TGF-ß1 and TGF-ß3, but not TGF-ß2, are upregulated in the ovaries of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome†.

Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is a life-threatening and potentially fatal complication during in vitro fertilization treatment. The levels of transforming growth factor-ß1 (TGF-ß1) are upregulated in human follicular fluid and granulosa-lutein cells (hGL) of OHSS patients and could contribute to the development of OHSS by downregulating steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR) expression. However, whether the same is true for the other two members of the TGF-ß family, TGF-ß2 and -ß3, remains unknown. We showed that all three TGF-ß isoforms were expressed in human follicular fluid. In comparison, TGF-ß1 was expressed at the highest level, followed by TGF-ß2 and TGF-ß3. Compared to non-OHSS patients, follicular fluid levels of TGF-ß1 and TGF-ß3 were significantly upregulated in OHSS patients. The same results were observed in mRNA levels of TGF-ß isoforms in hGL cells and ovaries of OHSS rats. In addition, StAR mRNA levels were upregulated in hGL cells of OHSS patients and the ovaries of OHSS rats. Treatment cells with TGF-ß isoforms downregulated the StAR expression with a comparable effect. Moreover, activations of SMAD3 signaling were required for TGF-ß isoforms-induced downregulation of StAR expression. This study indicates that follicular fluid TGF-ß1 and TGF-ß3 levels could be used as biomarkers and therapeutic targets for the OHSS.

Optimized personalized management approach for moderate/severe OHSS: development and prospective validation of an OHSS risk assessment index.

STUDY QUESTION: Can a simplified ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) risk assessment index be developed and validated with sufficient discrimination of moderate/severe OHSS from those without OHSS? SUMMARY ANSWER: This easy-to-use OHSS risk assessment index shows good discriminative power and high calibration accuracy in internal and external validation cohorts. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: An early alert and risk stratification is critical to prevent the occurrence of OHSS. We have previously developed a multi-stage smartphone app-based prediction model to evaluate the risk of OHSS, but app use might not be so convenient in many primary institutions. A simplified OHSS risk assessment index has been required. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This training and internal validation of an OHSS risk assessment index used retrospective cohort data from January 2016 to December 2020. External validation was performed with a prospective cohort database from January 2021 to May 2022. There were 15 066 cycles in the training cohort, 6502 cycles in the internal validation cohort, and 8097 cycles in the external validation cohort. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: This study was performed in the reproductive medicine center of a tertiary hospital. Infertile women who underwent ovarian stimulation were included. Data were extracted from the local database with detailed medical records. A multi-stage risk assessment index was constructed at multiple stages. The first stage was before the initiation of ovarian stimulation, the second was before the ovulation trigger, the third was after oocyte retrieval, and the last stage was on the embryo transfer day if fresh embryo transfer was scheduled. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: We established a simplified multi-stage risk assessment index for moderate/severe OHSS, the performance of which was further evaluated with discrimination and calibration abilities in training and internal and external validation cohorts. The discrimination abilities of the OHSS risk assessment index were determined with C-statistics. C-statistics in training (Stages 1-4: 0.631, 0.692, 0.751, 0.788, respectively) and internal (Stages 1-4: 0.626, 0.642, 0.755, 0.771, respectively) and external validation (Stages 1-4: 0.668, 0.670, 0.754, 0.773, respectively) cohorts were all increased from Stage 1 to 3 with similar trends, and were comparable between Stages 3 and 4. Calibration plots showed high agreement between observed and predicted cases in all three cohorts. Incidences of OHSS based on diverse risk stratification (negligible risk, low risk, medium risk, and high risk) were 0%, 0.6%, 2.7%, and 8.3% in the training cohort, 0%, 0.6%, 3.3%, and 8.5% in the internal validation cohort, and 0.1%, 1.1%, 4.1%, and 7.2% in the external validation cohort. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The influence from clinical interventions including cryopreservation of all embryos cannot be eliminated and thus certain risk factors like estrogen level on trigger day might be assigned with a lower risk score. Another weakness of the study is that several preventive treatments, for instance oral aspirin and letrozole, were not recorded and evaluated in the model. Despite the robust reliability of OHSS assessment index, this tool cannot be used directly for clinical decision-making or as a diagnostic tool. Its value lies in its capacity to evaluate the prognosis of various interventions and to facilitate clinician-patient communication. The combination of this tool and further symptoms and examinations should be all taken into consideration for accurate and personalized management of OHSS. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The OHSS risk assessment index can be implemented to facilitate personalized counseling and management of OHSS. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This study was supported by National Key R&D Program of China (2022YFC2702504), Medical Research Fund Guangdong Provincial (A2024003), and Xinjiang Support Rural Science and Technology (Special Correspondent) Program in Guangdong Province (KTPYJ 2023014). All authors had nothing to disclose. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Undetected, natural conception pregnancies in luteal phase stimulations-case series and review of literature.

