Reproducibility of APT-weighted CEST-MRI at 3T in healthy brain and tumor across sessions and scanners.

Amide proton transfer (APT)-weighted chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) imaging is a recent MRI technique making its way into clinical application. In this work, we investigated whether APT-weighted CEST imaging can provide reproducible measurements across scan sessions and scanners. Within-session, between-session and between scanner reproducibility was calculated for 19 healthy volunteers and 7 patients with a brain tumor on two 3T MRI scanners. The APT-weighted CEST effect was evaluated by calculating the Lorentzian Difference (LD), magnetization transfer ratio asymmetry (MTRasym), and relaxation-compensated inverse magnetization transfer ratio (MTRREX) averaged in whole brain white matter (WM), enhancing tumor and necrosis. Within subject coefficient of variation (COV) calculations, Bland-Altman plots and mixed effect modeling were performed to assess the repeatability and reproducibility of averaged values. The group median COVs of LD APT were 0.56% (N = 19), 0.84% (N = 6), 0.80% (N = 9) in WM within-session, between-session and between-scanner respectively. The between-session COV of LD APT in enhancing tumor (N = 6) and necrotic core (N = 3) were 4.57% and 5.67%, respectively. There were no significant differences in within session, between session and between scanner comparisons of the APT effect. The COVs of LD and MTRREX were consistently lower than MTRasym in all experiments, both in healthy tissues and tumor. The repeatability and reproducibility of APT-weighted CEST was clinically acceptable across scan sessions and scanners. Although MTRasym is simple to acquire and compute and sufficient to provide robust measurement, it is beneficial to include LD and MTRREX to obtain higher reproducibility for detecting minor signal difference in different tissue types.

PET Imaging and Protein Expression of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen in Glioblastoma: A Multicenter Inventory Study.

Upregulation of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) in neovasculature has been described in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), whereas vasculature in nonaffected brain shows hardly any expression of PSMA. It is unclear whether PSMA-targeting tracer uptake on PET is based on PSMA-specific binding to neovasculature or aspecific uptake in tumor. Here, we quantified uptake of various PSMA-targeting tracers in GBM and correlated this with PSMA expression in tumor biopsy samples from the same patients. Methods: Fourteen patients diagnosed with de novo (n = 8) or recurrent (n = 6) GBM underwent a preoperative PET scan after injection of 1.5 MBq/kg [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 (n = 7), 200 MBq of [18F]DCFpyl (n = 3), or 200 MBq of [18F]PSMA-1007 (n = 4). Uptake in tumor and tumor-to-background ratios, with contralateral nonaffected brain as background, were determined. In a subset of patients, PSMA expression levels from different regions in the tumor tissue samples (n = 40), determined using immunohistochemistry (n = 35) or RNA sequencing (n = 13), were correlated with tracer uptake on PET. Results: Moderate to high (SUVmax, 1.3-20.0) heterogeneous uptake was found in all tumors irrespective of the tracer type used. Uptake in nonaffected brain was low, resulting in high tumor-to-background ratios (6.1-359.0) calculated by dividing SUVmax of tumor by SUVmax of background. Immunohistochemistry showed variable PSMA expression on endothelial cells of tumor microvasculature, as well as on dispersed individual cells (of unknown origin), and granular staining of the neuropil. No correlation was found between in vivo uptake and PSMA expression levels (for immunohistochemistry, r = -0.173, P = 0.320; for RNA, r = -0.033, P = 0.915). Conclusion: Our results indicate the potential use of various PSMA-targeting tracers in GBM. However, we found no correlation between PSMA expression levels on immunohistochemistry and uptake intensity on PET. Whether this may be explained by methodologic reasons, such as the inability to measure functionally active PSMA with immunohistochemistry, tracer pharmacokinetics, or the contribution of a disturbed blood-brain barrier to tracer retention, should still be investigated.