A novel assisted reduction method in extra-articular fractures of the distal tibia treated with intramedullary nail.

Background: To explore the clinical efficacy and safety of Kirschner wires (KWs) as a blocking screw technique for extra-articular fractures of the distal tibia treated with intramedullary nails (IMNs). Methods: Fifty-three patients were treated with KW-assisted IMN for extra-articular fractures of the distal tibia via the blocking screw technique or Poller screw (PS) technique. The operation time, number of fluoroscopies, number of blocking screws used, blood loss and time to union were compared between the two groups. Additionally, the functional outcomes of the two groups were compared using range of motion (ROM), visual analog scale (VAS), American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS), and Lysholm scores. Results: Compared with those in the PS group, the operation time in the KW group was significantly shorter, and the number of fluoroscopy procedures and amount of blood loss during KW surgery were also significantly lower (p = 0.014, 0.001, and 0.036, respectively). Regarding the functional outcomes, there were no significant differences in the ROM, VAS score, AOFAS score or Lysholm score between the two groups (p > 0.05). Conclusion: In the treatment of extra-articular fractures of the distal tibia with nails, the use of KW as a blocking screw technique is safe and reliable.

A Randomized Controlled Study on the Efficacy of Different Approaches of Intramedullary Nailing with Blocking Screws for Proximal Tibial Fractures

SUMMARY: The objective of this study was to compare and analyze the clinical efficacy of different approaches of intramedullary nailing with blocking screws for proximal tibial fractures. One hundred cases of proximal tibial fractures treated in the orthopedic department from April 2021 to September 2023 were included in the study and divided into control and treatment groups using a random number table. A control group (n=50) treated with infrapatellar intramedullary nailing with blocking screws, and a treatment group (n=50) treated with suprapatellar intramedullary nailing with blocking screws. We observed the excellent and good rates in both groups, compared various perioperative indicators, changes in joint range of motion (ROM), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores, Lysholm knee joint function scores, changes in inflammatory factors, and various bone markers before and after treatment, and analyzed postoperative complications. There were no significant differences in baseline data such as age, sex, body mass index, fracture site, concomitant fibular fractures, time from fracture to surgery, injury mechanism, and AO/OTA fracture classification between the two groups (P>0.05). The excellent and good rate in the treatment group after treatment was 90.00 % (45/50), significantly higher than 72.00 % (36/50) in the control group (P0.05). However, the treatment group had shorter surgical times and fewer fluoroscopy times than the control group (P<0.05). After treatment, both groups showed increased ROM and Lysholm scores, as well as decreased VAS scores. Moreover, compared to the control group, the treatment group had higher ROM and Lysholm scores and lower VAS scores (P<0.05). Inflammatory factors including interleukin-1β (IL-1β), C-reactive protein (CRP), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), osteocalcin (BGP), and calcitonin (CT) increased in both groups after treatment, while total n- terminal propeptide of type I procollagen (Total-PINP) and b-C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (β-CTX) decreased. Compared to the control group, the treatment group exhibited greater increases in inflammatory factors and lower levels of Total-PINP and β-CTX, but higher BGP and CT levels (P<0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications was 8.00 % (4/50) in the treatment group and 24.00 % (12/50) in the control group, with statistically significant differences (P=4.762, X2=0.029). In the treatment of proximal tibial fractures, intramedullary nailing with blocking screws using the suprapatellar approach achieves significant clinical efficacy. It reduces surgical time, minimizes radiation exposure to healthcare workers and patients, improves knee joint range of motion and function, decreases postoperative pain and complication rates, suppresses inflammatory reactions, and promotes the improvement of bone markers related to fracture healing.

