Failed Neuroprotection of Combined Inhibition of L-Type and ASIC1a Calcium Channels with Nimodipine and Amiloride.

Effective pharmacological neuroprotection is one of the most desired aims in modern medicine. We postulated that a combination of two clinically used drugs-nimodipine (L-Type voltage-gated calcium channel blocker) and amiloride (acid-sensing ion channel inhibitor)-might act synergistically in an experimental model of ischaemia, targeting the intracellular rise in calcium as a pathway in neuronal cell death. We used organotypic hippocampal slices of mice pups and a well-established regimen of oxygen-glucose deprivation (OGD) to assess a possible neuroprotective effect. Neither nimodipine (at 10 or 20 µM) alone or in combination with amiloride (at 100 µM) showed any amelioration. Dissolved at 2.0 Vol.% dimethyl-sulfoxide (DMSO), the combination of both components even increased cell damage (p = 0.0001), an effect not observed with amiloride alone. We conclude that neither amiloride nor nimodipine do offer neuroprotection in an in vitro ischaemia model. On a technical note, the use of DMSO should be carefully evaluated in neuroprotective experiments, since it possibly alters cell damage.

Changes in selected metabolic parameters in patients over 65 receiving hydrochlorothiazide plus amiloride, atenolol or placebo in the MRC elderly trial.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of hypertension reduces incidence of stroke, myocardial infarction and heart failure perhaps partly by controlling different metabolic parameters. There is limited information regarding the changes in potassium, sodium, weight, cholesterol and glucose levels in patients using anti-hypertensives. This study aimed to determine changes in potassium, sodium, glucose, cholesterol, weight, urea and urate levels in patients using anti-hypertensives. Furthermore, to describe these changes and differences between the atenolol, hydrochlorothiazide plus amiloride and placebo arms of the Medical Research Council (MRC) elderly randomised controlled trial. METHODS: Patients were randomly allocated to one of the three treatment arms. Measurements were taken at baseline, end of year one and end of year two in 4396 subjects. Linear Mixed Models (LMM) were used to determine the longitudinal profiles of sodium, potassium, weight, cholesterol, glucose, urea and urate. Estimates of changes within groups and difference between groups were obtained. RESULTS: Patients randomised to receive hydrochlorothiazide + amiloride experienced a significantly greater mean reduction in potassium, sodium and weight compared to placebo at end of year one - mean differences in change -0.18 mmol/L, (95 % CI: -0.21, -0.15); -1.45 mmol/L, (95 % CI: -1.62, -1.29) and -0.46 kgs (95 % CI: -0.73, -0.20) respectively, and greater increases in cholesterol, urea and urate - mean differences in change 0.16 mmol/L, (95 % CI: 0.10,0.22); 0.77 mmol/L, (95 % CI: 0.68, 0.87) and 53.10 µmol/L, (95 % CI: 49.35, 56.85) respectively. Changes were in the same direction but smaller in the atenololarm except for potassium and weight (increases). No group differences in glucose were found. CONCLUSION: Results were in line with expectation except for lack of change in glucose in the hydrochlorothiazide + amiloride arms.

Indomethacin, amiloride, or eplerenone for treating hypokalemia in Gitelman syndrome.

Patients with Gitelman syndrome (GS), an inherited salt-losing tubulopathy, are usually treated with potassium-sparing diuretics or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and oral potassium and magnesium supplementations. However, evidence supporting these treatment options is limited to case series studies. We designed an open-label, randomized, crossover study with blind end point evaluation to compare the efficacy and safety of 6-week treatments with one time daily 75 mg slow-release indomethacin, 150 mg eplerenone, or 20 mg amiloride added to constant potassium and magnesium supplementation in 30 patients with GS (individual participation: 48 weeks). Baseline plasma potassium concentration was 2.8±0.4 mmol/L and increased by 0.38 mmol/L (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.23 to 0.53; P<0.001) with indomethacin, 0.15 mmol/L (95% CI, 0.02 to 0.29; P=0.03) with eplerenone, and 0.19 mmol/L (95% CI, 0.05 to 0.33; P<0.01) with amiloride. Fifteen patients became normokalemic: six with indomethacin, three with eplerenone, and six with amiloride. Indomethacin significantly reduced eGFR and plasma renin concentration. Eplerenone and amiloride each increased plasma aldosterone by 3-fold and renin concentration slightly but did not significantly change eGFR. BP did not significantly change. Eight patients discontinued treatment early because of gastrointestinal intolerance to indomethacin (six patients) and hypotension with eplerenone (two patients). In conclusion, each drug increases plasma potassium concentration in patients with GS. Indomethacin was the most effective but can cause gastrointestinal intolerance and decreased eGFR. Amiloride and eplerenone have similar but lower efficacies and increase sodium depletion. The benefit/risk ratio of each drug should be carefully evaluated for each patient.

Fidelity variants of RNA dependent RNA polymerases uncover an indirect, mutagenic activity of amiloride compounds.

In a screen for RNA mutagen resistance, we isolated a high fidelity RNA dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) variant of Coxsackie virus B3 (CVB3). Curiously, this variant A372V is also resistant to amiloride. We hypothesize that amiloride has a previously undescribed mutagenic activity. Indeed, amiloride compounds increase the mutation frequencies of CVB3 and poliovirus and high fidelity variants of both viruses are more resistant to this effect. We hypothesize that this mutagenic activity is mediated through alterations in intracellular ions such as Mg²+ and Mn²+, which in turn increase virus mutation frequency by affecting RdRp fidelity. Furthermore, we show that another amiloride-resistant RdRp variant, S299T, is completely resistant to this mutagenic activity and unaffected by changes in ion concentrations. We show that RdRp variants resist the mutagenic activity of amiloride via two different mechanisms: 1) increased fidelity that generates virus populations presenting lower basal mutation frequencies or 2) resisting changes in divalent cation concentrations that affect polymerase fidelity. Our results uncover a new antiviral approach based on mutagenesis.

Effectiveness of chlorthalidone/amiloride versus losartan in patients with stage I hypertension and diabetes mellitus: results from the PREVER-treatment randomized controlled trial.

AIMS: To compare the blood pressure (BP)-lowering efficacy of a chlorthalidone/amiloride combination pill with losartan, during initial management of JNC 7 Stage I hypertension in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. METHODS: In an a priori subgroup analysis of a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial, volunteers aged 30-70 years, with stage I hypertension and diabetes mellitus, were randomized to 12.5/2.5 mg of chlorthalidone/amiloride (N = 47) or 50 mg of losartan (N = 50), and followed for 18 months in 21 clinical centers. If BP remained uncontrolled after three months, study medication dose was doubled, and if uncontrolled after six months, amlodipine (5 and 10 mg) and propranolol (40 and 80 mg BID) were added as open label drugs in a progressive fashion. RESULTS: Systolic BP decreased to a greater extent in participants allocated to diuretics compared to losartan (P < 0.001). After 18 months of follow-up, systolic BP was 128.4 ± 10.3 mmHg in the diuretic group versus 133.5 ± 8.0 in the losartan group (P < 0.01). In the diuretic group, 36 out of 43 participants (83.7%) had a JNC 7 normal BP, compared to 31/47 (66%) in the losartan group (P = 0.089). Serum cholesterol was higher in the diuretic arm at the end of the trial. Other biochemical parameters and reports of adverse events did not differ by treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of hypertension based on a combination of chlorthalidone and amiloride is more effective for BP lowering compared to losartan in patients with diabetes mellitus and hypertension. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trials registration number: NCT00971165.

Inhibitory effects of amiloride on the current mediated by native GABA(A) receptors in cultured neurons of rat inferior colliculus.

1. The diuretic amiloride is known to modulate the activity of several types of ion channels and membrane receptors in addition to its inhibitory effects on many ion transport systems. However, the effects of amiloride on some important ion channels and receptors, such as GABA(A) receptors, in the central nervous system have not been characterized. 2. In the present study, we investigated the functional action of amiloride on native GABA(A) receptors in cultured neurons of rat inferior colliculus using whole-cell patch-clamp recordings. 3. Amiloride reversibly inhibited the amplitude of the GABA-induced current (I(GABA)) in a concentration-dependent manner (IC(50) 454 +/- 24 micromol/L) under conditions of voltage-clamp with a holding potential at -60 mV. The inhibition depended on drug application mode and was independent of membrane potential. Amiloride did not change the reversal potential of I(GABA). Moreover, amiloride induced a parallel right-ward shift in the concentration-response curve for I(GABA) without altering the maximal value and Hill coefficient. 4. The present study shows that amiloride competitively inhibits the current mediated by native GABA(A) receptors in the brain region, probably via a direct action on GABA-binding sites on the receptor. The findings suggest that the functional actions of amiloride on GABA(A) receptors may result in possible side-effects on the central nervous system in the case of direct application of this drug into the cerebrospinal fluid for treatment of diseases such as brain tumours.

Amiloride: A review.

Amiloride is a potassium retaining diuretic and natriuretic which acts by reversibly blocking luminal epithelial sodium channels (ENaCs) in the late distal tubule and collecting duct. Amiloride is indicated in oedematous states, and for potassium conservation adjunctive to thiazide or loop diuretics for hypertension, congestive heart failure and hepatic cirrhosis with ascites. Historical studies on its use in hypertension were poorly controlled and there is insufficient data on dose-response. It is clearly highly effective in combination with thiazide diuretics where it counteracts the adverse metabolic effects of the thiazides and its use in the Medical Research Council Trial of Older Hypertensive Patients, demonstrated convincing outcome benefits on stroke and coronary events. Recently it has been shown to be as effective as spironolactone in resistant hypertension but there is a real need to establish its potential role in the much larger number of patients with mild to moderate hypertension in whom there is a paucity of information with amiloride particularly across an extended dose range.

The long-term follow-up after idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury with jaundice.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Chronic evolution after drug-induced liver injury (DILI) has been reported. How often this leads to liver-related morbidity and mortality is unexplored. METHODS: Patients who survived DILI and concomitant jaundice reported to the Swedish Adverse Drug Reaction Advisory Committee (1970-2004) were linked to the Swedish Hospital Discharge and Cause of Death Registries. RESULTS: Among the 712 survivors, 27 could not be retrieved but 685 patients could be linked to the registries, 392 females (57.2%) and 293 males (42.8%) median age 58 (41-74), a mean follow-up of 10 years. A total of 23/685 (3.4%) patients had been hospitalized for liver disease and 5 had liver-related mortality. Eight patients developed cirrhosis (7 decompensated, 5 died), 5 had "cryptogenic" cirrhosis in which DILI might have played a role in this development. Duration of therapy before DILI was longer in patients with liver-related morbidity/mortality (135+/-31 days vs. 53+/-3; p<0.0001). Autoimmune hepatitis developed in 5/23 (22%), all of female gender after a mean of 5.8 years. CONCLUSIONS: Development of clinically important liver disease after severe DILI associated with jaundice is rare after acute DILI. However decompensated "cryptogenic" cirrhosis developed in some patients with fatal outcome in which DILI might have played a role in this development.

Efficacy of chlorthalidone and hydrochlorothiazide in combination with amiloride in multiple doses on blood pressure in patients with primary hypertension: a protocol for a factorial randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Thiazide diuretics have demonstrated favorable blood pressure lowering efficacy, but the equivalent doses of their more common agents, chlorthalidone and hydrochlorothiazide, are still unclear. Further, concerns exist regarding adverse metabolic effects, which may be attenuated with the concomitant administration of a potassium-sparing diuretic, such as amiloride. This trial aims to investigate the efficacy of chlorthalidone and hydrochlorothiazide, in combination with amiloride at different doses, for initial management of patients with primary hypertension. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a factorial (2 × 2) randomized double-blinded clinical trial comparing the association of a thiazide diuretic (chlorthalidone 25 mg/day or hydrochlorothiazide 50 mg/day) with a potassium-sparing diuretic (amiloride 10 mg/day or amiloride 20 mg/day) in patients with primary hypertension. The primary outcome will be the mean change from baseline in 24-h systolic and diastolic blood pressure measured by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. The secondary outcomes will be the mean change from baseline in daytime and nighttime systolic and diastolic blood pressure measured by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, mean change from baseline in systolic and diastolic blood pressure measured by office blood pressure, incidence of adverse events, variation of laboratory parameters, and proportion of patients who achieved blood pressure control. The follow-up will last 12 weeks. For a P alpha of 0.05, power of 80%, standard deviation of 9 mmHg, and absolute difference of 6 mmHg on systolic blood pressure on 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, it will be necessary to study a total of 76 patients. The sample size will be increased by 10% to compensate for losses, resulting in 84 patients being randomized. DISCUSSION: Diuretics are pivotal drugs for the treatment of hypertension. Chlorthalidone and hydrochlorothiazide, in combination with amiloride in multiple doses, will be tested in terms of blood pressure lowering efficacy and safety. Since the intensity of blood pressure reduction is the major determinant of reduction in cardiovascular risk in hypertensive patients, this study will help to determine which combination of diuretics represents the most appropriate treatment for this population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03928145. Registered on 25 April 2019. Last update on 29 April 2019.

