Utility of VerifyNow to assess the immediate pharmacodynamic response of chewed and swallowed aspirin: comparison with aggregometry.

VerifyNow (VN) test is a less laborious method to assess pharmacodynamics (PD) compared to light transmittance aggregometry (LTA). VN assay has not been used to study the immediate PD effects of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA). Ten healthy volunteers were randomly assigned to a single 162 or 650 mg dose of chewed and swallowed ASA. Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic measurements were performed at baseline and serially up to 60 min after ASA administration. Onset by VN was 20 ± 7 min with 162 mg and 13 ± 7 min with 650 mg ASA (p = .07). Onset by 1 mM AA-induced PA was 13 ± 12 min with 162 mg and 7 ± 3 min with 650 mg ASA (p=NS). VN correlated with AA-induced PA (r = 0.80, p < .001) and serum TxB2 levels (r = 0.76, p < .001). 95% inhibition of serum TxB2 was achieved at 38 ± 22 min and 22 ± 8 min with the 162 and 650 mg ASA, respectively (p = .08). The onset and extent of the antiplatelet effect of 650 mg ASA is numerically faster and greater than the 162 mg dose. VN identifies the onset, extent, and dose response to ASA therapy. The ease of using VN should facilitate multicenter PD investigations of ASA.

Aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) is an important drug widely used to prevent adverse ischemic events in patients with cardiovascular disease. Platelet aggregation and thromboxane B₂ levels in blood samples by complex laboratory methods are used to assess platelet response to aspirin. VerifyNow assay is a simple laboratory test that has not been used to assess the immediate effect of aspirin. In this study, conducted in 10 healthy volunteers, we compared the immediate platelet response to aspirin by serially assessing platelet aggregation by aggregometry and VerifyNow assay, and thromboxane B₂ levels. We also measured plasma levels of acetylsalicylic acid and salicylic acid. Our study demonstrated that the VerifyNow Aspirin test identifies the onset, extent, and dose-response to aspirin therapy. The ease of using the VerifyNow test should facilitate multicenter pharmacodynamic investigations of aspirin.

Analysis of Platelet Function Testing in Children Receiving Aspirin for Antiplatelet Effects.

Aspirin (ASA) remains the most common antiplatelet agent used in children. VerifyNow Aspirin Test® (VN) assesses platelet response to ASA, with therapeutic effect defined by the manufacturer as ≤ 549 aspirin reaction units (ARU). Single-center, observational, analysis of 195 children (< 18 years-old) who underwent first VN between 2015 and 2020. Primary outcome was proportion of patients with ASA biochemical resistance (> 549 ARU). Secondary outcomes included incidence of new clinical thrombotic and bleeding events during ≤ 6 months from VN in those who received ASA monotherapy (n = 113). Median age was 1.8 years. Common indications for ASA included cardiac anomalies or dysfunction (74.8%) and ischemic stroke (22.6%). Median ASA dose before VN was 4.6 mg/kg/day. Mean VN was 471 ARU. ASA biochemical resistance was detected in 14.4% (n = 28). Of 113 patients receiving ASA monotherapy, 14 (12.4%) had a thrombotic event and 2 (1.8%) had a bleeding event. Mean VN was significantly higher at initial testing in patients experiencing thrombotic event compared to those without thrombosis (516 vs 465 ARU, [95% CI: 9.8, 92.2], p = 0.02). Multivariable analysis identified initial VN ASA result ≥ 500 ARU at initial testing as the only significant independent risk factor for thrombosis (p < 0.01). VN testing identifies ASA biochemical resistance in 14.4% of children. VN ASA ≥ 500 ARU rather than ≥ 550 ARU at initial testing was independently associated with increased odds of thrombosis. Designated cut-off of 550 ARU for detecting platelet dysfunction by ASA may need reconsideration in children.

Clinical validation of AggreGuide A-100 ADP, a novel assay for assessing the antiplatelet effect of oral P2Y12 antagonists.