STUDY QUESTION: What is the risk of an undetected natural conception pregnancy during luteal phase ovarian stimulation, and how does it impact the pregnancy's course? SUMMARY ANSWER: The risk for an undetected, natural conception pregnancy in luteal phase ovarian stimulation is low and it appears that ovarian stimulation is unlikely to harm the pregnancy. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Random start ovarian stimulation appears to be similarly effective as early follicular stimulation start; and it allows ovarian stimulation to be started independent of the cycle day and throughout the cycle, in accordance with the patients' and clinics' schedule as long as there is no intention of a fresh embryo transfer in the same cycle. Starting ovarian stimulation in the luteal phase bears the possibility of an-at the timepoint of stimulation start-undetected, natural conception pregnancy that has already occurred. There is scarce data on the incidence of this event as well as on the possible implications of ovarian stimulation on the course of an existing pregnancy. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This retrospective observational study, performed between June 2017 and January 2024, analyzed luteal phase stimulations, in which a natural conception pregnancy was detected during the ovarian stimulation treatment for IVF/ICSI. Luteal phase stimulation was defined as ovarian stimulation started after ovulation and before the next expected menstrual bleeding, with a serum progesterone (P4) level of >1.5 ng/ml on the day of stimulation start or 1 day before. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Women who underwent a luteal phase ovarian stimulation in a tertiary referral ART center. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: A total of 488 luteal phase stimulation cycles were included in the analysis. Luteal phase stimulation was only started after a negative serum hCG measurement on the day or 1 day before commencement of ovarian stimulation. Ten patients (2.1%) had an undetected natural conception pregnancy at the time of luteal phase stimulation start. Eight of these patients underwent an ovarian stimulation in a GnRH-antagonist protocol and two in a progestin-primed stimulation protocol (PPOS). Recombinant FSH was used as stimulation medication for all patients, the patients with a PPOS protocol received additional recombinant LH. One pregnancy (0.2%) was detected after the oocyte retrieval, the other nine pregnancies were detected either due to persistent high serum progesterone levels or due to an increasing progesterone level after an initial decrease before oocyte retrieval. In the cycles with an undetected natural conception pregnancy, the median number of stimulation days was 8 days (range: 6-11 days) and median serum hCG at detection of pregnancy was 59 IU hCG (range: 14.91-183.1). From 10 patients with a pregnancy, three patients delivered a healthy baby, two patients had ongoing pregnancies at the time of summarizing the data, three patients had biochemical pregnancies (patient age: 30, 39, and 42 years), one patient had an ectopic pregnancy which required a salpingectomy, and one patient (age: 34 years) had an early pregnancy loss. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The retrospective study design and the small sample size can limit the accuracy of the estimates. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Overall, there is a small risk of undetected natural conception pregnancies when luteal phase stimulation is undertaken. It appears that there are no adverse effects through either direct effect on the embryo or indirectly through a detrimental effect on the corpus luteum function on the pregnancy in our cohort. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This study did not receive funding. The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Pretreatment with luteal estradiol for programming antagonist cycles compared to no pretreatment in advanced age women stimulated with corifollitropin alfa: a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial.

