Long-term oncological outcomes of endoscopic full-thickness resection after previous incomplete resection of low-risk T1 CRC (LOCAL-study): study protocol of a national prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: T1 colorectal cancer (CRC) without histological high-risk factors for lymph node metastasis (LNM) can potentially be cured by endoscopic resection, which is associated with significantly lower morbidity, mortality and costs compared to radical surgery. An important prerequisite for endoscopic resection as definite treatment is the histological confirmation of tumour-free resection margins. Incomplete resection with involved (R1) or indeterminate (Rx) margins is considered a strong risk factor for residual disease and local recurrence. Therefore, international guidelines recommend additional surgery in case of R1/Rx resection, even in absence of high-risk factors for LNM. Endoscopic full-thickness resection (eFTR) is a relatively new technique that allows transmural resection of colorectal lesions. Local scar excision after prior R1/Rx resection of low-risk T1 CRC could offer an attractive minimal invasive strategy to achieve confirmation about radicality of the previous resection or a second attempt for radical resection of residual luminal cancer. However, oncologic safety has not been established and long-term data are lacking. Besides, surveillance varies widely and requires standardization. METHODS/DESIGN: In this nationwide, multicenter, prospective cohort study we aim to assess feasibility and oncological safety of completion eFTR following incomplete resection of low-risk T1 CRC. The primary endpoint is to assess the 2 and 5 year luminal local tumor recurrence rate. Secondary study endpoints are to assess feasibility, percentage of curative eFTR-resections, presence of scar tissue and/or complete scar excision at histopathology, safety of eFTR compared to surgery, 2 and 5 year nodal and/or distant tumor recurrence rate and 5-year disease-specific and overall-survival rate. DISCUSSION: Since the implementation of CRC screening programs, the diagnostic rate of T1 CRC is steadily increasing. A significant proportion is not recognized as cancer before endoscopic resection and is therefore resected through conventional techniques primarily reserved for benign polyps. As such, precise histological assessment is often hampered due to cauterization and fragmentation and frequently leads to treatment dilemmas. This first prospective trial will potentially demonstrate the effectiveness and oncological safety of completion eFTR for patients who have undergone a previous incomplete T1 CRC resection. Hereby, substantial surgical overtreatment may be avoided, leading to treatment optimization and organ preservation. Trial registration Nederlands Trial Register, NL 7879, 16 July 2019 ( https://trialregister.nl/trial/7879 ).

High detection rate of adenomas in familial colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Subjects with one first-degree relative (FDR) with colorectal cancer (CRC) <50 years old or two FDRs with CRC have an increased risk for CRC (RR 4-6). Current guidelines recommend colonoscopic surveillance of such families. However, information about the yield of surveillance is limited. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the outcome of surveillance and to identify risk factors for the development of adenomas. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Subjects were included if they fulfilled the following criteria: asymptomatic subjects aged between 45 and 65 years, with one FDR with CRC <50 years old (group A) or two FDRs with CRC diagnosed at any age (group B). Subjects with a personal history of inflammatory bowel disease or colorectal surgery were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 551 subjects (242 male) met the selection criteria. Ninety-five subjects with a previous colonoscopy were excluded. Two of 456 remaining subjects (0.4%) were found to have a colorectal tumour (one CRC and one carcinoid). Adenomas were detected in 85 (18.6%) and adenomas with advanced pathology in 37 subjects (8.1%). 30 subjects (6.6%) had multiple (>1) adenomas. Men were more often found to have an adenoma than women (24% vs 14.3%; p=0.01). Adenomas were more frequent in group B compared with group A (22.0% vs 15.6%; p=0.09). CONCLUSION: The yield of colonoscopic surveillance in familial CRC is substantially higher than the yield of screening reported for the general population.

Liver chimerism after allogeneic blood stem cell transplantation.

UNLABELLED: Blood stem cells can mature into elements of many different lineages. We investigated the presence and nature of donor-derived (chimeric) cells within the liver after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. METHODS: Liver biopsy autopsy specimens were examined from nine female patients who had undergone allogeneic bone marrow (n = 6) or peripheral stem cell (n = 3) transplantation from a male donor. To identify the male origin of cells within the liver, in-situ hybridization for Y-chromosomes was performed in conjunction with CD45 staining to identify leucocytes. RESULTS: Hematopoietic stem cell engraftment was confirmed in all nine recipients. Histologic examination of the liver tissue sections revealed 5.6-fold more Y-chromosome-positive than CD45-positive staining cells (P < .02), indicative of considerable nonleucocytic chimerism. This was particularly observed in patients who had developed graft-versus-host disease. CONCLUSIONS: Donor-derived cells can be found in liver tissue specimens after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. A considerable fraction of chimeric (donor-derived) cells appeared to be of nonlymphohematopoietic origin. This finding supports the theory of blood stem cells developing into liver cells of mesenchymal origin.

A comparison of amodiaquine and chloroquine in the treatment therapy of falciparum malaria in Kenya.

During June to August 1989, 158 symptomatic outpatients with P. falciparum malaria were randomly treated with either amodiaquine or chloroquine 25 mg/kg, divided over three days. Amodiaquine (Camoquin, Parke-Davis) was significantly more effective in terms of the rate of parasite clearance, 2.4 versus 3.1 days; parasite clearance day 7; 87% versus 41%; and clinical amelioration, 98% versus 68%. Moreover, this study demonstrates the lack of therapeutic toxicity of amodiaquine. Globally, tolerance was better with amodiaquine than with chloroquine; in particular, cutaneous side effects were less frequent with amodiaquine. There was no evidence of granulocyte or gross hepatic toxicity. These results suggest that WHO recommendations concerning amodiaquine should be questioned. In view of its low cost, demonstrated efficacy and lack of proven therapeutic toxicity, amodiaquine should be considered as a viable replacement for chloroquine in areas with high levels of clinical chloroquine failure.

[Very-low-calorie diet in treatment of morbidly obese patient with diabetes mellitus type 2]. / Het zeer laagcalorisch dieet als behandeling voor de zeer adipeuze patiënt met diabetes mellitus type 2.

A 40-year-old woman with type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, central obesity (body mass index: 40 kg/m2) and mixed hyperlipidaemia was treated with oral hypoglycaemic, antihypertensive and hypolipidaemic drugs as well as with intramuscular insulin. She kept gaining weight and developed hiatus hernia with regurgitation. Treatment was changed to a very low caloric diet during 9 months. She lost 18 kg of body weight and all drugs could be discontinued, as she became normoglycaemic, normotensive and normolipidaemic. Obesity is a risk factor for insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes mellitus. To reach euglycaemia in overweight type 2 diabetics is a difficult task. Oral hypoglycaemic agents and insulin are often used in combination with dietary intervention without adequate results. Losing body weight should be first-line treatment. However, compliance with weight-reducing methods is often low. The pathophysiologic importance of significant weight loss in the treatment of (morbid) obesity in type 2 diabetic patients is great.

Acute cellular rejection is associated with matrix metalloproteinase-2 genotype chimerism after orthotopic liver transplantation.

PURPOSE: Chimerism in transplantation medicine refers to the coexistence of cells of donor and recipient origin. Their existence in relation to possible pathological mechanisms remains largely unknown. We used donor-recipient mismatches for matrix metalloproteinases (MMP) gene polymorphisms in liver biopsies and in blood as a marker for chimerism after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). The second aim of this study was to evaluate these polymorphisms in relation to clinical outcome such as ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) and acute cellular rejection (ACR). METHODS: MMP-2 and MMP-9 promoter polymorphism donor-recipient mismatches were determined in 147 OLT patients. The relationship between these MMP polymorphism mismatches in donor and recipient DNA with the development of IRI and ACR after OLT was evaluated. Liver biopsy specimens and peripheral blood samples were subsequently evaluated for the presence of chimerism, also in relation to these complications. RESULTS: MMP polymorphism donor-recipient mismatches were found in 53.7% (MMP-2) and 35.5% (MMP-9) of the OLT patients but no relation was observed with IRI or ACR. Chimerism in liver biopsy specimens was found to be present in 28.8% (MMP-2) and 16.2% (MMP-9) of the cases. Liver chimerism in MMP-2 was found to be significantly associated with ACR after OLT (χ(2) 6.4, P = .01). Multivariate analysis revealed MMP-2 chimerism to be an independent risk factor for ACR after OLT even adjusted for Model for End-stage Liver Disease score (hazard ratio = 3.83, P = .03). In addition, evidence of donor chimerism was found in peripheral blood samples of the recipients in some cases. CONCLUSION: Chimerism after OLT can be found in liver biopsy specimens and in peripheral blood. MMP donor-recipient polymorphism mismatches are good markers for assessing chimerism after OLT. In the multivariate analysis, liver chimerism in MMP-2 was found to be significantly associated with the development of ACR after OLT.

Highly variable anticoagulant response after subcutaneous administration of high-dose (12,500 IU) heparin in patients with myocardial infarction and healthy volunteers.

BACKGROUND: In this study, the anticoagulant response of 12,500 IU heparin s.c. was investigated in patients with myocardial infarction and healthy volunteers to determine variabilities in response and modifying factors. METHODS AND RESULTS: On the fourth day after thrombolytic therapy, blood samples were taken before and at frequent intervals until 10 hours after the injection of 12,500 IU heparin s.c. Plasma anti-Xa activity, anti-IIa activity, and the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) were measured in addition to body weight and thickness of the abdominal subcutaneous fat layer. Contrary to expectations, the increase of anti-Xa activity, anti-IIa activity, and APTT compared with baseline (predrug) levels was very small, with an average maximal APTT of 42.6 seconds (SD, 12.4 seconds; range, 30.4-70.7 seconds). Subsequently, the influence of the length of the injection needle on the anticoagulant effect of 12,500 IU heparin s.c. was studied in 10 healthy volunteers to find a factor that could be responsible for the poor response in the patients. The length of the injection needle did not influence the anticoagulant effect of heparin. Large interindividual and intraindividual variabilities were seen in the volunteers. The majority of volunteers had minimal prolongation of the APTT, but very strong prolongation was also seen (maximal APTT, 163 seconds). There was no correlation between the abdominal skinfold thickness and anti-Xa activity, anti-IIa activity, or APTT (p > 0.05), but in the patient study, there was a correlation between weight and anti-Xa activity and anti-IIa activity (p < 0.05), and in the volunteer study, there was a correlation between weight and anti-Xa activity and APTT (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Subcutaneous administration of heparin in a fixed dose for prophylactic and therapeutic purposes may be inadequate because of the large interindividual and intraindividual variations in anticoagulant effect.