RESUMO
PURPOSE: To investigate the variation in computed dose-volume (DV) indices for high-dose-rate (HDR) prostate brachytherapy that can result from typical differences in computation settings in treatment planning systems (TPSs). METHODS: Five factors were taken into account: number of dose-calculation points, radioactive source description, interpolation between delineated contours, intersections between delineated organ contours, and organ shape at the top and bottom contour using either full or partial slice thickness. Using in-house developed software, the DV indices of the treatment plans of 26 patients were calculated with different settings, and compared to a baseline setting that closely followed the default settings of the TPS used in our medical center. Studied organs were prostate and seminal vesicles, denoted as targets, and bladder, rectum, and urethra, denoted as organs at risk (OARs), which were delineated on MRI scans with a 3.3 mm slice thickness. RESULTS: When sampling a fixed number of points in each organ, in order to achieve a width of the 95% confidence interval over all patients of the DV indices of 1% or less, only 32,000 points had to be sampled per target, but 256,000 points had to be sampled per OAR. For the remaining factors, DV indices changed up to 0.4% for rectum, 1.3% for urethra, and 2.6% for prostate. DV indices of the bladder changed especially if the high-dose-region was (partly) located at the most caudal contour, up to 8.5%, and DV indices of the vesicles changed especially if there were few delineated contours, up to 9.8%, both due to the use of full slice thickness for the top and bottom contour. CONCLUSIONS: The values of DV indices used in prostate HDR brachytherapy treatment planning are influenced by the computation settings in a TPS, especially at the most caudal part of the bladder, as well as in the seminal vesicles.
Assuntos
Algoritmos , Braquiterapia , Órgãos em Risco/efeitos da radiação , Neoplasias da Próstata/radioterapia , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador/métodos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Radiometria/métodos , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , SoftwareRESUMO
PURPOSE: To investigate the dosimetric effect of variable gas volume in esophageal cancer radiation therapy (RT) and whether a density override (DO) in treatment planning can effectively mitigate this dosimetric effect. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Nine patients with gastrointestinal gas pockets in the planning computed tomography (pCT) were retrospectively included. Per patient, the intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans associated with no DO, DO = 0.5, and DO = 1 in the gas pockets were made. Initial and follow-up gas volumes were assessed from the pCTs and cone-beam CTs (CBCTs), respectively. Fractional CTs were created based on the pCT and CBCTs to calculate the fractional doses using all six plans. We then investigated for all six plans the correlation between the gas volume difference (relative to initial gas volume) and the dose difference (relative to planned dose). We also calculated and compared the accumulated dose by summing the fractional doses using two strategies: single-plan strategy (i.e. using each of the six plans separately) and plan-selection strategy (i.e. selecting one of the three plans depending on the fractional gas volume for IMRT and VMAT planning separately). RESULTS: The dose difference was approximately linearly correlated to the gas volume difference. Underdoses of >3.5% and overdoses of >7% were found for gas volume decreases >160 mL/330 mL and increases >260 mL/370 mL for IMRT/VMAT planning, respectively. Moreover, for most patients, the single-plan strategy with the use of DO = 0.5 resulted in neither undesired underdose nor much overdose. The plan-selection strategy, however, can always ensure sufficient target coverage and minimize high dose regions to the most extent. CONCLUSIONS: The variation in gas volume during the treatment course can result in clinically undesired underdose or overdose. The DO-based plan-selection strategy can effectively mitigate the gas-induced underdose and minimize the overdose for esophageal cancer RT.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Esofágicas/radioterapia , Esôfago/diagnóstico por imagem , Gases , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador/métodos , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada/métodos , Idoso , Neoplasias Esofágicas/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patologia , Esôfago/patologia , Feminino , Humanos , Intestinos/fisiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Radiometria/métodos , Radiometria/estatística & dados numéricos , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador/estatística & dados numéricos , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estômago/fisiologia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios XRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Due to improved visibility on MRI, contouring of the prostate is improved compared to CT. The aim of this study was to quantify the benefits of using MRI for treatment planning as compared to CT-based planning for temporary implant prostate brachytherapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: CT and MRI image data of 13 patients were used to delineate the prostate and organs at risk (OARs) and to reconstruct the implanted catheters (typically 12). An experienced treatment planner created plans on the CT-based structure sets (CT-plan) and on the MRI-based structure sets (MRI-plan). Then, active dwell-positions and weights of the CT-plans were transferred to the MRI-based structure sets (CT-plan(MRI-contours)) and resulting dosimetric parameters and tumour control probabilities (TCPs) were studied. RESULTS: For the CT-plan(MRI-contours) a statistically significant lower target coverage was detected: mean V100 was 95.1% as opposed to 98.3% for the original plans (p < 0.01). Planning on CT caused cold-spots that influence the TCP. MRI-based planning improved the TCPs by 6-10%, depending on the parameters of the radiobiological model used for TCP calculation. Basing the treatment plan on either CT- or MRI-delineations does not influence plan quality. CONCLUSION: Evaluation of CT-based treatment planning by transferring the plan to MRI reveals underdosage of the prostate, especially at the base side. Planning on MRI can prevent cold-spots in the tumour and improves the TCP.
Assuntos
Braquiterapia/métodos , Carcinoma/radioterapia , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Próstata/radioterapia , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador/métodos , Carcinoma/diagnóstico por imagem , Carcinoma/patologia , Humanos , Masculino , Tamanho do Órgão/fisiologia , Órgãos em Risco , Probabilidade , Próstata/patologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Carga Tumoral/fisiologia , UltrassonografiaRESUMO
PURPOSE: The aim was to assess the feasibility of online adaptive radiotherapy (oART) for bladder cancer using a focal boost by focusing on the quality of the online treatment plan and automatic target delineation, duration of the workflow and performance in the presence of fiducial markers for tumor bed localization. METHODS: Fifteen patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer received daily oART with Cone Beam CT (CBCT), artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted automatic delineation of the daily anatomy and online plan reoptimization. The bladder and pelvic lymph nodes received a total dose of 40 Gy in 20 fractions, the tumor received an additional simultaneously integrated boost (SIB) of 15 Gy. The dose distribution of the reference plan was calculated for the daily anatomy, i.e. the scheduled plan. Simultaneously, a reoptimization of the plan was performed i.e. the adaptive plan. The target coverage and V95% outside the target were evaluated for both plans. The need for manual adjustments of the GTV delineation, the duration of the workflow and the influence of fiducial markers were assessed. RESULTS: All 300 adaptive plans met the requirement of the CTV-coverage V95%≥98% for both the boost (55 Gy) and elective volume (40 Gy). For the scheduled plans the CTV-coverage was 53.5% and 98.5%, respectively. Significantly less tissue outside the targets received 55 Gy in case of the adaptive plans as compared to the scheduled plans. Manual corrections of the GTV were performed in 67% of the sessions. In 96% of these corrections the GTV was enlarged and resulted in a median improvement of 1% for the target coverage. The median on-couch time was 22 min. A third of the session time consisted of reoptimization of the treatment plan. Fiducial markers were visible on the CBCTs and aided the tumor localization. CONCLUSIONS: AI-driven CBCT-guided oART aided by fiducial markers is feasible for bladder cancer radiotherapy treatment including a SIB. The quality of the adaptive plans met the clinical requirements and fiducial markers were visible enabling consistent daily tumor localization. Improved automatic delineation to lower the need for manual corrections and faster reoptimization would result in shorter session time.
Assuntos
Radioterapia Conformacional , Radioterapia Guiada por Imagem , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária , Humanos , Marcadores Fiduciais , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador/métodos , Inteligência Artificial , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/radioterapia , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/patologia , Radioterapia Conformacional/métodos , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Radioterapia Guiada por Imagem/métodos , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada/métodosRESUMO
PURPOSE: This prospective study evaluates our first clinical experiences with the novel ``BRachytherapy via artificial Intelligent GOMEA-Heuristic based Treatment planning'' (BRIGHT) applied to high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between March 2020 and October 2021, 14 prostate cancer patients were treated in our center with a 15Gy HDR-brachytherapy boost. BRIGHT was used for bi-objective treatment plan optimization and selection of the most desirable plans from a coverage-sparing trade-off curve. Selected BRIGHT plans were imported into the commercial treatment planning system Oncentra Brachy . In Oncentra Brachy a dose distribution comparison was performed for clinical plan choice, followed by manual fine-tuning of the preferred BRIGHT plan when deemed necessary. The reasons for plan selection, clinical plan choice, and fine-tuning, as well as process speed were monitored. For each patient, the dose-volume parameters of the (fine-tuned) clinical plan were evaluated. RESULTS: In all patients, BRIGHT provided solutions satisfying all protocol values for coverage and sparing. In four patients not all dose-volume criteria of the clinical plan were satisfied after manual fine-tuning. Detailed information on tumour coverage, dose-distribution, dwell time pattern, and insight provided by the patient-specific trade-off curve, were used for clinical plan choice. Median time spent on treatment planning was 42 min, consisting of 16 min plan optimization and selection, and 26 min undesirable process steps. CONCLUSIONS: BRIGHT is implemented in our clinic and provides automated prostate high-dose-rate brachytherapy planning with trade-off based plan selection. Based on our experience, additional optimization aims need to be implemented to further improve direct clinical applicability of treatment plans and process efficiency.