In this prospective, 3-arm, repeated-measure multicenter investigation in 280 patients with cardiovascular risk factors, platelet aggregation was measured with the novel AggreGuide A-100 ADP (A-100 ADP) and VerifyNow (VN)-PRU assays at baseline, and after United States Food and Drug Administration approved loading and 7 days maintenance doses of clopidogrel (n = 94), prasugrel (n = 43) or ticagrelor, (n = 143). Based on the predetermined cutoff values of < 4.7 platelet activity index with A-100 ADP assay to indicate antiplatelet response, more than 91% of patients met the criteria following loading and maintenance doses of prasugrel and more than 84% patients met the criteria following loading and maintenance doses of ticagrelor whereas only 32% and 51% of patients met the criteria following loading and maintenance doses of clopidogrel, respectively. The total percent agreement between the A-100 ADP and VN-PRU assays was 89%. The A-100 ADP assay, which includes whole blood in motion, performs comparably to the VN-PRU assay in a study of patients with cardiovascular risk factors treated with P2Y12 inhibitors possessing known differences in antiplatelet potencies. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT3111420.

The Influence of Prostaglandin E1 and Use of Inhibitor Percentage on the Correlation between the Multiplate and VerifyNow in Patients on Dual Antiplatelet Therapy.

Platelet function tests (PFT), such as the Multiple Electrode Analyzer (Multiplate) and VerifyNow, show little concordance in patients using antiplatelet drugs. A major difference between these tests is the use of prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) to inhibit P2Y1-platelet-receptor activation in VerifyNow and is proposed to be of influence in the discrepancy between these tests. We aimed to investigate whether the presence of PGE1 could provide an explanation for the moderate correlation and concordance between Multiplate and VerifyNow by adding PGE1 to the Multiplate ADP assay, also known as the ADP-high sensitivity (ADP-HS) assay. We also aimed to investigate whether the difference in baseline platelet function as measured by the VerifyNow and Multiplate could (partly) explain the moderate correlation between the tests, by plotting ADP assay results against baseline function as measured by the corresponding device, which is expressed as the 'inhibitor percentage.' Fifty-one patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) received dual antiplatelet therapy and were considered to have a high risk of ischemic or bleeding complications were included. The addition of 20 µl PGE1 in the Multiplate resulted in a significant reduction in Arbitrary Aggregation Units, but did not improve correlation with the VerifyNow. The correlation between VerifyNow and Multiplate inhibitor percentage was moderate. Based on these results, we concluded that neither PGE1 nor the calculation of the inhibitor percentage greatly influenced the correlation between PFTs.

Assessment of platelet function after discontinuation of ticagrelor.

BACKGROUND: Patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) are often treated by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with insertion of coronary artery stents and a majority receive dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), usually a combination of a COX-1 inhibitor (aspirin) and a P2Y12 inhibitor (eg ticagrelor). Not seldom the question arises as to when DAPT should be discontinued prior to interventional surgery. This study was done with the primary aim of investigating thrombocyte function immediately prior to and after discontinuation of ticagrelor. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective, longitudinal, observational study including 24 patients, venous blood was obtained from patients on day 0, before stopping maintenance dose of 90 mg ticagrelor twice daily, and then on days 1, 3, 5, and 8, after discontinuation. Samples were analyzed using Multiplate® and VerifyNow® . RESULTS: Prior to urgent surgery platelet aggregation >30 aggregation units (Multiplate® ) and >208 P2Y12 reaction units (VerifyNow® ) have been shown to correlate with reduced risk of peri- and postoperative bleeding risk. On day 3 after ticagrelor discontinuation, 100% (P = .016) and 67% (P=<.001) of patients had reached these levels on Multiplate® and VerifyNow® , respectively. On day 5, the corresponding figures were 100% (P = .016) and 78% (P=<.001). CONCLUSION: Discontinuation of ticagrelor for 3 days resulted in return of adequate platelet function in all patients on Multiplate® and in a majority of patients on VerifyNow® , indicating a lower bleeding risk. A bedside test for platelet function may be considered if time to anticipated surgery is less than 5 days after ticagrelor discontinuation.

Comparison of factors affecting platelet reactivity in various platelet function tests.

