Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 202
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Annu Rev Immunol ; 33: 1-28, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25581308

RESUMO

Herman Eisen and Sondra Schlesinger spent several days together in September 2007 in Woods Hole, Massachusetts, talking about immunology, focusing on his remembrances of the field over the more than 60 years of his involvement. This article is an abridged version of those discussions (the full version is available on the Annual Reviews website). It is both an oral history and a written memory of some important but selected areas of immunology.


Assuntos
Alergia e Imunologia , Alergia e Imunologia/história , Alergia e Imunologia/organização & administração , Alergia e Imunologia/tendências , Animais , Anticorpos , História do Século XX , História do Século XXI , Humanos , Sistema Imunitário , Linfócitos T
3.
Trends Immunol ; 41(12): 1051-1053, 2020 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33160840

RESUMO

An exemplar outcome of an immunology-based intervention is vaccine development; the current COVID-19 pandemic is a case in point. Can we build an immunology research ecosystem in Africa that nurtures discovery and enables translation? We see African immunologists as key agents of change and discuss obstacles and opportunities.


Assuntos
Alergia e Imunologia , Países em Desenvolvimento , África , Alergia e Imunologia/educação , Alergia e Imunologia/organização & administração , Alergia e Imunologia/tendências , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2
4.
Gastroenterology ; 158(6): 1789-1810.e15, 2020 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32359563

RESUMO

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic inflammatory condition of the esophagus. Many new studies have been reported recently that describe EoE management. An expert panel was convened by the American Gastroenterological Association Institute and the Joint Task Force on Allergy-Immunology Practice Parameters to provide a technical review to be used as the basis for an updated clinical guideline. This technical review was developed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. Eighteen focused EoE management questions were considered, with 15 answered using the GRADE framework and 3 with a narrative summary. There is moderate certainty in the evidence that topical glucocorticosteroids effectively reduce esophageal eosinophil counts to <15 per high-power field over a short-term treatment period of 4-12 weeks, but very low certainty about the effects of using topical glucocorticosteroids as maintenance therapy. Multiple dietary strategies may be effective in reducing esophageal eosinophil counts to <15 per high-power field over a short-term treatment period, with moderate certainty for elemental diets, low certainty for empiric 2-, 4-, and 6-food elimination diets, and very low certainty that allergy-based testing dietary eliminations have a higher failure rate compared to empiric diet elimination. There is very low certainty for the effect of proton pump inhibitors in patients with esophageal eosinophilia. Although esophageal dilation appears to be relatively safe, there is no evidence that it reduces esophageal eosinophil counts. There is very low certainty in the effects of multiple other medical treatments for EoE: anti-interleukin-5 therapy, anti-interleukin-13 therapy, anti-IgE therapy, montelukast, cromolyn, and anti-TNF therapy.


Assuntos
Esofagite Eosinofílica/terapia , Medicina Baseada em Evidências/normas , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/diagnóstico , Administração Tópica , Adulto , Comitês Consultivos/normas , Fatores Etários , Alergia e Imunologia/organização & administração , Alergia e Imunologia/normas , Criança , Dilatação/efeitos adversos , Dilatação/normas , Esofagite Eosinofílica/diagnóstico , Esofagite Eosinofílica/imunologia , Eosinófilos/efeitos dos fármacos , Eosinófilos/imunologia , Esofagoscopia/efeitos adversos , Esofagoscopia/normas , Medicina Baseada em Evidências/métodos , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/complicações , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/dietoterapia , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/imunologia , Alimentos Formulados , Gastroenterologia/métodos , Gastroenterologia/organização & administração , Gastroenterologia/normas , Glucocorticoides/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/uso terapêutico , Sociedades Médicas/organização & administração , Sociedades Médicas/normas , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos
5.
Clin Exp Allergy ; 50(10): 1159-1165, 2020 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32686204

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To understand parent preferences for NHS paediatric allergy services. DESIGN: A stated preference study (discrete choice experiment). SETTING: West Midlands, UK. PARTICIPANTS: A sample of parents of children aged 16 years or younger recruited from the general population through a third party company approved by the University of Birmingham. INTERVENTION: An online questionnaire with 18 choice questions describing two hypothetical paediatric allergy specialist clinics described in terms of the clinician, information provision, additional facilities, waiting times and out of pocket expenses. Main outcome measures Preference and willingness to pay estimates for each of the specified attributes. RESULTS: Parents strongly preferred that their children be reviewed by consultants or specialist nurses formally trained in allergy compared with consultants with no formal allergy training [Willingness to pay (WTP) estimates for nurse specialist £150.9 (138.8-163.2), trained allergy consultants £218.7 (205.7-231.9), compared with consultants without formal training]. They were willing to wait longer to see trained practitioners. Parents also expressed a strong preference for improving online information regarding allergies [WTP for written information £18.4 (6.1-30.6) and £72.6 for improved online information (59.9-85.3), compared with verbal information]. Specialist clinics with additional dietician and eczema support were also preferred [WTP £29.9 (19.8-40.1), compared with no additional support]. CONCLUSIONS: Parents showed strong preference for formally trained practitioners in specialist allergy clinics. Access to improved online allergy information and additional facilities within allergy clinics were also preferred. These findings have implications for future commissioning of paediatric allergy services in the UK.