Assuntos
Braquiterapia , Neoplasias da Próstata , Masculino , Humanos , Próstata , Inteligência Artificial , Estudos Prospectivos , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Braquiterapia/métodos , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador/métodos , Neoplasias da Próstata/radioterapiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Online adaptive radiotherapy has the potential to reduce toxicity for patients treated for rectal cancer because smaller planning target volumes (PTV) margins around the entire clinical target volume (CTV) are required. The aim of this study is to describe the first clinical experience of a Conebeam CT (CBCT)-based online adaptive workflow for rectal cancer, evaluating timing of different steps in the workflow, plan quality, target coverage and patient compliance. METHODS: Twelve consecutive patients eligible for 5 × 5 Gy pre-operative radiotherapy were treated on a ring-based linear accelerator with a multidisciplinary team present at the treatment machine for each fraction. The accelerator is operated using an integrated software platform for both treatment planning and delivery. In all directions for all CTVs a PTV margin of 5 mm was used, except for the cranial/caudal borders of the total CTV where a margin of 8 mm was applied. A reference plan was generated based on a single planning CT. After aligning the patient the online adaptive procedure started with acquisition of a CBCT. The planning CT scan was registered to the CBCT using deformable registration and a synthetic CT scan was generated. With the support of artificial intelligence, structure guided deformation and the synthetic CT scan contours were adapted by the system to match the anatomy on the CBCT. If necessary, these contours were adjusted before a new plan was generated. A second and third CBCT were acquired to validate the new plan with respect to CTV coverage just before and after treatment delivery, respectively. Treatment was delivered using volumetric modulated arc treatment (VMAT). All steps in this process were defined and timed. RESULTS: On average the timeslot needed at the treatment machine was 34 min. The process of acquiring a CBCT, evaluating and adjusting the contours, creating the new plan and verifying the CTV on the CBCT scan took on average 20 min. Including delivery and post treatment verification this was 26 min. Manual adjustments of the target volumes were necessary in 50% of fractions. Plan quality, target coverage and patient compliance were excellent. CONCLUSIONS: First clinical experience with CBCT-based online adaptive radiotherapy shows it is feasible for rectal cancer. Trial registration Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act (WMO) does not apply to this study and was retrospectively approved by the Medical Ethics review Committee of the Academic Medical Center (W21_087 # 21.097; Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands).
Assuntos
Tomografia Computadorizada de Feixe Cônico/métodos , Processamento de Imagem Assistida por Computador/métodos , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador/métodos , Radioterapia Guiada por Imagem/métodos , Neoplasias Retais/radioterapia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Inteligência Artificial , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Órgãos em Risco/efeitos da radiação , Prognóstico , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada/métodos , Neoplasias Retais/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Retais/patologia , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Motivation for this research was a patient with large and bulky melanoma lesions on a leg, treated with hyperthermia in a special set-up with an open water bolus and two opposing applicators. Treatment planning was used to find the most suitable heating method, comparing 70 MHz capacitive contact flexible microstrip applicators (CFMAs) and 70 MHz waveguides. METHODS: The first three sessions were performed with CFMA applicators; the last session with waveguides. Power and water temperature were adjusted to achieve clinically relevant temperatures. Finite difference time domain (FDTD) simulations were performed for a CFMA and waveguide on a fat-muscle geometry to compare effective field size (EFS) and effective heating depth (EHD). A CT scan of the patient's leg was automatically segmented into muscle, fat and bone; tumour lesions were outlined manually. Patient simulations were performed to evaluate the 3D heating pattern and to compare CFMAs and waveguides for equal power and water temperature. RESULTS: Hyperthermia treatment was well tolerated. Temperature measurements indicated mainly superficial heating with CFMAs. Simulated EHD was 2.1 and 2.4 cm for CFMA and waveguide, respectively and EFS was 19.6 x 16.2 cm(2) and 19.4 x 16.3 cm(2). Simulation results confirmed the better performance of the waveguides. For normal amounts of fat tissue, approximately twice as much power is absorbed in fat with CFMAs compared to waveguides. [corrected] Simulations showed that a relatively high water temperature ( approximately 42 degrees C) improves the overall temperature distribution. CONCLUSION: CFMAs and waveguides have a similar EFS and EHD, but for large extremity lesions, the performance of 70 MHz waveguides is favourable compared to 70 MHz CFMA applicators.
Assuntos
Simulação por Computador , Hipertermia Induzida/instrumentação , Perna (Membro)/patologia , Melanoma/terapia , Algoritmos , Temperatura Corporal/efeitos da radiação , Eletrodos , Evolução Fatal , Humanos , Hipertermia Induzida/efeitos adversos , Hipertermia Induzida/métodos , Masculino , Melanoma/patologia , Melanoma/radioterapia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Imagens de Fantasmas , Terapia por Radiofrequência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Falha de TratamentoRESUMO
PURPOSE: Bi-objective simultaneous optimization of catheter positions and dwell times for high-dose-rate (HDR) prostate brachytherapy, based directly on dose-volume indices, has shown promising results. However, optimization with the state-of-the-art evolutionary algorithm MO-RV-GOMEA so far required several hours of runtime, and resulting catheter positions were not always clinically feasible. The aim of this study is to extend the optimization model and apply GPU parallelization to achieve clinically acceptable computation times. The resulting optimization procedure is compared with a previously introduced method based solely on geometric criteria, the adapted Centroidal Voronoi Tessellations (CVT) algorithm. METHODS: Bi-objective simultaneous optimization was performed with a GPU-parallelized version of MO-RV-GOMEA. This optimization of catheter positions and dwell times was retrospectively applied to the data of 26 patients previously treated with HDR prostate brachytherapy for 8-16 catheters (steps of 2). Optimization of catheter positions using CVT was performed in seconds, after which optimization of only the dwell times using MO-RV-GOMEA was performed in 1 min. RESULTS: Simultaneous optimization of catheter positions and dwell times using MO-RV-GOMEA was performed in 5 min. For 16 down to 8 catheters (steps of 2), MO-RV-GOMEA found plans satisfying the planning-aims for 20, 20, 18, 14, and 11 out of the 26 patients, respectively. CVT achieved this for 19, 17, 13, 9, and 2 patients, respectively. The P-value for the difference between MO-RV-GOMEA and CVT was 0.023 for 16 catheters, 0.005 for 14 catheters, and <0.001 for 12, 10, and 8 catheters. CONCLUSIONS: With bi-objective simultaneous optimization on a GPU, high-quality catheter positions can now be obtained within 5 min, which is clinically acceptable, but slower than CVT. For 16 catheters, the difference between MO-RV-GOMEA and CVT is clinically irrelevant. For 14 catheters and less, MO-RV-GOMEA outperforms CVT in finding plans satisfying all planning-aims.
Assuntos
Braquiterapia , Neoplasias da Próstata , Catéteres , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias da Próstata/radioterapia , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
PURPOSE: To characterise and evaluate the capacitive Contact Flexible Microstrip Applicator operating at 70 MHz, CFMA-70. This applicator is introduced for the treatment of superficial tumours with extension in depth beyond the range of regular superficial applicators. METHODS: E-field measurements were performed in an elliptical phantom filled with a saline solution using an E-field vector probe. E-field distributions and SAR patterns are compared to those of the CFMA-434 and of 70 MHz waveguides. The applicator has been used for the treatment of 6 patients with breast cancer with a tumour depth exceeding 4 cm. RESULTS: The effective heating depth of the CFMA-70 is 50% larger than for the CFMA-434. Its effective field size is 26 x 20 cm (aperture 29 x 20 cm), larger than for an equally sized CFMA-434. In contrast to the CFMA-434 the SAR pattern of this applicator is insensitive to the bolus thickness. Comparison to 70 MHz waveguides shows that the E-field component normal to the applicator is 100% larger for the CFMA-70. During clinical applications acceptable temperatures were realised for individual sessions (also at depth), but in many cases treatment limiting hot spots occurred close to superficial bony structures near the applicator edge. Both surface irregularities and the normal field component may be responsible. CONCLUSIONS: The CFMA-70 has adequate penetration depth for the treatment of superficial tumours exceeding a depth of 4 cm. However, the relatively large normal E-field component may induce treatment-limiting hot spots at tissue interfaces in the direction normal to the applicator's surface.
Assuntos
Hipertermia Induzida/instrumentação , Neoplasias da Mama/terapia , Feminino , Humanos , Hipertermia Induzida/métodos , Neoplasias/terapia , Imagens de Fantasmas , Ondas de RádioRESUMO
PURPOSE: Bi-objective treatment planning for high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy is a novel treatment planning method with two separate objectives that represent target coverage and organ-at-risk sparing. In this study, we investigated the feasibility and plan quality of this method by means of a retrospective observer study. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Current planning sessions were recorded to configure a bi-objective optimization model and to assess its applicability to our clinical practice. Optimization software, GOMEA, was then used to automatically generate a large set of plans with different trade-offs in the two objectives for each of 18 patients treated with high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy. From this set, five plans per patient were selected for comparison to the clinical plan in terms of satisfaction of planning criteria and in a retrospective observer study. Three brachytherapists were asked to evaluate the blinded plans and select the preferred one. RESULTS: Recordings demonstrated applicability of the bi-objective optimization model to our clinical practice. For 14/18 patients, GOMEA plans satisfied all planning criteria, compared with 4/18 clinical plans. In the observer study, in 53/54 cases, a GOMEA plan was preferred over the clinical plan. When asked for consensus among observers, this ratio was 17/18 patients. Observers highly appreciated the insight gained from comparing multiple plans with different trade-offs simultaneously. CONCLUSIONS: The bi-objective optimization model adapted well to our clinical practice. GOMEA plans were considered equal or superior to the clinical plans. In addition, presenting multiple high-quality plans provided novel insight into patient-specific trade-offs.
Assuntos
Braquiterapia/métodos , Tratamentos com Preservação do Órgão , Neoplasias da Próstata/radioterapia , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador/métodos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Viabilidade , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Órgãos em Risco , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Estudos Retrospectivos , SoftwareRESUMO
PURPOSE: Both midposition (MidP) and internal target volume (ITV) strategies can take the respiration-induced target motion into account. This study aimed to compare these 2 strategies in terms of clinical target volume (CTV) coverage and dose to organs at risk (OARs) for esophageal cancer radiation therapy (RT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Fifteen patients with esophageal cancer were included retrospectively for neoadjuvant RT planning. Per patient, a 10-phase, 4-dimensional (4D) computed tomography (CT) scan (4D-CT) was acquired with CTV and OARs delineated on the 20% phase. The MidP-CT scan was reconstructed based on deformable image registration between the 20% phase and the other 9 phases; thereby, the CTV and OARs delineations were propagated and an ITV was constructed. Both MidP and ITV strategies were used for treatment planning, yielding the planned dose. Next, these plans were applied to the 10-phase 4D-CT to calculate the dose distribution for each phase of the 4D-CT. On the basis of the deformable image registration, these calculated dose distributions were warped and averaged to yield the accumulated 4D dose. Subsequently, we compared, in terms of CTV coverage and dose to OARs, the planned dose with the accumulated 4D dose and the MidP strategy with the ITV strategy. RESULTS: The differences between the planned dose and the accumulated 4D dose were limited and clinically irrelevant. In 14 patients, both MidP and ITV strategies showed V95% > 98% for the CTV. Compared with the ITV strategy, the MidP strategy showed a significant reduction of approximately 10% in the dose-volume histogram parameters for the lungs, heart, and liver (P < .001, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the ITV strategy, the MidP strategy in treatment planning can lead to a reduction of approximately 10% in the dose to OARs, with an adequate CTV coverage for esophageal cancer RT.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Esofágicas/radioterapia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/radioterapia , Radiometria/métodos , Radioterapia/métodos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Tomografia Computadorizada Quadridimensional/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Movimento (Física) , Órgãos em Risco , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador/métodos , Radioterapia Adjuvante/métodos , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada/métodos , Respiração , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
PURPOSE: To determine the safety of pulsed-dose-rate (PDR) brachytherapy by analyzing errors and technical failures during treatment. METHODS AND MATERIALS: More than 1,300 patients underwent treatment with PDR brachytherapy, using five PDR remote afterloaders. Most patients were treated with consecutive pulse schemes, also outside regular office hours. Tumors were located in the breast, esophagus, prostate, bladder, gynecology, anus/rectum, orbit, head/neck, with a miscellaneous group of small numbers, such as the lip, nose, and bile duct. Errors and technical failures were analyzed for 1,300 treatment sessions, for which nearly 20,000 pulses were delivered. For each tumor localization, the number and type of occurring errors were determined, as were which localizations were more error prone than others. RESULTS: By routinely using the built-in dummy check source, only 0.2% of all pulses showed an error during the phase of the pulse when the active source was outside the afterloader. Localizations treated using flexible catheters had greater error frequencies than those treated with straight needles or rigid applicators. Disturbed pulse frequencies were in the range of 0.6% for the anus/rectum on a classic version 1 afterloader to 14.9% for orbital tumors using a version 2 afterloader. Exceeding the planned overall treatment time by >10% was observed in only 1% of all treatments. Patients received their dose as originally planned in 98% of all treatments. CONCLUSIONS: According to the experience in our institute with 1,300 PDR treatments, we found that PDR is a safe brachytherapy treatment modality, both during and outside of office hours.
Assuntos
Braquiterapia/métodos , Neoplasias/radioterapia , Braquiterapia/instrumentação , Fracionamento da Dose de Radiação , Análise de Falha de Equipamento/métodos , Segurança de Equipamentos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Prática PsicológicaRESUMO
PURPOSE: To investigate the dosimetric effect of prostate rotations and limited on-line corrections by couch rotations (Assuntos
Neoplasias da Próstata/radioterapia
, Radiometria/métodos
, Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador/métodos
, Simulação por Computador
, Fracionamento da Dose de Radiação
, Humanos
, Masculino
, Dosagem Radioterapêutica
, Rotação
, Glândulas Seminais/efeitos da radiação
, Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X
RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The two main modalities to deliver high dose to the prostate and prevent high doses to neighboring organs are intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) or external beam radiotherapy combined with brachytherapy. Because of the different biological effectiveness the physical dose distributions were converted to 3-dimensional linear quadratic dose at 2 Gy per fraction (EQD(2)). From the latter, cumulative EQD(2)-volume histograms were determined for comparison of the modalities. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An IMRT plan was made on the contoured planning target volume (PTV1) and organs at risk (OAR) of 20 patients (IMRT-only). A dose of 70 Gy was prescribed on the PTV1 with a concomitant boost to a total of 76 Gy on a subvolume (PTV2). Also a 46 Gy IMRT plan was made combined with either a pulsed dose-rate (PDR) or a high dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy boost. The EQD(2) on the PTV1 of the combined IMRT-PDR and IMRT-HDR plans were made equivalent to the EQD(2) of the 70 Gy IMRT-only plan. The alpha/beta-ratio for prostate was set to 1.5 Gy and 10 Gy. For normal tissues an alpha/beta-ratio of 3.0 Gy was taken. Several EQD(2)-volume histogram parameters were calculated for comparison and analyzed by two-way ANOVA. RESULTS: The mean EQD(2) to 95% of the prostate volume was slightly higher for the IMRT-only plan than for the brachytherapy modalities (P<0.001), in contrast to the mean EQD(2) to 50% of the prostate volume in which the opposite was the case (P<0.001). Rectum and bladder doses for IMRT-only are significantly higher (P<0.001). The urethra dose for IMRT-HDR was much higher than the other modalities only when the alpha/beta-ratio for prostate was 10 Gy. CONCLUSION: Because of the high doses within an implant, the dose in 50% of the prostate volume is much higher with the brachytherapy modalities than IMRT-only which may have clinical consequences. With brachytherapy the doses to the OAR are lower or similar to IMRT-only. Dose escalation for prostate tumors is more easily achieved with brachytherapy than with IMRT alone. Therefore, brachytherapy might be the preferred modality to achieve further dose escalation.
Assuntos
Braquiterapia , Neoplasias da Próstata/radioterapia , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada , Análise de Variância , Fracionamento da Dose de Radiação , Humanos , Masculino , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Eficiência Biológica Relativa , Resultado do Tratamento , Ultrassonografia de IntervençãoRESUMO
PURPOSE: Structure-based deformable image registration (DIR) can be used to calculate accumulated dose volume histogram parameters for cervical cancer brachytherapy (BT). The purpose of this study is to investigate dose warping uncertainties for the accumulated dose to the 2 cm3 receiving the highest dose [Formula: see text] in the rectal wall, using a physically realistic model (PRM) describing rectal wall deformation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: For 10 patients, treated with MRI-guided pulsed dose rate BT (two times 24 × 0.75 Gy, given in two applications BT1 and BT2), the planning images were registered with structure-based DIR. The resulting transformation vectors were used to accumulate the total rectum dose from BT. To investigate the dose warping uncertainty, a PRM describing rectal deformation was used. For point pairs on rectumBT1 and rectumBT2 that were at the same location according to the PRM, the dose for BT1 and BT2 was added (DPRM) and compared to the DIR-accumulated dose (DDIR) in the BT2 point. The remaining distance after DIR between corresponding point pairs, defined as the residual distance, was calculated. RESULTS: For points within the [Formula: see text] volume, more than 75% was part of the [Formula: see text] volume according to both PRM and DIR. The absolute dose difference was <7.3 GyEQD2, and the median (95th percentile) of the residual distance was 8.7 (22) mm. CONCLUSIONS: DIR corresponded with the PRM for on average 75% of the [Formula: see text] volume. Local absolute dose differences and residual distances were large. Care should therefore be taken with DIR for dose-warping purposes in BT.
Assuntos
Braquiterapia/métodos , Processamento de Imagem Assistida por Computador/métodos , Radioterapia Guiada por Imagem , Reto/efeitos da radiação , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/radioterapia , Feminino , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Reto/diagnóstico por imagem , Incerteza , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico por imagemRESUMO
Use of four-dimensional cone-beam CT (4D-CBCT) and fiducial markers for image guidance during radiation therapy (RT) of mobile tumors is challenging due to the trade-off among image quality, imaging dose, and scanning time. This study aimed to investigate different 4D-CBCT acquisition settings for good visibility of fiducial markers in 4D-CBCT. Using these 4D-CBCTs, the feasibility of marker-based 4D registration for RT setup verification and manual respiration-induced motion quantification was investigated. For this, we applied a dynamic phantom with three different breathing motion amplitudes and included two patients with implanted markers. Irrespective of the motion amplitude, for a medium field of view (FOV), marker visibility was improved by reducing the imaging dose per projection and increasing the number of projection images; however, the scanning time was 4 to 8 min. For a small FOV, the total imaging dose and the scanning time were reduced (62.5% of the dose using a medium FOV, 2.5 min) without losing marker visibility. However, the body contour could be missing for a small FOV, which is not preferred in RT. The marker-based 4D setup verification was feasible for both the phantom and patient data. Moreover, manual marker motion quantification can achieve a high accuracy with a mean error of [Formula: see text].
RESUMO
PURPOSE: To investigate the interfractional variability of respiration-induced esophageal tumor motion using fiducial markers and four-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography (4D-CBCT) and assess if a 4D-CT is sufficient for predicting the motion during the treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-four patients with 63 markers visible in the retrospectively reconstructed 4D-CBCTs were included. For each marker, we calculated the amplitude and trajectory of the respiration-induced motion. Possible time trends of the amplitude over the treatment course and the interfractional variability of amplitudes and trajectory shapes were assessed. Further, the amplitudes measured in the 4D-CT were compared to those in the 4D-CBCTs. RESULTS: The amplitude was largest in the cranial-caudal direction of the distal esophagus (mean: 7.1mm) and proximal stomach (mean: 7.8mm). No time trend was observed in the amplitude over the treatment course. The interfractional variability of amplitudes and trajectory shapes was limited (mean: ≤1.4mm). Moreover, small and insignificant deviation was found between the amplitudes quantified in the 4D-CT and in the 4D-CBCT (mean absolute difference: ≤1.0mm). CONCLUSIONS: The limited interfractional variability of amplitudes and trajectory shapes and small amplitude difference between 4D-CT-based and 4D-CBCT-based measurements imply that a single 4D-CT would be sufficient for predicting the respiration-induced esophageal tumor motion during the treatment course.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Esofágicas/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Esofágicas/radioterapia , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador/métodos , Idoso , Tomografia Computadorizada de Feixe Cônico/métodos , Feminino , Marcadores Fiduciais , Tomografia Computadorizada Quadridimensional/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Movimento , Mecânica Respiratória , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Structure-based deformable image registration (DIR) can be used to calculate accumulated brachytherapy (BT) and external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT) dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters in cervical cancer. Since direct parameter addition does not take dose non-uniformity into account, the added value of DIR over addition methods was investigated for bladder and rectum. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For twelve patients (EBRT: 46Gy, EBRT+BT: D90 85-90GyEQD2 in equivalent dose in 2Gy fractions) the EBRT planning CT and BT planning MRI were registered using DIR. Affected lymph nodes, located far from the BT boost region, received an EBRT boost (9.2Gy) not contributing to the BT boost dose. Cumulative bladder/rectum D2cm3/D1cm3 were calculated and compared to direct addition methods, assuming uniform EBRT doses (UD), or overlapping high dose volumes (OHD). RESULTS: Between the three methods, the maximum differences in the cumulative DVH parameters were 3.2GyEQD2 (bladder) and 3.3GyEQD2 (rectum). The difference between DIR and UD was <1.8GyEQD2 for both organs. CONCLUSIONS: The UD method provides a better estimate of D2cm3/D1cm3 than the OHD method. There is no added value of DIR since differences with direct addition methods are clinically insignificant. EBRT dose distributions can be considered uniform in bladder and rectum for the evaluated dose parameters.
