Short versus long-segment posterior fixation in the treatment of thoracolumbar junction fractures: a comparison of outcomes.

PURPOSE: To compare clinical and radiological outcomes between short (SSPF) and long-segment (LSPF) posterior fixation for thoracolumbar junction (TLJ) fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of adult patients, with single-level, TLJ (T11-L2) fractures, treated with posterior fixation between 2007 and 2014 at a regional spinal centre. SSPF and LSPF were defined as transpedicular screw fixation at one and two levels above and below the fractured vertebra, respectively. Construct failure was defined as instrument breakage or screw pull-out requiring operative intervention. Two independent assessors measured the kyphotic Cobb angle at up to six months. RESULTS: A total of 28 patients were included with a median age of 38 years (range 20-76 years) and median follow-up period of 14 months (4-41 months). All patients sustained traumatic fractures and the male to female ratio was 19:9. AO fracture classes were: A (29%), B (50%) and C (21%). SSPF and LSPF were performed in 17 (61%) and 11 (39%) patients, respectively. There was no significant difference in age (Fisher's exact, p > 0.99), AO fracture class (chi-squared, p = 0.510), preop TLICS score (independent t-test, p = 0.668) and length of stay (independent t-test, p = 0.106) between the groups. Construct failure occurred in three SSPF cases (3-14 months postop) and was associated with an increased mean loss of correction. By six months, the Cobb angle had increased significantly in the SSPF group (paired t-test, p = 0.049), but not the LSPF group (paired t-test, p = 0.157). CONCLUSIONS: Our data identified a trend towards better clinical and radiological outcomes in the LSPF, compared to the SSPF group. Although supported by some studies, these findings should be evaluated in future clinical trials.

External Immobilization of Odontoid Fractures: A Systematic Review to Compare the Halo and Hard Collar.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this systematic review was to compare the halo and hard collar in the management of adult odontoid fractures. METHODS: Systematic and independent searches on MEDLINE (PubMed) and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Inclusion criteria included studies 1) with clinical outcomes, 2) in adults (18 years of age or order), 3) with odontoid fractures, 4) with patients immobilized using a halo or hard collar, and 5) in multiple (more than 5) patients. Treatment failure rates were calculated as the proportion requiring operative intervention. RESULTS: There were 714 cases included, who were managed in a halo (60%) or collar (40%). The mean age was 66 years (range, 18-96 years). Type 2 odontoid fractures were the most common (83%). There was no significant difference in failure rates between the halo and collar in patients with type 2 odontoid fractures (P = 0.111). This was also true in elderly (older than 65 years of age) patients (P = 0.802). The collar had a higher failure rate in type 3 odontoid fractures, though numbers were small (P = 0.035). Fibrous malunion occurred in 56 patients, and only 7% failed. There was only 1 case of neurological deterioration. Although mortality rates were similar between the collar and halo (P = 0.173), the halo was associated with a significantly higher complication rate (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: For the most common clinical scenario, the halo and collar have similar failure rates, such that the higher morbidity associated with the halo may not be justified, especially in elderly patients. Malunion usually represents a stable clinical outcome, and surgery is rarely required. Prospective randomized studies are needed to more definitively compare the devices.

Change in spinal height following correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Corrective surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) leads to vertical growth arrest of the instrumented spine. This might be offset by the immediate gain in spinal height (SH) as a result of correction of the curvature. PURPOSE: This study aimed to identify predictors of gain in SH following corrective surgery for AIS. We present a unique model to predict postoperative height prior to intervention, which could contribute to the preoperative counseling and consenting process. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective case series. All surgeries were performed by one of four substantive pediatric spinal surgeons within a single regional center over a 3.5-year period. PATIENT SAMPLE: There were 104 patients who had instrumented posterior spinal fusion for AIS included. There were 93 females, and the age range was from 11 to 17 years. All patients had posterior instrumented fusion using rods and anchors (pedicle screws±hooks). OUTCOME MEASURES: Postoperative SH was the primary outcome measure. The SH (C7-L5) and Cobb angles were measured from a pre- and postoperative standing X-ray of each patient. METHODS: Variables associated with patients (demographic and radiological) and the surgical constructs were analyzed for predictability of height gain. A model was derived including only significant predictors of substantive importance using hierarchical regression methods. Cross-validation procedures verified the adequacy of the model fit. Analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows version 20.0 (IBM Corp. Armonk, NY, USA). RESULTS: The major curve was thoracic in 90% of cases. The number of vertebrae fused ranged from 5 to 15. The average preoperative Cobb angle was 66°, with an average correction of 45°. The average change in SH was 4.66 cm (SD 2.13 cm). The model presented included preoperative height, preoperative Cobb angle, and number of vertebrae within the construct, with coefficients of 1.00 (95% CI: 0.90, 1.09), 0.067 (95% CI: 0.039, 0.095), and 0.26 (95% CI: 0.11, 0.41), respectively. This model had an adjusted-R(2) value of 0.83 and a R(2) for prediction of 0.79, and can be shown to have similar predictive capability as a model comprising a wider range of predictors. CONCLUSION: The greatest postoperative height values following posterior spinal fusion for AIS could be expected from a patient with greater preoperative height and Cobb angle, and whose construct spans a large number of vertebrae.

An analysis of postoperative hemoglobin levels in patients with a fractured neck of femur.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to analyze the changes in hemoglobin level and to determine a suitable timeline for post-operative hemoglobin monitoring in patients undergoing fixation of femoral neck fracture. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent either dynamic hip screw (DHS) fixation (n = 74, mean age: 80 years) or hip hemiarthroplasty (n = 104, mean age: 84 years) for femoral neck fracture were included into the study. The hemoglobin level of the patients was monitored perioperatively. RESULTS: Analysis found a statistically and clinically significant mean drop in hemoglobin of 31.1 g/L over time from pre-operatively (D0) to day-5 post-operatively (p < 0.001), with significant reductions from D0 to day-1 and day-1 to day-2 (p < 0.001). At each post-operative time point, DHS patients had lower hemoglobin values over hemiarthroplasty patients (p = 0.046). CONCLUSION: The decrease in hemoglobin in the first 24-h post-operative period (D0 to day-1) is an underestimation of the ultimate lowest value in hemoglobin found at day-2. Relying on the day-1 hemoglobin could be detrimental to patient care. We propose a method of predicting patients likely to be transfused, and recommend a protocol for patients undergoing femoral neck fracture surgery to standardize postoperative hemoglobin monitoring. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV Prognostic study.

Postoperative hemoglobin level in patients with femoral neck fracture.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to analyze the changes of hemoglobin levels in patients undergoing fixation for femoral neck fracture. METHODS: Peroperative hemoglobin levels of patients who underwent either dynamic hip screw (DHS) fixation (n=74; mean age: 80 years) or hip hemiarthroplasty (n=104; mean age: 84 years) for femoral neck fracture was monitored. RESULTS: There was a statistically and clinically significant mean drop of 31.1 g/L between the preoperative (D0) and postoperative Day 5 Hb levels (p<0.001), with significant reductions from D0 to Day 1 and Day 1 to Day 2 (p<0.001). At each postoperative measurement, DHS patients had lower hemoglobin values over hemiarthroplasty patients (p=0.046). CONCLUSION: The decrease in hemoglobin in the first 24-hour postoperative period (D0 to Day 1) is an underestimation of the ultimate lowest value in hemoglobin found at Day 2. Relying on the Day 1 hemoglobin level could be detrimental to patient care. We propose a method of predicting patients likely to be transfused and recommend a protocol for patients undergoing femoral neck fracture surgery to standardize postoperative hemoglobin monitoring.

The pattern of blood loss in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Previous studies have shown that modern intraoperative blood-saving techniques dramatically reduce the allogeneic transfusion requirements in surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). No studies have looked at the pattern of postoperative hemoglobin (Hb) in AIS patients undergoing corrective spinal surgery and correlated this with the timing of allogeneic transfusion. PURPOSE: To describe the pattern of perioperative blood loss in instrumented surgery for AIS. We look at the recommendations regarding an ideal preoperative Hb, the need for preoperative cross-matching, and the timing of postoperative Hb analysis. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective case series. Surgeries were performed by one of four substantive pediatric spinal surgeons within a single regional center over a 3-year period. PATIENT SAMPLE: A consecutive series of 86 patients who underwent posterior instrumented fusion for AIS were included: 10 males and 76 females. Mean age was 14 years (range 10-17 years). All patients had posterior instrumented fusion using various blood-saving techniques (eg, cell-saver). All patients were cross-matched preoperatively, and our transfusion trigger value (TTV) was 7 g/dL. OUTCOME MEASURES: Hemoglobin level was the outcome measure. Hemoglobin readings were obtained preoperatively, within 2 hours of surgery, and daily up to 5 days after surgery. This physiologic measure was assessed using routine blood sampling techniques and standardized laboratory processing. METHODS: Patient predictor variables (demographic and surgical) were assessed for association with Hb levels in a hierarchical model, with repeated Hb readings at the lower level being clustered within an individual patient at the upper level of the structure. The variation of Hb levels within individuals was compared with mean levels in different individuals via the variance partition coefficient of the model structure. RESULTS: No patients required intraoperative allogeneic transfusion. Only four patients (4.65%) received allogeneic transfusion, all within 2 days of surgery. A clinically important drop in Hb occurred within the first 2 postoperative days, rising thereafter. The average postoperative drop in Hb was 4.1 g/dL. Young males had lower postoperative Hb values. Neither the preoperative curve magnitude (Cobb angle of major curve) nor the number of vertebrae/levels fused significantly affected the blood loss. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend setting a minimum preoperative Hb value that is 5 g/dL higher than your TTV. Because no patients required an intraoperative transfusion when using modern blood-saving techniques, preoperative cross-matching is unnecessary and potentially wasteful of blood reserves. Hemoglobin analysis beyond the second postoperative day is unnecessary unless clinically indicated.