Development of a Model for Video-Assisted Postoperative Team Debriefing.

BACKGROUND: Video-assisted debriefing may be a powerful tool to improve surgical team performance. Nevertheless, a true operating team debriefing culture is lacking to date. This study aimed to find evidence on how to debrief the surgical team and develop a model suitable for debriefing using a video and medical data recorder (MDR) in the operating room (OR). METHODS: A review of the PubMed and Embase databases and Cochrane Library was performed. The identified literature was studied and combined with a conceptual framework to develop a model for postoperative video-assisted team debriefing. Thirty-five surgical cases were recorded with an MDR and debriefed with the operating team using the proposed debrief model and a standardized video-assisted performance report. A questionnaire was used to assess the participants' satisfaction with this debrief model. RESULTS: Debrief models and methods are extensively described in the current medical literature. An overview was provided. The OR team needs a structured debrief model, minimizing resource, effort, and motivational constraints. A structured six-step team debrief model suitable for video-assisted OR team debriefing was developed. The model was tested in 35 multidisciplinary MDR-assisted debriefing sessions and the debriefing sessions were overall rated with a mean of 7.8 (standard deviation 1.4, 10-point Likert scale) by participants. CONCLUSIONS: Debriefing surgical teams using a video and MDR in the OR requires a model on how to use such recordings optimally. To date, no such model existed. The proposed debrief model was tested using a multisource MDR and may be used to facilitate OR debriefing across various settings.

Indications, contraindications, and safety aspects of procedural sedation.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: There is a steadily increasing demand for procedural sedation outside the operating room, frequently performed in comorbid high-risk adult patients. This review evaluates the feasibility and advantages of sedation vs. general anesthesia for some of these new procedures. RECENT FINDINGS: Generally, sedation performed by experienced staff is safe. Although for some endoscopic or transcatheter interventions sedation is feasible, results of the intervention might be improved when performed under general anesthesia. For elected procedures like intra-arterial treatment after acute ischemic stroke, avoiding general anesthesia and sedation at all might be the optimal treatment. SUMMARY: Anesthesiologists are facing continuously new indications for procedural sedation in sometimes sophisticated diagnostic or therapeutic procedures. Timely availability of anesthesia staff will mainly influence who is performing sedation, anesthesia or nonanesthesia personal. While the number of absolute contraindications for sedation decreased to almost zero, relative contraindications are becoming more relevant and should be tailored to the individual procedure and patient.

Does Regular Practice with a "Flexible Bronchoscopy Simulator" Improve Fibreoptic Intubation Skills in Experts and Novices? A Randomized Controlled Study.

BACKGROUND: The appropriate management of a "difficult airway" remains a challenge for novices and experienced anaesthetists. With the current available airway technologies, e.g., video laryngoscopy, flexible bronchoscopy (fibreoptic intubation (FOI)) for endotracheal intubation is decreasing, likely diminishing caregiver skills. We investigated whether bronchoscopy simulator training improved FOI skills. METHODS: 72 volunteers, consisting of anaesthetists, anaesthesia residents, and nurses, performed six exercises on a bronchoscopy simulator. At baseline and after 12 months, the six exercises included one serious game (to train agility), two basic airways, and three difficult airways. After a baseline assessment, subjects were randomly allocated to the intervention group (with) or control group without bronchoscopy simulator training every six weeks for 10 min using a preloaded serious game. The primary outcome was the difference in the time to reach the carina after 12 months, as measured objectively by the simulator. The level of stress and FOI confidence after 12 months were secondary outcomes. RESULTS: The control and intervention groups had a similar time to reach the carina in difficult airway cases and the reported stress levels, at baseline and 12 months, showed no difference. In contrast, the intervention group's self-reported confidence in FOI skills improved more. CONCLUSIONS: Although participants rated higher in confidence, practicing FOI skills on an airway simulator with an agility game did not increase their performance in simulated challenging airway instances.

Crisis Scenarios for Simulation-Based Nontechnical Skills Training for Cardiac Surgery Teams: A National Survey Among Cardiac Anesthesiologists, Cardiac Surgeons, Clinical Perfusionists, and Cardiac Operating Room Nurses.

