RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Catheter Ablation (CA) is an effective treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF). However, frail elderly patients have been understudied due to their exclusion from landmark trials. OBJECTIVES: Our study aims to evaluate outcomes in this population. METHODS: The national readmission database (2016-2020) was queried, and frailty categories were defined based on hospital risk frailty scores â¦5 as low while >5 as intermediate/high frailty (IHF). We used multivariate regression and propensity-matched analysis to compare outcomes in patients undergoing CA for atrial fibrillation based on frailty index. RESULTS: Among 55 936 CAs for AF, 33,248 patients had low frailty, while 22 688 had intermediate/high frailty (IHF). After propensity matching (N 12 448), IHF patients were found to have higher adverse events, including mortality (3% vs. 0.3%, p < .001), stroke (1.9% vs. 0.2%, p < .001), acute heart failure (53.8% vs. 42.2%, p < .001), AKI (42.5% vs. 6.8%, p < .001), pericardial complications (2.8 vs. 1.6%, p < .001), respiratory complications (27.8 vs. 7.2%, p < .001), major adverse cardiovascular events (21.2 vs. 9.4%, p < .001) and net adverse events (76.7 vs. 55%, p < .001). IHF patients had higher readmissions at 30 (15.5 vs. 12.6%, p < .001), 90 (31.9 vs. 25.1%, p < .001), and 180-day (41 vs. 34.7%, p < .001) intervals. A higher median length of stay (LOS) (7 vs. 3 days, p < .001) and cost ($44 287 vs. $27 517, p < .001) at index admission and subsequent readmissions were also observed (p < .001). CONCLUSION: Intermediate/high frailty patients undergoing catheter ablation had worse clinical outcomes, higher healthcare burden, and readmission rates. LOS has decreased in both groups from 2016 to 2020; however, total cost has increased.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Liver diseases were significant source of early readmission burden. This study aimed to evaluate the 30-day unplanned readmission rates, causes of readmissions, readmission costs, and predictors of readmission in patients with acute liver failure (ALF). METHODS: Patients admitted for ALF from 2019 National Readmission Database were enrolled. Weighted multivariable logistic regression models were applied and based on Directed Acyclic Graphs. Incidence, causes, cost, and predictors of 30-day unplanned readmissions were identified. RESULTS: A total of 3,281 patients with ALF were enrolled, of whom 600 (18.3%) were readmitted within 30 days. The mean time from discharge to early readmission was 12.6 days. The average hospital cost and charge of readmission were $19,629 and $86,228, respectively. The readmissions were mainly due to liver-related events (26.6%), followed by infection (20.9%). The predictive factors independently associated with readmissions were age, male sex (OR 1.227, 95% CI 1.023-1.472; P = 0.028), renal failure (OR 1.401, 95% CI 1.139-1.723; P = 0.001), diabetes with chronic complications (OR 1.327, 95% CI 1.053-1.672; P = 0.017), complicated hypertension (OR 1.436, 95% CI 1.111-1.857; P = 0.006), peritoneal drainage (OR 1.600, 95% CI 1.092-2.345; P = 0.016), etc. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ALF are at relatively high risk of early readmission, which imposes a heavy medical and economic burden on society. We need to increase the emphasis placed on early readmission of patients with ALF and establish clinical strategies for their management.
Assuntos
Bases de Dados Factuais , Falência Hepática Aguda , Readmissão do Paciente , Humanos , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Falência Hepática Aguda/economia , Falência Hepática Aguda/terapia , Fatores de Risco , Adulto , Idoso , Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores Sexuais , Fatores de Tempo , Modelos Logísticos , Fatores Etários , IncidênciaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The link between gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and essential hypertension (EH) and its causal nature remains controversial. Our study examined the connection between GERD and the risk of hypertension and assessed further whether this correlation has a causal relationship. METHODS: First, we utilized the National Readmission Database including 14 422 183 participants to conduct an observational study. Dividing the population into GERD and non-GERD groups, we investigated the correlation between GERD and EH using multivariate logistic regression. Next, bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization was adopted. The summary statistics for GERD were obtained from a published genome-wide association study including 78 707 cases and 288 734 controls. We collected summary statistics for hypertension containing 70 651 cases and 223 663 controls from the FinnGen consortium. We assessed causality primarily by the inverse-variance weighted method with validation by four other Mendelian randomization approaches as well as an array of sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: In the unadjusted model, GERD patients had a higher risk of EH than the non-GERD group, regardless of gender (odds ratio, 1.43; 95% confidence interval: 1.42-1.43; P < .001). Further adjusting for critical confounders did not change this association. For Mendelian randomization, we found that genetically predicted GERD was causally linked to an enhanced risk of EH in inverse-variance weighted technique (odds ratio, 1.52; 95% confidence interval: 1.39-1.67; P = 3.51 × 10-18); conversely, EH did not raise the risk of GERD causally. CONCLUSIONS: GERD is a causal risk factor for EH. Further research is required to probe the mechanism underlying this causal connection.
Assuntos
Refluxo Gastroesofágico , Hipertensão , Humanos , Análise da Randomização Mendeliana , Estudo de Associação Genômica Ampla , Readmissão do Paciente , Hipertensão Essencial , Hipertensão/epidemiologia , Hipertensão/genética , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/epidemiologia , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/genéticaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Cerebrovascular accidents (CVA) are potential sequelae of blunt cerebrovascular injuries (BCVI). To minimize their risk, medical therapy is used commonly. It is unclear if anticoagulant or antiplatelet medications are superior for decreasing CVA risk. It is also unclear as to which confer fewer undesirable side effects specifically in patients with BCVI. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes between nonsurgical patients with BCVI with hospital admission records who were treated with anticoagulant medications and those who were treated with antiplatelet medications. METHODS: We performed a 5-year (2016-2020) analysis of the Nationwide Readmission Database. We identified all adult trauma patients who were diagnosed with BCVI and treated with either anticoagulant or antiplatelet agents. Patients who were diagnosed with index admission CVA, intracranial injury, hypercoagulable states, atrial fibrillation, and or moderate to severe liver disease were excluded. Those who underwent vascular procedures (open and/or endovascular approaches) and or neurosurgical treatment were also excluded. Propensity score matching (1:2 ratio) was performed to control for demographics, injury parameters, and comorbidities. Index admission and 6-month readmission outcomes were examined. RESULTS: We identified 2133 patients with BCVI who were treated with medical therapy; 1091 patients remained after applying the exclusion criteria. A matched cohort of 461 patients (anticoagulant, 159; antiplatelet, 302) was obtained. The median patient age was 72 years (interquartile range [IQR], 56-82 years), 46.2% of patients were female, falls were the mechanism of injury in 57.2% of cases, and the median New Injury Severity Scale score was 21 (IQR, 9-34). Index outcomes with respect to (1) anticoagulant treatments followed by (2) antiplatelet treatments and (3) P values are as follows: mortality (1.3%, 2.6%, 0.51), median length of stay (6 days, 5 days; P < .001), and median total charge (109,736 USD, 80,280 USD, 0.12). The 6-month readmission outcomes are as follows: readmission (25.8%, 16.2%, <0.05), mortality (4.4%, 4.6%, 0.91), ischemic CVA (4.9%, 4.1%, P = not significant [NS]), gastrointestinal hemorrhage (4.9%, 10.2%, 0.45), hemorrhagic CVA (0%, 0.41%, P = NS), and blood loss anemia (19.5%, 12.2%, P = NS). CONCLUSIONS: Anticoagulants are associated with a significantly increased readmission rate within 6 months. Neither medical therapy is superior to one another in the reduction of the following: index mortality, 6-month mortality, and 6-month readmission with CVA. Notably, antiplatelet agents seem to be associated with increased hemorrhagic CVA and gastrointestinal hemorrhage on readmission, although neither association is statistically significant. Still, these associations underscore the need for further prospective studies of large sample sizes to investigate the optimal medical therapy for nonsurgical patients with BCVI with hospital admission records.
Assuntos
Traumatismo Cerebrovascular , Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Ferimentos não Penetrantes , Adulto , Humanos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Masculino , Anticoagulantes/efeitos adversos , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/efeitos adversos , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Traumatismo Cerebrovascular/complicações , Traumatismo Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico , Traumatismo Cerebrovascular/terapia , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/diagnóstico por imagem , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/terapia , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/complicações , Morbidade , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Hemorragias Intracranianas/complicações , Hemorragia GastrointestinalRESUMO
AIMS: The safety and feasibility of combining percutaneous catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation with left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) as a single procedure in the USA have not been investigated. We analyzed the US National Readmission Database (NRD) to investigate the incidence of combined LAAO + CA and compare major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) with matched LAAO-only and CA-only patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this retrospective study from NRD data, we identified patients undergoing combined LAAO and CA procedures on the same day in the USA from 2016 to 2019. A 1:1 propensity score match was performed to identify patients undergoing LAAO-only and CA-only procedures. The number of LAAO + CA procedures increased from 28 (2016) to 119 (2019). LAAO + CA patients (n = 375, mean age 74 ± 9.2 years, 53.4% were males) had non-significant higher MACE (8.1%) when compared with LAAO-only (n = 407, 5.3%) or CA-only patients (n = 406, 7.4%), which was primarily driven by higher rate of pericardial effusion (4.3%). All-cause 30-day readmission rates among LAAO + CA patients (10.7%) were similar when compared with LAAO-only (12.7%) or CA-only (17.5%) patients. The most frequent primary reason for readmissions among LAAO + CA and LAAO-only cohorts was heart failure (24.6 and 31.5%, respectively), while among the CA-only cohort, it was paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (25.7%). CONCLUSION: We report an 63% annual growth (from 28 procedures) in combined LAAO and CA procedures in the USA. There were no significant difference in MACE and all-cause 30-day readmission rates among LAAO + CA patients compared with matched LAAO-only or CA-only patients.
Assuntos
Apêndice Atrial , Fibrilação Atrial , Ablação por Cateter , Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Masculino , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Fibrilação Atrial/diagnóstico , Fibrilação Atrial/cirurgia , Fibrilação Atrial/complicações , Readmissão do Paciente , Apêndice Atrial/cirurgia , Pontuação de Propensão , Estudos Retrospectivos , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/etiologia , Ablação por Cateter/efeitos adversos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Socioeconomic disparities have been associated with outcomes in many medical conditions. The association of socioeconomic status (SES) with readmissions after ventral and inguinal hernia repair has not been well studied on a national level. This study aims to evaluate the association of SES with readmission as a significant outcome in patients undergoing ventral and inguinal hernia repair. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed evaluating patients undergoing ventral hernia and inguinal hernia repair with 1:1 propensity score matching using the Nationwide Readmissions Database (2016-2017). Both 30- and 90-day readmissions were examined. After matching, a multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed using confounding variables including hospital setting, comorbidities, urgency of repair, sociodemographic status, and payer. Likelihood of readmission was reported in odds ratio form. RESULTS: Readmission rates were 11.56% (24,323 out of 210,381) and 17.94% (30,893 out of 172,210) for 30- and 90-day readmissions, respectively. Patients with Medicaid and in the lower income quartile were more likely to present in an emergent fashion for hernia repair. After matching, a multivariate logistic regression analysis showed socioeconomic status (OR 1.250 and 1.229) was a statistically significant independent predictor of readmission at 30 and 90 days, respectively. Inversely, factors associated with the least likely chance of readmission were a laparoscopic approach (OR 0.646 and 0.641), elective admission (OR 0.824 and 0.779), and care in a teaching hospital (OR 0.784 and 0.798). CONCLUSION: SES is an independent predictor of readmission at 30 and 90 days following open and laparoscopic ventral and inguinal hernia repair. Patients with a lower socioeconomic status were more likely to undergo hernia repair in the emergent setting. Efforts toward mitigating SES disparities by potentially promoting MIS techniques, enhancing access to elective cases, and systematic approaches to perioperative care for this disadvantaged population can potentially enhance overall hernia outcomes.
Assuntos
Hérnia Inguinal , Hérnia Ventral , Laparoscopia , Hérnia Inguinal/complicações , Hérnia Ventral/cirurgia , Herniorrafia/métodos , Humanos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Readmissão do Paciente , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Classe Social , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Current guidelines suggest antibiotics prophylaxis is not necessary for patients with orthopedic prosthetics undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy. Clinical evidence to support this recommendation is lacking. AIMS: To analyze the association between inpatient gastrointestinal endoscopy and prosthetic joint infection (PJI) in patients with a recent arthroplasty. METHODS: We included patients admitted from July to October of each calendar year (index admissions) who had an arthroplasty in the same calendar year prior to the index admission. We followed the occurrence of PJI for 60 days after the index admission. Only admissions from July to October were chosen as index admissions, and the follow-up period was limited to 60 days because the database structure prohibits the analysis of events in different calendar years. We compared the rate of 60-day PJI between those who had gastrointestinal endoscopy on index admissions to those who had not. We excluded patients aged less than 18 years, who died on index admission, or had any infection in the same calendar year before or during the index admission. RESULTS: Of 1,831,218 patients with arthroplasty, 88,345 met the inclusion criteria, out of which 5,855 had gastrointestinal endoscopy. The rate of 60-day PJI in those who had endoscopy was 0.23%, and in those who had not was 0.52% (P < 0.001). EGD without excision (adjusted odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 0.20 [0.03-1.42], P = 0.107), EGD with excision (0.58 [0.21-1.60], P = 0.295), colonoscopy without excision (0.43 [0.11-1.72], P = 0.233), colonoscopy with excision (0.31 [0.04-2.21], P = 0.241), and PEG/PEJ (0.38 [0.05-2.71], P = 0.337) were not associated with risk of 60-day PJI. We found no PJI cases in patients underwent esophageal dilation, ERCP, and EUS with FNA. CONCLUSIONS: Gastrointestinal endoscopy in hospitalized patients with a recent previous arthroplasty is not associated with an increased risk of 60-day prosthetic joint infection.
Assuntos
Artrite Infecciosa , Artroplastia de Quadril , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese , Humanos , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/diagnóstico , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/epidemiologia , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/etiologia , Artroplastia de Quadril/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Artrite Infecciosa/complicações , Endoscopia Gastrointestinal/efeitos adversosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) devices have become a favorable alternative option among nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with long-term contraindication to anticoagulation. Real-world experience with postprocedural readmission rates and predictors of readmission in LAAO patients is limited. OBJECTIVE: To assess all-cause 30-day readmission rate and predictors of readmission after LAAO procedure in the United States. METHOD: This retrospective observational study included all AF patients undergoing percutaneous LAAO procedures in the United States from January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2017, in the National Readmission Database. The primary outcome measure was all-cause 30-day readmission. A propensity score-matched analysis compared outcomes with a non-LAAO AF cohort. RESULT: Among 14 024 LAAO procedures (age: 76 ± 8 years; 60.5% males), 9.4% were readmitted within 30-days and, 0.2% died during their index hospitalization. The most frequent primary diagnosis during readmission among LAAO was gastrointestinal bleeding (12%). The incidence of LAAO procedures increased by 102%. In the multivariate model, gender and CHA2 DS2 -VASc failed to predict readmission. Age 55-64 years had lower odds (adjusted odds ratios [aOR]: 0.41; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.18-0.94), while drug abuse (aOR: 4.1; 95% CI: 1.34-12.54), and deficiency anemia (aOR: 1.88; 95% CI: 1.12-3.18) had higher odds of readmission. In propensity-matched cohort, compared to non-LAAO AF, LAAO patients had lower 30-day readmission (9.4% vs. 10.98%, p = .002) and all-cause in-hospital mortality (0.19% vs. 0.57%, p < .001). CONCLUSION: The readmission rate following the LAAO procedure is substantial (approximately 10%), and largely attributable to gastrointestinal bleeding. Factors such as drug abuse and anemia must be explored further to minimize readmission risk.
Assuntos
Apêndice Atrial , Fibrilação Atrial , Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Apêndice Atrial/diagnóstico por imagem , Apêndice Atrial/cirurgia , Fibrilação Atrial/diagnóstico , Fibrilação Atrial/epidemiologia , Fibrilação Atrial/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Readmissão do Paciente , Pontuação de Propensão , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is being increasingly used for decompensated severe symptomatic aortic stenosis. Data on urgent and elective TAVR readmission is scarce in the literature. Here, we have performed a retrospective cohort study with the Nationwide Readmission Database of 2016 to identify the rate of 30-day all-cause readmission, common causes of readmission, and distribution of morbidity in index admission and readmission after urgent and elective TAVR. METHODS: We used International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes (02R.F38H, 02R.F38Z, 02R.F48Z) for identification of all TAVR procedures done in 2016 in patients >18 years old. We found 8379 patients who underwent urgent TAVR and 32,006 patients who underwent elective TAVR in 2016. RESULT: The mean age of patients undergoing urgent TAVR was 79 ± 9.97 years with 44.6% women. The mean age of patients undergoing elective TAVR was 80.7 ± 8.25 years with 46.2% women. We found the 30-day all-cause readmission rate of 15.5% and 9.5% in patients undergoing urgent and elective TAVR, respectively (p < 0.001). The cardiac cause was the predominant cause of readmission in both groups (43.77% vs. 42.11%, p = 0.57), followed by pulmonary cause, gastrointestinal (GI) cause, and renal cause. Among cardiac causes, congestive heart failure (CHF) was predominant cause of readmission and was similar in both groups (18.73 in urgent TAVR vs. 15.73 in elective TAVR, p = 0.12). CONCLUSION: We found that the all-cause 30-day readmission rate was higher in patients who had undergone urgent TAVR. Further studies are needed to better understand this difference.
Assuntos
Estenose da Valva Aórtica , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter , Adolescente , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Valva Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagem , Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagem , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/epidemiologia , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Readmissão do Paciente , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter/efeitos adversos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To compare maternal delivery hospitalization characteristics and postpartum outcomes in women with epilepsy (WWE) versus women without common neurological comorbidities. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of index characterizations and short-term postpartum rehospitalizations after viable delivery within the 2015-2017 National Readmissions Database using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes. Wald chi-squared testing compared baseline demographic, hospital and clinical characteristics and postpartum complications between WWE and controls. Multivariable logistic regression models examined odds of nonelective readmissions within 30 and 90â¯days for WWE compared to controls (alphaâ¯=â¯0.05). RESULTS: A total of 38,518 WWE and 8,136,335 controls had a qualifying index admission for delivery. Baseline differences were most pronounced in Medicare/Medicaid insurance (WWE: 58.2%, controls: 43%, pâ¯<â¯0.0001), alcohol/substance abuse (WWE: 8.3%, controls: 2.5%, pâ¯<â¯0.0001), psychotic disorders (WWE: 1.2%, controls 0.1%, pâ¯<â¯0.0001), and mood disorder (WWE: 15.5%, controls: 3.7%, pâ¯<â¯0.0001). At the time of delivery, WWE were more likely to have edema, proteinuria, and hypertensive disorders (WWE: 19%, controls: 12.9%, pâ¯<â¯0.0001); a history of recurrent pregnancy loss (WWE: 1%, controls: 0.4%, pâ¯<â¯0.0001); preterm labor (WWE: 7.3%, controls: 4.8%, pâ¯<â¯0.0001), or presence of any Center for Disease Control severe maternal morbidity indicator (WWE: 3.2%, controls: 0.6%, pâ¯<â¯0.0001; AOR 5.16, 95% CI 4.70-5.67, pâ¯<â¯0.0001). A higher proportion of WWE were readmitted within 30â¯days (WWE: 2.4%, controls: 1.1%) and 90â¯days (WWE: 3.7%, controls: 1.6%). After adjusting for covariates, the odds of postpartum nonelective readmissions within 30â¯days (AOR 1.86, 95% CI 1.66-2.08, p-value <0.0001) and 90â¯days (AOR 2.04, 95% CI 1.83-2.28, p-value <0.0001) were higher in WWE versus controls. INTERPRETATION: Women with epilepsy experienced critical obstetric complications and a higher risk of severe maternal morbidity indicators at the time of delivery. Although relatively low, nonelective short-term readmissions after delivery were higher in WWE than women without epilepsy or other common neurological comorbidities. Further research is needed to address multidisciplinary care inconsistencies, improve maternal outcomes, and provide evidence-based guidelines.
Assuntos
Epilepsia , Readmissão do Paciente , Idoso , Epilepsia/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Medicare , Período Pós-Parto , Gravidez , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Nationwide data on readmissions after the transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure are lacking. We aimed to investigate the 30-day readmission rate after TIPS procedure, reasons, and predictors for readmissions and its impact on resource utilization and mortality in the USA. METHODS: We identified all adults who underwent an inpatient TIPS procedure between 2010 and 2014 using the National Readmission Database. Outcomes included all-cause 30-day readmission rate, reasons and predictors of readmissions, mortality rate, and mean hospitalization charges. RESULTS: Out of a total of 31 230 hospitalizations with TIPS procedure, 28 021 patients met the study criteria and were finally included. The mean age of patients was 56.90 years, and 63.84% were men. All-cause 30-day readmission rate was 27.81%. Hepatic encephalopathy with or without coma was the most common reason for readmissions in at least 36.43% patients. The in-hospital mortality for index hospitalization and 30-day readmission was 10.69% and 5.85%, respectively. The mean hospitalization charges for index hospitalization and readmissions were $153 357 and $45 751, respectively. Advanced age, Medicaid insurance, higher Charlson comorbidy index, ascites as indication of TIPS, and nonspecific or hepatitis C cirrhosis etiologies for cirrhosis were found to be independent predictors of 30-day readmissions after a TIPS procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Our study found a high rate of readmission for patients undergoing TIPS procedure, and the majority of these readmissions were related to hepatic encephalopathy. Further studies highlighting areas for improvement, particularly for patient selection and post-discharge care, are needed to reduce readmissions.
Assuntos
Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Derivação Portossistêmica Transjugular Intra-Hepática , Feminino , Encefalopatia Hepática/epidemiologia , Encefalopatia Hepática/etiologia , Hepatite C/complicações , Hepatite C/epidemiologia , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Cirrose Hepática/epidemiologia , Cirrose Hepática/etiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Readmissão do Paciente/economia , Derivação Portossistêmica Transjugular Intra-Hepática/economia , Derivação Portossistêmica Transjugular Intra-Hepática/métodos , Derivação Portossistêmica Transjugular Intra-Hepática/mortalidade , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Early readmissions are an important indicator of the quality of care. Limited data exist describing hospital readmissions in acute diverticulitis. The study aimed to describe unplanned, 30-day readmissions among adult acute diverticulitis patients and to assess readmission predictors. METHODS: We analyzed the 2013 and 2014 United States National Readmission Database and identified acute diverticulitis admissions using administrative codes in adult patients older than 18 years of age. Our primary outcome was a 30-day, unplanned readmission rate. We used Chi-square tests, t tests, and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests for descriptive analyses and survey logistic regression to calculate adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals for associations with readmissions adjusting for confounders. RESULTS: In the cohort of 364,511 hospitalizations with acute diverticulitis, as the primary diagnosis on index admission, 31,420 (8.6%) had at least one unplanned 30-day readmission. Sixty percent of the readmissions occurred within the first 2 weeks of the index admission. The most common reasons for unplanned 30-day readmission were due to diverticulitis of the colon (41.5%), postoperative infection (4.2%), septicemia (3.6%), intestinal infection due to Clostridium difficile (3%), and other digestive system complications such bleeding or fistula (2.8%). Multivariable analysis showed advance age (> 75 years), discharge against medical advice, comorbidities (renal failure, coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation, congestive heart failure, hypertension, diabetes, obesity, weight loss, chronic lung disease, malignancy), blood transfusion, Medicare and Medicaid insurance, and increased length of stay (> 3 days) were associated with significantly higher odds for readmission. Patients who have undergone abdominal surgery during index admission were 31% less likely to get readmitted. CONCLUSIONS: On a national level, 1 in 11 hospitalizations for acute diverticulitis was followed by unplanned readmission within 30 days with most admissions occurring in the first 2 weeks. Multiple modifiable and non-modifiable factors influencing readmission rates were noted. Further studies should examine if strategies that address these predictors can decrease readmissions.
Assuntos
Doenças do Colo , Diverticulite , Readmissão do Paciente , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/organização & administração , Risco Ajustado/métodos , Doenças do Colo/diagnóstico , Doenças do Colo/economia , Doenças do Colo/epidemiologia , Doenças do Colo/terapia , Bases de Dados Factuais/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório/estatística & dados numéricos , Diverticulite/diagnóstico , Diverticulite/economia , Diverticulite/epidemiologia , Diverticulite/terapia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Readmissão do Paciente/economia , Readmissão do Paciente/normas , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/terapia , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding is one most common complications of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). We aimed to determine the incidence, in-hospital outcomes, associated healthcare burden and predictors of GI bleeding within 30 days after AMI. METHODS: Data were extracted from Nationwide Readmission Database 2010-2014. Patients were included if they had a primary diagnosis of ST or non-ST elevation myocardial infarction. Exclusion criteria were admissioned in December, aged less than 18 years and a diagnosis of type-2 MI. The primary outcome was 30-day readmission with upper or lower GI bleeding. Secondary outcomes were in-hospital mortality, etiology of bleeding, in-hospital complications, procedures, length of stay, and total hospitalization charges. Independent predictors of readmission were identified using multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Out of the 3,520,241 patients discharged with ACS, 10,018 (0.3%) were readmitted with GI bleeding within 30 days of discharge. 60% had lower GI bleeding. Most common sources suspected were GI cancers in 17% and hemorrhoidal bleeding in 10%. In hospital mortality rate for readmission was 3.6%. Independent predictors of readmission were age, Charlson comorbidity score, history of chronic kidney disease, GI tumor, inflammatory bowel disease and artificial heart valve. Type of treatment for AMI had no impact on readmission. Patients readmitted had higher rates of shock (adjusted odds ratio, 1.48, 95% CI 1.01-3.72). CONCLUSIONS: In the first nationwide study, 30-day incidence of GI bleeding after AMI is 0.3%. GI bleeding complicating AMI carries a substantial in-hospital mortality and cost of care.
Assuntos
Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/epidemiologia , Infarto do Miocárdio/complicações , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Comorbidade , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/economia , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/etiologia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Incidência , Seguro Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Tempo de Internação/economia , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Infarto do Miocárdio/economia , Readmissão do Paciente/economia , Fatores de Risco , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Hospital readmissions result in increased health care costs and are associated with worse outcomes after neurosurgical intervention. Understanding factors associated with readmissions will inform future studies aimed at improving quality of care in those with epilepsy. METHODS: Patients of all ages with epilepsy who underwent a neurosurgical intervention were identified in the 2014 Nationwide Readmissions Database, a nationally representative dataset containing data from roughly 17 million US hospital discharges. Diagnosis of epilepsy was based on International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM)-based case definitions. Neurosurgical interventions for epilepsy: resective/disconnective surgery, responsive neurostimulation/deep brain stimulation, vagus nerve stimulation, radiosurgery, and intracranial electroencephalography were identified using ICD-9-CM procedure codes. Primary outcome was all-cause 30-day readmission following discharge from the index hospitalization. RESULTS: There were a total of 2284 index surgical admissions. Overall, 10.83% (n = 251) of patients following an index epilepsy surgery admission were readmitted within 30 days. Factors independently associated with 30-day readmission for all epilepsy surgery admissions were: Medicare insurance (P < .01), discharge disposition that was not home (P < .01), higher Elixhauser comorbidity indexes (P < .01), longer length of stay (P < .01), and adverse events of surgical and medical care during index stay (P = .04). In the multivariate model, Medicare insurance (hazard ratio [HR] 1.81 [1.29-2.53], P < .01) and length of stay (HR 1.02 [1.01-1.04], P < .01) remained significant independent predictors for 30-day readmission. The most common primary reason for readmissions was epilepsy/convulsions accounting for 22.85%. SIGNIFICANCE: Our results suggest that careful management of postoperative seizures and discharge planning after epilepsy surgery may be important to optimize outcomes and reduce the risk of readmission, particularly for patients on Medicare.
Assuntos
Epilepsia/cirurgia , Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos/efeitos adversos , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the 30-day injury readmission risk among persons with epilepsy vs. without epilepsy using a nationally representative US database. Secondary objectives were to examine the factors associated with injury-related readmissions among those with epilepsy and identify specific causes of readmissions within 30â¯days of index admission. METHODS: Hospitalized individuals of all ages with epilepsy as the primary diagnosis were identified using validated International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes in the 2014 Nationwide Readmission Database (NRD). Primary outcome was 30-day readmission for an injury defined by ICD-9-CM diagnosis codes following discharge from index hospitalization. Subgroup differences in the groups with epilepsy and without epilepsy were estimated using standardized mean difference scores that are calculated with means and variances of the covariates. Multinomial logistic regressions were conducted to determine the 30-day injury readmission risk and examine the factors associated with injury-related readmissions. RESULTS: There were 60,074 unique persons with epilepsy (mean age: 42.53â¯years, female: 49.32%) and 9,282,952 without epilepsy (mean age: 44.46â¯years, female: 59.43%). A higher proportion of persons with epilepsy (nâ¯=â¯215, 0.34%) vs. without epilepsy (nâ¯=â¯22,783, 0.22%) had a 30-day readmission due to an injury. After adjusting for covariates, persons with epilepsy had higher odds of 30-day readmission due to an injury (adjusted OR: 1.40, 95% CI: 1.20-1.62, pâ¯<â¯0.0001). Factors associated with an injury-related readmission in persons with epilepsy include the following: increasing age (OR: 1.01, 95% CI: 1.00-1.02, pâ¯=â¯0.02), transfer to short term hospital/other facility (OR: 1.50, 95% CI: 1.00-2.27, pâ¯=â¯0.05), discharged against medical advice/discharge destination unknown (OR: 2.26, 95% CI: 1.40-4.45, pâ¯=â¯0.02), and higher Elixhauser comorbidity index (OR: 1.02, 95% CI: 1.01-1.03, pâ¯<â¯0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Higher odds of 30-day injury readmissions were observed in persons with epilepsy vs. without epilepsy. Optimizing the management of comorbid conditions during the patient's index admission for epilepsy, minimizing discharges against medical advice, and fostering outreach programs to those who have been transferred to short-term hospitals or facilities may reduce 30-day readmissions due to an injury.
Assuntos
Epilepsia/diagnóstico , Epilepsia/epidemiologia , Readmissão do Paciente/tendências , Ferimentos e Lesões/diagnóstico , Ferimentos e Lesões/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Bases de Dados Factuais/tendências , Feminino , Hospitalização/tendências , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Alta do Paciente/tendências , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Meningiomas are the most common benign primary brain tumors. The mainstay of treatment, surgical resection, is often curative. Given the excellent prognosis of these lesions, minimizing perioperative complications is of the utmost importance. With the establishment of the National Readmissions Database (NRD), researchers are now able to identify variables associated with postoperative complications beyond the index admission. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we sought to identify the leading causes for non-elective readmission and variables associated with increased likelihood of readmission at 30 and 90 days after discharge following a craniotomy for meningioma resection. METHODS: Adult inpatients who underwent craniotomy for meningioma resection between 2010 and 2014 were queried from the NRD. All-cause readmissions following craniotomy at 30 and 90 days were identified, and a multivariable logistic regression model was used to characterize independent risk factors. RESULTS: Among 26,034 patients who received craniotomy for meningioma resection, 2825 (10.9%) were readmitted at 30 days and 3436 (16.1%) were readmitted at 90 days. Postoperative wound infection was the most common readmission diagnosis, occurring in 9.32% and 10.2% of 30- and 90-day readmissions respectively. Patient factors associated with increased likelihood of readmission included male gender, greater illness severity, non-routine discharge, index length of hospitalization, and having Medicare or Medicaid insurance. CONCLUSIONS: Readmission following craniotomy for meningioma resection occurs at a clinically significant rate. Several patient factors were identified in association with all-cause 30- and 90-day readmissions. Further studies are required to identify means for preventing complications following discharge in these vulnerable patient populations.
