Nearly 14-Fold Increased Risk of Manipulation Under Anesthesia After Total Knee Arthroplasty When Previous Contralateral Total Knee Arthroplasty Required Manipulation Under Anesthesia.

BACKGROUND: Stiffness remains a common complication after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) is the gold standard treatment for early postoperative stiffness; however, there remains a paucity of data on the risk of MUA after primary TKA if a prior contralateral TKA required MUA. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 3,102 patients who had staged primary TKAs between 2016 and 2021. The mean body mass index was 33 (range, 18 to 59) and the mean age was 67 years (range, 24 to 91). The mean preoperative range of motion for the first TKA was 2 to 104°, and for the contralateral TKA was 1 to 107°. The primary outcomes were MUA following first and second primary TKAs. Multivariable Poisson regressions were used to evaluate associations between risk factors and outcomes. RESULTS: The rate of MUA after the first TKA was 2.6% (n = 83 of 3,102) and 1.3% (n = 40 of 3,102) after the contralateral TKA. After adjustment, there was a nearly 14-fold higher rate of MUA after the second TKA if the patient had an MUA after the first TKA (relative risk, 13.80; 95% CI [confidence interval], 7.14 to 26.66). For the first TKA, increasing age (adjusted risk ratio [ARR], 0.65; 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.83) and increasing body mass index (ARR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.90) were associated with lower risk for MUA. For the second TKA, increasing age was associated with a lower risk of MUA (ARR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.45 to 0.80). CONCLUSIONS: For patients undergoing staged bilateral TKA, patients who undergo MUA following the first primary TKA are nearly 14-fold more likely to undergo an MUA following the contralateral primary TKA than those who did not have an MUA after their first TKA.

Outcomes of Early Versus Delayed Manipulation Under Anesthesia for Stiffness Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Stiffness following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is often treated with manipulation under anesthesia (MUA). However, there is debate regarding the timing of MUA, with many recommending against MUA beyond 3 months after TKA. Therefore, the purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the functional and clinical outcomes of early versus delayed MUA for stiffness following TKA. METHODS: A search following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines was performed in the PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane databases in November 2023. Data regarding study characteristics, demographics, knee flexion and extension, patient-reported outcomes, complications, and revisions were collected. A quality assessment was performed using the Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies. Included were 14 studies analyzing 13,445 knees, 72.1% of which underwent early MUA and 27.8% of which underwent delayed MUA. Of the 14 studies, 10 defined early MUA as being performed within 3 months of the index TKA. RESULTS: Pre-MUA and post-MUA knee flexion for the early/delayed groups was 71.3°/77.9° and 103.0°/96.1°, respectively. Upon meta-analysis, pre-MUA knee flexion was significantly higher in the delayed group (P = .003), whereas post-MUA flexion was similar in both groups (P = .36). The mean gain in knee flexion for the early and delayed groups was 32.0°/19.2°. The surgical complication and revision TKA rates for the early and delayed groups were 4.9%/10.3% and 5%/9%, respectively. A meta-analysis found the risk of surgical or medical complications and revision TKA to be significantly higher in the delayed MUA group (P < .00001 and = .002, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Although post-MUA knee flexion was similar in patients undergoing early and delayed MUA following TKA, the mean gain in flexion for early patients was nearly double that of delayed patients. Delayed patients also had significantly higher risks of surgical or medical complications and revision TKA following MUA.

The impact of prior ACL reconstruction on total knee arthroplasty outcomes: a retrospective matched cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Discrepant data exists regarding the outcomes following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with a prior anterior cruciate reconstruction (ACLR). The purpose of our study was to compare surgical and medical outcomes in the patients with prior ACLR undergoing TKAs compared to a matched control group of the patients who had undergone TKAs without prior ACLR. We hypothesized that the patients with prior ACLR would have inferior clinical outcomes. MATERIAL/METHODS: We retrospectively queried the PearlDiver-database for patients who underwent TKA following ACLR from 2011 to 2020. We used propensity-score matching to create two cohorts. The two-sided independent t-test and Chi-Squared test were used. RESULTS: We identified 2,174 patients who had prior ACLR before the TKAs. There were another 1,348,870 patients who did not have ACLR before the TKAs. After matching, each group had 2,171 patients. The ACLR-TKA group had significantly lower rates of aseptic revision at 2 years (1.2% vs. 4.0%, OR 0.3, p < 0.01), PJI requiring antibiotic spacer at 2 years (0.3% vs. 0.8%, OR 0.35, p = 0.02), and MUA at 90 days (0.4% vs. 7.5%, OR 0.05, p < 0.01). The rate of wound disruption was lower for the ACLR-TKA group at 90 days (p = 0.03) as were several medical complications including AKI at 90 days (p < 0.01), DVT at 90 days (p < 0.01), pneumonia at 90 days (0.04), and required blood transfusion at 90 days (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: These results differed from our expectations. Within the limitations of the study, we are unable to determine the factors for the lower complications in the ACLR-TKA group. The data from this study are different from what had been reported in the previous studies.

Manipulation Following Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty is Associated With Increased Rates of Infection and Revision.

BACKGROUND: Stiffness following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a disabling complication and manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) is often performed as an early intervention. Few studies have focused on the revision risk, infection risk, demographics, and clinical outcomes in Medicare patients undergoing MUA following primary TKA. METHODS: We reviewed 142,440 patients who had primary TKA from a national database and identified 3,652 patients (2.6%) who underwent MUA. Patient demographics and comorbid conditions were evaluated to identify risk factors. Incidence of revision and periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) at 1-, 2-, and 5-year time points in a cohort of MUA patients was compared to patients who did not undergo MUA. Multivariate Cox regressions were used for statistical analyses. RESULTS: The incidence of MUA was higher in Black versus White individuals (4.1 versus 2.5%, P < .001). Revision risk was significantly greater in the MUA group at 1-, 2-, and 5-year time points with a hazard ratio (HR) of, 3.81, 3.90, and 3.22 respectively, P < .001. One- and 2-year revision risk was significantly greater when MUA occurred at 6 to 12 months post-TKA when compared to <3 months, P < .05. Risk of PJI was significantly greater in the MUA group with a HR of 2.2, 2.2, and 2.1 at 1, 2, and 5 years, respectively P < .001. CONCLUSION: The incidence of MUA was 2.6%. There was an increased incidence of revision surgery and PJI in patients undergoing MUA. Patients at increased risk for stiffness following TKA should be closely monitored and treated with early intervention to minimize risk of poor outcomes.

Manipulation Under Anesthesia is Safe After Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND: Cementless total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is thought to facilitate durable, biological fixation between the bone and implant. However, the 4-12 weeks required for osseointegration coincides with the optimal timeframe to perform a manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) if a patient develops postoperative stiffness. This study aims to determine the impact of early MUA on cementless fixation by comparing functional outcomes and survivorship of cementless and cemented TKAs. METHODS: A consecutive series of patients who underwent MUA for postoperative stiffness within 90 days of primary, unilateral TKA at 2 academic institutions between 2014 and 2018 were identified. Cases involving extensive hardware removal were excluded. Cementless TKAs undergoing MUA (n = 100) were propensity matched 1:1 to cemented TKAs undergoing MUA (n = 100) using age, gender, body mass index, and year of surgery. Both groups had comparable baseline Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (KOOS), Short Form (SF)-12 Physical, and SF-12 Mental scores. MUA-related complications as well as postoperative KOOS and SF-12 scores were compared. RESULTS: MUA-related complications were equivalently low in both groups (P = .324), with only 1 patella component dissociation in the cementless group. No tibial or femoral components acutely loosened in the perioperative period. Postoperative KOOS (P = .101) and SF-12 Mental scores (P = .380) were similar between groups. Six-year survivorship free from any revision after MUA was 98.0% in both groups (P = 1.000). CONCLUSION: Early postoperative MUA after cementless TKA was not associated with increased MUA-related complications or worse patient-reported outcomes compared to cemented TKA. Short-term survivorship was also comparable, suggesting high durability of the bone-implant interface.

Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs and Oral Corticosteroids Mitigated the Risk of Arthrofibrosis After Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The role of medications to prevent arthrofibrosis following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains unclear. We investigated the effect of common oral medications with reported antifibrotic properties on preventing arthrofibrosis and manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) following primary TKA. METHODS: Using our total joint registry, 9,771 patients (12,735 knees) who underwent TKA with cemented, posterior-stabilized, and metal-backed tibial components from 2000 to 2016 were identified. Arthrofibrosis, defined as range of motion (ROM) ≤90° for ≥12 weeks postoperatively or as ROM ≤90° requiring MUA, was diagnosed in 454 knees (4%) and matched 1:2 to controls. Mean age was 62 years (range, 19 to 87) and 57% were women. The majority of operative diagnoses were osteoarthritis. Perioperative use of 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins), angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE inhibitors), angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), oral corticosteroids, antihistamines, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were manually confirmed. Medication effect in preventing arthrofibrosis and MUA was assessed using adjusted multivariable analyses. Mean follow-up was 8 years (range, 2 to 20). RESULTS: Reduced risk of arthrofibrosis was associated with perioperative NSAID use (odds ratio (OR) 0.67, P = .045). A similar trend was observed with perioperative corticosteroids (OR 0.52, P = .098). Corticosteroids were associated with reduced risk of MUA (OR 0.26, P = .036), and NSAIDs trended towards reducing MUA (OR 0.69, P = .11). CONCLUSION: This investigation determined that perioperative NSAID use was associated with reduced risk of arthrofibrosis and trended towards reduced risk of subsequent MUA. Similarly, oral corticosteroids were associated with reduced risk of MUA and trended towards reduced risk of arthrofibrosis.

Perioperative Outcomes in Total Knee Arthroplasty for Non-English Speakers.

BACKGROUND: Many studies have demonstrated that in patients whose primary language is not English, outcomes after an orthopaedic surgery are worse compared to primary English speakers. The goal of this study was to compare perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) who prefer English as their first language versus those who prefer a different language. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent primary TKA from May 2012 to July 2021. Patients were separated into two groups based on whether English was their preferred primary language (PPL). Of the 13,447 patients who underwent primary TKA, 11,290 reported English as their PPL, and 2,157 preferred a language other than English. Patients whose PPL was not English were further stratified based on whether they requested interpreter services. Multiple regression analyses were performed to determine the significance of perioperative outcomes while controlling for demographic differences. RESULTS: Our analysis found that non-English PPL patients had significantly lower rates of readmission (P = .040), overall revision (P = .028), and manipulation under anesthesia (MUA; P = .025) within 90 days postoperatively. Sub analyses of the non-English PPL group showed that those who requested interpreter services had significantly lower 1-year revision (P < .001) and overall MUA (P = .049) rates. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate that TKA patients who communicated in English without an interpreter were significantly more likely to undergo revision, readmission, and MUA. These findings may suggest that language barriers may make it more difficult to identify postoperative problems or concerns in non-English speakers, which may limit appropriate postoperative care. LEVEL III EVIDENCE: Retrospective Cohort Study.

The Cost of Stiffness After Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Stiffness after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is debilitating and poorly understood. A heterogenous approach to the treatment is often utilized, including both nonoperative and operative treatment modalities. The purpose of this study was to examine the prevalence of treatments used between stiff and non-stiff TKA groups and their financial impact. METHODS: An observational cohort study was conducted using a large database. A total of 12,942 patients who underwent unilateral primary TKA from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2017, were included. Stiffness after TKA was defined as manipulation under anesthesia and a diagnosis code of stiffness or ankylosis, and subsequent diagnosis and procedure codes were used to identify the prevalence and financial impact of multiple common treatment options. RESULTS: The prevalence of stiffness after TKA was 6.1%. Stiff patients were more likely to undergo physical therapy, medication, bracing, alternative treatment, clinic visits, and reoperation. Revision surgery was the most common reoperation in the stiff TKA group (7.6%). The incidence of both arthroscopy and revision surgery were higher in the stiff TKA population. Dual component revisions were costlier for patients who had stiff TKAs ($65,771 versus $48,287; P < .05). On average, patients who had stiffness after TKA endured costs from 1.5 to 7.5 times higher than the cost of their non-stiff counterparts during the 2 years following index TKA. CONCLUSION: Patients who have stiffness after primary TKA face significantly higher treatment costs for both operative and nonoperative treatments than patients who do not have stiffness.

Role of non-ASA VTE prophylaxis in risk for manipulation following primary total knee arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: Stiffness and decreased range of motion frequently lead to hindrance of activities of daily living and dissatisfaction follow total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study aims to evaluate the effect of non-aspirin (ASA) chemoprophylaxis and determine patient-related risk factors for stiffness and need for manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) following primary TKA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A review of all patients undergoing primary TKA from 2013 to 2019 at a single academic orthopedic hospital was conducted. The primary outcome measure was MUA performed post-operatively. Chi-square analysis and Mann-Whitney U test were used to determine statistically significant relationships between risk factors and outcomes. Significance was set at p < 0.05. Univariate logistic regression was performed to control for identified independent risk factors for MUA. RESULTS: A total of 11,550 patients undergoing primary TKA from January 2013 to September 2019 at an academic medical center were included in the study. Increasing age and Charlson Comorbidity Index were associated with statistically significant decreased odds of MUA (0.93, 95% CI: 0.92-0.94, p < 0.001, OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.63-0.79, p < 0.001). Active smokers had a 2.01 increased odds of MUA (OR 2.01, 95% CI 1.28, 3.02, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in rates of MUA between ASA and non-ASA VTE prophylaxis (p 0.108). CONCLUSIONS: Younger age, lower CCI, and history of smoking are associated with a higher rate, while different chemical VTE prophylaxis does not influence rate of MUA after TKA. Arthroplasty surgeons should consider these risk factors when counseling patient preoperatively. Understanding each patients' risk for MUA allows surgeons to appropriately set preoperative expectations and reasonable outcome goals.

The effect of losartan on range of motion and rates of manipulation in total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective matched cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Arthrofibrosis remains a common cause of patient dissatisfaction and reoperation after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Losartan is an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) with inhibitory effects on transforming growth factor beta, previously implicated in tissue repair induced fibrosis, and has been studied to prevent stiffness following hip arthroscopy. This study aimed to evaluate pre- and postoperative range of motion (ROM) and the incidence of manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) following primary TKA in patients taking Losartan preoperatively for hypertension. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of 170 patients from 2012 to 2020 who underwent a primary, elective TKA and were prescribed Losartan at least three months prior to surgery. All patients who were prescribed Losartan and had a preoperative and postoperative ROM in their chart were included and were matched to a control group of patients who underwent TKA and had no Losartan prescription. ROM, MUA, readmissions, reoperations, and revisions were assessed using chi-square and independent sample t tests. RESULTS: Seventy-nine patients met the inclusion criteria. Preoperative ROM was similar between patients on Losartan and the control group (103.59° ± 16.14° vs. 104.59° ± 21.59°, respectively; p = 0.745). Postoperative ROM and ΔROM were greater for patients prescribed Losartan (114.29° ± 12.32° vs. 112.76° ± 11.65°; p = 0.429 and 10.57° ± 14.95° vs. 8.17° ± 21.68°; p = 0.422), though this difference did not reach statistical significance. There was no difference in readmission, rate of manipulation for stiffness, or all-cause revision rates. CONCLUSION: In this study, we found that the use of Losartan did not significantly improve postoperative ROM, reduce MUA or decrease revision rates. Further prospective studies using Losartan are required to elucidate the potential effects on ROM and incidence of arthrofibrosis requiring MUA. LEVEL III EVIDENCE: Retrospective cohort study.

Telerehabilitation has similar clinical and patient-reported outcomes compared to traditional rehabilitation following total knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: Telehealth rehabilitation (telerehab) is an increasingly popular cost-saving alternative to traditional rehabilitation after total joint arthroplasty. We compared the safety and efficacy of an institutional telerehab program to conventional "face-to-face" rehabilitation in a sample of patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: A retrospective matched cohort study was performed. Medicare patients who utilized telerehab following unilateral TKA were matched in a 1:3 ratio to those utilizing conventional rehabilitation. Patients were matched on sex, body mass index (BMI, ± 5 kg/m2), preoperative extension (± 10 degrees), preoperative flexion (± 10 degrees), and Risk Assessment and Prediction Tool (RAPT) score (± 2 points). Ninety-day unplanned healthcare encounters, 120-day manipulations under anesthesia (MUAs), and 6-week and 3-month changes in the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS-JR), pain visual analog scale (VAS), Veterans RAND 12 (VR-12), and Lower-Extremity Activity Scale (LEAS) were compared between groups. RESULTS: Eighty-two telerehab patients and 244 conventional rehab patients were included. After matching, there were no differences in 90-day unplanned healthcare encounters or 120-day MUA rates between groups. There were no differences in 6-week or 3-month changes in KOOS-JR, VAS pain, or VR-12 mental or physical sub-scores between groups. Telerehab patients had a greater improvement in LEAS score at 3 months compared to the conventional group (mean difference 1.9, P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: In a matched cohort study of 326 TKA patients, telerehab patients had similar rates of unplanned healthcare encounters and MUAs and similar patient-reported outcomes compared to conventional PT patients, suggesting that telerehab can be an equally effective alternative to conventional PT following TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Does capsular distension and a short period of countertraction improve outcome following manipulation under anesthesia for the treatment of primary adhesive capsulitis of the glenohumeral joint?

BACKGROUND: Despite the fact that primary adhesive capsulitis of the glenohumeral joint is often considered a self-limiting condition, not all patients make a full recovery. Manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) is performed to forcibly rupture the contracted capsule in a controlled manner. However, the technique, timing, and use of additional injections are often debated. In this study, we report the outcomes following the addition of capsular distension and countertraction to MUA as a treatment for adhesive capsulitis. METHODS: We performed a retrospective case-cohort study comparing 3 groups: Group 1 underwent MUA alone (n = 54); group 2, MUA with capsular distension (n = 114); and group 3, MUA with capsular distension and countertraction (n = 167). The re-MUA rate, Constant-Murley shoulder (CMS) score, and visual analog scale (VAS) score (for pain) were measured after 6 weeks and 6 months. RESULTS: The re-MUA rate fell with the addition of both capsular distension and countertraction: 63% in group 1, 39% in group 2, and 18% in group 3. Patients in group 3 recorded the greatest improvement in the CMS score after 6 weeks (+90% vs. +68% in group 2 and +58% in group 1), with all groups showing improvements compared with before treatment. The only independent risk factor identified for re-MUA was smoking. If a second MUA was performed, the CMS (+67%) and VAS (+61%) scores improved, but at 6 months, the CMS score (74.57 ± 7.6 vs. 83.30 ± 5.5) and VAS score (10.57 ± 1.8 vs. 12.96 ± 1.5) remained inferior to those of patients who only needed a single MUA. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: MUA combined with capsular distension and countertraction reduces the need for a second MUA and results in a faster improvement in functional outcome (CMS score) and reduction of pain (VAS score) compared with MUA alone or MUA with capsular distension. The results of this case-cohort study are of clinical relevance because they show that the efficacy of an MUA can be improved through relatively simple adaptations of the treatment protocol.

Racial Differences in Manipulation Under Anesthesia Rates Following Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Despite the extensive literature on racial disparities in care and outcomes after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), data on manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) is lacking. We aimed to determine (1) the relationship between race and rate of (and time to) MUA after TKA, and (2) annual trends in racial differences in MUA from 2013 to 2018. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study (using 2013-2018 Medicare Limited Data Set claims data) included 836,054 primary TKA patients. The primary outcome was MUA <1 year after TKA; time from TKA to MUA in days was also recorded. A mixed-effects multivariable model measured the association between race (White, Black, Other) and odds of MUA. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were reported. A Cochran Armitage Trend test was conducted to assess MUA trends over time, stratified by race. RESULTS: MUA after TKA occurred in 1.7%, 3.2% and 2.1% of White, Black, and Other race categories, respectively (SMD = 0.07). After adjustment for covariates, (Black vs White) patients had increased odds of requiring an MUA after TKA: odds ratio (OR) 1.97, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 1.86-2.10, P < .0001. Moreover, White (compared to Black) patients had significantly shorter time to MUA after TKA: 60 days (interquartile range [IQR] 46-88) versus 64 days (interquartile range [IQR] 47-96); P < .0001. These disparities persisted from 2013 through 2018. CONCLUSION: Continued racial differences exist for rates and timing of MUA following TKA signifying the continued need for efforts aimed toward understanding and eliminating inequalities that exist in total joint arthroplasty (TJA) care.

