Compromised Accuracy of Stereotactic Target Delineation Associated with Computed Tomography-Based Frame Registration: A Comparative Analysis of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Computed Tomography Fusion.

INTRODUCTION: Recent advancements in stereotactic neurosurgical techniques have become increasingly reliant on image-based target planning. We devised a case-phantom comparative analysis to evaluate the target registration errors arising during the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-computed tomography (CT) image fusion process. METHODS: For subjects whose preoperative MRI and CT images both contained fiducial frame localizers, we investigated discrepancies in target coordinates derived from frame registration based on either MRI or CT. We generated a phantom target through an image fusion process, merging the framed CT images with their corresponding reference MRIs after masking their fiducial indicators. This phantom target was then compared with the original during each instance of target planning. RESULTS: In our investigative study with 26 frame registrations, a systematic error in the y-axis was observed as -0.89 ± 0.42 mm across cases using either conventional CT and/or cone-beam CT (O-arm). For the z-axis, errors varied on a case-by-case basis, recording at +0.64 ± 1.09 mm with a predominant occurrence in those merged with cone-beam CT. Collectively, these errors resulted in an average Euclidean error of 1.33 ± 0.93 mm. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that the accuracy of frame-based stereotactic planning is potentially compromised during MRI-CT fusion process. Practitioners should recognize this issue, underscoring a pressing need for strategies and advancements to optimize the process.

Craniovertebral Junction Surgical Approaches: State of Art.

Surgical approaches directed toward craniovertebral junction (CVJ) can be addressed to the ventral, dorsal, and lateral aspects through a variety of 360° surgical corridors Herein, we report features, advantages, and limits of the updated technical support in CVJ surgery in clinical setting and dissection laboratories enriched by our preliminary surgical results of the simultaneous application of O-arm intraoperative neuronavigation and imaging system along with the 3D-4K EX in TOA for the treatment of CVJ pathologies.In the past 4 years, eight patients harboring CVJ compressive pathologies underwent one-step combined anterior neurosurgical decompression and posterior instrumentation and fusion technique with the aid of exoscope and O-arm. In our equipped Cranio-Vertebral Junction Laboratory, we use fresh cadavers (and injected "head and neck" specimens) whose policy, protocols, and logistics have already been elucidated in previous works. Five fresh-frozen adult specimens were dissected adopting an FLA. In these specimens, a TOA was also performed, as well as a neuronavigation-assisted comparison between transoral and transnasal explorable distances.A complete decompression along with stable instrumentation and fusion of the CVJ was accomplished in all the cases at the maximum follow-up (mean: 25.3 months). In two cases, the O-arm navigation allowed the identification of residual compression that was not clearly visible using the microscope alone. In four cases, it was not possible to navigate C1 lateral masses and C2 isthmi due to the angled projection unfitting with the neuronavigation optical system, so misleading the surgeon and strongly suggesting changing surgical strategy intraoperatively. In another case (case 4), it was possible to navigate and perform both C1 lateral masses and C2 isthmi screwing, but the screw placement was suboptimal at the immediate postoperative radiological assessment. In this case, the hardware displacement occurred 2 months later requiring reoperation.

A comparison of ultrasound volume navigation, O-arm navigation, and X-ray guidance for screw placement in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the differences between Ultrasound Volume Navigation (UVN), O-arm Navigation, and conventional X-ray fluoroscopy-guided screw placement in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MIS-TLIF) surgeries. METHODS: A total of 90 patients who underwent MIS-TLIF due to lumbar disc herniation from January 2022 to January 2023 were randomly assigned to the UVN group, O-arm group, and X-ray group. UVN, O-arm navigation, and X-ray guidance were used for screw placement in the respective groups, while the remaining surgical procedures followed routine MIS-TLIF protocols. Intraoperative data including average single screw placement time, total radiation dose, and average effective radiation dose per screw were recorded and calculated. On the 10th day after surgery, postoperative X-ray and CT examinations were conducted to assess screw placement accuracy and facet joint violation. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in general characteristics among the three groups, ensuring comparability. Firstly, the average single screw placement time in the O-arm group was significantly shorter than that in the UVN group and X-ray group (P<0.05). Secondly, in terms of total radiation dose during surgery, for single-level MIS-TLIF, the O-arm group had a significantly higher radiation dose compared to the UVN group and X-ray group (P<0.05). However, for multi-level MIS-TLIF, the X-ray group had a significantly higher radiation dose than the O-arm group and UVN group (P<0.05). In terms of average single screw radiation dose, the O-arm group and X-ray group were similar (P>0.05), while the UVN group was significantly lower than the other two groups (P<0.05). Furthermore, no significant differences were found in screw placement assessment grades among the three groups (P>0.05). However, in terms of facet joint violation rate, the UVN group (10.3%) and O-arm group (10.7%) showed no significant difference (P>0.05), while the X-ray group (26.7%) was significantly higher than both groups (P<0.05). Moreover, in the UVN group, there were significant correlations between average single screw placement time and placement grade with BMI index (r = 0.637, P<0.05; r = 0.504, P<0.05), while no similar significant correlations were found in the O-arm and X-ray groups. CONCLUSION: UVN-guided screw placement in MIS-TLIF surgeries demonstrates comparable efficiency, visualization, and accuracy to O-arm navigation, while significantly reducing radiation exposure compared to both O-arm navigation and X-ray guidance. However, UVN may be influenced by factors like obesity, limiting its application.

O-arm guided minimally invasive resection of intrathoracic epidural schwannoma: how I do it.

BACKGROUND: Schwannomas are the most common intrathoracic neurogenic tumors. In the past, they were often treated by traditional open surgery. Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) has also been used for some large tumors. Recently, minimally invasive posterior neurosurgical technique provides a new option for some of these tumors. METHOD: Here, we describe the specific steps involved in the O-arm guided minimally invasive removal of intrathoracic epidural schwannoma, as well as its advantages and limitations. CONCLUSION: O-arm guided minimally invasive resection of intrathoracic epidural schwannoma is safe and effective and causes little damage.

Intraoperative computerised tomography scan for percutaneous fixation of the pelvis: a retrospective case series.

PURPOSE: Fractures and dislocations of the pelvic ring are complex injuries that when treating require meticulous attention to detail and often specialized technical skill. These injuries can be the result of high-energy trauma, particularly in younger patients, or low energy trauma more often found in the elderly. Regardless of mechanism, these injuries lie on a spectrum of severity and can be treated conservatively or surgically. Percutaneous fixation under fluoroscopic guidance is the preferred standard technique when treating these fractures. This technique can be challenging for a variety of reasons including patient characteristics, intra-operative image quality, fracture morphology, among others. METHODS: This retrospective study evaluated the use of intra-operative computed tomography (CT) using an O-arm imaging system for critical evaluation of fluoroscopic-guided screw placement in twenty-three patients. We retrospectively reviewed all cases of patients who were treated by three fellowship-trained orthopaedic traumatologists during a one-year span. Patients undergoing percutaneous pelvis fixation using both standard fluoroscopy and intraoperative CT with the Medtronic O-arm® (Minneapolis, MN) imaging system. Additionally, procedures performed included open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) of the pelvic ring, acetabulum, and associated extremity fractures. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients were included in this study. On average, the use of intraoperative CT added 24.4 min in operative time. Five patients (21.7%) required implant adjustment after O-arm spin. Fourteen patients underwent additional post-operative CT. No secondary revision surgeries were attempted after any post-operative CT. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that intra-operative CT scan, compared to post-operative CT scan, can be utilized to prevent take-back surgery for misplaced implants and allow for adjustment in real-time.

Is navigation beneficial for transforaminal endoscopic lumbar foraminotomy? A preliminary comparison study with fluoroscopic guidance.

PURPOSE: The primary purpose of this study was to determine radiation exposure of the surgeon during transforaminal endoscopic lumbar foraminotomy (TELF). Secondary purpose of this study was to compare clinical and radiologic outcomes between TELF under C-arm fluoroscopic guidance (C-TELF) and O-arm navigation-guided TELF (O-TELF). METHODS: The author reviewed patients' medical records who underwent TELF at our institute from June 2015 to November 2022. A total of 40 patients were included (18 patients with C-TELF and 22 with O-TELF). Basic demographic data were collected. Preoperative/postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were recorded at the outpatient clinic. Radiologic features were compared on X-rays at each follow-up. The degree of foraminal expansion was measured/compared through MRI. In the C-TELF group, the amount of exposure was calculated with a dosimeter. RESULTS: Average surgeon's effective dose in the C-TELF group was 0.036 mSv. In the case of the O-TELF group, there was no radiation exposure during operation. However, the operation time in the O-TELF group was about 37 min longer than that in the C-TELF group. There were significant improvements in VAS/ODI after operation in both groups. Complications were identified in three patients. CONCLUSION: O-TELF showed similarly favorable clinical and radiologic outcomes to C-TELF in lumbar foraminal stenosis, including complication rate. Compared to C-TELF, O-TELF has an advantage of not wearing a lead apron since the operator is not exposed to radiation. However, the operation time was longer with O-TELF due to O-arm setting time. Because there are pros and cons, the choice of surgical method depends on the surgeon's preference.

Efficacy of less Invasive modified O-arm navigated delta fixation in osteoporotic high-grade spondylolisthesis: "a LIMO delta technique".

PURPOSE: In 1994, the technique of transdiscal screws fixation in spondylolisthesis was introduced but did not gained popularity as it failed to address problems with spinal sagittal imbalance, retroverted pelvis, pseudoarthrosis, implant failure and neural injury. Majority of problems were due to lack of clear indications; hence, in this study, with modification of traditional technique and use of O-arm navigation for selected group of patients, we have addressed the above problems and given good to excellent functional outcomes. METHODS: We did prospective study on 15 patients with osteoporotic high-grade spondylolisthesis Meyerding grade 3 & 4 admitted in period 2020-2021. Intraoperative assessment was done in form of blood loss, incision length, operative time and complications. The preoperative & postoperative assessment was done in the form of clinical and radiological parameters. RESULTS: The average follow-up was of 21.2 months (18-24 months). There was no significant difference between pre- & postoperative spinopelvic parameters. Intraoperative average blood loss was 100 ml (90-120 ml) with mean surgical time of 138 min (120-150 min). Incision length was about 5-6-cms-posterior midline with two paraspinal 1-cm incisions for transdiscal screws. Patients were mobilized on postoperative day-2. There was statistically significant improvement in mean ODI, COMI and VAS for LBP and radicular pain with no intra- or postoperative complication observed till latest follow-up with all patients showing solid monoblock fusion on 1-year follow-up CT scan. CONCLUSIONS: LIMO delta technique is a newly modified version of conventional transdiscal screw technique. Minimal incision, decreased blood loss & operative time with in situ 3-column rigid fixation and solid fusion minimizing risk of complications makes this novel technique safer, simpler & effective in osteoporotic HGS.

Fluoroscopy-Assisted Freehand Versus 3D-Navigated Imaging-Assisted Pedicle Screw Insertion: A Multicenter Study.

INTRODUCTION: Pedicle screw placement is a widely accepted surgical procedure for spinal fixation. Despite increases in knowledge about and expertise in pedicle screw insertion techniques, overall reported screw misplacement rates are still high. Spinal neuronavigation and intraoperative computed tomography (CT) imaging improves the accuracy and safety of pedicle screw placement through the continuous monitoring of screw trajectory. The purpose of this study is to compare pedicle screw placement under an O-arm intraoperative imaging system assisted by the StealthStation navigation system with screw placement under conventional fluoroscopy (C-arm). METHODS: For 222 patients, 1288 implanted pedicle screws in total were evaluated between 2018 and 2020. All patients underwent pedicle screw placement in the thoracic and lumbosacral regions through a posterior approach. Moreover, 107 patients (48.2%), 48 men and 59 women, underwent freehand screw placement under conventional fluoroscopy (C-arm group), whereas 115 patients (51.8%), 53 men and 62 women, underwent pedicle screw insertion under O-arm guidance with the help of the StealthStation neuronavigation system (Medtronic Navigation, Louisville, CO, USA) (O-arm group). Data were recorded and retrospectively analyzed. The accuracy of pedicle screw placement was postoperatively examined by using CT imaging and analyzed according to the Gertzbein-Robbins classification. RESULTS: Of the 1288 pedicle screws, 665 (51.6%) were placed with C-arm image-guided assistance with a mean of 6.21 ± 2.1 screws per patient and 643 (48.4%) with O-arm image-guided assistance with a mean of 5.59 ± 1.6 screws. The average time for the screw placement procedure was 3:57 ± 1:07 h in the C-arm group and 4:21 ± 1:41 h in the O-arm group. A correct screw placement was detected in 92.78% of patients in the C-arm group and in 98.13% of patients in the O-arm group. Medial cortical breach was shown in 13 Grade B screws (1.95%), 19 Grade C (2.86%), 14 Grade D (2.11%), and two Grade E (0.3%) in the C-arm group, whereas this was shown in 11 Grade B screws (1.71%) and one Grade C (0.16%) in the O-arm group. Lateral breach occurred in eight screws in both groups. Anterior vertebral body breach was shown in eight screws in the C-arm group, whereas it was shown in four screws in the O-arm group. Reoperation for screw misplacement was mandatory in five patients in the C-arm group and two patients in the O-arm group. CONCLUSION: Pedicle screw placement under an O-arm intraoperative imaging system assisted by spinal navigation showed greater accuracy compared with placement under conventional fluoroscopic control, thus avoiding the onset of major postoperative complications. Notably, a reduction in medial and anterior breaches has been demonstrated.

Postoperative computed tomography imaging of pediatric patients with craniosynostosis: radiation dose and image quality comparison between multi-slice computed tomography and O-arm cone-beam computed tomography.

BACKGROUND: When postoperative multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) imaging of patients with craniosynostosis is used, it is usually performed a few days after surgery in a radiology department. This requires additional anesthesia for the patient. Recently, intraoperative mobile cone-beam CT (CBCT) devices have gained popularity for orthopedic and neurosurgical procedures, which allows postoperative CT imaging in the operating room. OBJECTIVE: This single-center retrospective study compared radiation dose and image quality of postoperative imaging performed using conventional MSCT scanners and O-arm CBCT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 104 pediatric syndromic and non-syndromic patients who were operated on because of single- or multiple-suture craniosynostosis were included in this study. The mean volumetric CT dose index (CTDIvol) and dose-length product (DLP) values of optimized craniosynostosis CT examinations (58 MSCT and 46 CBCT) were compared. Two surgeons evaluated the subjective image quality. RESULTS: CBCT resulted in significantly lower CTDIvol (up to 14%) and DLP (up to 33%) compared to MSCT. Multi-slice CT image quality was considered superior to CBCT scans. However, all scans were considered to be of sufficient quality for diagnosis. CONCLUSION: The O-arm device allowed for an immediate postoperative CBCT examination in the operating theater using the same anesthesia induction. Radiation exposure was lower in CBCT compared to MSCT scans, thus further encouraging the use of O-arms. Cone-beam CT imaging with an O-arm is a feasible method for postoperative craniosynostosis imaging, yielding less anesthesia to patients, lower health costs and the possibility to immediately evaluate results of the surgical operation.

Effect of O-arm on reduction quality and functional recovery of acetabular dome impaction fractures: a retrospective clinical study.

BACKGROUND: Acetabular dome impaction fractures (ADIF) are difficult to reduce and have a high failure rate. Consistency between the acetabulum and the femoral head is usually assessed using intraoperative X-ray fluoroscopy to evaluate the quality of fracture reduction. This study examines the effects of intraoperative mobile 2D/3DX imaging system (O-arm) on the reduction quality and functional recovery of ADIF. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed the data of 48 patients with ADIF treated at Honghui Hospital between October 2018 and October 2021.The patients were divided into the X-ray and O-arm groups. The residual step-off and gap displacements in the acetabular dome region were measured, and fracture reduction quality was evaluated. Hip function was evaluated using the modified Merle d'Aubigné and Postel scoring systems. RESULTS: There were no significant intergroup differences in the preoperative general data (p > 0.05). The mean residual average step displacement in the acetabular dome region was 3.48 ± 2.43 mm and 1.61 ± 1.16 mm (p < 0.05), while the mean gap displacement was 6.72 ± 3.69 mm and 3.83 ± 1.67 mm (p < 0.05) in the X-ray and the O-arm groups, respectively. In the X-ray group, according to the fracture reduction criteria described by Verbeek and Moed et al., one case was excellent, 13 cases were good, 11 cases were poor; 56% were excellent or good. In the O-arm group, seven cases were excellent, 12 cases were good, and four cases were poor; overall in this group, 82.6% were excellent or good (p < 0.05). A total of 46 patients achieved fracture healing at the last follow-up. In the X-ray group, according to the modified Merle d'Aubigné and Postel function score, three cases were excellent,12 cases were good, six cases were middle, three cases were poor; 62.5% were excellent or good, In the O-arm group, 15 cases were excellent, four cases were good, two cases were middle, one case was poor; 86.4% were excellent or good (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The application of O-arm in ADIF can improve fracture reduction quality and functional recovery.

Minimally invasive percutaneous new designed transpedicular lag-screw fixation for the management of Hangman fracture using O-arm-based navigation: a clinical study.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the outcomes and safety of using minimally invasive percutaneous new transpedicular lag-screw fixation with intraoperative, full rotation, three-dimensional image (O-arm)-based navigation for the management of Hangman fracture. METHODS: Twenty-two patients with Hangman fracture were treated with minimally invasive percutaneous new transpedicular lag-screws using intraoperative, full rotation, and three-dimensional image (O-arm)-based navigation. The preoperative and postoperative conditions of the patients were evaluated according to the ASIA (American Spinal Injury Association) scale. The patient's VAS (visual analog scale) scores before and after surgery, operation time, cervical vertebral activity, intervertebral angle and bone healing were recorded and collected, and repeated measures analysis of variance was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: All patients were satisfactorily repositioned after surgery, and the VAS scores for neck pain were significantly lower than those before surgery on the first day and at 1 month, 3 months and the last follow-up (P < 0.001). According to the ASIA scale, four patients recovered from preoperative grade D to postoperative grade E. Bony fusion was achieved for all cases, and the range of neck rotation was restored to normal at the last follow-up. The post-surgery angular displacement (AD) demonstrated the stability of C2-3 after our new screw fixation for the treatment of Hangman fracture. CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive percutaneous new transpedicular lag-screw fixation using intraoperative, full rotation, three-dimensional image (O-arm)-based navigation achieved satisfactory clinical results with the advantages of immediate stability, safety and effectivity. We suggest that it is a reliable and advanced technique for the management of Hangman fracture.

Percutaneous Balloon Compression for Trigeminal Neuralgia. A Comparative Study Between the Fluoroscope Guided and Neuronavigated Technique.

Percutaneous balloon compression (PBC) is a safe and effective procedure in the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia (TN) due to its simplicity, low cost and the possibility of being repeated in case of pain recurrence. Foramen ovale (FO) cannulation is accomplished with the assistance of intraoperative C-arm fluoroscopy. Recently, several authors have reported successful application of intraoperative CT navigation as well. The reported advantages of CT navigation are linked to better spatial orientation and the low rate of attempts for FO cannulation. However, these advantages should be considered in the face of concerns regarding increased radiation dose to the patient and its possible adverse effects. Here we compared the fluoroscopic guided and neuronavigated PBC techniques in terms of efficacy and radiological exposure. We retrospectively analyzed 37 patients suffering for TN and submitted to PBC. We observed a significant improvement of pain at 1 month FU compared with the pre-operative in both groups (p < 0.0001 and p < 0.0001, respectively). A significant increase in radiation exposure was found in the neuronavigated group compared with the fluoroscopy group (p < 0.0001). We suggest the use of neuronavigated PBC only in selected cases, such as patients with multiple previous operations, in whom a difficult access can be pre-operatively hypothesized.

Combined Transoral Exoscope and OARM-Assisted Approach for Craniovertebral Junction Surgery. New Trends in an Old-Fashioned Approach.

BACKGROUND: The introduction of recent innovations in the field of intraoperative imaging and neuronavigation, such as the O-arm StealthStation, allows for obtaining crucial intraoperative data by performing safer and controlled surgical procedures. As part of the improvement of surgical visual magnification and wide expansion of surgical corridors, the 3D 4 K exoscope (EX) has nowadays become an interesting and useful tool. The transoral approach (TOA) is the historical gold-standard direct microsurgical route to ventral craniovertebral junction (CVJ). METHODS: We herein report our experience, consisting of ten cases via TOA concerning the simultaneous application of an O-arm with a StealthStation navigation system (Medtronic, Memphis, TN) and an imaging system, along with the 3D 4 K exoscopes in the TOA, for the treatment of CVJ pathologies. RESULTS: No intraoperative neurophysiological changes or postoperative infections occurred, but neurological improvement was evident in all the patients. A complete decompression and a stable instrumentation and fusion of the CVJ were accomplished in all cases at the maximum follow-up time. CONCLUSIONS: With EX, the role of the surgeon becomes self-sufficient with better individual surgical freedom compared to endoscopic surgery and excellent 3D vision and magnification. O-arms offer absolutely reliable intraoperative support for more-effective CVJ decompression. Nevertheless, with O-arm-assisted neuronavigation, it can be difficult to navigate C1 lateral masses and C2 isthmi, and converting 3D into 2D real-time navigation can be quite complicated. Finally, the combination of an EX with an O-arm appears more time-consuming compared to the old-fashion one.

Surgical outcomes of intraoperative O-arm versus C-arm fluoroscopy in occipitocervical fixation: a retrospective analysis.

PURPOSE: This study aims to compare the effect of using O-arm and C-arm fluoroscopy on the surgical outcomes of occipitocervical fixation. METHODS: The study included patients who underwent occipitocervical fixation using O-arm or C-arm between 2005 and 2021. Of 56 patients, 34 underwent O-arm-assisted surgery (O-group) and 22 underwent C-arm-assisted surgery (C-group). We assessed surgical outcomes, including operative time, intraoperative blood loss, perioperative complications, and bone union. RESULTS: Almost half of the patients had rheumatoid arthritis-related disorders in both groups. Sixteen cases (47.1%) in the O-group and 12 cases (54.5%) in the C-group were fixed from occipito (Oc) to C3, 12 cases (38.2%) in the O-group and 7 cases (31.8%) in the C-group from Oc to C4-7, 5 cases (14.7%) in the O-group, and 3 cases (13.6%) in the C-group from Oc to T2 (p = 0.929). There was no significant difference in operative time (p = 0.239) and intraoperative blood loss (p = 0.595) between the two groups. Dysphagia was the most common complication in both groups (O-group vs. C-group, 11.7% vs. 9.1%). Regarding implant-related complications, occipital plate dislodgement was observed in four cases (18.2%) in the C-group (p = 0.02). The bone union rate was 96.3% in the O-group and 93.3% in the C-group (P = 1). CONCLUSIONS: O-arm use is associated with a reduced rate of occipital plate dislodgment and has a similar complication incidence compared with C-arm-assisted surgery and does not prolong operative time despite the time needed for setting and scanning. Accordingly, an O-arm is safe and useful for occipitocervical fixation surgery.

A retrospective comparative study of clinical efficacy of percutaneous short segment pedicle screw fixation with or without screwing of the fractured vertebra with O-arm navigation.

OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively analyze the short and long-term efficacies of O-arm-navigated percutaneous short segment pedicle screw fixation, with or without screwing of the fractured vertebra. METHODS: A total of 42 patients who underwent O-arm-navigated percutaneous short segment pedicle screw fixation for the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures from February 2015 to December 2018 were selected for analysis. The patients were divided into two groups according to the surgical intervention they received: Group A received percutaneous short segment pedicle screw fixation with screwing of the fractured vertebra and Group B received percutaneous short segment pedicle screw fixation without screwing of the fractured vertebra. Radiographic analysis included Cobb angles and percentage of anterior vertebral height (AVH%). Clinical functional outcomes were assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS) for back pain and the oswestry disability index (ODI) scores. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed in the operation time and intraoperative blood loss between the two groups (P > 0.05). The length of incision was statistically significantly different between the two groups (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in Cobb angle and AVH% between the two groups before and after the surgery (P > 0.05). However, the Cobb angle and AVH% were both significantly larger in Group A than Group B at the final follow-up (P < 0.05). In terms of clinical outcomes, there were no statistically significant differences in VAS and ODI scores between the two groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: In the short term, both minimally invasive treatments were safe and effective in treating thoracolumbar fracture. Although there was significant difference between the two groups in Cobb angle and vertebral body height at the last follow-up, the difference was small. Therefore, these specific parameters will be an important outcome measure in further investigations.

C-arm Free O-arm Navigated Posterior Atlantoaxial Fixation in Down Syndrome: A Technical Note.

The surgical treatment of pediatric atlantoaxial subluxation (AAS) in Down syndrome (DS) remains technically challenging due to radiation exposure and complications such as vertebral artery injury and nonunion. The established treatment is fixation with a C1 lateral mass screw and C2 pedicle screw (modified Goel technique). However, this technique requires fluoroscopy for C1 screw insertion. To avoid exposing the operating team to radiation we present here a new C-arm free O-arm navigated surgical procedure for pediatric AAS in DS. A 5-year-old male DS patient had neck pain and unsteady gait. Radiograms showed AAS with an atlantodental interval of 10 mm, and irreducible subluxation on extension. CT scan showed Os odontoideum and AAS. MRI demonstrated spinal cord compression between the C1 posterior arch and odontoid process. We performed a C-arm free O-arm navigated modified Goel procedure with postoperative halo-vest immobilization. At oneyear follow-up, good neurological recovery and solid bone fusion were observed. The patient had no complications such as epidural hematoma, infection, or nerve or vessel injury. This novel procedure is a useful and safe technique that protects surgeons and staff from radiation risk.

O-Arm Stereotactic Imaging in Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery Workflow: A Utility and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery is an established treatment for movement disorders. Advances in neuroimaging techniques have resulted in improved targeting accuracy that may improve clinical outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of using the Medtronic O-arm device for the acquisition of intraoperative stereotactic imaging, targeting, and localization of DBS electrodes compared with standard stereotactic MRI or computed tomography (CT). METHODS: Patients were recruited prospectively into the study. Routine frame-based stereotactic DBS surgery was performed. Intraoperative imaging was used to facilitate and verify the accurate placement of the intracranial electrodes. The acquisition of coordinates and verification of the position of the electrodes using the O-arm were evaluated and compared with conventional stereotactic MRI or CT. Additionally, a systematic review of the literature on the use of intraoperative imaging in DBS surgery was performed. RESULTS: Eighty patients were included. The indications for DBS surgery were dystonia, Parkinson's disease, essential tremor, and epilepsy. The globus pallidus internus was the most commonly targeted region (43.7%), followed by the subthalamic nucleus (35%). Stereotactic O-arm imaging reduced the overall surgical time by 68 min, reduced the length of time of acquisition of stereotactic images by 77%, reduced patient exposure to ionizing radiation by 24.2%, significantly reduced operating room (OR) costs per procedure by 31%, and increased the OR and neuroradiology suite availability. CONCLUSIONS: The use of the O-arm in DBS surgery workflow significantly reduced the duration of image acquisition, the exposure to ionizing radiation, and costs when compared with standard stereotactic MRI or CT, without reducing accuracy.

The Nottingham radiation protocol for O-arm navigation in paediatric deformity patients: a feasibility study.

BACKGROUND: O-arm assisted pedicle screw placement has been proven to be more accurate than free-hand technique. Radiation exposure remains the primary drawback. We determined the feasibility and safety of a reduced radiation protocol in paediatric patients undergoing scoliosis correction. METHODS: A reduced radiation protocol for a medtronic O-arm navigational system was devised. 3D CT reconstructions of an anthropomorphic pelvic phantom indicated adequate image quality after reduction to 14% of current manufacturer default factors. A feasibility study to test the image quality was undertaken on four patients, one with syndromic and three with idiopathic scoliosis each receiving progressively reducing radiation exposure of 60%, 50%, 40% and 14% of what would have been delivered using the manufacturer default protocol. This represented 32% of the mayo clinic protocol. It was achieved by reducing the x-ray tube current to 10 mA while keeping the tube potential at 90 kVp. RESULTS: A low dose O-arm protocol was able to generate adequate image quality while delivering as little as 14% (for lumbar region reconstructions) of the recommended protocol radiation dose. The total radiation dose delivered with this protocol was approximately 0.8 milliSieverts for a single spin. This effective dose represents < 1/3 of average UK and < 1/6 average US annual radiation exposure. There were no neurological or implant-related complications. CONCLUSIONS: Our low dose O-arm radiation protocol significantly reduces the radiation exposure compared to the manufacturer recommended Mayo clinic protocol providing operational image quality to allow accurate screw placement in spinal deformity.

Validation of 3D fluoroscopy for image-guidance registration in depth electrode implantation for medically refractory epilepsy.

BACKGROUND: Frame registration is a critical step to ensure accurate electrode placement in stereotactic procedures such as stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) and is routinely done by merging a computed tomography (CT) scan with the preoperative magnetic resonance (MR) examination. Three-dimensional fluoroscopy (XT) has emerged as a method for intraoperative electrode verification following electrode implantation and more recently has been proposed as a registration method with several advantages. METHODS: We compared the accuracy of SEEG electrode placement by frame registration with CT and XT imaging by analyzing the Euclidean distance between planned and post-implantation trajectories of the SEEG electrodes to calculate the error in both the entry (EP) and target (TP) points. Other variables included radiation dose, efficiency, and complications. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients (13 CT and 14 XT) underwent placement of SEEG electrodes (319 in total). The mean EP and TP errors for the CT group were 2.3 mm and 3.3 mm, respectively, and 1.9 mm and 2.9 mm for the XT group, with no statistical difference (p = 0.75 and p = 0.246). The time to first electrode placement was similar (XT, 82 ± 10 min; CT, 84 ± 22 min; p = 0.858) and the average radiation exposure with XT (234 ± 55 mGy*cm) was significantly lower than CT (1245 ± 123 mGy*cm) (p < 0.0001). Four complications were documented with equal incidence in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The use of XT as a method for registration resulted in similar implantation accuracy compared with CT. Advantages of XT are the substantial reduction in radiation dose and the elimination of the need to transfer the patient out of the room which may have an impact on patient safety and OR efficiency.

O-arm Navigation-Guided Surgical Resection and Posterior Fixation for a Large Sacral Schwannoma.

Sacral schwannoma is a rare tumor with relatively few symptoms; it thus tends to be large at diagnosis and is challenging to treat surgically. We present the case of a 12-year-old girl with a large sacral schwannoma that was successfully surgically resected using O-arm navigation in a two-stage operation. First, we performed tumor resection from the posterior aspect with assisted O-arm navigation. One week later, resection from the anterior aspect was conducted with posterior spinopelvic fixation and fibula graft. We performed partial resection of the tumor from the anterior and posterior aspects as much as possible. O-arm navigation contributed to precise and safe tumor resection and implant insertion.