El objetivo de este estudio fue comparar y analizar la eficacia clínica de diferentes abordajes de clavo intramedular con tornillos de bloqueo para las fracturas de tibia proximal. Se incluyeron en el estudio 100 casos de fracturas de tibia proximal tratados en el departamento de ortopedia desde abril de 2021 hasta septiembre de 2023 y se dividieron en grupos de control y de tratamiento mediante una tabla de números aleatorios. Un grupo control (n=50) tratado con clavo intramedular infrapatelar con tornillos de bloqueo, y un grupo tratamiento (n=50) tratado con clavo intramedular suprapatelar con tornillos de bloqueo. Observamos excelentes y buenas tasas en ambos grupos, comparamos varios indicadores perioperatorios, cambios en el rango de movimiento articular (ROM), puntuaciones de dolor en la escala visual analógica (EVA), puntuaciones de función Lysholm de la articulación de la rodilla , cambios en factores inflamatorios y varios marcadores óseos, antes y después del tratamiento, y se analizaron las complicaciones postoperatorias. No hubo diferencias significativas en los datos iniciales como edad, sexo, índice de masa corporal, sitio de fractura, fracturas de fíbula concomitantes, tiempo desde la fractura hasta la cirugía, mecanismo de lesión y clasificación de fractura AO/OTA entre los dos grupos (P>0,05). La tasa de excelente y buena en el grupo con tratamiento después del tratamiento fue del 90,00 % (45/50), significativamente mayor que el 72,00 % (36/50) en el grupo control (P0,05). Sin embargo, el grupo con tratamiento tuvo tiempos quirúrgicos más cortos y menos tiempos de fluoroscopía que el grupo control (P <0,05). Después del tratamiento, ambos grupos mostraron un aumento de las puntuaciones de ROM y Lysholm, así como una disminución de las puntuaciones de VAS. Además, en comparación con el grupo control, el grupo con tratamiento tuvo puntuaciones ROM y Lysholm más altas y puntuaciones EVA más bajas (P <0,05). Los factores inflamatorios que incluyen interleucina-1β (IL-1β), proteína C reactiva (CRP), factor de necrosis tumoral-α (TNF-α), osteocalcina (BGP) y calcitonina (CT) aumentaron en ambos grupos después del tratamiento, mientras que el total disminuyó el propéptido n-terminal del procolágeno tipo I (Total-PINP) y el telopéptido β-C-terminal del colágeno tipo I (β-CTX). En comparación con el grupo control, el grupo con tratamiento mostró mayores aumentos en los factores inflamatorios y niveles más bajos de Total-PINP y β-CTX, pero niveles más altos de BGP y CT (P <0,05). La incidencia de complicaciones postoperatorias fue del 8 % (4/50) en el grupo de tratamiento y del 24 % (12/50) en el grupo control, con diferencias estadísticamente significativas (P=4,762, X2=0,029). En el tratamiento de las fracturas de tibia proximal, el clavo intramedular con tornillos de bloqueo mediante el abordaje suprapatelar logra una eficacia clínica significativa. Reduce el tiempo quirúrgico, minimiza la exposición a la radiación de los trabajadores de la salud y los pacientes, mejora el rango de movimiento y la función de la articulación de la rodilla, disminuye el dolor postoperatorio y las tasas de complicaciones, suprime las reacciones inflamatorias y promueve la mejora de los marcadores óseos relacionados con la curación de las fracturas.

Blocking screws for alignment control in intramedullary limb lengthening.

Simultaneous deformity correction in the frontal and sagittal plane becomes more and more an important part of intramedullary lengthening to avoid further operative procedures. Such as in fracture treatment blocking screws can be used for alignment control if osteotomy is performed in the metaphyseal bone. 31 intramedullary lengthening procedures between 2009 and 2011 were retrospectively analysed for precision of simultaneous deformity correction. The average planned correction to the HKA was 2.4° (0.1°-8.0°) and the final results after lengthening deviated an average of 1.7° (0.0°-8.1°) from the planning. With blocking screws a higher degree of deformity (mean 3.2° vs. 1.7°; p<0.05) was corrected with a slightly higher precision (mean 1.5° vs. 1.9°; p=0.48) compared to patients without blocking screws. Placed on the concave side of the deformity blocking screws are a helpful tool to successfully address leg length discrepancy and other deformities with one single operation.

Treatment of distal tibial fractures with novel blocking screws plus intramedullary nails: a biomechanical analysis / 中华创伤骨科杂志

