Cancer patients, physicians, and nurses differ in their attitudes toward the decisional role in do-not-resuscitate decision-making.

PURPOSE: Do-not-resuscitate (DNR) decision-making in severely ill patients presents many difficult medical, ethical, and legal challenges. The primary aim of this study was to explore cancer patients' and health care professionals' attitudes regarding DNR decision-making authority and timing of the decision. METHODS: This study was a questionnaire survey among Danish cancer patients and their attending physicians and nurses in an oncology outpatient setting. Potential differences between patients', physicians', and nurses' answers to the questionnaire were analyzed using Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: Responses from 904 patients, 59 physicians, and 160 nurses were analyzed. The majority in all three groups agreed that DNR decisions should be made in collaboration between physician and patient. However, one-third of the patients answered that the patient alone should make the decision regarding DNR, which contrasts with the physicians' and nurses' attitudes, 0% and 6% pointing to the patient as sole decision-maker, respectively. In case of disagreement between patient and physician, a majority of both patients (66%) and physicians (86%) suggested themselves as the ultimate decision-maker. Additionally, 43% of patients but only 19% of physicians preferred the DNR discussion being brought up early in the course of the disease. CONCLUSIONS: With regard to the decisional role of patient vs. physician and the timing of the DNR discussion, we found a substantial discrepancy between the attitudes of cancer patients and physicians. This discrepancy calls for a greater awareness and discussion of this sensitive topic among both health care professionals and the public.

Absence of Relatives Impairs the Approach of Nurses to Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Non-Cancer Elderly Patients without a Do-Not-Attempt-Resuscitation Order: A Vignette-Based Questionnaire Study.

A Do-Not-Attempt-Resuscitation (DNAR) order solely precludes performing cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) following cardiopulmonary arrest. A patient's personal status is known to influence a range of clinical practices, not only CPR, when a DNAR order is given. We assessed whether the absence of supporting relatives or a diagnosis of dementia can influence nurses' perceptions of clinical practices for elderly patients with non-malignant and chronic diseases. A vignette-based questionnaire was used to evaluate nurses' beliefs both before and after issuance of a DNAR order. Three vignettes were developed: the control vignette described an 85-year-old woman with repeated heart failure, the second and third incorporated a lack of relatives and a dementia diagnosis, respectively. The survey assessed the approach of nurses to 10 routine medical procedures, including CPR, clinical laboratory testing and nursing care, using a 5-base Likert-scale, for six vignette scenarios. A questionnaire was completed by 186 nurses (64% response). The pre-DNAR non-relative vignette showed significantly lower scores for CPR, indicating a deterioration in willingness to perform CPR, compared to the pre-DNAR control (median [interquartile]; 3 [2-4] and 4 [3-4] in the non-relative and control vignettes, respectively, p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed between the dementia and control vignettes. Absence of contactable relatives and resultant lack of communication can diminish the perception of nurses regarding the provision of CPR, even when a DNAR does not exist. This result suggests a necessity for comprehensive training all medical staff about issuance of DNAR orders and what care should be provided thereafter.

Use of resuscitation plans at a tertiary Australian hospital: room for improvement.

BACKGROUND: The 'Acute Resuscitation Plan' (ARP) is a document for recording the resuscitation plans of patients at a tertiary hospital for adult patients. The ARP was introduced at the hospital in September 2014, superseding the 'Not for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR)' form. Unlike the Not for CPR form, the ARP was relevant to patients with and without resuscitation limits. AIM: To evaluate the introduction of the ARP. METHODS: This study is a retrospective audit of the records of all admissions to the hospital from January to June 2014 (Not for CPR period) and January to June 2015 (ARP period). The main outcomes are the incidence of resuscitation plans, the proportion of ARP specifying consultation with the patient (or representative) and with senior medical staff, and the proportion of ARP among older patients and those with significant comorbidity. RESULTS: Resuscitation plans were present for 453 of 23 325 (1.9%) admissions in the Not for CPR period versus 1801 of 24 037 (7.5%) in the ARP period (odds ratio (OR) 4.1, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.7-4.5, P < 0.001). A total of 42% of ARP specified 'care of the dying' in the event of arrest. Acknowledgement of the views of the patient (or representative) was indicated on 37% of ARP and of a senior physician on 28%. An ARP was not present for 67% of patients aged ≥90 years, 59% from aged care, 90% with metastatic cancer and 64% aged ≥80 years and with a Charlson comorbidity index ≥3. CONCLUSIONS: More patients had resuscitation plans after introducing the ARP. However, patients and senior physicians were often remote from the consultation process, and an ARP was not present for many patients likely to have a poor outcome from cardiopulmonary arrest.

Comparison of not for resuscitation (NFR) forms across five Victorian health services.

BACKGROUND: Within Australian hospitals, cardiac and respiratory arrests result in a resuscitation attempt unless the patient is documented as not for resuscitation. AIM: To examine the consistency of policies and documentation for withholding in-hospital resuscitation across health services. METHOD: An observational, qualitative review of hospital policy and documentation was conducted in June 2013 in three public and two private sector hospitals in metropolitan Melbourne. Not for resuscitation (NFR) forms were evaluated for physical characteristics, content, authorisation and decision-making. Hospital policies were coded for alerts, definition of futility and burden of treatment and management of discussions and dissent. RESULTS: There was a lack of standardisation, with each site using its own unique NFR form and accompanying site-specific policies. Differences were found in who could authorise the decision, what was included on the form, the role of patients and families, and how discussions were managed and dissent resolved. Futility and burden of treatment were not defined independently. These inconsistencies across sites contribute to a lack of clarity regarding the decision to withhold resuscitation, and have implications for staff employed across multiple hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: NFR forms should be reviewed and standardised so as to be clear, uniform and consistent with the legislative framework. We propose a two-stage process of documentation. Stage 1 facilitates discussion of patient-specific goals of care and consideration of limitations of treatment. Stage 2 serves to communicate a NFR order. Decisions to withhold resuscitation are inherently complex but could be aided by separating the decision-making process from the communication of the decision, resulting in improved end-of-life care.

Inadequate resuscitation documentation in older patients' clinical case notes.

This research examined the quality of resuscitation decisions documented in the clinical notes of 99 older patients within 48 h of admission. Only 34 had current documentation that was frequently inconsistent and ambiguous, leaving patients at risk of receiving inappropriate and unwanted resuscitation. Clear guidelines with community input to guide the implementation and documentation of end-of-life decisions are essential.

In-hospital end-of-life care in the old: a retrospective study of intensive care unit use and do-not-resuscitate forms in patients deceased in a Belgian university hospital.

OBJECTIVES: To explore the quality of in-hospital end-of-life care in adult patients with special attention to those 75 years and older and to make a comparison with the situation 10 years ago. METHODS: Data were retrospectively collected on adult patients who deceased at Ghent University Hospital between September 2018 and December 2019. The main outcome measures were 'ICU use' and 'presence of DNR forms on non-ICU units' in the final hospitalization. In order to identify possible risk factors for ICU use, logistic regression was performed. RESULTS: In total, 762 people died, of whom 35% were 75 or older. Just as 10 years ago, one-third (31%) died in the ICU versus 49% of those younger than 75 years (p < 0.001). Of people ≥75 years, 38%, compared to 42% 10 years ago, received an ICU treatment during their final hospitalization. The median length of an ICU stay was 4 versus 3 days 10 years ago. After adjusting for gender, comorbidities and the Charlson Comorbidity Index, factors associated with less ICU use were higher age, active malignancy and dementia (OR 0.838, 0.116 and 0.098 respectively). Seventy-nine percent of older patients on non-ICU wards died with a DNR form (versus 87% 10 years ago). CONCLUSION: Although there was an increase in the presence of DNR forms in the final hospitalization, no significant differences were seen in actual ICU use compared to 10 years ago. Factors associated with less ICU use were higher age, active malignancy and dementia.

Scope of treatment and clinical-decision making in the older patient with COVID-19 infection, a European perspective.

PURPOSE: Older patients were particularly vulnerable to severe COVID-19 disease resulting in high in-hospital mortality rates during the two first waves. The aims of this study were to better characterize the management of older people presenting with COVID-19 in European hospitals and to identify national guidelines on hospital admission and ICU admission for this population. METHODS: Online survey based on a vignette of a frail older patient with Covid-19 distributed by e-mail to all members of the European Geriatric Medicine Society. The survey contained questions regarding the treatment of the vignette patient as well as general questions regarding available services. Additionally, questions on national policies and differences between the first and second wave of the pandemic were asked. RESULTS: Survey of 282 respondents from 28 different countries was analyzed. Responses on treatment of the patient in the vignette were similar from respondents across the 28 countries. 247 respondents (87%) would admit the patient to the hospital, in most cases to a geriatric COVID-19 ward (78%). Cardiopulmonary resuscitation was found medically inappropriate by 85% of respondents, intubation and mechanical ventilation by 91% of respondents, admission to the ICU by 82%, and ExtraCorpular Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) by 93%. Sixty percent of respondents indicated they would consult with a palliative care specialist, 56% would seek the help of a spiritual counsellor. National guidelines on admission criteria of geriatric patients to the hospital existed in 22 different European countries. CONCLUSION: This pandemic has fostered the collaboration between geriatricians and palliative care specialists to improve the care for older patients with a severe disease and often an uncertain prognosis.

Mechanical life support algorithm developed by simulation for inpatient emergency management of recipients of implantable left ventricular assist devices.

Background: Published guidance concerning emergency management of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) recipients is both limited and lacking in consensus which increases the risk of delayed and/or inappropriate actions. Methods: In our specialist tertiary referral centre we developed, by iteration, a novel in-hospital resuscitation algorithm for LVAD emergencies which we validated through simulation and assessment of our multi-disciplinary team. A Mechanical Life Support course was established to provide theoretical and practical education combined with simulation to consolidate knowledge and confidence in algorithm use. We assessed these measures using confidence scoring, a key performance indicator (the time taken to restart LVAD function) and a multiple-choice question (MCQ) examination. Results: The mean baseline staff confidence score in management of LVAD emergencies was 2.4 ± 1.2 out of a maximum of 5 (n = 29). After training with simulation, mean confidence score increased to 3.5 ± 0.8 (n = 13).Clinical personnel who were provided with the novel resuscitation algorithm were able to reduce time taken to restart LVAD function from a mean value of 49 ± 8.2 seconds (pre-training) to 20.4 ± 5 seconds (post-training) (n = 42, p < 0.0001).The Mechanical Life Support course increased mean confidence from 2.5 ± 1.2 to 4 ± 0.6 (n = 44, p < 0.0001) and mean MCQ score from 18.7 ± 3.4 to 22.8 ± 2.6, out of a maximum of 28 (n = 44, p < 0.0001). Conclusion: We present a simplified LVAD Advanced Life Support algorithm to aid the crucial first minutes of resuscitation where basic interventions are likely to be critical in assuring good patient outcomes.

Cerebral regional oxygen saturation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation and return of spontaneous circulation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIM: Predicting the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in victims of cardiac arrest (CA) remains challenging. Cerebral regional oxygen saturation (rSO2) measured during resuscitation is feasible, and higher initial and overall values seem associated with ROSC. However, these observations were limited to the analysis of few small single-centre studies. There is a growing number of studies evaluating the role of cerebral rSO2 in the prediction of ROSC. METHODS: We conducted an updated meta-analysis aimed at investigating the association of initial and overall values of cerebral rSO2 with ROSC after CA. We performed subgroups analyses according to the location of CA and conducted a secondary analysis according to the country where the study was conducted (resuscitation practice varies greatly for out-of-hospital CA). RESULTS: We included 17 studies. Higher initial rSO2 values (11 studies, n = 2870, 16.6% achieved ROSC) were associated with ROSC: Mean Difference (MD) -11.54 [95%Confidence Interval (CI)-20.96, -2.12]; p = 0.02 (I2 = 97%). The secondary analysis confirmed this finding when pooling together European and USA studies, but did not for Japanese studies (p = 0.06). One multi-centre Japanese study was an outlier with large influence on 95%CI. Higher overall rSO2 values during resuscitation (9 studies, n = 894, 33.7% achieving ROSC) were associated with ROSC: MD-10.38; [-13.73, -7.03]; p < 0.00001 (I2 = 77%). All studies were conducted in Europe/USA. CONCLUSIONS: This updated meta-analysis confirmed the association between higher initial and overall values of cerebral rSO2 and ROSC after CA. However, we found geographical differences, since this association was not present when Japanese studies were analysed separately.

Advanced do-not-attempt-resuscitation directives and emergency medical services for out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest patients in Japan: a pilot study.

AIMS: We investigated how do-not-attempt-resuscitation (DNAR) orders are currently used, and we examined the emergency medical team responses for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) cases in Japan. METHODS: The sample for this prospective study comprised all OHCA cases attended to by the Sagamihara Municipal Fire Department emergency medical services between May 30, 2019 and February 15, 2020. Data were recorded by the responding emergency medical team. RESULTS: There were 396 OHCA cases. The mean age was 75 ± 18 years, and individuals aged 65 years or older accounted for 80.6%. Approximately 70% of the patients had an underlying disease. A DNAR order was available in only 45 (11.4%) of the cases, of which 12 (26.7%) were written, 27 (60%) were verbally confirmed, and six (13.3%) were confirmed in some other way or both. The home physician was present and able to confirm the patient's death in only one of the DNAR cases. In 43 (95.6%) of the cases, the emergency medical team carried out cardiopulmonary resuscitation despite a DNAR order; of them, a total of 17 (37.8%) patients were transported to a tertiary emergency hospital. CONCLUSIONS: Our analyses indicate the under-utilization of DNAR advance directives and advance care planning (which are important for better end-of-life care) in Japan. Currently, an emergency medical team could be required to attempt resuscitation against an individuals' clear DNAR order. In the future, legal arrangements regarding the handling of DNAR directives on site may be required to respect patients' wishes.

Testing a new form to document 'Goals-of-Care' discussions regarding plans for end-of-life care for patients in an Australian emergency department.

OBJECTIVE: There is limited literature to inform the content and format of Goals-of-Care forms, for use by doctors when they are undertaking these important conversations. METHODS: This was a prospective, qualitative and quantitative study evaluating the utility of a new 'Goals-of-Care' form to doctors in a private, tertiary ED, used from December 2016 to February 2017 at Cabrini, Melbourne. A Goals-of-Care form was designed, incorporating medical aims of therapy and patient values and preferences. Doctors wishing to complete a Not-for-CPR form were also supplied with the trial Goals-of-Care form. Form use, content and patient progress were followed. Doctors completing a form were invited to interview. RESULTS: Forms were used in 3% of attendances, 120 forms were taken for use and 108 were analysed. The median patient age was 91, 81% were Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT) positive and patients had a 48% 6-month mortality. A total of 34 doctors completed the forms, 16 were interviewed (two ED trainees, 11 senior ED doctors and three others). Theme saturation was only achieved for the senior doctors interviewed. Having a Goals-of-Care form was valued by 88% of doctors. The frequency of section use was: Aims-of-Care 91%; Quality-of-Life 75% (the term was polarising); Functional Impairments 35%; and Outcomes of Value 29%. Opinions regarding the ideal content and format varied. Some doctors liked free-text space and others tick-boxes. The median duration of the conversation and documentation was 10 min (interquartile range 6-20 min). CONCLUSIONS: Having a Goals-of-Care form in emergency medicine is supported; the ideal contents of the form was not determined.

Life-Sustaining Treatment Status at the Time of Death in a Japanese Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.

BACKGROUND: Substantial variability exists among countries regarding the modes of death in pediatric intensive care units (PICUs). However, there is limited information on end-of-life care in Japanese PICUs. Thus, this study aimed to elucidate the characteristics of end-of-life care practice for children in a Japanese PICU. METHODS: We examined life-sustaining treatment (LST) status at the time of death based on medical chart reviews from 2010 to 2014. All deaths were classified into 3 groups: limitation of LST (limitation group, death after withholding or withdrawal of LST or a do not attempt resuscitation order), no limitation of LST (no-limitation group, death following failed resuscitation attempts), or brain death (brain death group). RESULTS: Of the 62 patients who died, 44 (71%) had limitation of LST, 18 (29%) had no limitation of LST, and none had brain death. In the limitation group, the length of PICU stay was longer than that in the no-limitation group (13.5 vs 2.5 days; P = .01). The median time to death after the decision to limit LST was 2 days (interquartile range: 1-5.5 days), and 94% of the patients were on mechanical ventilation at the time of death in the limitation group. CONCLUSIONS: Although limiting LST was a common practice in end-of-life care in a Japanese PICU, a severe limitation of LST such as withdrawal from the ventilator was hardly practiced, and a considerable LST was still provided at the time of death.

The Natural History of Changes in Preferences for Life-Sustaining Treatments and Implications for Inpatient Mortality in Younger and Older Hospitalized Adults.

OBJECTIVES: To compare changes in preferences for life-sustaining treatments (LSTs) and subsequent mortality of younger and older inpatients. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC). PARTICIPANTS: Individuals hospitalized at 21 KPNC hospitals between 2008 and 2012 (N = 227,525). MEASUREMENTS: Participants were divided according to age (<65, 65-84, ≥85). The effect of age on adding new and reversing prior LST limitations was evaluated. Survival to inpatient discharge was compared according to age group after adding new LST limitations. RESULTS: At admission, 18,254 (54.2%) of those aged 85 and older, 18,349 (20.8%) of those aged 65 to 84, and 3,258 (3.1%) of those younger than 65 had requested that the use of LST be limited. Of the 187,664 participants who initially did not request limitations on the use of LST, 15,932 (8.5%) had new LST limitations added; of the 39,861 admitted with LST limitations, 3,017 (7.6%) had these reversed. New limitations were more likely to be seen in older participants (aged 65-84, odds ratio (OR) = 2.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.16-2.39; aged ≥85, OR = 6.43, 95% CI = 6.05-6.84), and reversals of prior limitations were less likely to be seen in older individuals (aged 65-84, OR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.65-0.83; aged ≥85, OR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.41-0.53) than in those younger than 65. Survival rates to inpatient discharge were 71.7% of subjects aged 85 and older who added new limitations, 57.2% of those aged 65 to 84, and 43.4% of those younger than 65 (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Changes in preferences for LSTs were common in hospitalized individuals. Age was an important determinant of likelihood of adding new or reversing prior LST limitations. Of subjects who added LST limitations, those who were older were more likely than those who were younger to survive to hospital discharge.

Cerebral oximetry and return of spontaneous circulation after cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIM: The prediction of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) during resuscitation of patients suffering of cardiac arrest (CA) is particularly challenging. Regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rSO2) monitoring through near-infrared spectrometry is feasible during CA and could provide guidance during resuscitation. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on the value of rSO2 in predicting ROSC both after in-hospital (IH) or out-of-hospital (OH) CA. Our search included MEDLINE (PubMed) and EMBASE, from inception until April 4th, 2015. We included studies reporting values of rSO2 at the beginning of and/or during resuscitation, according to the achievement of ROSC. RESULTS: A total of nine studies with 315 patients (119 achieving ROSC, 37.7%) were included in the meta-analysis. The majority of those patients had an OHCA (n=225, 71.5%; IHCA: n=90, 28.5%). There was a significant association between higher values of rSO2 and ROSC, both in the overall calculation (standardized mean difference, SMD -1.03; 95%CI -1.39,-0.67; p<0.001), and in the subgroups analyses (rSO2 at the beginning of resuscitation: SMD -0.79; 95%CI -1.29,-0.30; p=0.002; averaged rSO2 value during resuscitation: SMD -1.28; 95%CI -1.74,-0.83; p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Higher initial and average regional cerebral oxygen saturation values are both associated with greater chances of achieving ROSC in patients suffering of CA. A note of caution should be made in interpreting these results due to the small number of patients and the heterogeneity in study design: larger studies are needed to clinically validate cut-offs for guiding cardiopulmonary resuscitation.