Echocardiographic Left Ventricular Reverse Remodeling After 18 Months of Antihypertensive Treatment in Stage I Hypertension. Results From the Prever-Treatment Study.

BACKGROUND: Antihypertensive treatment improves echocardiographic parameters of hypertensive target organ damage in stage II hypertension, but less is known about the effects in stage I hypertension. METHODS: In a cohort study nested in the randomized double-blind trial PREVER-treatment, 2-dimensional echocardiograms were performed in 110 individuals, aged 54.8 ± 7.9 years-old, with stage I hypertension at baseline and after 18 months of treatment with chlorthalidone/amiloride or losartan. RESULTS: At baseline, 66 (60%) participants had concentric remodeling. After antihypertensive treatment, systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (BP) were reduced from 141/90 to 130/83 mm Hg (P = 0.009). There was a significant reduction in left ventricular (LV) mass (LVM) index (82.7 ± 17.1 to 79.2 ± 17.5 g/m2; P = 0.005) and relative wall thickness (0.45 ± 0.06 to 0.42 ± 0.05; P < 0.001), increasing the proportion of participants with normal LV geometry (31% to 49%, P = 0.006). Left atrial (LA) volume index reduced (26.8 ± 7.3 to 24.9 ± 6.5 ml/m2; P = 0.001), and mitral E-wave deceleration time increased (230 ± 46 to 247 ± 67 ms; P = 0.005), but there was no change in other parameters of diastolic function. LVM reduction was significantly higher in the 2 higher tertiles of SBP reduction compared to the lower tertile. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of patients with stage I hypertension for 18 months promotes favorable effects in the LA and LV remodeling. This improvement in cardiac end-organ damage might be associated with reduction of long term clinical consequences of hypertensive cardiomyopathy, particularly heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Amiloride, An Old Diuretic Drug, Is a Potential Therapeutic Agent for Multiple Myeloma.

Purpose: The search for new drugs that control the continuous relapses of multiple myeloma is still required. Here, we report for the first time the potent antimyeloma activity of amiloride, an old potassium-sparing diuretic approved for the treatment of hypertension and edema due to heart failure.Experimental Design: Myeloma cell lines and primary samples were used to evaluate cytotoxicity of amiloride. In vivo studies were carried out in a xenograft mouse model. The mechanisms of action were investigated using RNA-Seq experiments, qRT-PCR, immunoblotting, and immunofluorescence assays.Results: Amiloride-induced apoptosis was observed in a broad panel of multiple myeloma cell lines and in a xenograft mouse model. Moreover, amiloride also had a synergistic effect when combined with dexamethasone, melphalan, lenalidomide, and pomalidomide. RNA-Seq experiments showed that amiloride not only significantly altered the level of transcript isoforms and alternative splicing events, but also deregulated the spliceosomal machinery. In addition, disruption of the splicing machinery in immunofluorescence studies was associated with the inhibition of myeloma cell viability after amiloride exposure. Although amiloride was able to induce apoptosis in myeloma cells lacking p53 expression, activation of p53 signaling was observed in wild-type and mutated TP53 cells after amiloride exposure. On the other hand, we did not find a significant systemic toxicity in mice treated with amiloride.Conclusions: Overall, our results demonstrate the antimyeloma activity of amiloride and provide a mechanistic rationale for its use as an alternative treatment option for relapsed multiple myeloma patients, especially those with 17p deletion or TP53 mutations that are resistant to current therapies. Clin Cancer Res; 23(21); 6602-15. ©2017 AACR.

NVP-QBE170: an inhaled blocker of the epithelial sodium channel with a reduced potential to induce hyperkalaemia.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Inhaled amiloride, a blocker of the epithelial sodium channel (ENaC), enhances mucociliary clearance (MCC) in cystic fibrosis (CF) patients. However, the dose of amiloride is limited by the mechanism-based side effect of hyperkalaemia resulting from renal ENaC blockade. Inhaled ENaC blockers with a reduced potential to induce hyperkalaemia provide a therapeutic strategy to improve mucosal hydration and MCC in the lungs of CF patients. The present study describes the preclinical profile of a novel ENaC blocker, NVP-QBE170, designed for inhaled delivery, with a reduced potential to induce hyperkalaemia. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: The in vitro potency and duration of action of NVP-QBE170 were compared with amiloride and a newer ENaC blocker, P552-02, in primary human bronchial epithelial cells (HBECs) by short-circuit current. In vivo efficacy and safety were assessed in guinea pig (tracheal potential difference/hyperkalaemia), rat (hyperkalaemia) and sheep (MCC). KEY RESULTS: In vitro, NVP-QBE170 potently inhibited ENaC function in HBEC and showed a longer duration of action to comparator molecules. In vivo, intratracheal (i.t.) instillation of NVP-QBE170 attenuated ENaC activity in the guinea pig airways with greater potency and duration of action than that of amiloride without inducing hyperkalaemia in either guinea pig or rat. Dry powder inhalation of NVP-QBE170 by conscious sheep increased MCC and was better than inhaled hypertonic saline in terms of efficacy and duration of action. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: NVP-QBE170 highlights the potential for inhaled ENaC blockers to exhibit efficacy in the airways with a reduced risk of hyperkalaemia, relative to existing compounds.

Comparison of single and combination diuretics on glucose tolerance (PATHWAY-3): protocol for a randomised double-blind trial in patients with essential hypertension.

INTRODUCTION: Thiazide diuretics are associated with increased risk of diabetes mellitus. This risk may arise from K(+)-depletion. We hypothesised that a K(+)-sparing diuretic will improve glucose tolerance, and that combination of low-dose thiazide with K(+)-sparing diuretic will improve both blood pressure reduction and glucose tolerance, compared to a high-dose thiazide. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a parallel-group, randomised, double-blind, multicentre trial, comparing hydrochlorothiazide 25-50 mg, amiloride 10-20 mg and combination of both diuretics at half these doses. A single-blind placebo run-in of 1 month is followed by 24 weeks of blinded active treatment. There is forced dose-doubling after 3 months. The Primary end point is the blood glucose 2 h after oral ingestion of a 75 g glucose drink (OGTT), following overnight fasting. The primary outcome is the difference between 2 h glucose at weeks 0, 12 and 24. Secondary outcomes include the changes in home systolic blood pressure (BP) and glycated haemoglobin and prediction of response by baseline plasma renin. Eligibility criteria are: age 18-79, systolic BP on permitted background treatment ≥ 140 mm Hg and home BP ≥ 130 mm Hg and one component of the metabolic syndrome additional to hypertension. Principal exclusions are diabetes, estimated-glomerular filtration rate <45 mL/min, abnormal plasma K(+), clinic SBP >200 mm Hg or DBP >120 mm Hg (box 2). The sample size calculation indicates that 486 patients will give 80% power at α=0.01 to detect a difference in means of 1 mmol/L (SD=2.2) between 2 h glucose on hydrochlorothiazide and comparators. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: PATHWAY-3 was approved by Cambridge South Ethics Committee, number 09/H035/19. The trial results will be published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: Eudract number 2009-010068-41 and clinical trials registration number: NCT02351973.

Amiloride in primary hyperaldosteronism.

Amiloride is a potassium-sparing diuretic used in spontaneous and diuretic-induced hypokalemia. The effect of amiloride was studied prospectively in 12 patients with primary hyperaldosteronism. Four patients had unilateral adrenal adenomas and eight had bilateral adrenal hyperplasia. All patients were hypertensive and their mean plasma potassium levels were low. Amiloride, 10 to 40 mg daily, was given for 6 mo. Mean plasma potassium levels rose (0.96 mEq/l, P less than 0.001) and remained normal throughout the study without potassium supplementation. Mean blood pressure was lowered by amiloride (22/10 mm Hg, P less than 0.001) but normotension required concomitant antihypertensive therapy in most patients. No significant adverse clinical or laboratory experiences could be directly attributed to amiloride therapy. There was no correlation between the response to therapy and the plasma aldosterone levels, aldosterone secretion rate, or presence of a unilateral adrenal adenoma. Our study demonstrates the efficacy of amiloride in the correction of hypokalemia and amelioration of hypertension in primary hyperaldosteronism.

Mucosal irritant potential of a potassium-sparing diuretic and of wax-matrix potassium chloride.

To measure their relative upper gastrointestinal irritant potential, either 5 mg amiloride and 50 mg hydrochlorothiazide (twice daily) or 24 mEq wax-matrix potassium chloride (three times a day) were given to 30 normal subjects with no prior endoscopic abnormalities in the esophagus, stomach, or duodenum. All subjects received glycopyrrolate, 2 mg (3 times a day) to slow gastric emptying. Repeat endoscopy after 7 days of treatment with wax-matrix potassium chloride revealed that 10 of 15 (67%) of the subjects developed one or more gradable upper gastrointestinal lesions (esophageal ulcer, gastric ulcer, eight cases of one or more mucosal erosions, and four cases of hyperemia or edema of the esophagus, stomach, or duodenum). Four subjects (27%) taking amiloride/hydrochlorothiazide developed either mild hyperemia or edema, but there were no erosions or ulcers in this group.

Amiloride, spironolactone, and potassium chloride in thiazide-treated hypertensive patients.

Dose-response curves for amiloride and spironolactone were defined in 15 hypertensive patients treated with bendroflumethiazide (bendrofluazide). The relative potency amiloride:spironolactone in correcting hypokalemia was 2.8:1, an estimate significantly lower than the 5:1 potency currently accepted. The relative potency for reduction of plasma sodium was 3.9:1 (amiloride:spironolactone). Amiloride was disproportionately potent in lowering serum bicarbonate, and the data do not suggest that these drugs elevate plasma potassium simply by correcting metabolic alkalosis. Changes in blood pressure were confounded by the presence of carryover effect between treatment phases. Both drugs increased plasma angiotension II and aldosterone, but the rise in aldosterone with spironolactone was smaller than expected from concurrent plasma angiotension II and potassium concentrations. This was consistent with a partial block of aldosterone biosynthesis by spironolactone. The activity of spironolactone did not require the presence of hyperaldosteronism. In a smaller study potassium chloride induced a significant log dose-response on plasma potassium, but the effect was small in absolute terms. At least 64 mmole potassium chloride was needed to match the effect of 20 mg amiloride or 56 mg spironolactone.

Amiloride-quinidine interaction: adverse outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: Previous studies have reported beneficial antiarrhythmic effects when selected drugs were combined. The purpose of this study was to assess whether a favorable interaction would occur with amiloride and quinidine. DESIGN: The antiarrhythmic and electrophysiologic effects of quinidine alone and in combination with amiloride were assessed in 10 patients with inducible sustained ventricular tachycardia. Parallel electrophysiologic studies assessed this drug combination in guinea pig papillary muscle. RESULTS: None of the patients had adverse effects during quinidine monotherapy. However, seven of 10 patients had adverse responses to the combination treatment: three patients had suppression of inducible ventricular tachycardia during quinidine monotherapy but had sustained ventricular tachycardia induced during combination treatment; three other patients had somatic side effects that resulted in discontinuation of the combination therapy but were absent during quinidine monotherapy; and one patient had 12 episodes of sustained ventricular tachycardia during this combination therapy. The patient had no such response during monotherapy. Surface QRS duration was significantly more prolonged during combination therapy than during monotherapy. Parallel electrophysiologic effects assessed this drug combination in guinea pig papillary muscle. The combination of amiloride (1 mumol/L) and quinidine (10 mumol/L) synergistically decreased the maximum rate of rise of phase 0 of the action potential (Vmax) (43 +/- 12 V/sec) compared with quinidine alone (24 +/- 9 V/sec) because of a greater degree of tonic block of Vmax (14% +/- 6%) as compared to quinidine alone (3% +/- 3%) with no significant change in action potential duration. CONCLUSIONS: Amiloride exaggerates the effects of quinidine on QRS duration in patients and on Vmax during in vitro study, which implies that the proarrhythmic effect of the combination of amiloride and quinidine may be associated with synergistic increase in sodium channel blockade.