Assuntos
Alergia e Imunologia , Comportamento de Escolha , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Hipersensibilidade/terapia , Pais/psicologia , Medicina Estatal , Acesso à Informação , Adolescente , Adulto , Alergia e Imunologia/economia , Alergia e Imunologia/organização & administração , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/economia , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/organização & administração , Inglaterra , Feminino , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Gastos em Saúde , Humanos , Hipersensibilidade/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidade/imunologia , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Especialização , Medicina Estatal/economia , Medicina Estatal/organização & administração , Fatores de Tempo , Listas de Espera , Adulto Jovem
6.
Med J Aust ; 210(2): 89-93, 2019 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30636277

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The Australasian Society of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, the peak professional body for clinical immunology and allergy in Australia and New Zealand, develops and provides information on a wide range of immune-mediated disorders, including advice about infant feeding and allergy prevention for health professionals and families. Guidelines for infant feeding and early onset allergy prevention were published in 2016, with additional guidance published in 2017 and 2018, based on emerging evidence. MAIN RECOMMENDATIONS: When the infant is ready, at around 6 months, but not before 4 months, start to introduce a variety of solid foods. (This is not a strict window of introduction but rather a recommendation not to delay the introduction of solid foods beyond 12 months.) Introduce peanut and egg in the first year of life in all infants, regardless of their allergy risk factors. Hydrolysed (partially and extensively) formula is no longer recommended for the prevention of allergic disease. CHANGES IN MANAGEMENT A RESULT OF THE GUIDELINES: The guidelines specifically recommend introducing solid foods at around 6 months of age and introducing peanut and egg in the first year of life in all infants to prevent allergy development. Hydrolysed formula is no longer recommended for prevention of allergic disease. A new document outlining the reasons for and the method of peanut introduction to high risk infants is available for health professionals.


Assuntos
Hipersensibilidade Alimentar , Alergia e Imunologia/organização & administração , Australásia , Pré-Escolar , Dieta , Feminino , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/prevenção & controle , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/terapia , Humanos , Lactente , Alimentos Infantis , Recém-Nascido , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Gravidez
7.
Mol Biol (Mosk) ; 53(5): 707-710, 2019.
Artigo em Russo | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31661472

RESUMO

This special issue of the journal is dedicated to the tenth anniversary of the Department of Immunology, Faculty of Biology, Moscow State University and describes some of the results of its work. Most of the materials were prepared by young graduates and post-graduate students of the department.


Assuntos
Alergia e Imunologia/história , Alergia e Imunologia/organização & administração , Universidades/organização & administração , Aniversários e Eventos Especiais , Disciplinas das Ciências Biológicas/história , Disciplinas das Ciências Biológicas/organização & administração , História do Século XXI , Moscou , Universidades/história
14.
Harefuah ; 155(3): 170-6, 195, 2016 Mar.
Artigo em Hebraico | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27305752

RESUMO

Our immune system protects us from various pathogens, autoimmune processes and malignancy. Primary immunodeficiency disorders are rare, however in contrast to the conventional perception, primary immunodeficiency diseases are more common than expected and may occur at any age. An insult to the immune system, primary or secondary, may lead to an increased incidence of infectious diseases, autoimmune diseases and malignancies. Primary care physicians, frequently encounter children and adults who suffer from recurrent infections, emphasizing the need for a structured approach for the evaluation of patients with suspected immunodeficiency. The growing knowledge of the fundamental mechanisms and function of the immune system together with recent developments in the field of clinical immunodeficiency enables us to use advanced diagnostic tools for the early diagnosis and treatment of these patients. In this review, we summarize the main aspects and updates of primary and secondary immune deficiency diseases, outline the "red flags" of immunodeficiency states and offer a stepwise workup approach for primary physicians and clinical immunology specialists. Some of the immunodeficiency "red flags" include recurrent infections, invasive infections, atypical pathogens, partial response to antibiotic treatment and frequent use of antibiotics, failure to thrive, chronic diarrhea and fungal infections, unexplained skin rash and a family history.


Assuntos
Doenças Autoimunes/terapia , Sistema Imunitário/imunologia , Síndromes de Imunodeficiência/terapia , Adulto , Alergia e Imunologia/organização & administração , Doenças Autoimunes/epidemiologia , Doenças Autoimunes/imunologia , Criança , Diagnóstico Precoce , Humanos , Síndromes de Imunodeficiência/epidemiologia , Síndromes de Imunodeficiência/imunologia , Infecções/epidemiologia , Infecções/imunologia , Infecções/terapia
15.
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA