Comparison of Drug-Eluting Embolics versus Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization for the Treatment of Patients with Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

PURPOSE: To compare the cost-effectiveness of using doxorubicin-loaded drug-eluting embolic (DEE) transarterial chemoembolization versus that of using conventional transarterial chemoembolization for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A decision-analysis model was constructed over the lifespan of a payer's perspective. The model simulated the clinical course, including periprocedural complications, additional transarterial chemoembolization or other treatments (ablation, radioembolization, or systemic treatment), palliative care, and death, of patients with unresectable HCC. All clinical parameters were derived from the literature. Base case calculations, probabilistic sensitivity analyses, and multiple two-way sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: In the base case calculations for patients with a median age of 67 years (range for conventional transarterial chemoembolization: 28-88 years, range for DEE-transarterial chemoembolization: 16-93 years), conventional transarterial chemoembolization yielded a health benefit of 2.11 quality-adjusted life years (QALY) at a cost of $125,324, whereas DEE-transarterial chemoembolization yielded 1.71 QALY for $144,816. In 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations, conventional transarterial chemoembolization continued to be a more cost-effective strategy. conventional transarterial chemoembolization was cost-effective when the complication risks for both the procedures were simultaneously varied from 0% to 30%. DEE-transarterial chemoembolization became cost-effective if the conventional transarterial chemoembolization mortality exceeded that of DEE-transarterial chemoembolization by 17% in absolute values. The two-way sensitivity analyses demonstrated that conventional transarterial chemoembolization was cost-effective until the risk of disease progression was >0.4% of that for DEE-transarterial chemoembolization in absolute values. Our analysis showed that DEE-transarterial chemoembolization would be more cost-effective if it offered >2.5% higher overall survival benefit than conventional transarterial chemoembolization in absolute values. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with DEE-transarterial chemoembolization, conventional transarterial chemoembolization yielded a higher number of QALY at a lower cost, making it the more cost-effective of the 2 modalities.

Are different methotrexate regimens as first line therapy for low risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia more cost effective than the dactinomycin regimen used in GOG 0174?

OBJECTIVES: Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) 0174 compared weekly intramuscular methotrexate (MTX) with biweekly pulsed intravenous dactinomycin (Act-D) as single-agent chemotherapy for low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN). Act-D had a higher rate of initial complete response (CR) (70% vs. 53%, p=0.01), but multi-day regimens of MTX have higher historic success rates. We assessed the cost-effectiveness of Act-D vs. MTX per GOG 0174 and explored multi-day MTX regimens. METHODS: A cost effectiveness decision model was constructed with data from GOG 0174. Outcome was cost per first-line treatment success expressed in terms of incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Front-line failures were assumed to receive cross-over single agent therapy, second line failures; multi-agent chemotherapy. GOG 0174 had no quality of life (QOL) evaluation, so equal QOL (utility 1.0) was assumed but varied in sensitivity analysis. A second exploratory model included 5-day and 8-day MTX regimens. RESULTS: Act-D ($18,505) was more expensive compared to weekly MTX ($8950) with an ICER of $56,215 per first-line treatment success compared to weekly MTX. Small decreases in QOL dramatically increased the ICER during sensitivity analysis. Models with multi-day MTX regimens were also more cost-effective than Act-D. If effectiveness was redefined as avoidance of multi-agent chemotherapy, weekly MTX was more effective. CONCLUSIONS: With a complete cure rate for low-risk GTN regardless of initial agent, our model supports provider hesitation toward first line Act-D for low risk GTN. While Act-D is more effective for first line treatment success, it is more costly, and does not decrease rate of multi-agent chemotherapy use.

Comparison of Cost-Effectiveness Between Actinomycin D Versus Methotrexate-Folinic Acid in the Treatment of Low-Risk Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the cost-effectiveness between actinomycin D (Act-D) and methotrexate-folinic acid (MTX-FA) in the treatment of low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) in the Thai population. STUDY DESIGN: A comparative cost-effectiveness analysis was performed from a societal perspective. A decision tree model was developed comparing 2 alternative treatment options: initial 5-day Act-D and 8-day MTX-FA. Treatment would be switched to another regimen in case of resistance. The outcome of interest is number of days to remission. Clinical data was obtained from our previous study in which Act-D demonstrated 100% remission rates as compared to 73.6% for MTX-FA. Cost of treatment data, which includes chemotherapeutics, accessory medications, laboratory tests, and hospital fees, was obtained from a university hospital. Patient-related travel cost and opportunity cost due to absence from work were also included. All costs were calculated to 2015 base year. RESULT: Costs per treatment cycle were $308.01 and $227.20 US dollars (USD) for 5-day Act-D and 8-day MTX-FA, respectively. Expected time toward treatment completion for Act-D was 12.6 days shorter than for MTX-FA. Expected costs toward remission for initial treatment with Act-D and MTX-FA were $1,078.04 and $1,064.56 USD, respectively, i.e., an incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $1.07 USD/day of earlier treatment completion. After sensitivity analysis, remission rate of lower than 72% would make initial treatment with MTX-FA more expensive than with Act-D. CONCLUSION: Treatment costs of low-risk GTN are almost equal between the 2 treatment options with different time to remission. Initial treatment with MTX-FA is slightly less expensive, but there is longer time to remission. The ICER of initial treatment with Act-D over MTX-FA is $1.07 USD/day of earlier treatment completion.

Economic and humanistic consequences of preventable bladder tumor recurrences in nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer cases.

PURPOSE: Perioperative intravesical chemotherapy following transurethral resection of bladder tumor has been underused despite level 1 evidence supporting its performance. The primary objective of this study was to estimate the economic and humanistic consequences associated with preventable recurrences in patients initially diagnosed with nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using population based estimates of nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer incidence, a 2-year model was developed to estimate the number of preventable recurrences in eligible patients untreated with perioperative intravesical chemotherapy. Therapy utilization rates were obtained from a retrospective database analysis and a chart review study of 1,010 patients with nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer. Recurrence rates of nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer were obtained from a randomized clinical trial comparing transurethral resection of bladder tumor with or without perioperative mitomycin C. Costs were estimated using prevailing Medicare reimbursement rates. Quality adjusted life-year estimates and disutilities for complications were obtained from the literature. RESULTS: The model estimated that 7,827 bladder recurrences could be avoided if all patients received immediate intravesical chemotherapy. It estimated an economic savings of $3,847 per avoidable recurrence, resulting in an aggregate savings of $30.1 million. The model also estimated that 1,025 quality adjusted life-years are lost every 2 years due to preventable recurrences, resulting in 0.13 quality adjusted life-years (48 quality adjusted days) lost per avoidable recurrence. This translates into 0.02 quality adjusted life-years (8.1 quality adjusted days) lost per patient not receiving immediate intravesical chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Greater use of immediate intravesical chemotherapy in the United States has the potential to substantially decrease the economic and humanistic burdens of nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer.

Comparison of pulsed actinomycin D and 5-day actinomycin D as first-line chemotherapy for low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the treatment outcome and cost-effectiveness of pulsed actinomycin D (Act-D) and 5-day Act-D in patients with low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN). METHOD: The present retrospective study included patients with low-risk GTN who received pulsed Act-D or 5-day Act-D as first-line chemotherapy at West China Second Hospital, Chengdu, China, between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2017. Complete remission rates, mean number of treatment courses, and adverse events were compared, and a cost-effectiveness analysis was performed. RESULTS: The study included 34 patients treated with pulsed Act-D and 26 patients treated with 5-day Act-D. Overall complete remission was observed in 21 (62%) patients in the pulsed Act-D group and 19 (73%) patients in the 5-day Act-D group (P=0.355); the mean number of treatment courses were 5.1 and 5.3, respectively (P=0.686). When Act-D failed, patients in each group required 4.9 and 4.6 courses, respectively, of a multi-agent regimen (P=0.545). No major adverse events were observed but moderate adverse events were more frequent in the pulsed Act-D group (P=0.011). The 5-day Act-D regimen was more expensive compared with pulsed Act-D regimen (US$7504.33 vs $5541.79), with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $64 557.08 per avoidance of treatment failure. CONCLUSION: Pulsed Act-D was more cost-effective than 5-day Act-D and could be preferred when considering Act-D as chemotherapy for low-risk GTN.

Cardioprotection against the toxic effects of anthracyclines given to children with cancer: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the technologies used to reduce anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity in children. Also to evaluate cardiac markers to quantify cardiotoxicity, and identify cost-effectiveness studies and future research priorities. DATA SOURCES: Eight electronic databases were searched from inception to January 2006. Bibliographies of related papers were assessed for relevant studies and experts contacted to identify additional published references. REVIEW METHODS: A systematic review of the evidence was undertaken using a priori methods. RESULTS: Four randomised controlled trials (RCTs) met the inclusion criteria of the review, each considering a different cardioprotective intervention; all trials included children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, and one also included children with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. However, all had methodological limitations. No cost-effectiveness studies were identified. One RCT and six cohort studies on the use of cardiac markers met the inclusion criteria of the review, but also had methodological limitations. Of the two RCTs that considered continuous infusion versus bolus (rapid) infusion, one found that continuous infusion of doxorubicin did not offer any cardioprotection over bolus; the other suggested that continuous infusion of daunorubicin had less cardiotoxicity than bolus. Two studies considered cardioprotective agents, one concluded that dexrazoxane prevents or reduces cardiac injury without compromising the antileukaemic efficacy of doxorubicin and the other reported a protective effect of coenzyme Q10 on cardiac function during anthracycline therapy. One RCT suggested that cardiac troponin T can be used to assess the effectiveness of the cardioprotective agent dexrazoxane. Two cohort studies considering atrial natriuretic peptide and two considering brain (B-type) natriuretic peptide suggested that these chemicals are elevated in some subgroups of children treated with anthracyclines for cancer. N-terminal B-type natriuretic peptide levels were significantly elevated in children treated with anthracyclines who had cardiac dysfunction. One cohort study found that serum lipid peroxide was higher in younger children treated with doxorubicin than correspondingly aged children not receiving doxorubicin. No differences in carnitine levels were found in children treated with doxorubicin and a group of healthy children in one cohort study. CONCLUSIONS: It is difficult to draw conclusions about the effectiveness of technologies for reducing or preventing cardiotoxicity and about the use of cardiac markers in children as the evidence is limited in quantity and quality. The lack of standardisation for monitoring and reporting cardiac performance is problematic. Not all studies report effectiveness in terms of cardiac outcomes and event-free survival with supporting statistical analyses. Studies are mostly small and of short duration, making generalisation difficult. Increasing numbers of survivors of childhood cancer treated with anthracyclines will experience cardiac damage and require long-term surveillance and management. This will have an impact on cardiac services and costs. Diverse medical problems and other late sequelae that affect cardiac outcome will have an impact on other specialist services. Mechanisms to reduce or prevent cardiotoxicity from anthracycline therapy and cardiac markers to improve monitoring could alter the extent of this impact on service provision. RCTs of the different methods for reducing or preventing cardiotoxicity in children treated with anthracyclines for cancer with long-term follow-up are needed to determine whether the technologies influence the development of cardiac damage. Cost-effectiveness research is also required.

Cost-effectiveness analysis comparing chemotherapy regimens in the treatment of AIDS-related Kaposi's sarcoma in Brazil.

