most studies are cross-sectional and the role of disinfectant exposures in asthma development requires longitudinal studies. We investigated the association between occupational exposure to disinfectants and incident asthma in a large cohort of U.S. female nurses. METHODS: The Nurses' Health Study II is a prospective cohort of 116 429 female nurses enrolled in 1989. Analyses included 61 539 participants who were still in a nursing job and with no history of asthma in 2009 (baseline; mean age: 55 years). During 277 744 person-years of follow-up (2009-2015), 370 nurses reported incident physician-diagnosed asthma. Occupational exposure was evaluated by questionnaire and a Job-Task-Exposure Matrix (JTEM). We examined the association between disinfectant exposure and subsequent asthma development, adjusted for age, race, ethnicity, smoking status, and body mass index. RESULTS: Weekly use of disinfectants to clean surfaces only (23% exposed) or to clean medical instruments (19% exposed) was not associated with incident asthma (adjusted hazard ratio [95% confidence interval] for surfaces, 1.12 [0.87-1.43]; for instruments, 1.13 [0.87-1.48]). No association was observed between high-level exposure to specific disinfectants/cleaning products evaluated by the JTEM (formaldehyde, glutaraldehyde, bleach, hydrogen peroxide, alcohol quats, or enzymatic cleaners) and asthma incidence. CONCLUSIONS: In a population of late career nurses, we observed no significant association between exposure to disinfectants and asthma incidence. A potential role of disinfectant exposures in asthma development warrants further study among healthcare workers at earlier career stage to limit the healthy worker effect.


Assuntos
Asma Ocupacional/induzido quimicamente , Asma Ocupacional/epidemiologia , Desinfetantes/toxicidade , Enfermeiras e Enfermeiros , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
7.
Respir Res ; 20(1): 33, 2019 Feb 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30764884

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Early life exposure to tobacco smoke has been extensively studied but the role of second-hand smoke (SHS) for new-onset respiratory symptoms and lung function decline in adulthood has not been widely investigated in longitudinal studies. Our aim is to investigate the associations of exposure to SHS in adults with respiratory symptoms, respiratory conditions and lung function over 20 years. METHODS: We used information from 3011 adults from 26 centres in 12 countries who participated in the European Community Respiratory Health Surveys I-III and were never or former smokers at all three surveys. Associations of SHS exposure with respiratory health (asthma symptom score, asthma, chronic bronchitis, COPD) were analysed using generalised linear mixed-effects models adjusted for confounding factors (including sex, age, smoking status, socioeconomic status and allergic sensitisation). Linear mixed-effects models with additional adjustment for height were used to assess the relationships between SHS exposure and lung function levels and decline. RESULTS: Reported exposure to SHS decreased in all 26 study centres over time. The prevalence of SHS exposure was 38.7% at baseline (1990-1994) and 7.1% after the 20-year follow-up (2008-2011). On average 2.4% of the study participants were not exposed at the first, but were exposed at the third examination. An increase in SHS exposure over time was associated with doctor-diagnosed asthma (odds ratio (OR): 2.7; 95% confidence interval (95%-CI): 1.2-5.9), chronic bronchitis (OR: 4.8; 95%-CI: 1.6-15.0), asthma symptom score (count ratio (CR): 1.9; 95%-CI: 1.2-2.9) and dyspnoea (OR: 2.7; 95%-CI: 1.1-6.7) compared to never exposed to SHS. Associations between increase in SHS exposure and incidence of COPD (OR: 2.0; 95%-CI: 0.6-6.0) or lung function (ß: - 49 ml; 95%-CI: -132, 35 for FEV1 and ß: - 62 ml; 95%-CI: -165, 40 for FVC) were not apparent. CONCLUSION: Exposure to second-hand smoke may lead to respiratory symptoms, but this is not accompanied by lung function changes.


Assuntos
Nível de Saúde , Sistema Respiratório/fisiopatologia , Poluição por Fumaça de Tabaco/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Asma/epidemiologia , Asma/etiologia , Bronquite Crônica/epidemiologia , Bronquite Crônica/etiologia , Dispneia/epidemiologia , Dispneia/etiologia , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , União Europeia , Seguimentos , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Incidência , Prevalência , Testes de Função Respiratória , Doenças Respiratórias/epidemiologia , Doenças Respiratórias/etiologia , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Poluição por Fumaça de Tabaco/estatística & dados numéricos
8.
Occup Environ Med ; 76(4): 222-229, 2019 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30700596

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Chronic bronchitis (CB) is an important chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)-related phenotype, with distinct clinical features and prognostic implications. Occupational exposures have been previously associated with increased risk of CB but few studies have examined this association prospectively using objective exposure assessment. We examined the effect of occupational exposures on CB incidence in the European Community Respiratory Health Survey. METHODS: Population samples aged 20-44 were randomly selected in 1991-1993, and followed up twice over 20 years. Participants without chronic cough or phlegm at baseline were analysed. Coded job histories during follow-up were linked to the ALOHA Job Exposure Matrix, generating occupational exposure estimates to 12 categories of chemical agents. Their association with CB incidence over both follow-ups was examined with Poisson models using generalised estimating equations. RESULTS: 8794 participants fulfilled the inclusion criteria, contributing 13 185 observations. Only participants exposed to metals had a higher incidence of CB (relative risk (RR) 1.70, 95% CI 1.16 to 2.50) compared with non-exposed to metals. Mineral dust exposure increased the incidence of chronic phlegm (RR 1.72, 95% CI 1.43 to 2.06). Incidence of chronic phlegm was increased in men exposed to gases/fumes and to solvents and in women exposed to pesticides. CONCLUSIONS: Occupational exposures are associated with chronic phlegm and CB, and the evidence is strongest for metals and mineral dust exposure. The observed differences between men and women warrant further investigation.


Assuntos
Bronquite Crônica/etiologia , Incidência , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Austrália/epidemiologia , Bronquite Crônica/complicações , Bronquite Crônica/epidemiologia , Tosse/epidemiologia , Tosse/etiologia , Poeira , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Feminino , Gases/efeitos adversos , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Exposição Ocupacional/estatística & dados numéricos , Praguicidas/efeitos adversos , Fatores de Risco , Fumar/efeitos adversos , Fumar/epidemiologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
9.
Indoor Air ; 29(2): 299-307, 2019 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30575131

RESUMO

Exposure to moisture-damaged indoor environments is associated with adverse respiratory health effects, but responsible factors remain unidentified. In order to explore possible mechanisms behind these effects, the oxidative capacity and hemolytic activity of settled dust samples (n = 25) collected from moisture-damaged and non-damaged schools in Spain, the Netherlands, and Finland were evaluated and matched against the microbial content of the sample. Oxidative capacity was determined with plasmid scission assay and hemolytic activity by assessing the damage to isolated human red blood cells. The microbial content of the samples was measured with quantitative PCR assays for selected microbial groups and by analyzing the cell wall markers ergosterol, muramic acid, endotoxins, and glucans. The moisture observations in the schools were associated with some of the microbial components in the dust, and microbial determinants grouped together increased the oxidative capacity. Oxidative capacity was also affected by particle concentration and country of origin. Two out of 14 studied dust samples from moisture-damaged schools demonstrated some hemolytic activity. The results indicate that the microbial component connected with moisture damage is associated with increased oxidative stress and that hemolysis should be studied further as one possible mechanism contributing to the adverse health effects of moisture-damaged buildings.


Assuntos
Microbiologia do Ar , Poluição do Ar em Ambientes Fechados/efeitos adversos , Hemólise , Umidade/efeitos adversos , Estresse Oxidativo , Poluição do Ar em Ambientes Fechados/análise , Estudos Transversais , Poeira/análise , Endotoxinas/análise , Monitoramento Ambiental , Finlândia , Fungos/isolamento & purificação , Bactérias Gram-Positivas/isolamento & purificação , Humanos , Países Baixos , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase , Instituições Acadêmicas , Espanha
10.
Indoor Air ; 29(4): 670-679, 2019 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30963644

RESUMO

This longitudinal study investigated whether smoking bans influence passive smoking at work and/or at home in the same subjects. Passive smoking at work and/or at home was investigated in random population samples (European Community Respiratory Health Survey) in 1990-1995, with follow-up interviews in 1998-2003 and 2010-2014. National smoking bans were classified as partial (restricted to public workplaces) or global (extended to private workplaces). Multivariable analysis was accomplished by three-level logistic regression models, where level-1, level-2, and level-3 units were, respectively, questionnaire responses, subjects, and centers. Passive smoking at work was reported by 31.9% in 1990-1995, 17.5% in 1998-2003, and 2.5% in 2010-2014. Concurrently, passive smoking at home decreased from 28.9% to 18.2% and 8.8%. When controlling for sex, age, education, smoking status, and ECHRS wave, the odds of passive smoking at work was markedly reduced after global smoking bans (OR = 0.45, 95% CI 0.25-0.81), particularly among non-smokers, while the protective effect of global smoking bans on passive smoking at home was only detected in non-smokers. Smoking bans both in public and private workplaces were effective in reducing passive smoking at work in Europe. However, given the inefficacy of smoking bans in current smokers' dwellings, better strategies are needed to avoid smoking indoors.