Objective:To characterize the biomechanical performance of our self-designed novel blocking screws in the treatment of distal tibial fractures.Methods:Thirty artificial composite tibial bones were used to create models of unstable distal tibial fracture (AO type 43-A3) which were randomized into 3 even groups ( n=10) according to modes of fixation. Group A was subjected to fixation with intramedullary nails only with merely preset holes reserved for the blocking screws, group B to fixation with intramedullary nails plus conventional anteroposterior blocking screws, and group C to fixation with intramedullary nails plus novel lateral blocking screws. In all the 3 groups, a lateral bending stress test was conducted to record the maximum transversal displacement of the intramedullary nail, a fatigue test to observe the structural abnormality in the model and an axial stress test to record the maximum axial displacement of the intramedullary nail-bone structure. The 3 groups were compared in structural abnormality, the maximum transversal displacement of the intramedullary nail and the maximum axial displacement of the intramedullary nail-bone structure. Results:The lateral bending stress tests showed the maximum transversal displacements were (5.02±1.03) mm; (4.19±0.64) mm and (4.18±0.65) mm in groups A, B and C; compared with group A, the maximum transversal displacement decreased by 16.6%( P=0.027) in group B and decreased by 16.8%( P=0.025) in group C, showing significant differences but there was no significant difference in the maximum transversal displacement between groups B and C ( P=0.978). In the fatigue test, all models showed no structural abnormality under cyclic loading. In the axial stress test, the maximum axial displacements of the intramedullary nail-bone structure were, respectively, (5.69±0.75) mm, (5.31±0.61) mm and (5.51±0.65) mm in groups A, B and C, showing no statistically significant difference among the 3 groups ( P>0.05). Conclusion:Our self-designed novel blocking screws can be a new means in clinical application, because they are similar to conventional blocking screws in increasing the stability of nail-bone construct and other biomechanical performance.

The use of blocking screws with internal lengthening nail and reverse rule of thumb for blocking screws in limb lengthening and deformity correction surgery.

Internal lengthening nail (ILN) is a recent development in limb lengthening and deformity correction specialty. The ILN has the distinct advantage of combining acute deformity correction with gradual lengthening of bone. While using ILN, the short metaphyseal bone fragment may develop a deformity at the time of osteotomy and nail insertion or during bone lengthening because of the wide medullary canal. These deformities are typically predictable, and blocking screws (Poller screws) are helpful in these situations. This manuscript describes the common deformities that occur in femur and tibia with osteotomies at different locations while using ILN in antegrade and retrograde nailing technique. Also, a systematic approach to the appropriate use of blocking screws in these deformities is described. In addition, the "reverse rule of thumb" is introduced as a quick reference to determine the ideal location(s) and number of blocking screws. These principles are applicable to limb lengthening and deformity correction as well as fracture fixation using intramedullary nails.

Techniques for intramedullary nailing of proximal tibia fractures.

Despite poor early results with intramedullary nailing of extra-articular proximal tibia fractures, improvements in surgical technique and implant design modifications have resulted in more acceptable outcomes. However, prevention of the commonly encountered apex anterior and/or valgus deformities remains a challenge when treating these injuries. It is necessary for the surgeon to recognize this and know how to neutralize these forces. Surgeons should be comfortable using a variety of the reduction techniques presented to minimize fracture malalignment.

Use of blocking screws in intramedullary fixation of subtrochanteric fractures.

Intramedullary fixation is the mainstay of treatment for femur fractures in the adult trauma population. With subtrochanteric fractures, accurate reduction and stable fixation become technically challenging. Adjuvant blocking screws in the proximal fragment can effectively be used to prevent varus and apex anterior malalignment when intramedullary nails are used in these fractures. Blocking screws decrease the canal volume, thereby allowing the intramedullary device to control the proximal segment. This aids in improving alignment between the proximal and distal fragments during reduction. We review the cases of six patients with proximal femur fractures who were treated with intramedullary nailing in conjunction with the placement of blocking screws.

Strategy for aseptic shaft nonunion of the lower extremities after intramedullary nailing:internal bone grafting combined with blocking screws / 中国矫形外科杂志

[Objective]To analyze the causes for aseptic shaft nonunion of the lower extremities after intramedullary nailing and to observe the therapeutic effects on bone nonunion by the combined technique of internal bone grafting with blocking screws.[Method]In 12 patients suffering from shaft aseptic nonunion of the low extremities(femur:5 cases;tibia:7 cases;hypertrophic nonunion: 8 cases;atrophic nonunion:4 cases),the therapeutic effects of the method of stabilizing the bone segments(exchanging larger nailing plus blocking screws technique),correcting bone deformity(blocking screws technique plus reduction finger) and reinforcing the bone healing capacity(internal bone grafting technique) were observed respectively.[Result]All patients were followed up for 1-2 years(mean 1.5 years) and all nonunions healed.The union rate was 100% and the period required to achieve union was 4.7-13.5 months(mean 7.8 months).All patients felt no pain at last and no complication occured.[Conclusion]Internal bone grafting combined with blocking screws is an effective treatment for aseptic nonunion of the lower extremities after intramedullary nailing.