Assuntos
Craniotomia/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Meníngeas/cirurgia , Meningioma/cirurgia , Readmissão do Paciente , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Medicare , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Alta do Paciente , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Sexuais , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/etiologia , Estados Unidos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Rigid flatfoot deformity is a debilitating condition that can be managed by triple arthrodesis surgery. Triple arthrodesis has the potential to restore health-related quality of life, but it is also associated with several complications. Few studies have examined the 30-day readmission rates after triple arthrodesis. The objective of this study was to investigate risk factors for 30-day all-cause readmissions after triple arthrodesis. The nationwide readmission database was queried from 2013. By using International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision, procedure codes, all triple arthrodesis procedures were identified. Demographic factors, comorbidities, insurance status, and hospital characteristics were statistically compared between patients who experienced a 30-day readmission and those who did not. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify independent risk factors for 30-day readmission. Overall, 1916 triple arthrodesis cases were identified. The overall 30-day readmission rate after triple arthrodesis was 4.6%. Univariate analysis revealed a statistically higher proportion of patients with electrolyte abnormalities (13.8% vs 4.6%; p < .01) in the patients who were readmitted within 30 days compared with those who were not. Multivariable analysis demonstrated Medicaid insurance, relative to private insurance, as the only statistically significant predictor of 30-day readmission with an odds ratio of 4.43 (p < .05). These results suggest that patients of lower socioeconomic status may be at a greater risk for development of a short-term readmission after triple arthrodesis surgery. These findings are important for surgeon and patient communication, counseling, and postoperative care when choosing to pursue triple arthrodesis surgery.
Assuntos
Artrodese/efeitos adversos , Pé Chato/cirurgia , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Artrodese/estatística & dados numéricos , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Medicaid , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Estados UnidosRESUMO
Hospital readmissions are a major contributor to increased health care costs and are associated with worse patient outcomes after neurosurgery. We used the newly released Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD) to describe the association between patient, hospital and payer factors with 30- and 90-day readmission following craniotomy for malignant brain tumor. All adult inpatients undergoing craniotomy for primary and secondary malignant brain tumors in the NRD from 2013 to 2014 were included. We identified all cause readmissions within 30- and 90-days following craniotomy for tumor, excluding scheduled chemotherapeutic procedures. We used univariate and multivariate models to identify patient, hospital and administrative factors associated with readmission. We identified 27,717 admissions for brain tumor craniotomy in 2013-2014, with 3343 (13.2%) 30-day and 5271 (25.7%) 90-day readmissions. In multivariate analysis, patients with Medicaid and Medicare were more likely to be readmitted at 30- and 90-days compared to privately insured patients. Patients with two or more comorbidities were more likely to be readmitted at 30- and 90-days, and patients discharged to skilled nursing facilities or home health care were associated with increased 90-day readmission rates. Finally, hospital procedural volume above the 75th percentile was associated with decreased 90-day readmission rates. Patients treated at high volume hospitals are less likely to be readmitted at 90-days. Insurance type, non-routine discharge and patient comorbidities are predictors of postoperative non-scheduled readmission. Further studies may elucidate potentially modifiable risk factors when attempting to improve outcomes and reduce cost associated with brain tumor surgery.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Encefálicas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Encefálicas/cirurgia , Craniotomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Idoso , Neoplasias Encefálicas/economia , Craniotomia/economia , Bases de Dados Factuais , Economia Hospitalar , Humanos , Medicaid , Medicare , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Alta do Paciente/economia , Alta do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Readmissão do Paciente/economia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/economia , Estados UnidosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Alcoholic hepatitis (AH) represents a severe manifestation of alcoholic liver disease (ALD) associated with a wide severity spectrum. ALD is linked to nutritional deficiencies, with the gravity of malnutrition escalating as alcohol abuse and ALD progress. This study aims to delve into the impact of malnutrition on the clinical trajectory of AH. METHODS: We identified adult patients admitted with AH using the National Readmission Database (NRD) 2016-2020. We further classified AH patients based on the severity of malnutrition. We compared the outcomes of AH hospitalizations using a multivariate regression model. RESULTS: We included 82,367 AH patients, of whom 15,693 (19.00%) had malnutrition. 4,243 (5.15%) patients exhibited mild to moderate malnutrition, 5,862 (7.07%) patients had severe malnutrition, and 5,588 (6.78%) patients had unspecified severity of malnutrition. We found that adjusted in-hospital mortality due to AH was higher in patients with malnutrition, corresponding to the severity of malnutrition (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.62 and 3.14 in mild-moderate malnutrition and severe malnutrition, respectively; p < .01). Additionally, patients with malnutrition had progressively elevated odds of septic shock, vasopressor requirement, mechanical ventilation, and intensive care unit (ICU) admission with escalating intensity of malnutrition. Liver-related complications, such as spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, coagulopathy, hepatorenal syndrome, and hepatic encephalopathy, were also found to have an increased likelihood in the presence of malnutrition. Furthermore, resource utilization showed a progressive increase with increasing severity of malnutrition. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that malnutrition is a common comorbidity in AH patients, with varying degrees of severity, which correlates with higher mortality rates, emphasizing the critical role of nutritional status in the prognosis of AH. These findings underscore the importance of addressing and managing malnutrition in patients with AH, not only for its potential contribution to mortality but also because of its association with a spectrum of complications and increased healthcare resource utilization.