Phosphorylation of the compartmentalized PKA substrate TAF15 regulates RNA-protein interactions.

Spatiotemporal-controlled second messengers alter molecular interactions of central signaling nodes for ensuring physiological signal transmission. One prototypical second messenger molecule which modulates kinase signal transmission is the cyclic-adenosine monophosphate (cAMP). The main proteinogenic cellular effectors of cAMP are compartmentalized protein kinase A (PKA) complexes. Their cell-type specific compositions precisely coordinate substrate phosphorylation and proper signal propagation which is indispensable for numerous cell-type specific functions. Here we present evidence that TAF15, which is implicated in the etiology of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, represents a novel nuclear PKA substrate. In cross-linking and immunoprecipitation experiments (iCLIP) we showed that TAF15 phosphorylation alters the binding to target transcripts related to mRNA maturation, splicing and protein-binding related functions. TAF15 appears to be one of multiple PKA substrates that undergo RNA-binding dynamics upon phosphorylation. We observed that the activation of the cAMP-PKA signaling axis caused a change in the composition of a collection of RNA species that interact with TAF15. This observation appears to be a broader principle in the regulation of molecular interactions, as we identified a significant enrichment of RNA-binding proteins within endogenous PKA complexes. We assume that phosphorylation of RNA-binding domains adds another layer of regulation to binary protein-RNAs interactions with consequences to RNA features including binding specificities, localization, abundance and composition.

Binding of the nuclear ribonucleoprotein family member FUS to RNA prevents R-loop RNA:DNA hybrid structures.

The protein FUS (FUSed in sarcoma) is a metazoan RNA-binding protein that influences RNA production by all three nuclear polymerases. FUS also binds nascent transcripts, RNA processing factors, RNA polymerases, and transcription machinery. Here, we explored the role of FUS binding interactions for activity during transcription. In vitro run-off transcription assays revealed FUS-enhanced RNA produced by a non-eukaryote polymerase. The activity also reduced the formation of R-loops between RNA products and their DNA template. Analysis by domain mutation and deletion indicated RNA-binding was required for activity. We interpret that FUS binds and sequesters nascent transcripts to prevent R-loops from forming with nearby DNA. DRIP-seq analysis showed that a knockdown of FUS increased R-loop enrichment near expressed genes. Prevention of R-loops by FUS binding to nascent transcripts has the potential to affect transcription by any RNA polymerase, highlighting the broad impact FUS can have on RNA metabolism in cells and disease.

Evidence that only EWS among the FET proteins acquires a low partitioning property for the hyperosmotic stress response by O-GlcNAc glycosylation on its low-complexity domain.

FET proteins (FUS, EWS, and TAF15) share a common domain organization, bind RNA/DNA, and perform similarly multifunctional roles in the regulation of gene expression. Of the FET proteins, however, only EWS appears to have a distinct property in the cellular stress response. Therefore, we focused on the relationship between hyperosmotic stress response and post-translational modifications of the FET proteins. We confirmed that the hyperosmotic stress-dependent translocation from the nucleus to the cytoplasm and the cellular granule formation of FET proteins, and that EWS is less likely to partition into cellular granules in the cytoplasm than FUS or TAF15. The domain involved in the less partitioning property of EWS was found to be its low-complexity domain (LCD). Chemoenzymatic labeling analysis of O-linked ß-N-acetylglucosamine (O-GlcNAc) residues revealed that O-GlcNAc glycosylation occurs frequently in the LCD of EWS. A correlation was observed between the glycosylation of EWS and the less partitioning property under the hyperosmotic stress. These results suggest that among the FET proteins, only EWS has acquired the unique property through O-GlcNAc glycosylation. The glycosylation may play an essential role in regulating physiological functions of EWS, such as transcriptional activity, in addition to the property in cellular stress response.

O-GlcNAc glycosylation stoichiometry of the FET protein family: only EWS is glycosylated with a high stoichiometry.

Of the FET (fused in sarcoma [FUS]/Ewing sarcoma protein [EWS]/TATA binding protein-associated factor 15 [TAF15]) family of heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein particle proteins, FUS and TAF15 are consistently and EWS variably found in inclusion bodies in neurodegenerative diseases such as frontotemporal lobar degeneration associated with FUS. It is speculated that dysregulation of FET proteins at the post-translational level is involved in their cytoplasmic deposition. Here, the O-linked ß-N-acetylglucosamine (O-GlcNAc) glycosylation stoichiometry of the FET proteins was chemoenzymatically analyzed, and it was found that only EWS is dynamically glycosylated with a high stoichiometry in the neural cell lines tested and in mouse brain. It was also confirmed that EWS, but not FUS and TAF15, is glycosylated with a high stoichiometry not only in the neural cells but also in the non-neural cell lines tested. These results indicate that O-GlcNAc glycosylation imparts a physicochemical property on EWS that is distinct from that of the other FET proteins in most of cell lineages or tissues.

Differential interaction of PRMT1 with RGG-boxes of the FET family proteins EWS and TAF15.

The FET sub-family (FUS/TLS, EWS, TAF15) of RNA-binding proteins have remarkably similar overall structure but diverse biological and pathological roles. The molecular basis for FET protein specialization is largely unknown. Gly-Arg-Rich regions (RGG-boxes) within FET proteins are targets for methylation by Protein-Arginine-Methyl-Transferase-1 (PRMT1) and substrate capture is thought to involve electrostatic attraction between positively charged polyRGG substrates and negatively charged surface channels of PRMT1. Unlike FUS and EWS, a high proportion of TAF15 RGG-boxes are embedded within neutrally charged YGGDR(S/G)G repeats, suggesting that they might not bind well to PRMT1. This notion runs contrary however to a report that YGGDR(S/G)G repeats are methylated by PRMT1. Using peptide-based polyRGG substrates and a novel 2-hybrid binding assay, we find that the Asp residue in YGGDR(S/G)G repeats confers poor binding to PRMT1. Our results therefore indicate that YGGDR(S/G)G repeats may contribute to TAF15 specialization by enabling differential interactions with PRMT1 and reduced overall levels of TAF15 methylation compared with other FET proteins. By analogy with molecular recognition of other disordered polyvalent ligands by globular protein partners, we also propose a dynamic polyelectrostatic model for substrate capture by PRMT1.

RGG boxes within the TET/FET family of RNA-binding proteins are functionally distinct.

The multi-functional TET (TAF15/EWS/TLS) or FET (FUS/EWS/TLS) protein family of higher organisms harbor a transcriptional-activation domain (EAD) and an RNA-binding domain (RBD). The transcriptional activation function is, however, only revealed in oncogenic TET-fusion proteins because in native TET proteins it is auto-repressed by RGG-boxes within the TET RBD. Auto-repression is suggested to involve direct cation-pi interactions between multiple Arg residues within RGG boxes and EAD aromatics. Via analysis of TET transcriptional activity in different organisms, we report herein that repression is not autonomous but instead requires additional trans-acting factors. This finding is not supportive of a proposed model whereby repression occurs via a simple intramolecular EAD/RGG-box interaction. We also show that RGG-boxes present within reiterated YGGDRGG repeats that are unique to TAF15, are defective for repression due to the conserved Asp residue. Thus, RGG boxes within TET proteins can be functionally distinguished. While our results show that YGGDRGG repeats are not involved in TAF15 auto-repression, their remarkable number and conservation strongly suggest that they may confer specialized properties to TAF15 and thus contribute to functional differentiation within the TET/FET protein family.