Assuntos
Política Antifumo , Prevenção do Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Fumar/epidemiologia , Poluição por Fumaça de Tabaco/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Feminino , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Habitação , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Poluição por Fumaça de Tabaco/análise , Poluição por Fumaça de Tabaco/prevenção & controle , Reino Unido/epidemiologia , Local de Trabalho , Adulto Jovem
11.
Thorax ; 73(1): 37-48, 2018 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28974648

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Change in the prevalence of asthma-like symptoms in populations of ageing adults is likely to be influenced by smoking, asthma treatment and atopy. METHODS: The European Community Respiratory Health Survey collected information on prevalent asthma-like symptoms from representative samples of adults aged 20-44 years (29 centres in 13 European countries and Australia) at baseline and 10 and 20 years later (n=7844). Net changes in symptom prevalence were determined using generalised estimating equations (accounting for non-response through inverse probability weighting), followed by meta-analysis of centre level estimates. FINDINGS: Over 20 years the prevalence of 'wheeze' and 'wheeze in the absence of a cold' decreased (-2.4%, 95% CI -3.5 to -1.3%; -1.5%, 95% CI -2.4 to -0.6%, respectively) but the prevalence of asthma attacks, use of asthma medication and hay fever/nasal allergies increased (0.6%, 95% CI 0.1 to 1.11; 3.6%, 95% CI 3.0 to 4.2; 2.7%, 95% CI 1.7 to 3.7). Changes were similar in the first 10 years compared with the second 10 years, except for hay fever/nasal allergies (increase seen in the first 10 years only). Decreases in these wheeze-related symptoms were largely seen in the group who gave up smoking, and were seen in those who reported hay fever/nasal allergies at baseline. INTERPRETATION: European adults born between 1946 and 1970 have, over the last 20 years, experienced less wheeze, although they were more likely to report asthma attacks, use of asthma medication and hay fever. Decrease in wheeze is largely attributable to smoking cessation, rather than improved treatment of asthma. It may also be influenced by reductions in atopy with ageing.


Assuntos
Asma/complicações , Asma/epidemiologia , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Austrália , Estudos de Coortes , Europa (Continente) , Feminino , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Masculino , Prevalência , Sons Respiratórios , Rinite Alérgica Sazonal/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
12.
Thorax ; 73(11): 1008-1015, 2018 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29574416

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Occupational exposures have been associated with an increased risk of COPD. However, few studies have related objectively assessed occupational exposures to prospectively assessed incidence of COPD, using postbronchodilator lung function tests. Our objective was to examine the effect of occupational exposures on COPD incidence in the European Community Respiratory Health Survey. METHODS: General population samples aged 20-44 were randomly selected in 1991-1993 and followed up 20 years later (2010-2012). Spirometry was performed at baseline and at follow-up, with incident COPD defined using a lower limit of normal criterion for postbronchodilator FEV1/FVC. Only participants without COPD and without current asthma at baseline were included. Coded job histories during follow-up were linked to a Job-Exposure Matrix, generating occupational exposure estimates to 12 categories of agents. Their association with COPD incidence was examined in log-binomial models fitted in a Bayesian framework. FINDINGS: 3343 participants fulfilled the inclusion criteria; 89 of them had COPD at follow-up (1.4 cases/1000 person-years). Participants exposed to biological dust had a higher incidence of COPD compared with those unexposed (relative risk (RR) 1.6, 95% CI 1.1 to 2.3), as did those exposed to gases and fumes (RR 1.5, 95% CI 1.0 to 2.2) and pesticides (RR 2.2, 95% CI 1.1 to 3.8). The combined population attributable fraction for these exposures was 21.0%. INTERPRETATION: These results substantially strengthen the evidence base for occupational exposures as an important risk factor for COPD.


