Invasive aspergillosis in liver transplant recipients in the current era.

Invasive aspergillosis (IA) is a rare but fatal disease among liver transplant recipients (LiTRs). We performed a multicenter 1:2 case-control study comparing LiTRs diagnosed with proven/probable IA and controls with no invasive fungal infection. We included 62 IA cases and 124 matched controls. Disseminated infection occurred only in 8 cases (13%). Twelve-week all-cause mortality of IA was 37%. In multivariate analyses, systemic antibiotic usage (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 4.74; P = .03) and history of pneumonia (aOR, 48.7; P = .01) were identified as independent risk factors associated with the occurrence of IA. Moreover, reoperation (aOR, 5.99; P = .01), systemic antibiotic usage (aOR, 5.03; P = .04), and antimold prophylaxis (aOR, 11.9; P = .02) were identified as independent risk factors associated with the occurrence of early IA. Among IA cases, Aspergillus colonization (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 86.9; P < .001), intensive care unit stay (aHR, 3.67; P = .02), disseminated IA (aHR, 8.98; P < .001), and dialysis (aHR, 2.93; P = .001) were identified as independent risk factors associated with 12-week all-cause mortality, while recent receipt of tacrolimus (aHR, 0.11; P = .001) was protective. Mortality among LiTRs with IA remains high in the current era. The identified risk factors and protective factors may be useful for establishing robust targeted antimold prophylactic and appropriate treatment strategies against IA.

Fungal infection frequency in newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukaemia patients treated with venetoclax plus azacitidine with or without antifungal prophylaxis.

Our observational study analysed fungal infection frequency within cohorts with versus without antifungal prophylaxis (AFP) among newly diagnosed first-line venetoclax and azacitidine (VEN + AZA)-treated acute myeloid leukaemias in Czech, Austrian and Slovak haematology centres. Among 186 patients, 85 (46%) received antifungal prophylaxis, while 101 (54%) received no prophylaxis. Fungal infections occurred in 1/85 patients with prophylaxis (1%) and 5/101 patients without prophylaxis (5%) (p = 0.222). No significant difference was recorded between cohorts with and without AFP in terms of death rate (p = 0.296) and overall survival (p = 0.844). In conclusion, most infections were not severe, developing during the first treatment-cycle and did not affect patients' overall outcome.

Use of nebulized liposomal amphotericin B and posaconazole as antifungal prophylaxis in patients with severe SARS-CoV2 infection in intensive care unit.

PURPOSE: COVID-19 associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA) is common and linked with high fatality rates. To assess the impact on the incidence and outcome of CAPA of an antifungal prophylaxis (AFP) we compared two cohorts of COVID-19 patients admitted to intensive care units (ICU) in Brescia, Italy, from January to August 2021. METHODS: The study cohort included all mechanically ventilated patients observed between April 2021 and August 2021 with SARS-CoV-2-pneumonia, who received AFP with oral posaconazole (200 mg every 6 h) and nebulized liposomal amphotericin B (50 mg every 2 weeks) from ICU admission to 7 days after discharge or, if applicable, until tracheostomy removal. The control cohort included COVID-19 patients admitted to the same ICU between January and March 2021 who did not receive any AFP. Subjects with CAPA at ICU admission were excluded. RESULTS: We included 270 patients, of whom 64 (23.7%) received AFP. In patients in the study group, CAPA-related mortality was significantly reduced (29% vs. 48% p = 0.04), as well as the incidence of CAPA (3.1% vs 12.1%, p = 0.03). Patients who developed CAPA were older (mean of 70-y-old vs 63-y-old, p < 0.001). One subject discontinued posaconazole due to an adverse reaction. Among the 46 patients who received it, only one patient reached an effective plasma concentration of posaconazole. CONCLUSION: AFP was associated with reduced incidence and mortality from CAPA and was well tolerated in patients with severe COVID-19. Posaconazole concentrations below the efficacy threshold in almost all patients may be attributable to drug interactions and prompt further studies to define its clinical significance.

Effect of coccidioidomycosis prophylaxis in selecting non-Candida albicans species amongst solid organ transplant recipients in Arizona.

BACKGROUND: Invasive candidiasis carries an increased risk of morbidity and mortality. The rates of non-albicans Candida species (NAC) infections are on the rise secondary to frequent azole antifungal use. NAC incidence and risk amongst solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients in Arizona receiving prolonged azole course for coccidioidomycosis prophylaxis have not been well elucidated. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated SOT recipients hospitalised between 2017 and 2021 with a positive Candida spp. culture. RESULTS: There were 66 SOT recipients with 74 hospitalisations and 79 Candida spp. isolates. The median age was 59 (IQR 45-66), 68% were male, 58% were non-Hispanic White, and the most common SOT 38/74 (51%) was a liver transplant. Median time from transplant to the identification of any NAC (infection or colonisation) was significantly shorter, 8 months (IQR 3-78) vs 128 months (IQR 10-282) for Candida albicans isolates, p = .03. Prior use of azoles was significantly higher in NAC-associated post-transplant colonisation and invasive disease hospitalisations (83%) than in those with C. albicans (17%), p < .001. There were 59 hospitalisations with invasive disease, with the majority having NAC isolates of 49 (83%). CONCLUSION: The universal azole prophylaxis has reduced the incidence of coccidioidomycosis complications amongst SOT recipients in Arizona; however, there is an increased risk of developing NAC colonisation and infections, which can complicate the care of the SOT recipients with invasive candidiasis. Future studies are needed to investigate methods of reducing the risk of NAC infections whilst preventing coccidioidomycosis amongst SOT recipients.

Invasive Aspergillosis among Haematological Malignancy Patients in Ghana: A Pilot Study on Prevalence and Antifungal Prophylaxis at the National Referral Hospital.

BACKGROUND: Invasive aspergillosis (IA) among haematological malignancy patients is rarely diagnosed or studied in many African countries. Aspergillus galactomannan (GM) enzyme immunoassay (EIA) utilized in aiding diagnosis is not readily accessible in Ghana. Previous studies have evaluated the IMMY sona Aspergillus GM lateral flow assay (LFA) and suggested it as a potential alternative to the GM EIA. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to use the LFA in international (EORTC/ MSGERC) definitions to obtain preliminary data on IA among patients with haematological malignancies in Ghana with a focus on the prevalence and antifungal prophylaxis. METHODS: We conducted a pilot study among patients with haematological malignancies at the Korle-Bu Teaching Hospital, Ghana using the LFA, culture and computed tomography scan to screen for and classify IA cases according to international definitions. RESULTS: A total of 56 adult patients were recruited including acute leukaemia 14 (25.0%), chronic leukaemia 38 (67.9%), and lymphoma 4 (7.1%). Nine (16.1%) patients had a history of severe neutropenic episodes. All patients were on at least one chemotherapy drug. Three (5.4%) patients met the criteria for IA, comprising two probable IA in acute myeloid leukaemia and one possible IA in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and constitutes one of five (20%) patients with ongoing severe neutropenia. The LFA was diagnostic in two IA patients. The IA cases were among 49 (87.5%) patients who did not receive antifungal prophylaxis. CONCLUSION: Proactive diagnostic approaches to IA and effective antifungal prophylaxis may be significant in the management of haematological malignancy patients with severe neutropenia in Ghana.