Cemented Total Knee Arthroplasty Shows Less Blood Loss but a Higher Rate of Aseptic Loosening Compared With Cementless Fixation: An Updated Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to update the current evidence on functional outcomes, complications, and reoperation rates between cemented and cementless total knee arthroplasty (TKA) by evaluating comparative studies published over the past 15 years. METHODS: The PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central databases were used to search keywords and a total of 18 studies were included. Random and fixed effect models were used for the meta-analysis of pooled mean differences (MDs) and odds ratios (ORs). RESULTS: A total of 5,222 patients were identified with a mean age of 64.4 ± 9.4 and 63 ± 8.6 years for the cemented and cementless TKA groups, respectively. The mean follow-up was 107.9 ± 30 and 104.3 ± 10 months for the cemented and cementless TKA groups, respectively. Cemented TKA showed a significantly greater postoperative Knee Society Score (MD = -0.95, 95% CI [-1.57, 0.33], P = .003) and range of motion (MD = -1.09, 95% CI [-1.88, -0.29], P = .0007), but no differences in other outcome scores were found. The incidence of periprosthetic joint infection, radiolucent lines, instability, and polyethylene wear was also comparable. Cemented TKA showed less perioperative blood loss (SMD = -438.41, 95% CI [-541.69, -35.14], P < .0001) but a higher rate of manipulation under anesthesia (OR = 3.39, 95% CI [1.64, 6.99], P = .001) and aseptic loosening (OR = 1.62, 95% CI [1.09, 2.41], P = .02) than cementless TKA. No differences were found in terms of the reoperation rate. CONCLUSION: When cemented and cementless fixations are compared in primary TKA, comparable functional outcomes and reoperation rates can be achieved. Cemented TKA showed less blood loss but a higher rate of manipulation under anesthesia and aseptic loosening.

Treatment of arthrofibrosis and stiffness after total knee arthroplasty: an updated review of the literature.

PURPOSE: There is currently no consensus regarding the optimal treatment for stiffness following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). With the increased utilization of value-based models, it is important to determine the most effective treatments that will reduce the need for further intervention and additional expenditure. A systematic review was performed to compare the outcomes of manipulation under anaesthesia (MUA), arthroscopic lysis of adhesions (aLOA), and revision TKA (rTKA) for arthrofibrosis and stiffness following TKA. METHODS: PubMed and MEDLINE databases were reviewed for articles published through October 2020. Studies were included if they reported patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) following MUA, aLOA, or rTKA. The primary endpoint was PROMs, while secondary outcomes included range of motion and the percentage of patients who pursued further treatment for stiffness. RESULTS: A total of 40 studies were included: 21 on rTKA, 7 on aLOA, and 14 on MUA. The mean or median post-operative arc ROM was > 90° in 6/20 (30%) rTKA, 5/7 (71%) aLOA, and 7/10 (70%) MUA studies. Post-operative Knee Society (KSS) clinical and functional scores were the greatest in patients who underwent MUA and aLOA. As many as 43% of rTKA patients required further care compared to 25% of aLOA and 17% of MUA patients. CONCLUSION: Stiffness following TKA remains a challenging condition to treat. Nonetheless, current evidence suggests that patients who undergo rTKA have poorer clinical outcomes and a greater need for further treatment compared to patients who undergo MUA or aLOA.

Acquired Idiopathic Stiffness After Contemporary Total Knee Arthroplasty: Incidence, Risk Factors, and Results Over 25 Years.