Assuntos
Previsões , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos/métodos , Doenças Profissionais/complicações , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/epidemiologia , Adulto , Austrália/epidemiologia , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Doenças Profissionais/epidemiologia , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/etiologia , Testes de Função Respiratória , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Adulto Jovem
13.
Eur Respir J ; 51(2)2018 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29437937

RESUMO

Both protective and adverse effects of indoor microbial exposure on asthma have been reported, but mostly in children. To date, no study in adults has used non-targeted methods for detection of indoor bacteria followed by quantitative confirmation.A cross-sectional study of 198 asthmatic and 199 controls was conducted within the European Community Respiratory Health Survey (ECRHS) II. DNA was extracted from mattress dust for bacterial analysis using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE). Selected bands were sequenced and associations with asthma confirmed with four quantitative PCR (qPCR) assays.15 out of 37 bands detected with DGGE, which had at least a suggestive association (p<0.25) with asthma, were sequenced. Of the four targeted qPCRs, Clostridium cluster XI confirmed the protective association with asthma. The association was dose dependent (aOR 0.43 (95% CI 0.22-0.84) for the fourth versus first quartile, p for trend 0.009) and independent of other microbial markers. Few significant associations were observed for the three other qPCRs used.In this large international study, the level of Clostridium cluster XI was independently associated with a lower risk of prevalent asthma. Results suggest the importance of environmental bacteria also in adult asthma, but need to be confirmed in future studies.


Assuntos
Poluição do Ar em Ambientes Fechados/efeitos adversos , Asma/microbiologia , Clostridioides difficile/genética , Poeira/análise , Adulto , Asma/etiologia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Estudos Transversais , DNA Bacteriano/análise , União Europeia , Feminino , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Imunoglobulina E/sangue , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada
14.
Occup Environ Med ; 75(7): 507-514, 2018 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29650699

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to update an asthmagen job exposure matrix (JEM) developed in the late 1990s. Main reasons were: the number of suspected and recognised asthmagens has since tripled; understanding of the aetiological role of irritants in asthma and methodological insights in application of JEMs have emerged in the period. METHODS: For each agent of the new occupational asthma-specific JEM (OAsJEM), a working group of three experts out of eight evaluated exposure for each International Standard Classification of Occupations, 1988 (ISCO-88) job code into three categories: 'high' (high probability of exposure and moderate-to-high intensity), 'medium' (low-to-moderate probability or low intensity) and 'unexposed'. Within a working group, experts evaluated exposures independently from each other. If expert assessments were inconsistent the final decision was taken by consensus. Specificity was favoured over sensitivity, that is, jobs were classified with high exposure only if the probability of exposure was high and the intensity moderate-to-high. In the final review, all experts checked assigned exposures and proposed/improved recommendations for expert re-evaluation after default application of the JEM. RESULTS: The OAsJEM covers exposures to 30 sensitisers/irritants, including 12 newly recognised, classified into seven broad groups. Initial agreement between the three experts was mostly fair to moderate (κ values 0.2-0.5). Out of 506 ISCO-88 codes, the majority was classified as unexposed (from 82.6% (organic solvents) to 99.8% (persulfates)) and a minority as 'high-exposed' (0.2% (persulfates) to 2.6% (organic solvents)). CONCLUSIONS: The OAsJEM developed to improve occupational exposure assessment may improve evaluations of associations with asthma in epidemiological studies and contribute to assessment of the burden of work-related asthma.


Assuntos
Asma Ocupacional/induzido quimicamente , Irritantes/efeitos adversos , Exposição Ocupacional/análise , Medição de Risco/métodos , Humanos , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Ocupações , Fatores de Risco , Solventes/efeitos adversos , Sulfatos/efeitos adversos
15.
Occup Environ Med ; 75(5): 378-381, 2018 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29475850

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the association between occupational exposure to disinfectants/antiseptics used for hand hygiene and asthma control in nurses. METHODS: In 2014, we invited female nurses with asthma drawn from the Nurses' Health Study II to complete two supplemental questionnaires on their occupation and asthma (cross-sectional study, response rate: 80%). Among 4055 nurses (mean age: 59 years) with physician-diagnosed asthma and asthma medication use in the past year, we examined asthma control, as defined by the Asthma Control Test (ACT). Nurses were asked about the daily frequency of hand hygiene tasks: 'wash/scrub hands with disinfectants/hand sanitizers' (hand hygiene) and 'wash/scrub arms with disinfecting products' (surrogate of surgical hand/arm antisepsis). Analyses were adjusted for age, race, ethnicity, smoking status and body mass index. RESULTS: Nurses with partly controlled asthma (ACT: 20-24, 50%) and poorly controlled asthma (ACT ≤19, 18%) were compared with nurses with controlled asthma (ACT=25, 32%). In separate models, both hand and arm hygiene were associated with poorly controlled asthma. After mutual adjustment, only arm hygiene was associated with poorly controlled asthma: OR (95% CI) for <1 time/day, 1.38 (1.06 to 1.80); ≥1 time/day, 1.96 (1.52 to 2.51), versus never. We observed a consistent dose-response relationship between frequency of arm hygiene tasks (never to >10 times/day) and poor asthma control. Associations persisted after further adjustment for surfaces/instruments disinfection tasks. CONCLUSIONS: Frequency of hand/arm hygiene tasks in nurses was associated with poor asthma control. The results suggest an adverse effect of products used for surgical hand/arm antisepsis. This potential new occupational risk factor for asthma warrants further study.