STUDY QUESTION: Does luteal estradiol (E2) pretreatment give a similar number of retrieved oocytes compared to no-pretreatment in advanced-aged women stimulated with corifollitropin alfa in an antagonist protocol? SUMMARY ANSWER: Programming antagonist cycles with luteal E2 gave similar number of retrieved oocytes compared to no-pretreatment in women aged 38-42 years. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Programming antagonist cycles with luteal E2 pretreatment is a valuable tool to organize the IVF procedure better and is safe without any known impact on cycle outcome. However, variable effects were observed on the number of retrieved oocytes depending on the treated population. In advanced-age women, recruitable follicles tend to decrease in number and to be more heterogeneous in size but it remains unclear if estradiol pretreatment could change the oocyte yield through its negative feed-back effect on FSH intercycle rise. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This non-blinded randomized controlled non-inferiority trial was conducted between 2016 and 2022 with centrally computerized randomization and concealed allocation. Participants were 324 women aged 38-42 years undergoing IVF treatment. The primary endpoint was the total number of retrieved oocytes. Statistical analysis was performed with one-sided alpha risk of 2.5% and 95% confidence interval (CI) with the non-inferiority of E2 pretreatment proved by a P value <0.025 and a lower delta margin of the CI within two oocytes compared to no pretreatment. Secondary endpoints were duration and total dosage of recombinant FSH, cancellation rate, percentage of oocyte pick-up (OPU) on working days, total number of metaphase II oocytes and obtained embryos, fresh transfer live birth rate, and cumulative live birth rate. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: This multicentric study enrolled women with regular cycles, weight >50 kg and body mass index <32, IVF cycle 1-2. According to randomization, micronized estradiol 2 mg twice a day was started on days 20-24 and continued until Wednesday beyond the onset of menses followed by administration of corifollitropin alfa on Friday, i.e. stimulation (S)1 or from D1-3 of a natural cycle in unpretreated patients. GnRH antagonist was started at S6 and additional FSH at S8. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Basal characteristics were similar in patients randomized in E2 pretreated (n = 164) and non-pretreated (n = 160) groups (intended to treat (ITT) population). A total of 291 patients started treatment (per protocol (PP) population), 147 in E2 pretreated group with a mean number [SD] of pre-treatment days 9.8 [2.6] and 144 in the non-pretreated group. Despite advanced age, oocyte yields ranged from 0 to 29 in both groups with a median number of 6 retrieved oocytes in accordance with a mean anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) level above 1.2 ng/ml. We demonstrated the non-inferiority of E2 pretreatment with a mean difference of -0.1 oocyte 95% CI [-1.5; 1.3] P = 0.004 in the PP population and a mean difference of -0.44 oocyte [-1.84; 0.97] P = 0.014 in the ITT population. Oocyte retrieval was more often on working days in E2 pretreated patients (91.9 versus 74.2%, P < 0.001). In patients reaching OPU, the duration of stimulation was statistically significantly longer (11.7 [1.7] versus 10.8 [1.8] days, P < 0.001) and the extra FSH dosage in addition to corifollitropin alfa was statistically significantly higher (1040 [548] versus 778 [504] IU, P < 0.001) in E2 pretreated than non-pretreated patients. We did not observe any significant differences in the number of retrieved oocytes (8.4 [6.1] versus 9.1 [6.0]), in the number of Metaphase 2 oocytes (7 [5.5] versus 7.3 [5.2]) nor in the number of obtained embryos (5 [4.6] versus 5.2 [4.2]) in E2 pretreated patients compared to non-pretreated patients. The live birth rate after fresh transfer (16.2% versus 18.5%, respectively), and the cumulative live birth rate per patient (17.7% versus 22.9%, respectively) were similar in both groups. Among the PP population, 31.6% of patients fulfilled the criteria for group 4 of Poseïdon classification (AMH <1.2 ng/ml and/or antral follicle count <5). In this sub-group of patients, we observed in contrast a statistically higher number of retrieved oocytes in E2 pretreated patients compared to non-pretreated (5.1 [3.8] versus 3.4 [2.7], respectively, the mean difference of +1.7 oocyte [0.2; 3.2] P = 0.022) but without significant difference in the cumulative live birth rate per patient (15.7% versus 7.3%, respectively). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Our stimulated women older than 38 years obtained a wide range of collected oocytes suggesting very different stages of ovarian aging in both groups. E2 pretreatment is more likely to increase oocyte yield at the stage of ovarian aging characterized by asynchrony of a reduced follicular cohort. Another limitation is the sample size in sub-group analysis of patients with AMH <1.2 ng/ml. Finally, the absence of placebo for pretreatment could also introduce possible bias. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Programming antagonist cycles with luteal E2 pretreatment seems a useful tool in advanced age women to better schedule oocyte retrievals on working days. However, the potential benefit of the number of collected oocytes remains to be demonstrated in a larger population displaying the characteristics of decreased ovarian reserve encountered in Poseïdon classification. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): Research grant from (MSD) Organon, France. I.C., S.D., B.B., X.M., S.G., and C.J. have no conflict of interest with this study. I.C.D. declares fees as speaker from Merck KGaA, Gedeon Richter, MSD (Organon, France), Ferring, Theramex, and IBSA and participation on advisory board from Merck KGaA. I.C.D. also declares consulting fees, and travel and meeting support from Merck KGaA. N.M. declares grants paid to their institution from MSD (Organon, France); consulting fees from MSD (Organon, France), Ferring, and Merck KGaA; honoraria from Merck KGaA, General Electrics, Genevrier (IBSA Pharma), and Theramex; support for travel and meetings from Theramex, Merck KGaG, and Gedeon Richter; and equipment paid to their institution from Goodlife Pharma. N.C. declares grants from IBSA Pharma, Merck KGaA, Ferring, and Gedeon Richter; support for travel and meetings from IBSA Pharma, Merck KGaG, MSD (Organon, France), Gedeon Richter, and Theramex; and participation on advisory board from Merck KGaA. A.G.L. declares fees as speaker from Merck KGaA, Gedeon Richter, MSD (Organon, France), Ferring, Theramex, and IBSA. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02884245. TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE: 29 August 2016. DATE OF FIRST PATIENT'S ENROLMENT: 4 November 2016.