Assuntos
Braquiterapia/métodos , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador/métodos , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/radioterapia , Feminino , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Reto/efeitos da radiação , Bexiga Urinária/efeitos da radiaçãoRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The TRENDY trial is an international multi-center phase-II study, randomizing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients between transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) with a target dose of 48-54â¯Gy in six fractions. The radiotherapy quality assurance (QA) program, including prospective plan feedback based on automated treatment planning, is described and results are reported. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Scans of a single patient were used as a benchmark case. Contours submitted by nine participating centers were compared with reference contours. The subsequent planning round was based on a single set of contours. A total of 20 plans from participating centers, including 12 from the benchmark case, 5 from a clinical pilot and 3 from the first study patients, were compared to automatically generated VMAT plans. RESULTS: For the submitted liver contours, Dice Similarity Coefficients (DSC) with the reference delineation ranged from 0.925 to 0.954. For the GTV, the DSC varied between 0.721 and 0.876. For the 12 plans on the benchmark case, healthy liver normal-tissue complication probabilities (NTCPs) ranged from 0.2% to 22.2% with little correlation between NCTP and PTV-D95% (R2â¯<â¯0.3). Four protocol deviations were detected in the set of 20 treatment plans. Comparison with co-planar autoVMAT QA plans revealed these were due to too high target dose and suboptimal planning. Overall, autoVMAT resulted in an average liver NTCP reduction of 2.2 percent point (range: 16.2 percent point to -1.8 percent point, pâ¯=â¯0.03), and lower doses to the healthy liver (pâ¯<â¯0.01) and gastrointestinal organs at risk (pâ¯<â¯0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Delineation variation resulted in feedback to participating centers. Automated treatment planning can play an important role in clinical trials for prospective plan QA as suboptimal plans were detected.
Assuntos
Benchmarking , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/radioterapia , Quimioembolização Terapêutica , Neoplasias Hepáticas/radioterapia , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde , Radiocirurgia , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador/métodos , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Dosagem RadioterapêuticaRESUMO
PURPOSE: An adaptive plan selection strategy can account for daily target volume variations for radiotherapy in rectal cancer patients. The aim was to quantify the daily dosimetric consequences of plan selection compared to a non-adaptive approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten patients with rectal cancer, treated with 25Gy in five fractions to the mesorectum and pelvic lymph nodes, were selected. The adaptive strategy was simulated by creating three plans per patient, with varying upper ventral PTV margins, and selecting the smallest PTV covering the entire mesorectum on every daily CBCT scan. Subsequently, mesorectum, bladder, and bowel cavity were delineated on these scans. Daily dose-volume histograms were calculated for both the adaptive and non-adaptive plan, with a ventral PTV margin of 20mm. Coverage of the mesorectum, defined as V95%>99%, was calculated, as well as bladder and bowel cavity V95% and V15Gy. RESULTS: In one patient, mesorectum coverage improved. A reduction in bladder V95% and bowel cavity V15Gy was found, of 6.9% and 18.4cm(3) (p<0.01), respectively. CONCLUSION: Plan selection for radiotherapy in rectal cancer can improve coverage of the target volume. Overall dosimetric sparing of bladder and bowel cavity was limited but could be beneficial for individual patients.