Assuntos
Asma/prevenção & controle , Desinfecção das Mãos , Enfermeiras e Enfermeiros/estatística & dados numéricos , Braço , Asma/epidemiologia , Feminino , Mãos , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
16.
Gut ; 66(2): 314-322, 2017 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26628509

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Studies indicate an inverse association between ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas (PDAC) and nasal allergies. However, controversial findings are reported for the association with asthma. Understanding PDAC risk factors will help us to implement appropriate strategies to prevent, treat and diagnose this cancer. This study assessed and characterised the association between PDAC and asthma and corroborated existing reports regarding the association between allergies and PDAC risk. DESIGN: Information about asthma and allergies was collated from 1297 PDAC cases and 1024 controls included in the PanGenEU case-control study. Associations between PDAC and atopic diseases were studied using multilevel logistic regression analysis. Meta-analyses of association studies on these diseases and PDAC risk were performed applying random-effects model. RESULTS: Asthma was associated with lower risk of PDAC (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.88), particularly long-standing asthma (>=17 years, OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.65). Meta-analysis of 10 case-control studies sustained our results (metaOR 0.73, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.89). Nasal allergies and related symptoms were associated with lower risk of PDAC (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.83 and OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.77, respectively). These results were supported by a meta-analysis of nasal allergy studies (metaOR 0.6, 95% CI 0.5 to 0.72). Skin allergies were not associated with PDAC risk. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows a consistent inverse association between PDAC and asthma and nasal allergies, supporting the notion that atopic diseases are associated with reduced cancer risk. These results point to the involvement of immune and/or inflammatory factors that may either foster or restrain pancreas carcinogenesis warranting further research to understand the molecular mechanisms driving this association.


Assuntos
Asma/epidemiologia , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/epidemiologia , Rinite Alérgica/epidemiologia , Idoso , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/epidemiologia , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Proteção
17.
Eur Respir J ; 50(4)2017 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28982772

RESUMO

Disinfectant use has been associated with adverse respiratory effects among healthcare workers. However, the specific harmful agents have not been elucidated. We examined the association between occupational exposure to disinfectants and asthma control in the Nurses' Health Study II, a large cohort of female nurses.Nurses with asthma were invited in 2014 to complete two questionnaires on their current occupation and asthma (response rate 80%). Asthma control was defined by the Asthma Control Test (ACT). Exposure to major disinfectants was evaluated by a job-task-exposure matrix (JTEM).Analyses included 4102 nurses with asthma (mean age 58 years). Asthma control was poor (ACT score 16-19) in 12% of nurses and very poor (ACT score ≤15) in 6% of nurses. Use of disinfectants to clean medical instruments (19% exposed) was associated with poorly (OR 1.37; 95% CI 1.05-1.79) and very poorly (OR 1.88, 95% CI 1.38-2.56) controlled asthma (ptrend=0.004, after adjustment for potential confounders). Using JTEM estimates, exposure to formaldehyde, glutaraldehyde, hypochlorite bleach, hydrogen peroxide and enzymatic cleaners was associated with poor asthma control (all ptrend<0.05); exposure to quaternary ammonium compounds and alcohol was not.Use of several disinfectants was associated with poor asthma control. Our findings suggest targets for future efforts to prevent worsening of asthma control in healthcare workers.