Previous studies have reported that various factors affect ADP-induced platelet reactivity during clopidogrel therapy. The aim of this study was to determine whether clinical and laboratory variables for platelet reactivity during dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) are dependent on the assay used. We enrolled 904 patients receiving DAPT following coronary intervention. Platelet reactivity was measured using three methods: the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay, multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA) ADP assay, and the light transmittance aggregometry (LTA) ADP assay at 24-48 h following coronary intervention. The VerifyNow results demonstrated a significant inverse correlation with hematocrit value (r = -0.268, p < 0.0001); however, MEA results had no such correlation with hematocrit (r = 0.044, p = 0.188). There was a positive correlation between the MEA results and platelet count (r = 0.255, p < 0.0001). LTA was weakly influenced by hematocrit (r = -0.064, p = 0.057) and platelet count (r = 0.069, p = 0.040). Gender (odds ratio 1.53, 95% CI 1.10-2.14, p = 0.013) and hematocrit (odds ratio 0.91,95% CI 0.88-0.94, p < 0.0001) were the independent variables for HPR by VerifyNow. Smoking (odds ratio 0.38, 95% CI 0.16-0.94, p = 0.036) and platelet count (odds ratio 1.01, 95% CI 1.00-1.01, p < 0.0001) were independent factors for HPR when using the MEA assay, whereas platelet count (odds ratio 1.00, 95% CI 1.00-1.01, p = 0.006) was identified as the only independent variable for HPR when using LTA. The incidence of HPR and the influencing variables involved are dependent on the platelet function test used.

How does measurement of platelet P-selectin compare with other methods of measuring platelet function as a means of determining the effectiveness of antiplatelet therapy?

Measurement of P-selectin on activated platelets as a means of measuring platelet function utilizing the technology described here has the advantage of not requiring immediate access to specialist equipment and expertise. Blood samples are activated, fixed, stored, and transported to a central laboratory for flow cytometric analysis. Here we have compared P-selectin with other more traditional approaches to measuring platelet function in blood and/or platelet-rich plasma (PRP) from patients with acute coronary syndromes on treatment for at least 1 month with either aspirin and clopidogrel or aspirin with prasugrel. The comparators were light transmission aggregometry (LTA), VerifyNow and Multiplate aggregometry (for determining the effects of aspirin) and LTA, VerifyNow and Multiplate together with the BioCytex VASP phosphorylation assay (for the P2Y12 antagonists). The P-selectin Aspirin Test revealed substantial inhibition of platelet function in all but three of 96 patients receiving aspirin with clopidogrel and in none of 51 patients receiving aspirin and prasugrel. The results were very similar to those obtained using LTA. There was only one patient with high residual platelet aggregation and low P-selectin expression. The same patients identified as "non-responders" to aspirin also presented with the highest residual platelet activity as measured using the VerifyNow system, although not quite as well separated from the other values. With the Multiplate test only one of these patients clearly stood out from the others. The results obtained using the P-selectin P2Y12 Test in 102 patients taking aspirin and clopidogrel were similar to the more traditional approaches in that a wide scatter of results was obtained. Generally, high values seen with the P-selectin P2Y12 Test were also high with the LTA, VerifyNow, Multiplate, and BioCytex VASP P2Y12 Tests. Similarly, low residual platelet function using the P2Y12 test was seen irrespective of the testing procedure used. However, there were differences in some patients. Prasugrel was always more effective than clopidogrel in inhibiting platelet function with none of 56 patients (P-selectin and VerifyNow), only 2 of 56 patients (Multiplate) and only 3 of 56 patients (Biocytex VASP) demonstrating high on-treatment residual platelet reactivity (HRPR) defined using previously published cut-off values. The exception was LTA where there were 11 of 56 patients with HRPR. It remains to be seen which experimental approach provides the most useful information regarding outcomes after adjusting therapies in treated patients.

Association between CYP2C19 genotype and the additional effect of cilostazol to clopidogrel resistance in neuroendovascular therapy.

We investigated the association between CYP2C19 genotype and additional effect of cilostazol on clopidogrel resistance (CR) in neuroendovascular therapy. Between January 2012 and January 2016, 447 consecutive patients were administered with 75-mg cilostazol/day. The VerifyNow System was used for evaluating P2Y12 reaction units (PRU) > 230 and/or percentage inhibition of platelet function (% Inhibition) ≤ 20 as CR. Among 158 patients with CR, 31 were administered with additional 100- or 200-mg cilostazol/day and their platelet function was evaluated. According to CYP2C19 genotypes revealed using the Spartan RX and DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit, patients were classified into three phenotypic groups: extensive metabolizer (EM, three patients), intermediate metabolizer (IM, 12 patients), and poor metabolizer (PM, 16 patients). Administration of additional cilostazol decreased PRU (EM group: 160.7 ± 85.2 after vs 278.3 ± 40.1 before, P = 0.15; IM group: 205.6 ± 74.0 vs 254.3 ± 35.0, P = 0.02; and PM group: 227.8 ± 52.2 vs 282.1 ± 30.4, P = 0.003), and increased % Inhibition (EM group: 40.0 ± 27.9 vs 9.3 ± 3.8, P = 0.25; IM group: 31.4 ± 18.0 vs 11.8 ± 8.2, P = 0.001; and PM group: 24.6 ± 15.0 vs 10.4 ± 9.3, P = 0.001). However, the rate of normalized-clopidogrel response, thromboembolic lesions, and bleeding complications were not significantly different among the three groups. Thus, the addition of cilostazol was effective on CR in terms of PRU, % Inhibition, rate of change of normalized-clopidogrel response, thromboembolic events, and bleeding complications irrespective of phenotype.