Effect of aromatase inhibitors for preventing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in infertile patients undergoing in vitro fertilization: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: To summarize the findings of relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and conduct a meta-analysis to investigate the potential effect of aromatase inhibitors on preventing moderate to severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in infertile women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF). METHODS: We searched for relevant RCTs in electronic databases, including MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and ClinicalTrials.gov (from inception to August 2023). In addition, we manually searched the related reviews and reference lists of included studies for further relevant studies. We included RCTs where aromatase inhibitors prescribed either during controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) or in early luteal phase. The meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4.1 software. The primary outcome was the incidence of moderate to severe OHSS. A descriptive analysis was conducted in cases where a meta-analysis was not feasible due to heterogeneity or lack of comparable data. RESULTS: 2858 records were retrieved and 12 RCTs were finally included. Letrozole was administered in the treatment group during COS in seven RCTs, whereas in the early luteal phase in five RCTs. Compared with the control group, the risk of moderate to severe OHSS significantly reduced by 55% in the letrozole group (RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.64, I2 = 0%, 5 RCTs, 494 patients). Moreover, serum estradiol (E2) levels on hCG trigger day significantly decreased with the administration of letrozole during COS (MD -847.23, 95% CI -1398.00 to -296.47, I2 = 93%, 5 RCTs, 374 patients). And serum E2 levels on the 4th, 5th and 7th to 10th day after hCG trigger were also significantly lower than those in the control group when letrozole was administered in the early luteal phase. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with high risk of OHSS probably benefit from letrozole, which has been revealed to reduce the incidence of moderate to severe OHSS by this systematic review. However, the very limited number of participants and the quality of the included studies does not allow to recommend letrozole for the prevention of severe OHSS.

Serum erythropoietin level is increased during stimulation for IVF but not in OHSS.

BACKGROUND: Erythropoietin (Epo) is a potent vascular growth factor that induces angiogenesis and antiapoptotic signalling. We investigated whether the development of numerous follicles and corpora lutea during in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle affects circulating Epo levels and further, if Epo could be used as a novel marker for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). METHODS: 24 women were included in the uncomplicated IVF group and 35 women in the OHSS group. Repeated blood samples from both groups were analysed for Epo, progesterone, blood haemoglobin, and creatinine. Follicular fluid from the IVF group was analysed for Epo and progesterone. Repeated measure analysis was performed for the variables and circulating Epo levels were compared between the IVF group and early OHSS. Furthermore, related growth factors, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and hypoxia-inducible factor-1 (HIF-1) were analysed from subgroup of women to test for correlation with Epo. RESULTS: During IVF, circulating Epo increased from natural mid-luteal phase to stimulated mid-luteal phase (median 9.5; 95% CI 7.2-13.4 IU/L and 12.5; 10.3-13.4 IU/L; p = 0.003). In cycles resulting in pregnancy, Epo level decreased 14 days after oocyte pick-up (OPU) and remained low thereafter. In cycles not resulting in pregnancy, Epo level increased again 35 days after OPU. Follicle fluid Epo concentration was 1.5 times higher than the serum concentration (median 15.4; 95% CI 10.4-19.2 IU/L vs. 10.2; 8.8-12.7; p = 0.006). There was no difference in circulating Epo concentration between early OHSS and uncomplicated IVF. Circulating Epo did not correlate with VEGF or HIF-1. CONCLUSIONS: Circulating Epo levels fluctuate during IVF cycle. We hypothesise this may suggest Epo's involvement in ovarian physiology and angiogenesis. However, Epo was not a clinical marker for OHSS.

Repeated ovarian hyperstimulation promotes depression-like behavior in female mice.

Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) is a common step for treating infertile couples undergoing assisted reproductive technologies and in female fertility preservation cycles. In some cases, undergoing multiple COHs is required for couples to conceive. Behavioral changes such as anxiety and depression can be caused by ovulation-inducing drugs. Sex steroids play a role in locomotor activity, behavioral changes, and nociception, specifically during fluctuations and sudden drops in estrogen levels. This study evaluated the effect of repeated ovarian hyperstimulation (ROH) on weight, locomotor activity, anxiety-like and depression-like behavior, and nociception in female mice. The animals were divided into two groups: control (placebo; Control) and treated (ROH; Treatment). Ovulation was induced once weekly for 10 consecutive weeks. Locomotor activity (open field test), anxiety-like behavior (elevated plus maze, hole board, and marble burying tests), depression-like behavior (splash and forced swim tests), and nociception (hot plate and Von Frey tests) were evaluated before and after ROH. Statistical analysis was conducted using two-way analysis of variance to evaluate the effects of ROH, age of mice, and their interaction. The results suggested that ROH contributed to weight gain, increased locomotor activity, and induced depression-like behavior in female mice. Furthermore, the age of the mouse contributed to weight gain, increased locomotor activity, and induced anxiety-like and depression-like behavior in female mice. ROH could change the behavior of female mice, particularly inducing depression-like behavior. Further studies are required to evaluate various COH protocols, specifically with drugs that prevent fluctuations and drastic drops in estrogen levels, such as aromatase inhibitors.