Assuntos
Asma , Desinfetantes , Enfermagem , Exposição Ocupacional , Asma/induzido quimicamente , Asma/diagnóstico , Asma/prevenção & controle , Desinfetantes/efeitos adversos , Desinfetantes/classificação , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Enfermagem/métodos , Enfermagem/normas , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Exposição Ocupacional/análise , Saúde Ocupacional/normas , Serviços Preventivos de Saúde/métodos , Melhoria de Qualidade , Sistema Respiratório/efeitos dos fármacos , Sistema Respiratório/fisiopatologia , Inquéritos e Questionários
18.
BMC Infect Dis ; 17(1): 725, 2017 11 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29157226

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Prior to the 2007-2010 Q fever epidemic in the Netherlands, the seroprevalence of antibodies against Coxiella burnetii in the general population was 1.5%, which is low compared to other countries. We aimed to determine the seroprevalence after the Q fever epidemic among people living in the affected area, compare the seroprevalence with the incidence of Q fever notifications during the 2007-2010 Q fever epidemic, and to identify farm exposures associated with having antibodies against C. burnetii. METHODS: During the period March 2014-February 2015, residents aged 18-70 years from two provinces were invited by general practitioners to complete a questionnaire on their symptoms and personal characteristics and to submit a blood sample. We used the mandatory provincial database of livestock licences to calculate distance to farms/farm animals for each participant. To compare ELISA-positive participants for C. burnetii antibodies with those who were negative, we calculated prevalence ratios (PR) using binominal regression. We compared the C. burnetii seroprevalence in the period March 2014-February 2015 with the incidence of Q fever notifications during the 2007-2010 Q fever epidemic at municipal level by calculating the Spearman correlation coefficient. RESULTS: Of the 2296 participants (response rate: 34%), 6.1% (n = 139, 95% CI 5.1-7.1%) had C. burnetii antibodies (range in municipalities: 1.7-14.1%). C. burnetii seroprevalence was higher in individuals living within 1000 m of goat farms (PR 3.0; 95% CI 1.4-6.4) or within 1000 m of > 50 goats (PR 1.9; 95% CI 1.2-3.0). Seroprevalence increased with decreasing distance to the closest goat farm that was infected during the epidemic years (< 500 m, PR 9.5, 95% CI 2.8-32; 500-1000 m, PR 4.5, 95% CI 2.6-7.7; 1000-1500 m, PR 2.2, 95% CI 1.1-4.3, 1500-2000 m, PR 1.2, 95% CI 0.6-2.5; > 2000 reference group). There was no significant correlation between C. burnetii seroprevalence and Q fever incidence during the 2007-2010 epidemic (r s = 0.42, p = 0.156). CONCLUSIONS: Results showed a remarkable spatial variation in C. burnetii seroprevalence in a relatively small livestock dense area. It confirms previous evidence that the Q fever epidemic was primarily the result of airborne C. burnetii transmission from Q fever affected goat farms.


Assuntos
Coxiella burnetii , Reservatórios de Doenças/estatística & dados numéricos , Febre Q/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Animais , Anticorpos Antibacterianos/sangue , Coxiella burnetii/imunologia , Coxiella burnetii/patogenicidade , Estudos Transversais , Indústria de Laticínios/estatística & dados numéricos , Epidemias , Cabras/microbiologia , Humanos , Incidência , Gado/microbiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , Prevalência , Febre Q/imunologia , Estudos Soroepidemiológicos
20.
Am J Ind Med ; 60(1): 131-140, 2017 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27862135

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Disinfectant use among healthcare workers has been associated with respiratory disorders, especially asthma. We aimed to describe disinfectants used by U.S. nurses, and to investigate qualitative and quantitative differences according to workplace characteristics and region. METHODS: Disinfectant use was assessed by questionnaire in 8,851 nurses. Hospital characteristics were obtained from the American Hospital Association database. RESULTS: Working in a hospital was associated with higher disinfectant use (OR: 2.06 [95%CI: 1.89-2.24]), but lower spray use (0.74 [0.66-0.82]). Nurses working in smaller hospitals (<50 beds vs. ≥200 beds) were more likely to use disinfectants (1.69 [1.23-2.32]) and sprays (1.69 [1.20-2.38]). Spray use was lower in the West than in the Northeast (0.75 [0.58-0.97]). CONCLUSION: Disinfectant use was more common among nurses working in smaller hospitals, possibly because they perform more diverse tasks. Variations in spray use by hospital size and region suggest additional targets for future efforts to prevent occupational asthma. Am. J. Ind. Med. 60:131-140, 2017. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.


Assuntos
Desinfetantes , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Recursos Humanos de Enfermagem Hospitalar/estatística & dados numéricos , Exposição Ocupacional , Aerossóis , Álcoois , Desinfecção , Feminino , Tamanho das Instituições de Saúde , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Compostos de Amônio Quaternário , Hipoclorito de Sódio , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA