Onco-TESE (Testicular Sperm Extraction): Insights from a Tertiary Center and Comprehensive Literature Analysis.

Background and Objectives: The peak of incidence of testicular cancer (TC) occurs among individuals in their reproductive age, emphasizing the importance of fertility preservation as an integral aspect of disease management. Sperm cryopreservation performed before orchiectomy is ineffective in azoospermic men, necessitating alternative approaches such as microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) at the time of orchiectomy (onco-mTESE) to obtain viable sperm. This study presents the findings from our institution's experience with onco-mTESE and critically discusses our results in light of the existing body of literature. Materials and Methods: This is a tertiary center retrospective analysis of onco-mTESE procedures performed at a single center between December 2011 and July 2022. The included patients were post-puberal men with testicular tumors requiring orchiectomy, along with concomitant severe oligozoospermia or azoospermia. Bilateral mTESE was performed in all cases. Surgical outcomes, sperm retrieval rates, the usage of preserved viable sperm, assistive reproductive techniques' results, and post-operative serum testosterone were recorded. Results: A total of nine patients were included, with a median age of 34 (IQR 29-36) years. All patients had germ cell tumors (GCTs), with seminomatous and non-seminomatous GCTs accounting for 44.4% (n = 4) and 55.6% (n = 5) of patients, respectively. Sperm retrieval occurred in three (33%) patients: one patient in the ipsilateral testis, one in the contralateral testis, and one in both testes. No complications were reported during the procedure, and no post-operative hypogonadism was observed. Among the three patients with successful sperm retrieval, an intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) was performed in two patients, resulting in two pregnancies, leading to one healthy live birth and one miscarriage. Conclusions: In the context of TC, it is essential to conduct a thorough evaluation of testicular function, including a semen analysis and cryopreservation. Onco-mTESE has proven its safety in preserving fertility in azoospermic cases while ensuring the efficacy of oncological treatment.

[Onco-TESE and testicular cancer]. / Onco-TESE et cancer du testicule.

INTRODUCTION: Fertility preservation is essential before cancer treatment. When ejaculated sperm preservation is not possible, testicular tissue can be surgically collected by Onco-TESE technic (Oncological Testicular Sperm Extraction) to isolate sperm. We report on our experience with Onco-TESE in testicular cancer patients at the Rouen University Hospital. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Retrospective study including all pubescent men, treated for testicular cancer, uni- or bilateral, before any carcinological therapy, who have undergone Onco-TESE at the Rouen University Hospital. Fragment weight, detection of sperm or its precursors were analysed. A histological interpretation of the testicular tumor was carried out. For each positive sample, straws were kept at the French Sperm Bank. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients had an Onco-TESE: 58.34% severe sperm alteration (SSA) and 41.36% sperm collection failure (SCF), between 1996 and 2019. The mean age was 26.6 (±5.29) years. The mean procedure and length of stay were 71minutes (±30.7) and 3.75 days (±2.83), respectively. The rate of positive testicular biopsies (TB) was 58.33% overall and 66,67% in the case of TB on tumour testis. One patient had a Clavian-Dindo III complication. The mean number of straws preserved per patient was 14.28 (±15.34) for 7.14% use. CONCLUSION: Our results seem to confirm that Onco-TESE is an effective solution for preserving fertility in men with testicular cancer in cases of SSA or SCF. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Fertility managment in testicular cancer: the need to establish a standardized and evidence-based patient-centric pathway.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present paper was to determine the impact of testicular cancer (TC) and its treatments on fertility and to review the current management options for the infertile patient with TC, both before diagnosis and after treatment, with the aim of providing practical recommendations to update contemporary guidelines and standardize clinical practice. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Searches were conducted for relevant articles on Pubmed and Google Scholar between 2000 and 2017, with additional articles sourced from reference lists of included publications. RESULTS: At time of diagnosis, 6-24% of patients with TC were reported to be azoospermic and 50% oligozoospermic. Without conducting semen analysis at diagnosis, these patients cannot be identified and may be at further risk of subfertility. Gonadotoxic therapies cause an overall decrease in male fertility by 30% and there is currently no method to predict which patients will become azoospermic after treatment. Patients with larger, more invasive tumours, however, are at greater risk of infertility from local tumour effects, and are also more likely to undergo several different type of therapy, which has further detrimental effects on conception rates. Most treatment-induced infertility recovers 2 years post-treatment, but paternity can be delayed during a couple's peak reproductive years. Semen cryopreservation remains the procedure of choice in preserving fertility, but the service is underused, with only 24% of patients banking sperm. Microdissection testicular sperm extraction (microTESE) at the time of orchidectomy (onco-microTESE) is a successful infertility treatment option for those found to be azoospermic or severely oligozoospermic at diagnosis, while microTESE may still retrieve sperm in azoospermic patients after chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: The underutilisation of semen analysis and sperm cryopreservation results in the failure to identify the azoospermic or severely oligozoospermic patient at diagnosis who may benefit from fertility-preserving procedures, for example, onco-microTESE at the time of orchidectomy. Fertility preservation and counselling needs to be broached earlier in the TC treatment pathway and made a greater priority. Given the advances in treatment, more patients with TC are surviving and looking to return to a normal life. Preserving their future fertility plays an important role in achieving this.

Fertility preservation in testicular cancer - predictors of spermatogenesis.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the frequency of spermatogenesis in patients with testicular cancer and to assess for any predictors of spermatogenesis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 103 testicular germ cell tumours (TGCTs) in men who underwent radical orchidectomy conducted at Guy's Hospital, London, between 2011 and 2015. Primary outcome measures included: the presence and characteristics of spermatogenesis (widespread/focal/proximity to tumour). Secondary outcome measures included: the presence of testicular microlithiasis, tumour characteristics (size, stage, and type), and tumour markers. Secondary outcome measures as potential predictors of spermatogenesis were assessed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: Spermatogenesis was present in 70% (72/103) of the patients; it was widespread in 63% (45/72) and focal in 38% (27/72). Neither tumour type, stage, presence of microcalcification nor tumour markers predicted spermatogenesis. Men with a percentage testis tumour occupation (PTTO) of >50% of their testis were 82% (95% confidence interval 73.2-98.4) less likely to have spermatogenesis than a PTTO of <50%. CONCLUSIONS: Spermatogenesis is present in most testes affected by TGCTs; it is widespread in two-thirds of patients, and located away from the tumour in 94%. These findings can help predict and guide successful surgical sperm retrieval in testes with TGCTs. The finding of focal spermatogenesis in a third of patients would support a microsurgical approach to sperm retrieval at the time of orchidectomy to maximise success.

Ex-vivo microscopic oncotesticular sperm extraction: step-by-step surgical technique at time of radical orchiectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the intraoperative surgical techniques required for simultaneous radical orchiectomy and microscopic oncotesticular sperm extraction (m-OncoTESE) in a step-by-step fashion. DESIGN: Video presentation. SETTING: University Hospital (University of Chicago). PATIENTS: A 37-year-old man (status after right orchiectomy at another institution for stage II-C testicular seminoma with positive preoperative tumor markers) was referred for contralateral orchiectomy of multifocal left testis mass and fertility preservation. Semen analysis before, microscopic testicular sperm extraction during, and semen or testicular specimen analysis after the first orchiectomy were unable to identify any sperm. A postoperative analysis of the m-OncoTESE performed on the left testis resulted in the cryopreservation of 200,000 motile sperm for future assisted reproductive technology (i.e., in vitro fertilization or in vitro fertilization-intracytoplasmic sperm injection). INTERVENTIONS: Left radical orchiectomy and left m-OncoTESE. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A comprehensive visual documentation of m-OncoTESE surgical techniques with concurrent commentary detailing the reasons behind each surgical step. A brief discussion on the background of m-OncoTESE and alternative fertility preservation methods accompanies the procedure. RESULTS: This video provides a step-by-step guide to performing an m-OncoTESE (proceeding a radical orchiectomy in a patient with testicular cancer) as a means of fertility preservation in an azoospermic patient. Successful extraction and cryopreservation of testicular spermatozoa were achieved after targeted ex-vivo testicular microdissection. CONCLUSIONS: Sperm extraction via m-OncoTESE is a viable option for azoospermic patients with testicular cancer undergoing radical orchiectomies. The use of preoperative imaging and microsurgical techniques facilitates and optimizes surgical dissection and sperm recovery.

Frequent azoospermia in patients with testicular germ cell cancer and a history of cryptorchidism: a report of nine cases and review of the literature.

This study analyzed semen parameters in patients with testicular germ cell cancer and a history of cryptorchidism. Among testicular cancer patients referred for sperm cryopreservation, the semen of 9 patients with a history of cryptorchidism, including three cases of bilateral cryptorchidism and one case of cryptorchidism with bilateral metachronous tumor, was analyzed. Eight patients underwent orchidopexy during childhood. The tumor was observed on the contralateral side of the undescended testis, except in the bilateral metachronous tumor and cryptorchidism cases. Five patients, including the one who developed a metachronous testicular tumor on the undescended testis, showed azoospermia even though in three of them, semen was collected before undergoing orchiectomy. Clinical urologists should recognize that spermatogenesis is severely impaired in these patients and consider cryopreservation before orchiectomy or onco-TESE.

A case of congenital single testis with testicular cancer patient and azoospermia who was able to collect spermatozoa with ipsilateral Onco-TESE.

Onco-TESE is a useful strategy for cancer patients with a congenital single testis who wish to preserve their fertility.

Guideline based approach to male fertility preservation.

With the increased awareness that cancer and its treatments may have a substantial impact upon quality of life before, during, and after therapy, fertility preservation is now widely recognized as an essential component of care for all patients with a new cancer diagnosis. The emergence of formal fertility preservation guidelines from multiple professional societies has provided a framework for incorporating fertility preservation into clinical practice. Providers should discuss fertility considerations with new cancer patients at the earliest possible opportunity, prior to initiation of potentially gonadotoxic cancer treatments. Sperm banking via masturbation remains the easiest and most reliable method for fertility preservation, though a variety of alternatives exist for adolescents and adult males with azoospermia or those who are unable to provide a sample. Ultimately, care can be optimally delivered through a formal fertility preservation program that includes providers from multiple disciplines with the resources to provide comprehensive and expedient care.

Onco-testicular sperm extraction (Onco-TESE) from a single testis with metachronous bilateral testicular cancer: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Although oncologic testicular sperm extraction (onco-TESE) has been increasingly practiced, the evidence of onco-TESE performed in patients with testicular cancer is insufficient. Furthermore, in bilateral testicular cancer, accounting for 0.5%-1% of testicular cancers, onco-TESE is more challenging and has been insufficiently reported. CASE PRESENTATION: Here we report the case of a 25-year-old man who underwent onco-TESE from his residual single testis with a nonseminomatous germ cell tumor that occurred 5 years after orchiectomy of the contralateral testis. A second orchiectomy and simultaneous TESE from the noncancerous testicular tissue were performed. The pathological diagnosis was germ cell tumors, tumors of more than one histological type (embryonal carcinoma, immature teratoma, yolk sac tumor, seminoma, and choriocarcinoma; pT1N0M0). The patient subsequently married and hoped for fatherhood 3 years later. Whereas histological diagnosis of the normal testicular tissue was Johnsen score 6 (maturation arrest), morphologically normal and motile sperms were successfully retrieved from thawed TESE samples and used for multiple cycles of intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Although the conception has not been succeeded to date, ICSI attempts have been continuing. CONCLUSION: This case demonstrates the effectiveness of onco-TESE for challenging cases such as bilateral and nonseminmatous testicular cancer.

CONTEXTE: Bien que l'extraction oncologique de spermatozoïdes testiculaires (onco-TESE) soit une pratique croissante, le bien-fondé de réaliser une onco-TESE chez des patients qui ont un cancer du testicule reste insuffisamment étayé. Par ailleurs, en cas de cancer bilatéral, qui représente 0,5­1% des cancers du testicule, l'onco-TESE est. plus difficile, et peu de cas ont été rapportés. CAS CLINIQUE: Nous rapportons le cas d'un homme de 25 ans qui a bénéficié d'une onco-TESE pour tumeur à cellules germinales non séminomateuse sur testicule unique résiduel, survenant 5 ans après une orchidectomie controlatérale. Ont été réalisées simultanément une seconde orchidectomie et une TESE sur tissu testiculaire non tumoral. L'étude anatomopathologique a montré des tumeurs à cellules germinales de plus d'un type histologique (carcinome embryonnaire, tératome immature, tumeur vitelline, séminome, et choriocarcinome; pT1N0M0). Le patient a ensuite convolé en noces et le couple a souhaité avoir un enfant 3 ans plus tard. Alors que l'étude histologique du tissu testiculaire normal donnait un score de Johnsen à 6 (arrêt de maturation), des spermatozoïdes morphologiquement normaux et mobiles ont été retrouvés dans les échantillons de TESE décongelés; ces spermatozoïdes ont été utilisés pour réaliser plusieurs cycles d'injection intra cytoplasmique. Bien qu'aucune conception n'ait eu lieu à ce jour, les tentatives d'ICSI se poursuivent. CONCLUSIONS: Ce cas montre l'efficacité de l'onco-TESE face à des cas tels qu'un cancer testiculaire bilatéral et non séminomateux.

Onco-testicular sperm extraction (onco-TESE) for bilateral testicular tumors: two case reports.

BACKGROUND: Most patients with testicular cancer are infertile; thus, the preservation of the sperm after surgery is an important factor to consider. We report two cases of bilateral testicular cancer in patients who underwent bilateral higher orchiectomy and simultaneous testicular sperm extraction. CASE PRESENTATION: Two Asian-Japanese men were referred to our hospital with bilateral testicular tumors. Both of the patients were preoperatively diagnosed with azoospermia and requested testicular sperm extraction at the time of higher orchiectomy. In one patient, sperm was successfully harvested and then frozen. In the other patient, sperm could not be retrieved from the patient's testis. In both patients, the pathological diagnosis was seminoma. Testicular tumors often occur in patients of reproductive age. The preservation of sperm before chemotherapy or bilateral orchiectomy is necessary for patients with testicular tumors who wish to be fathers. CONCLUSIONS: Onco-testicular sperm extraction might be an option for patients with testicular cancer and azoospermia or severe oligospermia.

Predictors of spermatogenesis in radical orchiectomy specimen and potential implications for patients with testicular cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the ability of semen analysis and other patients' characteristics to predict the presence of spermatozoa in radical orchiectomy pathological specimen, and describe potential implications for patients with azoospermia and testis cancer. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary hospital. PATIENT(S): A total of 214 consecutive patients with testicular cancer who underwent radical orchiectomy between 1997 and 2015. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Histologic slides were reviewed and the presence of mature spermatozoa was documented. Clinical, laboratory, and radiographic characteristics were recorded. Logistic regression analyses were used to identify factors associated with the presence of spermatozoa in the noninvolved ipsilateral testicular parenchyma. RESULT(S): Spermatozoa were found in the pathological specimen of 145 patients (67.8%). At multivariate analysis, increased tumor size was the only factor associated with lower rates of spermatozoa in the specimen. Mean tumor diameter was 4.06 cm, and spermatozoa were found in 83% and 49% of testes with tumor diameters <4 and ≥4 cm, respectively. Preoperative semen analysis records were available for 107 patients. Oligozoospermia, severe oligozoospermia, azoospermia, and cryptozoospermia were observed in 17 (16%), 18 (17%), 9 (8%) and 3 (3%) patients, respectively. Sperm concentration and motility were not associated with complete spermatogenesis. Seven of 12 patients (58%) with either azoospermia or cryptozoospermia had mature sperm in their pathological sections. CONCLUSION(S): Larger testicular cancers are associated with lower rates of spermatozoa in the ipsilateral testis. Given the substantial likelihood (∼60%) of spermatozoa to be present in the cancerous testis of patients with azoospermia and cryptozoospermia, concomitant oncologic testicular sperm extraction (TESE) can be considered in these selected patients.