CONTEXTE: L'aspergillose invasive (AI) parmi les hémopathies malignes est rarement diagnostiquée ou étudiée dans de nombreux pays africains et le dosage immunoenzymatique (EIA) d'Aspergillus galactomannane (GM) utilisé pour faciliter le diagnostic n'est pas facilement accessible. Le test à flux latéral (TFL) IMMY sona® Aspergillus GM récemment introduit est évalué et suggéré comme alternative au GM EIA. OBJECTIFS: Nous avons cherché à utiliser les définitions TFA et les définitions internationales (EORTC/MSGERC) pour obtenir des données préliminaires sur l'AI dans les hémopathies malignes au Ghana en mettant l'accent sur la prévalence et la prophylaxie antifongique. MÉTHODES: Nous avons mené une étude pilote auprès de patients atteints d'hémopathie maligne à l'hôpital universitaire de Korle-Bu, au Ghana, en utilisant le TFL, la culture et la tomodensitométrie pour dépister et classer les cas d'AI selon les définitions internationales. RESULTATS: Au total, 56 patients adultes ont été recrutés, dont une leucémie aiguë (25 %), une leucémie chronique (67,9 %) et un lymphome (7,1 %), neuf (16,1 %) ayant des antécédents d'épisodes neutropéniques. La plupart des patients (70 %) avaient une maladie évolutive. Trois patients répondaient aux critères d'AI, comprenant deux AI probables et une AI possible, uniquement chez des patients atteints de leucémie aiguë et un sur cinq (20 %) avec une neutropénie en cours. Le TFL était utilisé comme méthode de diagnostique chez deux patients d'AI. Les cas d'AI concernaient tous les 49 (87,5 %) des patients n'ayant pas reçu de prophylaxie antifongique. CONCLUSION: L'AI a probablement une incidence de 5,4 % dans les leucémies, mais de 20 % chez les patients neutropéniques et chez aucun patient recevant une prophylaxie antifongique. Des approches diagnostiques proactives de l'AI et une prophylaxie antifongique efficace peuvent être importantes dans la prise en charge des hémopathies malignes au Ghana. Mots clés: Aspergillose invasive, Hémopathie maligne, Ghana, Aspergillus galactomannan, Neutropénie, Prophylaxie antifongique.

Late Onset of Chronic Granulomatous Disease Revealed by Paecilomyces lilacinus Cutaneous Infection.

Chronic granulomatous disease (CGD) is an inherited immunodeficiency due to defective leukocyte NADPH responsible for recurrent infections and aberrant inflammation. Mutations in the CYBB gene are responsible for the X-linked CGD and account for approximately 70% of the cases. CGD is diagnosed during childhood in males. Female carriers may have biased X-inactivation and may present with clinical manifestations depending on the level of residual NADPH oxidase activity. We report the case of a previously asymptomatic female carrier who was diagnosed at age 67 with a skin infection with the rare fungus Paecilomyces lilacinus as the first manifestation of CGD. Dihydrorhodamine 123 (DHR) activity was below 10%. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) revealed mutations in DNMT3A, ASXL1, and STAG2 suggesting that clonal hematopoiesis could be responsible for a progressive loss of NADPH oxidase activity and the late onset of X-linked CGD in this patient. Long-term follow-up of asymptomatic carrier women seems to be essential after 50 years old.

Nystatin is commonly prescribed as prophylaxis in children beyond the neonatal age.

The indications for nystatin as prophylaxis or treatment are limited. In the PASOAP (Pediatric Antifungal Stewardship Optimizing Antifungal Prescription) study, high use of nystatin in hospitalized children beyond the neonatal age was observed. In this report, we present the data on nystatin use in infants and children ≥ 3 months who participated in the PASOAP study. Nystatin was prescribed mainly for prophylaxis. Congenital heart disease, cystic fibrosis, and chronic renal disease were the most commonly reported conditions in children receiving prophylactic nystatin. There is sparse evidence supporting the use of nystatin prophylaxis beyond neonates; trials in specific pediatric patient groups are required.

The topical antifungal nystatin has not many indications. Prophylaxis of invasive candidiasis in very low birth weight neonates is one of them. In our study, we found that nystatin prophylaxis was used frequently beyond this specific neonatal group. Stronger evidence justifying its use is required.

Posaconazole oral suspension for secondary antifungal prophylaxis in allogeneic stem cell transplantation recipients: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on the optimal secondary antifungal prophylaxis (SAP) regimen in patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of posaconazole oral suspension as secondary prophylaxis of invasive fungal disease (IFD) for allo-HSCT patients. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed clinical data from prior IFD patients who received posaconazole oral suspension as systemic antifungal prophylaxis between June 2016 and January 2021 and have a follow-up period of 1 year after HSCT. The clinical outcomes of patients with a prior history of IFD (n = 30) and those without (n = 93) were compared. RESULTS: The 1-year cumulative incidence of prophylaxis failure was 58.3% in the group with prior history of IFD and 41.6% in the group without a prior history of IFD (p = 0.459). The cumulative incidence of proven, probable or possible IFD within 1 year after allo-HSCT was 23.1% in the group with prior history of IFD and 14.1% in the group without prior history of IFD (p = 0.230). There was no significant difference between the cumulative incidence of proven or probable IFD within 1-year after allo-HSCT in the group with a prior history of IFD and the group without (p = 0.807). Multivariate logistic regression revealed cytomegalovirus disease as risk factor for post-transplantation IFD occurrence in posaconazole oral suspension prophylaxis. There was not a significant difference in overall survival between the patients with IFD history and those without (P = 0.559). CONCLUSIONS: Our study support that allo-HSCT recipients with a prior history of IFD and normal GI absorption can choose posaconazole oral suspension as a safe and effective SAP option.

Neutropenia and Infection Prophylaxis in Childhood Cancer.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Pediatric oncology patients frequently experience episodes of prolonged neutropenia which puts them at high risk for infection with significant morbidity and mortality. Here, we review the data on infection prophylaxis with a focus on both pharmacologic and ancillary interventions. This review does not include patients receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. RECENT FINDINGS: Patients with hematologic malignancies are at highest risk for infection. Bacterial and fungal prophylaxis decrease the risk of infection in certain high-risk groups. Ancillary measures such as ethanol locks, chlorhexidine gluconate baths, GCSF, IVIG, and mandatory hospitalization do not have enough data to support routine use. There is limited data on risk of infection and role of prophylaxis in patients receiving immunotherapy and patients with solid tumors. Patients with Down syndrome and adolescent and young adult patients may benefit from additional supportive care measures and protocol modifications. Consider utilizing bacterial and fungal prophylaxis in patients with acute myeloid leukemia or relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia. More research is needed to evaluate other supportive care measures and the role of prophylaxis in patients receiving immunotherapy.

Optimizing antifungal prophylaxis in allogeneic stem cell transplantation: A cohort study of two different approaches.

BACKGROUND: Limited consensus exists on the optimal use of antifungal agents to prevent invasive fungal infection in the early post allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (alloHCT) period, particularly when patients cannot tolerate oral medication administration. METHODS: We undertook a retrospective observational cohort study to assess the tolerability, efficacy, and cost of a new antifungal prophylaxis pathway at a major tertiary alloHCT centre. Patients aged ≥16 years who underwent alloHCT between February 2018 and October 2019 (cohort 1) or between April 2020 and November 2021 (cohort 2) were included. In both cohorts, first line prophylactic therapy was oral posaconazole. The second line drugs where oral therapy was unable to be administered were intravenous voriconazole (cohort 1) versus intravenous posaconazole (cohort 2). RESULTS: There were 142 patients enrolled in the study, 71 in each cohort. The proportion of patients remaining on first-line prophylaxis or progressing to second-, third-, and fourth-line options was 22.5%, 39.4%, 29.6%, and 8.5% in cohort 1 and 39.4%, 59.2%, 1.4%, and 0% in cohort 2, respectively. The frequency of neuropsychiatric adverse events was significantly higher in cohort 1 compared to cohort 2 (49.3% vs. 19.8%, p = .0004). Occurrence of proven and probable fungal infections was not significantly different between cohorts. Antifungal drug expenditure was $359 935 (AUD) more in cohort 1 ($830 486 AUD) compared to cohort 2 ($477 149 AUD). CONCLUSION: The antifungal prophylaxis pathway used in cohort 2 resulted in reduced antifungal-associated adverse effects, less patients requiring progression to 3rd and 4th line prophylaxis and reduced antifungal drug costs.

Antifungal stewardship in solid organ transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Antifungal stewardship (AFS) has emerged as an important component of quality in managing invasive fungal infections (IFIs), and cost-benefit calculations suggest regular training in AFS is well worth the effort. METHODS: This review will discuss the most common IFIs in solid organ transplantation (SOT)-recipients, how to diagnose them, and current recommendations for antifungal treatment and prophylaxis before demonstrating key takeaway points of AFS in this high-risk population. RESULTS: Effective AFS starts before a patient is admitted for SOT, through education and regular interactions of the interdisciplinary clinical team involved in patient management, considering local factors such as epidemiological data and knowledge of diagnostic options including local turnaround times. Understanding the spectrum of antifungal agents, their efficacy and safety profiles, and pharmacokinetics, as well as duration of therapy is hereby essential. The most frequent IFIs in SOT recipients are caused by Candida species, followed by Aspergillus species, both with increasing resistance rates. Diagnosis of IFI can be challenging due to unspecific clinical presentation and difficult interpretation of microbiological findings and biomarkers. Prophylactic strategies, such as those for invasive aspergillosis in lung transplantation or invasive candidiasis (IC) in certain liver transplant settings, as well as the selection of the appropriate therapeutic agents require detailed knowledge on the pharmacokinetics and drug-drug interactions of antifungals. CONCLUSIONS: Here in this review, we address what constitutes good AFS in this heterogeneous field of solid organ transplant recipients.

Fluconazole versus micafungin for initial antifungal prophylaxis against Candida in pancreas transplant recipients: A comparative study of two consecutive periods.

BACKGROUND: Invasive fungal infection, particularly intraabdominal candidiasis, exerts a negative impact on the outcome of pancreas transplant recipients (PTRs). Optimal antifungal prophylaxis in this context remains unclear. METHODS: We performed a single-centre retrospective study to compare the incidence of invasive candidiasis during the first 6 post-transplant months in a cohort of 218 PTRs over two periods in which different agents for antifungal prophylaxis were used: fluconazole (Fluco-Px) from March 1995 to June 2012, and micafungin followed by fluconazole (Mica-Px) from July 2012 to December 2018. RESULTS: A total of 152 and 66 PTRs received Fluco-Px and Mica-Px. Mean age was 39.7 ± 7.8 years, 56.4% (123/218) were males, and 85.3% (186/218) underwent simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation. Invasive candidiasis occurred in 21.7% (33/152) of PTRs under Fluco-Px compared to 24.2% (16/66) of those under Mica-Px (p-value = .681). Median time from transplantation to infection was 8 days (interquartile range [IQR]: 6-16) under Fluco-Px versus 6.5 (IQR: 3.3-15.8) under Mica-Px (p-value = .623). Non-albicans Candida species comprised 27.5% (11/40) and 25.0% (4/16) of episodes under Fluco-Px and Mica-Px respectively (p-value = .849). Surgical site infection was the most common form in both groups (82.5% [33/40] and 87.5% [14/16]; p-value = .954). Multivariable analysis identified cold ischaemia time of the pancreas and kidney grafts, surgical reintervention and insulin requirement after transplantation as risks factor for invasive candidiasis. CONCLUSION: This retrospective study did not reveal a significant benefit from the initial use of micafungin-based antifungal prophylaxis over fluconazole among PTRs in terms of invasive candidiasis.

Invasive aspergillosis in relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukaemia patients: Results from SEIFEM 2016-B survey.

BACKGROUND: In patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukaemia (R/R AML) who received salvage chemotherapy, limited and not updated studies explored the incidence of invasive aspergillosis (IA) and the role of antifungal prophylaxis (AP). The aims of this multicentre retrospective 'SEIFEM 2016-B' study were as follows: (1) to evaluate the current rate and the outcome of proven/probable IA and (2) to assess the efficacy of AP, in a large 'real life' series of patient with R/R AML submitted to salvage chemotherapy. RESULTS: Of 2250 R/R AML patients, a total of 74 cases of IA (5.1%) were recorded as follows: 10 (0.7%) proven and 64 (4.3%) probable. Information about AP were available in 73/74 (99%) patients. Fifty-eight (79%) breakthrough infections occurred, mainly during AP with posaconazole [25 (43%)]. The patients who received AP during salvage chemotherapy showed a benefit from antifungal therapy (AT) than patients who did not received AP [43 (86%) vs 7 (14%); p < .033]. In a multivariate analysis, AP and absence of severe mucositis had a significant favourable effect on overall response rate. CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrated that the incidence of IA during the salvage chemotherapy is similar to the past. Nevertheless, the attributable mortality rate (AMR) appears to be lower than that previously reported in R/R AML. Further prospective studies should be performed to confirm our preliminary observation and understand and the why a decreased AMR is reported in this setting of high-risk patients.

Isavuconazole as Primary Antifungal Prophylaxis in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia or Myelodysplastic Syndrome: An Open-label, Prospective, Phase 2 Study.

BACKGROUND: Mold-active primary antifungal prophylaxis (PAP) is routinely recommended in neutropenic patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) undergoing remission-induction chemotherapy (RIC). Isavuconazole (ISAV) is an extended spectrum mold-active triazole and has superior tolerability and fewer significant drug-drug interactions compared with other triazoles. METHODS: In our investigator-initiated, phase 2 trial, treatment-naive adult patients with AML or MDS starting RIC received ISAV per the dosing recommendations in the US label until neutrophil recovery (absolute neutrophil count [ANC] ≥ 0.5 × 109/L) and attainment of complete remission, occurrence of invasive fungal infection (IFI), or for a maximum of 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was the incidence of proven/probable IFI during ISAV PAP and up to 30 days after the last dose. RESULTS: Sixty-five of 75 enrolled patients received ISAV PAP (median age, 67 years, median ANC at enrollment, 0.72 × 109/L). Thirty-two patients (49%) received oral targeted leukemia treatments (venetoclax, FTL3 inhibitors). Including the 30-day follow-up period, probable/proven and possible IFIs were encountered in 4 (6%) and 8 patients (12%), respectively. ISAV trough serum concentrations were consistently > 1 µg/mL, showed low intraindividual variation, and were not significantly influenced by chemotherapy regimen. Tolerability of ISAV was excellent, with only 3 cases (5%) of mild to moderate elevations of liver function tests and no QTc prolongations. CONCLUSIONS: ISAV is a safe and effective alternative for PAP in patients with newly diagnosed AML/MDS undergoing RIC in the era of recently approved or emerging small-molecule antileukemia therapies. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT03019939.

Isavuconazole Is as Effective as and Better Tolerated Than Voriconazole for Antifungal Prophylaxis in Lung Transplant Recipients.

BACKGROUND: Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) are common following lung transplantation. Isavuconazole is unstudied as prophylaxis in organ transplant recipients. We compared effectiveness and tolerability of isavuconazole and voriconazole prophylaxis in lung transplant recipients. METHODS: A single-center, retrospective study of patients who received isavuconazole (September 2015-February 2018) or voriconazole (September 2013-September 2015) for antifungal prophylaxis. IFIs were defined by EORTC/MSG criteria. RESULTS: Patients received isavuconazole (n = 144) or voriconazole (n = 156) for median 3.4 and 3.1 months, respectively. Adjunctive inhaled amphotericin B (iAmB) was administered to 100% and 41% of patients in the respective groups. At 1 year, 8% of patients receiving isavuconazole or voriconazole developed IFIs. For both groups, 70% and 30% of IFIs were caused by molds and yeasts, respectively, and breakthrough IFI (bIFI) rate was 3%. Outcomes did not significantly differ for patients receiving or not receiving iAmB. Independent risk factors for bIFI and breakthrough invasive mold infection (bIMI) were mold-positive respiratory culture and red blood cell transfusion >7 units at transplant. Bronchial necrosis >2 cm from anastomosis and basiliximab induction were also independent risk factors for bIMI. Isavuconazole and voriconazole were discontinued prematurely due to adverse events in 11% and 36% of patients, respectively (P = .0001). Most common causes of voriconazole and isavuconazole discontinuation were hepatotoxicity and lack of oral intake, respectively. Patients receiving ≥90 days prophylaxis had fewer IFIs at 1 year (3% vs 9%, P = .02). IFIs were associated with increased mortality (P = .0001) and longer hospitalizations (P = .0005). CONCLUSIONS: Isavuconazole was effective and well tolerated as antifungal prophylaxis following lung transplantation.

Invasive Fungal Infections in Immunocompromised Children: Novel Insight Following a National Study.

OBJECTIVE: To obtain a national overview of the epidemiology and management of invasive fungal infections (IFIs) in France for severely immunocompromised children who were treated for acute leukemia or had undergone allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (a-HSCT). STUDY DESIGN: We performed a national multicenter retrospective study to collect epidemiologic data for proven and probable IFIs in children with acute leukemia under first- line or relapse treatment or who had undergone a-HSCT. We also conducted a prospective practice survey to provide a national overview of IFI management in pediatric hematology units. RESULTS: From January 2014 to December 2017, 144 cases of IFI were diagnosed (5.3%) in 2721 patients, including 61 cases of candidiasis, 60 cases of aspergillosis, and 23 cases of infection with "emergent" fungi, including 10 cases of mucormycosis and 6 cases of fusariosis. The IFI rate was higher in patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (12.9%) (OR, 3.24; 95% CI, 2.15-4.81; P < .0001) compared with the rest of the cohort. Patients undergoing a-HSCT had an IFI rate of only 4.3%. In these patients, the use of primary antifungal prophylaxis (principally fluconazole) was associated with a lower IFI rate (OR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.14-0.60; P = 4.90 ×10-4) compared with a-HSCT recipients who did not receive antifungal prophylaxis. The main cause of IFI in children receiving prophylaxis was emergent pathogens (41%), such as mucormycosis and fusariosis, which were resistant to the prophylactic agents. CONCLUSIONS: The emerging fungi and new antifungal resistance profiles uncovered in this study should be considered in IFI management in immunocompromised children.

Clinical considerations on posaconazole administration and therapeutic drug monitoring in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant recipients.

There is a paucity of data on posaconazole (PCZ) dosing and therapeutic-drug-monitoring (TDM) in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant recipients (allogeneic-HCTr). This was a 3-year retrospective multicenter study (January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2018) in adult allogeneic-HCTr who received PCZ (intravenously, IV and/or as delayed-release tablet, DRT) as prophylaxis or treatment for ≥7 consecutive days (D) with at least 1-PCZ-level available using data of the Swiss Transplant Cohort Study. The primary objective was to describe the distribution of PCZ-level and identify predictors of therapeutic PCZ-level and associations between PCZ-dosing and PCZ-level. A total of 288 patients were included: 194 (67.4%) and 94 (32.6%) received PCZ as prophylaxis and treatment, respectively, for a median of 90 days (interquartile range, IQR: 42-188.5). There were 1944 PCZ-level measurements performed, with a median PCZ level of 1.3 mg/L (IQR: 0.8-1.96). PCZ-level was <0.7 mg/L in 383/1944 (19.7%) and <1.0 mg/L in 656/1944 (33.7%) samples. PCZ-level was <0.7 mg/L in 260/1317 (19.7%) and <1.0 mg/L in 197/627 (31.4%) in patients who received PCZ-prophylaxis versus treatment, respectively. There were no significant differences in liver function tests between baseline and end-of-treatment. There were nine (3.1%) breakthrough invasive fungal infections (bIFI), with no difference in PCZ levels between patients with or without bIFI. Despite a very intensive PCZ-TDM, PCZ-levels remain below target levels in up to one-third of allogeneic-HCTr. Considering the low incidence of bIFI observed among patients with PCZ levels in the targeted range, our data challenge the clinical utility of routine universal PCZ-TDM.

An evidence-based, risk-adapted algorithm for antifungal prophylaxis reduces risk for invasive mold infections in children with hematologic malignancies.

BACKGROUND: Children with hematologic malignancies, especially those who receive intensive chemotherapy, are at high risk for invasive mold infections (IMI) that confer substantial mortality. Randomized controlled trials support the use of antifungal prophylaxis with antimold activity as an optimal strategy for risk reduction in this population, but studies outlining the practical application of evidence-based recommendations are lacking. PROCEDURE: We conducted a 15-year, single-institution retrospective review in a diverse cohort of children with hematologic malignancies treated with chemotherapy to determine the incidence of proven or probable IMI diagnosed between 2006 and 2020. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify host and disease factors associated with IMI risk. We then compared the incidence and type of IMI and related factors before and after 2016 implementation of an evidence-based, risk-adapted antifungal prophylaxis algorithm that broadened coverage to include molds in patients at highest risk for IMI. RESULTS: We identified 61 cases of proven or probable IMI in 1456 patients diagnosed with hematologic malignancies during the study period (4.2%). Implementation of an antifungal prophylaxis algorithm reduced the IMI incidence in this population from 4.8% to 2.9%. Both Hispanic ethnicity and cancer diagnosis prior to 2016 were associated with risk for IMI. CONCLUSION: An evidence-based, risk-adapted approach to antifungal prophylaxis for children with hematologic malignancies is an effective strategy to reduce incidence of IMI.