BACKGROUND: Acquired idiopathic stiffness (AIS) remains a common failure mode of contemporary total knee arthroplasties (TKAs). The present study investigated the incidence of AIS and manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) at a single institution over time, determined outcomes of MUAs, and identified risk factors associated with AIS and MUA. METHODS: We identified 9771 patients (12,735 knees) who underwent primary TKAs with cemented, modular metal-backed, posterior-stabilized implants from 2000 to 2016 using our institutional total joint registry. Mean age was 68 years, 57% were female, and mean body mass index was 33 kg/m2. Demographic, surgical, and comorbidity data were investigated via univariate Cox proportional hazard models and fit to an adjusted multivariate model to access risk for AIS and MUA. Mean follow-up was 7 years. RESULTS: During the study period, 456 knees (3.6%) developed AIS and 336 knees (2.6%) underwent MUA. Range of motion (ROM) increased a mean of 34° after the MUA; however, ROM for patients treated with MUA was inferior to patients without AIS at final follow-up (102° vs 116°, P < .0001). Significant risk factors included younger age (HR 2.3, P < .001), increased tourniquet time (HR 1.01, P < .001), general anesthesia (HR 1.3, P = .007), and diabetes (HR 1.5, P = .001). CONCLUSION: Acquired idiopathic stiffness has continued to have an important adverse impact on the outcomes of a subset of patients undergoing primary TKAs. When utilized, MUA improved mean ROM by 34°, but patients treated with MUA still had decreased ROM compared to patients without AIS. Importantly, we identified several significant risk factors associated with AIS and subsequent MUA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Reduction of Opioid Quantities at Discharge After TKA Did Not Increase the Risk of Manipulation Under Anesthesia: An Institutional Experience.

BACKGROUND: In response to the opioid epidemic, our arthroplasty service sequentially reduced the opioid quantities prescribed at primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) discharge. However, its effect on postdischarge pain control and rehabilitation is unknown. We assessed if this decrease was associated with an increase in the risk of manipulation under anesthesia (MUA). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 8799 patients undergoing primary TKA from 2016 to 2019 at a single institution. There were two institution-wide reductions in the amount of opioids prescribed at discharge; therefore, we divided patients into 3 periods (P1, P2, and P3). The mean discharge morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) went from 900 MMEs to ~525 MMEs to ~320 MMEs in P1, P2, and P3, respectively. We analyzed MUA rates and if lower discharge MMEs was a risk factor for MUA in a multivariate model. We also compared refill patterns (rates, number, refill MMEs, and total MMEs) between MUA and non-MUA patients. RESULTS: The rate of MUA did not increase with reduced discharged opioids (5.5% in P1, 5.8% in P2, and 4.6% in P3, P = .74). In a multivariate analysis, discharge MMEs of <450 was not a significant risk factor for MUA. However, a diagnosis of chronic pain (OR = 1.86, P < .001) and an elevated body mass index (OR = 1.02 per unit increase, P < .001) were significant risk factors. We did not find significant differences in any opioid prescription refill patterns in MUA and non-MUA patients. CONCLUSION: Serial reductions in discharge MMEs after primary TKA did not significantly affect the rate of MUA, a surrogate marker for pain control and the rehabilitative process.

Arthrofibrosis after total knee arthroplasty: patients with keloids at risk.

BACKGROUND: Arthrofibrosis remains one of the leading causes for revision in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Similar in nature to arthrofibrosis, hypertrophic scars and keloid formation are a result of excessive collagen formation. There is paucity in the literature on whether there is an association between keloid formation and the development of arthrofibrosis following TKA. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to utilize a large nationwide database to identify and compare the rates of postoperative complications related to arthrofibrosis after primary TKA in patients with history of hypertrophic scar and keloid disorders versus those without. METHODS: Patient records from 2010 to the second quarter of 2016 were queried from an administrative claims database, comparing rates of arthrofibrosis, manipulation under anesthesia (MUA), lysis of adhesions (LOA), and revision TKA in patients with chart diagnosis of keloids versus those without in patients who underwent primary TKA. Data analysis was performed using R statistical software (R Project for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) utilizing multivariate logistic regression, chi square analysis, or Welch's t- test where appropriate with p values < 0.05 being considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Of 545,875 primary TKAs, 11,461 (2.1%) had a keloid diagnosis at any time point in their record, while 534,414 (97.9%) had not. Patients in the keloid cohort had a significantly higher association with ankylosis within 30 days (OR, 1.7), 90 days (OR, 1.2), 6 months (OR, 1.2), and 1 year (OR, 1.3) following primary TKA. The keloid cohort also had a significantly greater risk of MUA (90-day OR, 1.1; 6-month OR, 1.1; 1-year OR, 1.2) and LOA (90-day OR, 2.2; 6-month OR, 2.0; 1-year OR, 1.9). CONCLUSION: Patients with keloids have increased odds risk of arthrofibrosis following primary TKA. These patients are subsequently at a higher odds risk of undergoing the procedures necessary to treat arthrofibrosis, such as MUA and LOA. Future studies investigating confounding factors such as race, prior surgery, range of motion, and postoperative recovery are needed to confirm the association of keloid diagnosis and arthrofibrosis following primary TKA demonstrated in this study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III retrospective comparative study.

Operative versus nonoperative treatment in children with painful rigid flatfoot and talocalcaneal coalition.

BACKGROUND: The management of painful rigid flatfoot (RFF) with talocalcaneal coalition (TCC) is controversial. We aimed to compare operative and nonoperative treatment in children with RFF and TCC. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed medical records and radiographs of children with RFF and TTC treated between 2005 and 2015. The nonoperative treatment consisted of manipulation under anesthesia, cast immobilization and shoe insert after cast removal. The operative treatment consisted of combined TCC resection, graft interposition and subtalar arthroereisis. RESULTS: Thirty-four children (47 ft) in the nonoperative group and twenty-one children (34 ft) in the operative group were included. No differences were found between groups, concerning baseline characteristics. The mean age at treatment was 11.8 years (9-17): 11.6 (9-17) for the nonoperative group, 12.2 (10-15) for the operative group. The mean follow-up averaged 6.6 (3-12) years and was significantly longer in the nonoperative group (7.8 versus 4.7 years; p < 0.0005), since the operative procedure was increasingly practiced in the latest years. There were no complications in either groups, but 6 patients (7 ft) in the nonoperative group were unsatisfied and required surgery. At the latest follow-up, the AOFAS-AHS improved in both groups, although the operative group showed significantly better improvement. The operative group reported also significantly better FADI score, after adjustment for follow-up and baseline variables. CONCLUSION: The operative treatment showed better results compared to the nonoperative treatment. Symptomatic RFF with TCC in children can be effectively treated in one step with resection, graft interposition and subtalar arthroereisis. Further prospective randomized studies are needed to confirm our findings and to identify the best operative strategy in this condition.

Treatment with posterior capsular release, botulinum toxin injection, hamstring tenotomy, and peroneal nerve decompression improves flexion contracture after total knee arthroplasty: minimum 2-year follow-up.

PURPOSE: No definite treatment option with reasonable outcome has been presented for old and refractory flexion contracture after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We describe a surgical technique for 21 refractory cases of knee flexion contracture, including 12 patients with history of failed manipulation under anesthesia (MUA). METHODS: Retrospective review was conducted for procedures performed by a single surgeon between 2005 and 2016. Twenty-one knees (19 patients) with knee flexion contracture after primary TKA were treated with all the following procedures: posterior capsular release, hamstring tenotomy, prophylactic peroneal nerve decompression, and botulinum toxin type A injections. Twelve of the 21 knees had at least 1 prior unsuccessful MUA before this soft-tissue release procedure. Mean age at intervention was 60 years (range 46-78 years). Mean preoperative knee range of motion (ROM) was - 27° extension (range - 20° to - 40°) to 100° flexion (range 90°-115°). All radiographs were evaluated for proper component sizing and signs of loosening. RESULTS: Full extension was achieved immediately after surgery in all patients. Only one knee required repeat botulinum toxin type A injection. All patients had full extension at mean follow-up of 31 months (range 24-49 months). No significant change was observed in knee flexion after the procedure (n.s.). Significant improvement was noted in the postoperative Knee Society Score (KSS) (mean 80, range 70-90) when compared with preoperative KSS (mean 45, range 25-65) (p = 0.008). CONCLUSION: The proposed surgical technique is efficacious in treating patients with refractory knee flexion contracture following TKA to gain and maintain full extension at minimum 2-year follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, retrospective case series.