[High On-Treatment Platelet Reactivity Determinants on Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients With Ischemic Heart Disease Before Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention].

OBJECTIVE: to determine impact of different laboratory and genetic factors on high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HOPR) during dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). METHODS: We included in this study 94 patients with stable ischemic heart disease (mean age 59±9.67 years). All patients underwent elective PCI with implantation of drug eluting stents at the background of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and clopidogrel. Platelet reactivity was assessed using light transmission aggregometry with 5 µmol/L ADP (LTA 5ADP) and VerifyNow assay before PCI. All patients underwent genotyping to detect CYP2C19 polymorphism. In 74 patients at baseline examination we determined levels of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCPR), soluble platelet-selectin (sP-selectin), soluble CD40­ligand (sCD40L), interleukin-6 (IL-6), plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI-1) and activity of von Willebrand factor. RESULTS: Incidence of HOPR according to LTA-5ADP was 16 % and VerifyNow - 24.5 %. Univariate regression analysis showed that the following factors were significantly associated with HPR determined by LTA-5ADP: body mass index (BMI) (p=0.02), levels of total cholesterol (CH) (p=0.01), low density lipoprotein CH (p=0.004), and sP-selectin (p=0.009), activity of von Willebrand factor (p=0.04). Carriage of CYP2C19*2 allele was also associated with HOPR (p=0.006). According to multivariate regression analysis body mass index and level of sP-selectin were independent predictors of HOPR during DAPT. CONCLUSIONS: HOPR determined by LTA was significantly associated with high BMI, levels of total and LDL CH, carriage of CYP2C19*2 allele, levels of hsCRP and sP-selectin. Independent factors significantly related to HORP were BMI and sP-selectin level.

Assessment of three point-of-care platelet function assays in adult trauma patients.

BACKGROUND: Antiplatelet (AP) medication use is common among trauma patients and is associated with poor outcomes. Management options for platelet dysfunction in trauma patients are controversial, expensive, and potentially harmful. Although light transmission platelet aggregometry is considered the standard test to assess platelet function, it is cumbersome and not generally available. Currently, there are no widely accepted platelet function point-of-care tests for acute trauma. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective observational study from 2014 to 2015. Baseline Multiplate aggregometry aspirin area under the platelet aggregation curve (ASPI AUC), Thrombelastography Platelet Mapping percent inhibition of arachidonic acid (TEG-PM AA), and VerifyNow Aspirin Test (ARU) were compared for ability to detect any AP medication use (aspirin or clopidogrel), platelet dysfunction, and identify patients at risk for intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) progression by calculating the area under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values. Adenosine diphosphate assays were similarly evaluated. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients were enrolled, 25 were taking AP medications. AP patients were older (71.6 versus 35.0 y, P < 0.001) and received more platelet transfusions, but other baseline characteristics were similar. Median ASPI AUC (22.0 versus 53.5 P < 0.001) and VerifyNow ARU (503.5 versus 629.0, P < 0.001) were lower, whereas TEG-PM AA (51.8% versus 18.3%, P < 0.001) was higher in AP patients. Multiplate ASPI AUC, TEG-PM AA percent inhibition, and VerifyNow ARU could identify AP medication use (AUC: 0.90, 0.77, and 0.90, respectively). Adenosine diphosphate assays did not correlate with AP medication use in this population. TEG-PM AA percent inhibition and VerifyNow ARU correlated well with Multiplate ASPI AUC to identify platelet dysfunction (AUC: 0.78, 0.89, respectively). ICH occurred in 29 patients; 12 of which had progression of their injury. ASPI AUC (AUC: 0.50) and VerifyNow ARU (AUC: 0.59) did not correlate, and TEG-PM AA percent inhibition (AUC: 0.66) minimally correlated with progression. CONCLUSIONS: Multiplate, TEG-PM, and VerifyNow are useful point-of-care tests which identify AP medication use and platelet dysfunction in trauma patients. Initial TEG-PM AA percent inhibition may be associated with risk for ICH progression. However, additional large, prospective studies are needed.

Platelet testing in flow diversion: a review of the evidence.

OBJECTIVE Although the use of dual antiplatelet therapy with flow diversion is recommended and commonplace, the testing of platelet inhibition is more controversial. METHODS The authors reviewed the medical literature to establish and describe the physiology of platelet adhesion, the pharmacology of antiplatelet medications, and the mechanisms of the available platelet function tests. Additionally, they present a review of the pertinent neurointerventional and interventional cardiology literature. RESULTS Competing reports in the neurointerventional literature argue for and against the use of routine platelet function testing, with adjustments to the dosage or medications based on the results. The interventional cardiology literature has also wrestled with this dilemma after percutaneous coronary interventions, with conflicting reports of the benefits of platelet function testing. CONCLUSIONS Despite its prevalence, the benefits of platelet function testing prior to flow diversion are unproven. This practice will likely remain controversial until the level of evidence improves through more rigorous testing and reporting.

Platelet reactivity in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Thromboembolic events, primarily stroke, might complicate transcatheter aortic-valve implantation (TAVI) procedures in 3-5 % of cases. Thus, it is common to administer aspirin and clopidogrel pharmacotherapy for 3-6 months following TAVI in order to prevent those events. The biologic response to the dual anti platelet treatment (DAPT) is heterogeneous, e.g. low response, known as high on treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) may be associated with adverse thromboembolic events. Little is known about the prevalence of HTPR among patients undergoing TAVI. To assess the variability in response and rates of residual platelet reactivity in patients undergoing TAVI. We examined platelet reactivity in response to clopidogrel and aspirin in 40 consecutive patients (mean age 81.7 ± 6.5 years, 66.7 % women) who underwent successful TAVI using the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay and the multiple electrode aggregometry assay (Multiplate analyzer) in response to adenosine diphosphate and arachidonic acid respectively, at different time points before and following TAVI. Before TAVI, the majority of patients were on antiplatelet therapy (68.5 % aspirin, 12.5 % clopidogrel, 12.5 % DAPT). Following the procedure all patients were on DAPT or clopidogrel and warfarin. Among analyzed patients, 41 % had HTPR for clopidogrel and 12.5 % for aspirin at baseline, which did not significantly change 1-month following the procedure (p = 0.81 and p  = 0.33, respectively). In conclusion, patients undergoing TAVI for severe aortic stenosis and treated with DAPT have high rates of residual platelet reactivity during the peri-procedural period and up to 1-month thereafter. These findings may have clinical implications for the anti-platelet management of TAVI patients.

Impact of an integrated treatment algorithm based on platelet function testing and clinical risk assessment: results of the TRIAGE Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Interventions To Improve Clinical Outcomes Through Optimal Platelet Inhibition study.

Assessment of platelet reactivity alone for thienopyridine selection with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has not been associated with improved outcomes. In TRIAGE, a prospective multicenter observational pilot study we sought to evaluate the benefit of an integrated algorithm combining clinical risk and platelet function testing to select type of thienopyridine in patients undergoing PCI. Patients on chronic clopidogrel therapy underwent platelet function testing prior to PCI using the VerifyNow assay to determine high on treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR, ≥230 P2Y12 reactivity units or PRU). Based on both PRU and clinical (ischemic and bleeding) risks, patients were switched to prasugrel or continued on clopidogrel per the study algorithm. The primary endpoints were (i) 1-year major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) composite of death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or definite or probable stent thrombosis; and (ii) major bleeding, Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 2, 3 or 5. Out of 318 clopidogrel treated patients with a mean age of 65.9 ± 9.8 years, HTPR was noted in 33.3 %. Ninety (28.0 %) patients overall were switched to prasugrel and 228 (72.0 %) continued clopidogrel. The prasugrel group had fewer smokers and more patients with heart failure. At 1-year MACE occurred in 4.4 % of majority HTPR patients on prasugrel versus 3.5 % of primarily non-HTPR patients on clopidogrel (p = 0.7). Major bleeding (5.6 vs 7.9 %, p = 0.47) was numerically higher with clopidogrel compared with prasugrel. Use of the study clinical risk algorithm for choice and intensity of thienopyridine prescription following PCI resulted in similar ischemic outcomes in HTPR patients receiving prasugrel and primarily non-HTPR patients on clopidogrel without an untoward increase in bleeding with prasugrel. However, the study was prematurely terminated and these findings are therefore hypothesis generating.