BACKGROUND: Nontechnical skills in cardiac surgery are vital in ensuring patient safety in the operating room (OR). To train these skills in a simulation-based scenario, a collection of commonly accepted crisis scenarios is needed to serve as a framework for a simulation-based training program. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to identify and reach consensus on a collection of relevant crisis scenarios in cardiac surgery suitable for simulation-based team training focusing on nontechnical skills. METHODS: Using the Delphi method, a national assessment was performed among cardiac surgeons, cardiac anesthesiologists, clinical perfusionists, and cardiac OR nurses in the Netherlands. In the first Delphi round, potential crisis scenarios for simulation-based team training in cardiac surgery were identified. In the second round, the identified scenarios were rated using a 5-point Likert scale. Finally, based on consensus (two-thirds majority), scenarios were prioritized and explored for feasibility. RESULTS: One hundred fourteen experts participated in the study (26 cardiac anesthesiologists, 24 cardiac surgeons, 25 clinical perfusionists, and 39 OR nurses), representing all 16 cardiac surgical centers in the Netherlands. In the first round, 237 scenarios were identified. After eliminating duplicates and grouping similar scenarios, 44 scenarios were scored in round 2, which finally resulted in 13 relevant crisis scenarios with an expert consensus higher than 67%. CONCLUSIONS: Thirteen crisis scenarios relevant to simulation-based team training were identified by an expert panel consisting of all members of the cardiac surgical team. Further research is needed to evaluate the educational value of the respective scenarios.

Effect of Cognitive Aids on Adherence to Best Practice in the Treatment of Deteriorating Surgical Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial in a Simulation Setting.

Importance: Failure to rescue causes significant morbidity and mortality in the surgical population. Human error is often the underlying cause of failure to rescue. Human error can be reduced by the use of cognitive aids. Objectives: To test the effectiveness of cognitive aids on adherence to best practice in the management of deteriorating postoperative surgical ward patients. Design, Setting, and Participants: Randomized clinical trial in a simulation setting. Surgical teams consisted of 1 surgeon and 2 nurses from a surgical ward from 4 different hospitals in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Data were analyzed between February 2, 2017, and December 18, 2018. Interventions: The teams were randomized to manage 3 simulated deteriorating patient scenarios with or without the use of cognitive aids. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome of the study was failure to adhere to best practice, expressed as the percentage of omitted critical management steps. The secondary outcome of the study was the perceived usability of the cognitive aids. Results: Of the total participants, 93 were women and 51 were men. Twenty-five surgical teams performed 75 patient scenarios with cognitive aids, and 25 teams performed 75 patient scenarios without cognitive aids. Using the cognitive aids resulted in a reduction of omitted critical management steps from 33% to 10%, which is a 70% (P < .001) reduction. This effect remained significant (odds ratio, 0.63; 95% CI, -0.228 to -0.061; P = .001) in a multivariate analysis. Overall usability (scale of 0-10) of the cognitive aids was scored at a median of 8.7 (interquartile range, 8-9). Conclusions and Relevance: Failure to comply with best practice management of postoperative complications is associated with worse outcomes. In this simulation study, adherence to best practice in the management of postoperative complications improves significantly by the use of cognitive aids. Cognitive aids for deteriorating surgical patients therefore have the potential to reduce failure to rescue and improve patient outcome. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03812861.

Cognitive aids: 'a must' for procedures performed by multidisciplinary sedation teams outside the operation room?

The human brain might not perform optimally during stressful situations. Cognitive aids can help in such situations to carry out all necessary treatment steps in a correct order. We present the case of a severe anaphylactic reaction during a percutaneous radiological intervention to drain an echinococcosis cyst on the radiology suite outside the operation room (OR), in which cognitive aids were successfully used to optimise patient care by a multidisciplinary team. Cognitive aids do not replace experience and skills of the individual caregivers, but can be invaluable tools for multidisciplinary teams dealing with crisis situations outside the OR.