Evaluation of targeted versus universal prophylaxis for the prevention of invasive fungal infections following lung transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Antifungal prophylaxis to prevent invasive fungal infections (IFI) is widely used following lung transplantation, but the optimal strategy remains unclear. We compared universal with targeted antifungal prophylaxis for effectiveness in preventing IFI. METHODS: Adult patients who underwent lung transplantation at the University of Michigan from /1 July 2014-31 December 2017 were studied for 18 months post-transplant. Universal prophylaxis consisted of itraconazole with or without inhaled liposomal amphotericin B. Using specific criteria, targeted prophylaxis was given with voriconazole for patients at risk for invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) and with fluconazole or micafungin for patients at risk for invasive candidiasis. Risk factors, occurrence of proven/probable IFI, and mortality were analyzed for the two prophylaxis cohorts. RESULTS: Of 105 lung transplant recipients, 84 (80%) received a double lung transplant, and 38 (36%) of patients underwent transplant for pulmonary fibrosis. Fifty-nine (56%) patients received universal antifungal prophylaxis, and 46 (44%), targeted antifungal prophylaxis. Among 20 proven/probable IFI, there were 14 IPA, 4 invasive candidiasis, 1 cryptococcosis, and 1 deep sternal mold infection. Six (10%) IFI occurred in the universal prophylaxis cohort and 14 (30%) in the targeted prophylaxis cohort. Five of 6 (83%) IFI in the universal prophylaxis cohort, compared with 9/14 (64%) in the targeted prophylaxis cohort, were IPA Candida infections occurred only in the targeted prophylaxis cohort. The development of IFI was more likely in the targeted prophylaxis cohort than the universal prophylaxis cohort, HR = 4.32 (1.51-12.38), P = .0064. CONCLUSIONS: Universal antifungal prophylaxis appears to be more effective than targeted antifungal prophylaxis for prevention of IFI after lung transplant.

Epidemiology, risk factors, and association of antifungal prophylaxis on early invasive fungal infection in heart transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Invasive fungal infection (IFI) in heart transplant recipients is associated with poor outcomes. Estimated risk of 1-year IFI in heart transplant recipients is 3.4-8.6% with risk factors inconsistently identified in previous studies. The role of antifungal prophylaxis is unclear. The transplant program at Mayo Clinic provides 6 months of universal azole prophylaxis for those heart transplant recipients in Arizona. We sought to define risk factors for 1-year IFI and determine the effect of antifungal prophylaxis. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing heart transplantation at Mayo Clinic from January 2000 to March 2019. We analyzed demographics, details of transplant hospitalization, antifungal prophylaxis, and fungal infection. Multivariable Cox analyses were performed to identify risk factors of 1-year IFI and impact of IFI on posttransplant mortality. RESULTS: A total of 966 heart transplant recipients were identified with a median age of 56 years (IQR 47, 62). A total of 444 patients received antifungal prophylaxis. Over 1-year follow-up, 62 patients developed IFI with a cumulative incidence of 6.4%. In multivariable analysis, factors associated with IFI were renal replacement therapy (RRT) (HR 3.24, 95% CI 1.65-6.39), allograft rejection (HR 2.33, 95% CI 1.25-4.34), and antifungal prophylaxis (HR 0.32, 95% CI 0.11-0.96). RRT was also associated with invasive mold infection (HR 3.00, 95% CI 1.29-6.97). CONCLUSIONS: RRT and allograft rejection after transplantation are associated with 1-year IFI, and RRT is also associated with invasive mold infection. Antifungal prophylaxis appears to be protective and further study is needed in the heart transplant population.