Comparison of half- and standard-dose ticagrelor in Chinese patients with NSTE-ACS.

Ticagrelor is a novel direct-acting P2Y12 receptor antagonist used for preventing atherothrombotic events in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). The current recommended dose is 90 mg bid, but a low dose of ticagrelor has not been previously studied in Chinese ACS patients. Therefore, we performed this study to observe the different effects of half- and standard-dose ticagrelor on platelet aggregation in Chinese patients with NSTE-ACS. Sixty-two NSTE-ACS subjects were assigned to half-dose ticagrelor (n = 20), standard-dose ticagrelor (n = 22) and clopidogrel (n = 20) groups. Five days after drug administration, VerifyNow P2Y12 assay was performed to test P2Y12 reaction units (PRU) and inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA). High-platelet reactivity (HPR) was defined as a PRU > 208. The adverse events, including bleeding events and dyspnoea, were monitored throughout the study. PRU values in the half-dose (44.55 ± 32.88) and standard-dose (39.10 ± 40.02) ticagrelor were dramatically lower than those in the clopidogrel group (189.20 ± 65.22; P < 0.0001). The half-dose (84% ± 10%) and standard-dose (86% ± 13%) ticagrelor both showed greater IPA than clopidogrel (33% ± 20%; P < 0.0001). There were no significant differences in PRU and IPA between the two ticagrelor groups (P = 0.3085 and 0.4028, respectively). HPR rates were significantly lower in the two ticagrelor groups (0% for both) than those in the clopidogrel group (35%). In conclusion, half-dose ticagrelor had a similar inhibitory effect on platelet aggregation as standard-dose ticagrelor in Chinese patients with NSTE-ACS, which was significantly stronger than that of clopidogrel.

Comparison of VerifyNow P2Y12 and thrombelastography for assessing clopidogrel response in stroke patients in China.

Poor response to clopidogrel is often associated with recurrent ischemic events, and reliable platelet function tests are needed to identify clopidogrel low response (CLR). The aim of the study was to compare the consistency of VerifyNow P2Y12 and thrombelastography (TEG) in acute ischemic stroke patients treated with clopidogrel. Patients hospitalized in Changhai Hospital from August 2012 to September 2013 and assigned to treatment with a daily 75-mg dose of clopidogrel. The blood samples were taken on the 5-7th day to assess the capability of VerifyNow P2Y12 and TEG for evaluation of clopidogrel response, and all instrument parameters were used to perform correlation analysis. Patients with CLR were detected by using the methods and criteria published earlier (PRU ≥ 230 assayed by VerifyNow P2Y12 or TEG-Inhib% ≤30 % measured by TEG). Totally 58 patients were enrolled for the study and there were wide varieties in parameters of VerifyNow P2Y12 and TEG. Results showed a total of 17 and 9 patients, respectively, identified as CLR assessed by VerifyNow P2Y12 and TEG, but only three patients were detected to be clopidogrel low responders with both tests. The kappa consistency analysis showed poor consistency between VerifyNow P2Y12 and TEG results in terms of CLR (Kappa = -0.0349, p = 0.7730). Linear regression also demonstrated poor correlation between VerifyNow-PRU/VerifyNow-Inhib% and TEG-Inhib% (p = 0.07901 and p = 0.3788, respectively). Our study demonstrated that there was poor correlation between VerifyNow P2Y12 and TEG results, and VerifyNow P2Y12 showed a larger proportion of CLR than TEG.

[Ability to Overcome the Thrombocyte Resistance to Acetylsalicylic Acid in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease After Myocardial Revascularization With Coronary Stenting].

Resistance to acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) in patients with coronary artery disease is a poor predictor for the development of atherothrombotic complications. In 277 patients with coronary artery disease suffered uncomplicated coronary angioplasty with stent implantation, we was estimated arachidon-induced platelet aggregation during treatment with acetylsalicylic acid by bedside VerifyNow Assay test at 28-90 days after the intervention. It was found that 18.9% of the 144 patients receiving a combination of ASA 75 mg with 15.2 mg of magnesium hydroxide had true (laboratory) resistance to ASA. At the same time on the original enteric coated ASA 100 mg, we can found only 0.8% resistance to ASA among 129 patients. We made switch from combination of ASA 75 mg with 15.2 mg of magnesium hydroxide to original enteric coated ASA 100 mg and repeat VerifyNow Assay test at 2-4 days and found lost of resistance in 92% of 28 patients. Thus, resistance to the ASA is not constant, it depends on the form and the applied dose of ASA, and eliminating more than 92% when ASA changes from ineffective to effective form.

Relationship between clopidogrel-related polymorphisms and variable platelet reactivity at 1 year: A cohort study from Han Chinese.

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to investigate the effect of clopidogrel-related gene polymorphisms on platelet reactivity and clinical outcome in Chinese Han patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three hundred and thirty-six percutaneous coronary intervention - treated patients were recruited and followed for 1 year. Blood samples were collected from all patients for DNA genotyping. The platelet reactivity unit was measured by the VerifyNow technique. The CYP2C19*2, CYP2C19*3, CYP2C19*17, ATP-binding cassette subfamily B member 1, ITGB3, CYP2C9*3, CYP2B6*9, and P2Y12 alleles were assessed. RESULTS: The clinical endpoints were related to previous heart disease history (11.90% vs. 28.57%, P = 0.017), stroke (12.24% vs. 16.67%, P = 0.039), and diabetes (27.55% vs. 52.38%, P = 0.047). High on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) was frequent in advanced age (P = 0.019), male gender (P = 0.016), hypertension (P = 0.033), and chronic renal failure (P = 0.040). There were more endpoints in the CYP2C19*2 and P2Y12 mutant carriers (76.19% vs. 43.20%, P < 0.001; 50.00% vs. 35.71%, P = 0.001, respectively), whereas fewer in the CYP2C19*17 mutant carriers (11.90% vs. 56.46%, P = 0.001). CYP2C19*2 and P2Y12 polymorphism manifested HTPR (194.25 ± 45.91 vs. 151.38 ± 58.14, P < 0.001; 180.33 ± 67.25 vs. 161.89 ± 56.49, P = 0.008, respectively), whereas CYP2C19*17 mutant improved platelet reactivity (97.17 ± 45.38 vs. 169.08 ± 57.15, P = 0.003). However, there were no further cardiovascular deaths in endpoint patients. CONCLUSION: In Han Chinese people of mainland China, clopidogrel-related gene polymorphisms are related to variable platelet reactivity after clopidogrel maintenance dosing, which influences major adverse cardiovascular events, without an effect on cardiac death.

Prostaglandin E1 potentiates the effects of P2Y12 blockade on ADP-mediated platelet aggregation in vitro: Insights using short thromboelastography.

In addition to adenosine diphosphate (ADP), a number of platelet function tests including the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay (VN-P2Y12) employ prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) to improve specificity for P2Y12 blockade by mitigating the contribution of the P2Y1 pathway on ADP-mediated platelet aggregation. Using short thromboelastography (s-TEG), we have previously shown that VN-P2Y12 overestimates the functional effect of clopidogrel in some individuals. We investigated whether PGE1 systematically increases the inhibitory effects of P2Y12 blockade on ADP-mediated platelet aggregation in an in vitro model. Using s-TEG, we measured ADP-induced platelet aggregation either in the presence or absence of PGE1 (11 or 22 nM) in blood samples taken from healthy volunteers pre-incubated with prasugrel active metabolite (PAM; 0, 1, 3 or 10 µM). Individually, both PGE1 (p < 0.02) and PAM (p < 0.0001) inhibited ADP-mediated platelet aggregation in a dose-dependent manner, as expected. Furthermore, inclusion of PGE1 augmented inhibition of ADP-mediated platelet aggregation in response to PAM (p < 0.02) in a dose-dependent manner such that a 10-fold higher dose of PAM was required to attain equivalent inhibition of ADP-mediated platelet aggregation to that achieved by 1 µM PAM in the presence of 11 nM PGE1. In conclusion, PGE1 potentiates the anti-aggregatory effects of P2Y12 blockade on ADP-mediated platelet aggregation. Assays that employ PGE1 with ADP may therefore overestimate therapeutic response to prasugrel in a proportion of individuals, potentially making them unsuitable candidates for guiding delivery of personalized antiplatelet therapy.

Comparison between a new platelet count drop method PL-11, light transmission aggregometry, VerifyNow aspirin system and thromboelastography for monitoring short-term aspirin effects in healthy individuals.

Platelet function has been described by many laboratory assays, and PL-11 is a new point-of-care platelet function analyzer based on platelet count drop method, which counts platelet before and after the addition of agonists in the citrated whole blood samples. The present study sought to compare PL-11 with other three major more established assays, light transmission aggregometry (LTA), VerifyNow™ aspirin system and thromboelastography (TEG), for monitoring the short-term aspirin responses in healthy individuals. Ten healthy young men took 100 mg/d aspirin for 3-day treatment. Platelet function was measured via PL-11, LTA, VerifyNow and TEG, respectively. The blood samples were collected at baseline, 2 hour, 1 day during the aspirin treatment and 1 day, 5 ± 1 days, 8 ± 1 days after the aspirin withdrawal. Moreover, 90 additional healthy subjects were recruited to establish a reference range for PL-11. Platelet function of healthy subjects decreased significantly 2 hours after 100 mg/d aspirin intake and began to recover during 4-6 days after the aspirin withdrawal. Correlations between methods were PL-11 vs. LTA (r = 0.614, p < 0.01); PL-11 vs. VerifyNow (r = 0.829, p < 0.01); PL-11 vs. TEG (r = 0.697, p < 0.001). There was no significant bias between PL-11 and LTA at baseline (bias = 1.94%, p = 0.804) using Bland-Altman analysis, while the data of PL-11 were significantly higher than LTA (bias = 24.02%, p < 0.001) during the aspirin therapy. The reference range for PL-11 in healthy young individuals was from 66.8 to 90.5% (95%CI). When aspirin low-responsiveness was defined as LTA > 20%, the cut-off values for each method were, respectively: PL-11 > 50%, VerifyNow > 533 ARU, TEG > 60.2%. The results of different platelet function assays were uninterchangeable for monitoring aspirin response and correlations among them were also varied. Correlations among PL-11 and other three major assays suggested the ability of PL-11 to assess the treatment effects of aspirin. But a large cohort study is needed to confirm the cut-off value of aspirin response detected by PL-11.

Evaluation of the INNOVANCE PFA P2Y assay and its association with CYP2C19 genotypes.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate associations between INNOVANCE PFA P2Y (PFA P2Y) test results and CYP2C19 genotypes and provide baseline data for PFA P2Y testing to establish a therapeutic monitoring strategy for clopidogrel. A total of 75 new patients with acute coronary syndrome with planned percutaneous coronary intervention were enrolled between June 2012 and September 2012. All patients received clopidogrel at an initial loading dose of 600 mg followed by a 75-mg daily maintenance dose. Blood samples were obtained on the third morning after clopidogrel loading. PFA P2Y, VerifyNow P2Y12 and VASP assays were used to determine platelet inhibition due to clopidogrel, and the Verigene CYP2C19 test was used for CYP2C19 genotyping. The genotype frequency of 75 patients was as follows: CYP2C19 *1/*1 (wild type), 28 (37.3%); *1/*2, 31 (41.3%); *1/*3, 4 (5.3%); *2/*2, 5 (6.7%); *2/*3, 5 (6.7%); *1/*17, 1 (1.3%); and *2/*17, 1 (1.3%). Classified according to CYP2C19 genotypes, there were 29 (38.7%) extensive metabolizers (EM) or ultra rapid metabolizers (UM), 35 (46.7%) intermediate metabolizers (IM), and 10 (13.3%) poor metabolizers (PM). Median (interquartile range) PFA P2Y closure times (seconds) were 119 (101-260), 300 (130-300) and 300 (300-300) in the PM, IM and EM or UM groups, respectively (p < 0.05). Median (interquartile range) VerifyNow PRUs were 294 (213-297), 215 (165-320) and 189 (118-279); and the VASP platelet reactivity index (%) was 52.7 (33.3-91.9), 59.9 (41.4-72.8) and 38.9 (26.8-62.2) in the PM, IM and EM or UM groups, respectively (p > 0.05). Compared with non-carriers, carriers of reduced function CYP2C19 alleles tended to have higher platelet reactivity after clopidogrel treatment. The cut-off for PM versus other groups (IM and EM or UM) was ≤ 141 seconds (AUC 0.704, sensitivity 70%, specificity 76.6%) on the ROC curve. A statistically significant correlation between PFA P2Y (seconds) and VerifyNow (PRU) was found (ρ = -0.47, p < 0.0001). In conclusion, the PFA P2Y test showed a statistically significant association with CYP2C19 metabolizer phenotypes based on CYP2C19 genotyping and effectively determined the risk groups resistant to clopidogrel therapy, including PM.