The good, the bad and the ugly of luteal phase stimulations.

An early follicular phase start of ovarian stimulation in assisted reproductive technology (ART) is only required if a fresh embryo transfer is planned. A shift from fresh to frozen embryo transfers has recently characterized ART treatments and, combined with the trend towards treatment individualization and simplification, facilitated random-start stimulation. Luteal phase stimulation, started between ovulation and the next menses, has gained momentum and the good, the bad and the ugly sides have become obvious with the increasing number performed. Unprotected intercourse during the follicular phase or around ovulation can result in an unknown and undetectable conception at the time of starting stimulation. Aside from the theoretical implications for embryo development from exposure to stimulation medication, embryo-derived human chorionic gonadotrophin may cause ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. The duration of stimulation and consumption of gonadotrophin appear to be longer and higher than in the early follicular phase start approach, although the number of retrieved/mature oocytes is comparable or, in some instances, higher. On the other hand, elevated progesterone concentrations during the luteal phase may prevent premature ovulation and, in theory, might replace pituitary suppression using gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonists or exogeneous progestins. Furthermore, the flexibility in stimulation timing will meet the needs of patients with time constraints.

Effects of various controlled ovarian hyperstimulation protocols and surgery on pregnancy outcomes in women with endometriosis.

Endometriosis is a common gynecological condition in women of childbearing age that causes symptoms such as menstrual changes and dysmenorrhea, and is also a major cause of infertility. Therefore, women with endometriosis usually need to use assisted reproductive technology (ART), such as in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection, to increase their chances of conceiving. Numerous clinical observations and studies have indicated that endometriosis can affect the success of ART, such that women with endometriosis who use ART have a lower live-birth rate than those without endometriosis who use ART. Therefore, this article reviews the impact of various controlled ovarian hyperstimulation protocols and surgery on the pregnancy outcomes of women with endometriosis using ART to explore the selection of individualized treatment.

Spironolactone use and oocyte maturation in patients undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the association between spironolactone use and controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) outcomes. METHODS: Retrospective study, including patients who underwent COH. Oocyte yield and maturation rates were compared by categories of spironolactone use at the start of their cycle. RESULTS: 402 patients were included. 83 patients continued spironolactone, 44 patients discontinued spironolactone, and 275 matched control patients were spironolactone-naïve. No difference was observed in the number of oocytes retrieved (17 ± 14 vs. 15 ± 13, p = 0.4) or mature oocytes vitrified (15 ± 9.5 vs. 12 ± 11, p = 0.4) in patients who continued spironolactone use and spironolactone naïve patients, respectively. When comparing patients who continued spironolactone use and patients who discontinued spironolactone use, no difference was seen in the number of oocytes retrieved (17 ± 14 vs. 17.5 ± 7.8, p = 0.9) or mature oocytes vitrified (15 ± 9.5 vs. 13.5 ± 6.5, p = 0.5), respectively. There was no observed relationship between total daily spironolactone dose (< 100mg/day, 100mg/day, 150mg/day and > 200 mg/day) and the total number of mature oocytes vitrified (respectively, 14.0 ± 13.0, 16.0 ± 7.8, 14.0 ± 4.5, 11.0 ± 7.0 oocytes, p = 0.4). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to evaluate the association between spironolactone and oocyte yield and maturation rates during COH cycles. These findings can assist in counseling patients on the implications of continuing spironolactone during COH cycle.

Reassessing the impact of letrozole co-administration in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation: findings from a single-center repeated measures study.

PURPOSE: To explore whether letrozole improved outcomes in subsequent controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) cycles. METHODS: This was a retrospective repeated measures cohort study examining COH cycles. Patients were included if they underwent two cycles for unexplained infertility, male factor infertility, or planned oocyte/embryo cryopreservation. The first cycles for all patients implemented a non-letrozole, conventional gonadotropin protocol. Second cycles for the study group included letrozole (2.5-7.5 mg for 5 days) with no medication change to second cycles amongst controls. Our primary objective was to compare oocyte yield. Cohorts were then subdivided by pursuit of oocyte (OC) or embryo (IVF) cryopreservation. Secondary outcome amongst the OC subgroup was oocyte maturation index (metaphase II (MII)/total oocytes). Secondary outcomes amongst the IVF subgroup were normal fertilization rate (2-pronuclear zygotes (2PN)/oocytes exposed to sperm), blastocyst formation rate (blastocysts/2PNs), and embryo ploidy (%euploid and aneuploid). RESULTS: Fifty-four cycles (n = 27) were included in letrozole and 108 cycles (n = 54) were included in control. Oocyte yield was higher in second cycles (p < 0.008) in the letrozole group but similar in second cycles (p = 0.26) amongst controls. Addition of letrozole did not impact MII index (p = 0.90); however, MII index improved in second cycles amongst controls (p < 0.001). Both groups had similar rates of normal fertilization (letrozole: p = 0.52; control: p = 0.61), blast formation (letrozole: p = 0.61; control: p = 0.84), euploid (letrozole: p = 0.29; control: p = 0.47), and aneuploid embryos (letrozole: p = 0.17; control: p = 0.78) between cycles. CONCLUSIONS: Despite improved oocyte yield, letrozole did not yield any difference in oocyte maturation or embryo outcomes.

Severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome following sole gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist trigger: a case series and literature review.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to report three cases of early severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in patients undergoing a GnRH antagonist protocol triggered with GnRH agonist (GnRH-a), leading to hospitalization and the need for peritoneal drainage. Additionally, a review of the existing literature on this topic is provided. DESIGN: This is a retrospective case series and a literature review. SETTING: This study was conducted at obstetrics and gynecology department of tertiary academic referral hospitals, Israel. PARTICIPANTS: This study included three patients presented with severe OHSS symptoms, including abdominal distension, ascites, and hemoconcentration. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main focus of the treatment was to address the symptoms and prevent any further complications. The outcome was the complete recovery of the patients. RESULTS: The presented cases detail instances of severe OHSS following oocyte retrieval, utilizing GnRH-a for triggering. Case 1 involved a 33-year-old patient with a history of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), Case 2 featured a 22-year-old patient with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), and Case 3 included a 41-year-old patient with a history of depressive disorder. All patients receiving supportive care, including infusions and medications, exhibited gradual improvement during hospitalization, with complete resolution observed during the 20-day post-hospitalization check-up. CONCLUSIONS: These three cases highlight the occurrence of severe early OHSS following a GnRH antagonist protocol triggered with GnRH-a in the absence of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) administration for trigger or luteal-phase support. Clinicians must be aware that a GnRH-a trigger followed by a freeze-all approach does not guarantee the complete elimination of OHSS in all patients.

Levothyroxine may not adequately prepare hypothyroid women for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation.

BACKGROUND: Thyroid axis dysregulation during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) is more pronounced in hypothyroid-treated women. Whether or not this leads to compromised thyroid hormone levels within the ovarian follicular fluid is not known. AIMS: To determine whether ovarian follicular thyroid hormone levels are compromised in adequately replaced hypothyroid women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH), and/or influence cycle/pregnancy outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective cohort study involving 46 euthyroid (anti-thyroid peroxidase antibody negative) and 16 levothyroxine-replaced women with baseline thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) <2.5 mIU/L attending their first COH cycle. Follicular fluid TSH, free triiodothyronine (T3) and free thyroxine (T4) were recorded at oocyte pick-up. Serum levels were measured at: (i) baseline; (ii) human chorionic gonadotropin trigger day; and (iii) cycle conclusion. The number of mature oocytes retrieved, fertilisation, early pregnancy loss and live birth rates were compared. RESULTS: Median serum TSH levels were similar at baseline (1.76 vs 1.24 mIU/L, P = 0.053), but free T3 levels were lower (4.5 vs 4.8 pmol/L, P = 0.029) in levothyroxine-replaced compared to euthyroid women, with serum TSH levels increasing across ovarian stimulation (P = 0.006) into pregnancy testing (P = 0.030). Follicular fluid free T3 levels were lower in levothyroxine-replaced women (median 4.3 vs 4.6 pmol/L, P = 0.032). Fertilisation rates were lower (52% vs 71%, P = 0.043) in women requiring levothyroxine replacement, but numbers of mature oocytes retrieved, early pregnancy loss and live births did not differ. CONCLUSION: Adequately replaced hypothyroid women achieve lower ovarian follicular fluid free T3 levels and poorer fertilisation rates compared to euthyroid women undergoing COH. Optimising T3 levels may be pivotal in improving COH outcomes in hypothyroid women.

Ischemic events are infrequent in patients with ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Case reports describe arterial thrombosis including ischemic stroke associated with severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), but the prevalence of major ischemic events during or shortly after OHSS is unknown. METHODS: Using publicly available administrative datasets in the United States between 2015 and 2020, we conducted two separate cross-sectional studies of patients with OHSS. We included all patients with OHSS. Our study outcome was any hospitalization for acute ischemic stroke, acute myocardial infarction, cerebral venous sinus thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, or acute deep venous thrombosis during the index hospitalization or within 90 days of OHSS diagnosis. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: We found very few major ischemic events in patients with OHSS.

Efficacy and safety of follitropin delta versus follitropin alpha/beta in infertility treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Follitropin δ may be an alternative to conventional follitropin α/ß for controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) within assisted reproductive treatment (ART), but its efficacy and safety remain unknown. We performed a random-effects meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of follitropin δ and follitropin α/ß. Methods: We searched randomized controlled trials comparing follitropin δ and follitropin α/ß using MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov, and WHO-ITCRP on December 14, 2022. The primary outcomes were the live birth rate and the incidence of moderate or severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). The certainty of the evidence was assessed using the grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation approach. The protocol was registered on the Open Science Framework. Results: Three studies involving 2682 participants were included in our meta-analysis. The results indicated that follitropin δ may result in little to no difference in live birth rates (risk ratio [RR], 1.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.91-1.38; low certainty) and the incidence of moderate or severe OHSS (RR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.48-1.26; low certainty) compared with follitropin α/ß. Conclusion: Follitropin δ may result in little to no difference in COS compared with follitropin α/ß, especially in terms of live births and safety.

Reinfusion of peritoneal fluid elevates the level of plasma D-dimer in patients with early-onset ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.

Purpose: This study aimed to elucidate the factors that affect the dynamics of blood D-dimer in ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed medical records from two hospitals and extracted data obtained during assisted reproductive technology and OHSS treatment. Blood D-dimer levels during hospitalization were plotted against body weight. Other factors possibly related to blood D-dimer levels were also analyzed. Results: The analysis included 10 patients with OHSS admitted between January 2013 and June 2023. In all patients, blood D-dimer levels increased significantly when they convalesced from OHSS and lost weight. None of the patients showed clinical signs of thrombosis, which was confirmed using imaging tests in 8 of 10 patients. Two patients underwent cell-free and concentrated ascites reinfusion therapy (CART), and their blood D-dimer levels increased dramatically after the procedure. Conclusion: Weight change and CART are associated with blood D-dimer dynamics in OHSS. Our results show that elevated blood D-dimer levels in patients with OHSS do not always represent the presence of thrombosis. Reinfusion of pooled D-dimer in ascites may explain the D-dimer surge during the recovery phase or after CART in these patients. Our study provides new perspectives on the clinical implications of D-dimer during OHSS.

[Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome with controlled ovarian stimulation after induction therapy for Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia].

A 27-year-old woman with newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia received induction therapy with dasatinib and prednisolone. From the time of diagnosis, oocyte storage was planned in accordance with the patient's wishes. After progesterone administration for suppression of menstruation, and blood cell recovery, ovarian stimulation was performed and a sufficient number of eggs was collected. The patient was considered at high risk for ovarian stimulation syndrome (OHSS) and received cabergoline and letrozole. However, ovarian enlargement and ascites were observed on ultrasonography 2 days after egg collection, and a diagnosis of moderate OHSS was made. Circulatory management was performed and low-molecular-weight heparin was administered. Dasatinib was discontinued due to the appearance of pleural effusion. Fluid retention improved after menstruation resumed, and the patient was able to continue consolidation with dasatinib and cord blood transplantation. Although tyrosine kinase inhibitors are expected to simplify planning of oocyte storage, the risk of complicating OHSS should be noted.

The best evidence for the management of ovarian hyper-stimulation syndrome in patients undergoing assisted reproductive therapy. / è¾ åŠ©ç”Ÿæ®–æ‚£è€ åµå·¢è¿‡åº¦åˆºæ¿€ç»¼åˆå¾ç®¡ç†çš„æœ€ä½³è¯æ®æ€»ç»“.

OBJECTIVES: To summarize the best evidence for the management of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in patients undergoing assisted reproductive therapy. METHODS: Evidence related to the management of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in patients undergoing assisted reproductive therapy, including practice guidelines, systematic evaluation, expert consensuws and evidence summary was systematically searched in UpToDate, BMJ Best Practice, World Health Organization (WHO) website, Guidelines International Network (GIN), National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) website, National Guidelines website, American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) website, New York Academy of Sciences (NYAS) website, Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) database, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, PubMed, Wanfang Knowledge Data Service Platform, CNKI, and China Biomedical Literature Database from inception to March 1, 2024. Two researchers independently evaluated the quality of the literature, and a senior researcher made the final decision for literature inclusion. RESULTS: A total of 14 articles met the criteria, including 5 practical guidelines, 3 systematic evaluations, 2 expert consensuses, 1 evidence summary paper and 3 from UptoDate. The final formation includes five aspects: risk assessment, disease monitoring, early prevention, institutional management, and health education, with a total of 27 best pieces of evidence. CONCLUSIONS: The updated evidence indicates that the monitoring and prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome should start early; medical practitioners should provide personalized treatment plans for patients, promote the rational allocation of treatment resources, and enhance effective management of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.

Clinical characteristics of functioning gonadotroph adenoma in women presenting with ovarian hyperstimulation: Audit of UK pituitary centres.

OBJECTIVE: Functioning gonadotroph adenomas (FGAs) are rare pituitary tumours stimulating ovarian function with potential life-threatening consequences in women. However, a lack of aggregated clinical experience of FGAs impairs management in affected women. The aim of this study is to present the clinical course of FGA-induced ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) cases as identified by some of the largest UK pituitary endocrine tertiary centres with a view to increasing awareness and improving diagnosis and management of women with FGA. DESIGN: A retrospective observational study; audit of eight UK regional pituitary centres for cases of FGAs. SETTING: Specialist neuroendocrine centres in the United Kingdom. PATIENTS AND MEASUREMENTS: Women diagnosed with FGA-induced OHSS. Description of their clinical course. RESULTS: Seven cases of FGA were identified in women, all causing OHSS. Mean age was 33.4 years at diagnosis. Abdominal pain, irregular periods, headache, and visual disturbances were reported at presentation by 100%, 71%, 57% and 43% of women, respectively. Three of seven women underwent ovarian surgery before FGA diagnosis. Six women underwent transsphenoidal surgery (TSS) with incomplete tumour resection in five of those, but all showed improvement or resolution in symptoms and biochemistry postoperatively. CONCLUSION: FGA is a rare cause of spontaneous OHSS. TSS improves clinical and biochemical features of ovarian hyperstimulation in FGAs. Improved awareness of FGA will prevent inappropriate emergency ovarian surgery.

Recent clomiphene citrate exposure does not impact subsequent clinical outcomes in single euploid frozen embryo transfer cycles.

STUDY QUESTION: Do infertile couples who recently utilized clomiphene citrate (CC) for ovulation induction or ovarian stimulation (<90 days previously) followed by a single euploid embryo transfer (SEET) have lower implantation potential compared with patients who were not exposed to CC within 90 days before embryo transfer (ET)? SUMMARY ANSWER: There does not appear to be an association between recent CC exposure and lower implantation potential in patients who undergo a frozen embryo transfer (FET) of euploid embryos. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Clomiphene has been found to be associated with lower pregnancy rates when compared against other ovarian stimulation medications. The majority of published research about the effects of CC on implantation potential suggest an anti-estrogenic effect on the endometrium. Quality evidence and information about utilization of CC and its effect on implantation potential after euploid ETs is lacking in the literature. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A retrospective cohort study with propensity score matching was carried out. We included all patients that underwent an autologous SEET from September 2016 to September 2022 at a single academic-private ART center. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: The study group included patients that had utilized CC during either ovulation induction cycles and/or controlled ovarian stimulation at least 90 days before FET. A propensity score-matched control group of patients that were unexposed to CC within 90 days prior to SEET was used for comparisons. The primary outcome was positive pregnancy test (defined as a positive serum ß-hCG measured 9 days after ET), with other outcomes including clinical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, biochemical pregnancy loss, and clinical pregnancy loss rates per SEET. Multivariate regression analyses fitted with generalized estimating equations were utilized to analyze if there was an association between CC utilization and IVF outcomes. Furthermore, the study evaluated the cumulative effect of CC and endometrial receptivity in vivo and subsequent IVF outcomes. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: A total of 593 patients with utilization of CC in <90 days before ET were compared with 1779 matched controls. Positive pregnancy test rates were comparable among the control group and the CC exposed groups, respectively (74.3% versus 75.7%, P = 0.79), as were clinical pregnancy (64.0% versus 65.0%, P = 0.60), ongoing pregnancy (51.8% versus 53.2%, P = 0.74), biochemical pregnancy loss (15.7% versus 14.03%, P = 0.45), and clinical pregnancy loss rates were also comparable among cohorts (17.1% versus 18.1%, P = 0.71). No association was found between utilization of clomiphene and lower implantation rates (adjusted odds ratio 0.95, 95% CI 0.76-1.18). Also, no differences were observed in sub-analyses based on multiple CC utilization periods. Finally, no association was found between the number of consecutive cumulative clomiphene cycles and sub-optimal IVF outcomes. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The study has inherent bias that originated from its retrospective design. Serum levels of CC were not measured and sample size for the sub-analyses was small. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: There does not appear to be an association between recent CC exposure and lower implantation potential in patients who undergo a FET of euploid embryos. This finding remains consistent, even in patients who undergo multiple, consecutive clomiphene cycles prior to ET. There were no long-term effects of CC on endometrial development and clinical characteristics examined in this study. Patients that utilized CC medication prior to a SEET cycle for either ovarian stimulation or ovulation induction, can be assured that there is no evidence of a residual effect of recent CC administration that could jeopardize their pregnancy probability. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): No funding was received for the realization of this study. A.C. is advisor and/or board member of Sema4 (stakeholder in data) and Progyny. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.