BACKGROUND: Economic analyses of agents used in the treatment of AIDS and opportunistic diseases are particularly important in developing countries. PURPOSE: To analyze the cost-effectiveness of AIDS-related Kaposi's sarcoma (AIDS-KS) chemotherapy regimens in Brazil. METHOD: A decision-analysis model was developed, and effectiveness data were derived from randomized phase III trials evaluating pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD), liposomal daunorubicin (DNX), and the ABV regimen (doxorubicin, bleomycin, and vincristine). Resource data on direct medical costs were obtained from local sources. RESULTS: The cost-effectiveness estimates (defined as average costs per patient who responds completely or partially) favored PLD (US $10,272/responder) in comparison to DNX (US $16,263/responder). Regarding cost-effectiveness, the ABV regimen that is widely used in developing countries had better results when compared to both PLD (US $1,268 vs. US $10,271) and DNX (US $1,268 vs. US $16,260). The incremental cost per additional responder of using PLD instead of ABV was US $20,990. Sensitivity analyses suggest that these results hold over a wide range of assumptions. CONCLUSION: ABV seems to be the most reasonable treatment option for AIDS-KS patients in resource-limited countries like Brazil.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of sequential paclitaxel adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with node positive primary breast cancer.

An economic evaluation of paclitaxel added subsequently to doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide (AC) adjuvant therapy for early breast cancer with lymph nodes positive is presented. Health care cost associated with AC alone vs. AC with paclitaxel was compared under Thai health care context. Based on CALGB9344, paclitaxel increased the disease-free survival (DFS) by 17%. Based on Markov simulation for 15 years, paclitaxel prolonged the patient's life by 0.30 quality-adjusted life years (QALY). Such an increased effectiveness was offset by the adjuvant cost net of recurrence, follow-up, and terminal care by 221,433 Baht. This means an additional year of perfect health gained by paclitaxel is achieved through an incremental cost of 738,111 Baht. Such an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) is beyond the threshold recommended by World Health Organization. In women with negative estrogen receptor that DFS was improved to 28%, the ICER of paclitaxel was reduced to 393,984 Baht per QALY.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of serum vancomycin concentration monitoring in patients with hematologic malignancies.

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of vancomycin serum concentration monitoring in patients with hematologic malignancies. METHODS: The study was designed as a prospective randomized study. Seventy immunocompromised febrile patients with hematologic malignancies were randomly assigned to either a vancomycin therapeutic drug monitoring group (TDM group; n = 37) or to a control group (n = 33). Intervention in the TDM group involved patient follow-up by a clinical pharmacist to obtain and pharmacokinetically interpret serum vancomycin concentrations for dosage individualization. RESULTS: Evaluation of all patients included global clinical response and nephrotoxicity, as well as the economic costs and effectiveness derived from the vancomycin monitoring program. There were no significant differences between the TDM and control groups in the outcome measures, except for the incidence of nephrotoxicity: the rates of minor nephrotoxicity were 33.3% and 13.5% in the control and TDM groups, respectively. The corresponding figures for moderate nephrotoxicity were 9.1% and 0%. Logistic regression analysis confirmed that TDM independently reduced the incidence of nephrotoxicity in this patient population. On the basis of this reduced nephrotoxicity, a incremental cost of $435 per case of nephrotoxicity prevented was found for vancomycin serum concentration monitoring. CONCLUSIONS: A decreased incidence of nephrotoxicity provides evidence of a real clinical benefit to patient management in patients with hematologic malignancies. The TDM for vancomycin therapy in this high-risk population has been shown to be a cost-effective procedure.

Pharmacoeconomics of liposomal anthracycline therapy.

Pharmacoeconomic analyses are being used with greater frequency in clinical oncology trials. These analyses provide guidelines for prioritizing competing interventions and allocating health care resources, particularly when deciding whether to use a drug with a higher acquisition cost. For liposomal anthracyclines, the competing treatments are other liposomal anthracyclines and nonliposomal chemotherapy agents with similar activity. Pharmacoeconomic analyses of data from clinical trials in patients with Kaposi's sarcoma determined that the overall cost to achieve objective response was substantially lower with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Doxil/Caelyx [PLD]) than with liposomal daunorubicin (DaunoXome [DNX]). Additional economic analyses in patients with ovarian cancer showed that PLD has lower overall treatment costs than topotecan because it is administered less frequently and requires fewer interventions for toxicity. The decision to allocate health care resources to liposomal anthracycline treatment must therefore include consideration of cost-effectiveness and potential cost savings owing to improved tolerability.

Prospective randomized trial of talc slurry vs bleomycin in pleurodesis for symptomatic malignant pleural effusions.

OBJECTIVE: Symptomatic malignant pleural effusions are common sequelae in patients with certain malignancies. Pleurodesis via bedside thoracostomy is the current treatment option most commonly used. To our knowledge, this is the first prospective randomized trial to examine which agent, bleomycin or talc slurry, is superior in terms of effectiveness, safety, and cost. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between July 1992 and March 1995, 35 patients presenting to our medical center with symptomatic malignant pleural effusions were prospectively randomized to undergo chemical pleurodesis with either bleomycin or talc slurry via bedside thoracostomy. The conditions of patients were assessed and graded before and after treatment concerning pain, dyspnea, and chest radiographs. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients who underwent 33 treatments (14 with bleomycin and 19 with talc) were available for follow-up. Follow-up ranged from 2 weeks to 8 months (mean, 1.7 months). Both groups demonstrated notable improvement in both pain and dyspnea following treatment, but there were no statistically significant differences between groups in the amount of improvement (two-tailed Student's t test). Permanent control of effusions, defined objectively on chest radiograph, was achieved with 11 bleomycin treatments (79%) and 17 talc treatments (90%) (p=0.388). The procedures were well tolerated and no significant adverse effects were observed. Talc is a much less costly agent than bleomycin ($12.36 cost to our medical center per treatment for talc vs $955.83 for bleomycin). CONCLUSION: Given the similar efficacy and significant cost advantage, we conclude that talc is the agent of choice when utilizing pleurodesis for control of symptomatic malignant pleural effusions.

Cost analysis of hospital treatment--two chemotherapic regimens for non-surgical non-small cell lung cancer. GFPC (Groupe Français Pneumo Cancérologie)

STUDY OBJECTIVES: compare the costs of two regimens of chemotherapy. Apply weighted costs to an economic model in a hospital perspective. DESIGN: prospective randomized study of two groups of patients receiving: branch B, mitomycin-navelbine-cisplatin (MNP); branch A, mitomycin-vindesine-cisplatin (MVP). SETTING: pneumologic units of University and non-University hospitals. METHODS: clinical evaluation during chemotherapy incorporated events enabling construction of an event tree. Direct hospital costs included those of: cytostatic agents, materials used and nursing time; costs of side-effects (medical and paramedical time, diagnostic and therapeutic examinations). Effectiveness was measured in terms of response rates. PATIENTS: 209 patients were included, 100 in arm B, 109 in arm A. RESULTS: the response rates were 25% in branch B, 17% in branch A. In the hypothesis of equivalence of the two strategies, we compared only overall mean cost per patient. Despite the fact arm B needed more hospital injections, the difference was low (+4.6%). For a difference in effectiveness, the opposite was observed for the average cost-effectiveness ratio: arm B was less costly (-12 339.40 FF for a responder). CONCLUSION: incorporation of economic parameters was found to have a bearing on the choice of chemotherapeutic regimen for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. Economic analyses of this kind can provide useful extra information for rational therapeutic decisions.

Cost utility of chemotherapy and best supportive care in non-small cell lung cancer.

Polychemotherapy is the therapeutic option recommended for nonresectable, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the modest gains in survival, and the frequent and often serious adverse effects, associated with chemotherapy should also be considered when deciding on therapy. We therefore performed a cost-utility analysis of chemotherapy and best supportive care in NSCLC. Effectiveness and costs were analysed on 70 patients who were randomised to receive one of 3 treatments: VP (vindesine and cisplatin), CAP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and cisplatin), or best supportive care. Subsequently, an assessment of the value of polychemotherapy and best supportive care was performed by oncology personnel using the time trade-off technique. Polychemotherapy was found to be more effective than best supportive care, but was also more costly and had a lower value score. Because of its cost utility and its higher value, best supportive care should not be discarded as an alternative for the treatment of NSCLC.

Properties and cost effective method for production of the antitumor agent declauxin from sporulating Penicillium herquei.

Duclauxin, an antitumor agent, was isolated from sporulating Penicillium herquei (ATCC34665) grown on a medium of peanut hulls supplemented with potato starch solution (termed "Gostar"). The medium was inoculated with a sporulating subculture of P. herquei established on a 2% potato starch slurry supplemented with mineral salts. The P. herquei grew as well on Gostar as on an enriched medium. Duclauxin was isolated in crystalline form from Gostar-grown P. herquei. Comparison of costs of duclauxin obtained from inexpensive Gostar versus costly enriched media indicated that Gostar reduces production expenses. Duclauxin was not effective as an antibiotic against certain species of gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, fungi, and viruses, but a concentration-dependent inhibition of wheat coleoptile growth was observed. Duclauxin was characterized by melting point, optical rotation, IR and NMR spectroscopy, MS and X-ray diffraction.

A phase II trial of four courses of preoperative chemotherapy in squamous or anaplastic carcinoma of the oesophagus.

We have reported the results of a previous Phase II trial of two courses of neoadjuvant mitomycin (6 mg/m2), ifosfamide (3 g/m2) and cisplatin (50 mg/m2) (MIC) in squamous or anaplastic carcinoma of the oesophagus. In this current study, we have investigated whether there was any clinical benefit in extending the preoperative treatment to four courses for patients who responded after two courses. Response was assessed by barium swallow, which was compared with previous barium swallows performed prior to any treatment and after the second course of MIC. Of an initial 43 patients, 27 (63%) were assessed as responders after two courses of MIC. Twenty of these 27 patients were entered into the study with a view to receiving two further courses of MIC prior to surgery. Seventeen completed four courses. Five patients were complete responders after two courses and remained complete responders after four courses. Twelve patients were partial responders after two courses; six of these became complete responders after four courses, five remained partial responders, and one showed progression. Haematological toxicity and alopecia were increased after extending the number of courses beyond two. On pathological assessment, three patients with a complete response after four courses, and one with a complete response after three courses, had microscopic clearance of tumour. Extension beyond two courses of neoadjuvant MIC gives an improvement in response, as judged by barium assessment, but increases toxicity, cost of treatment and delay before surgery. Although the numbers are small, the results suggest that a worthwhile improvement in the radiological response of squamous or anaplastic oesophageal tumours may be gained by proceeding beyond two courses of MIC. A randomized trial, with larger numbers of patients, is needed to show whether there is any improvement in radiological and pathological response rates and in survival to be gained by the extension of treatment beyond two courses.

Doxorubicin liposomal pegylated: new preparation. Breast cancer: not just a question of short-term cardiac effects.

(1) There is no reference first-line chemotherapy regimen for metastatic breast cancer. Anthracycline-based combinations are generally used. One of the main problems with anthracyclines is the risk of heart failure, both during and some time after treatment. (2) A liposomal pegylated doxorubicin, an anthracycline, is now available in Europe. The aim of pegylation is supposedly to reduce the cardiotoxicity relative to standard doxorubicin. The marketing licence specifies that liposomal pegylated doxorubicin must not be used in combination with other drugs in people with metastatic breast cancer. This is the second liposomal doxorubicin preparation to be authorised for this use in France; we concluded that the first product, a non-pegylated form, offered no therapeutic advance. (3) According to the only available comparative trial, liposomal pegylated doxorubicin is no more effective than standard doxorubicin in terms of the duration or quality of survival. (4) In this trial, liposomal pegylated doxorubicin was associated with slightly fewer cardioechographic abnormalities than standard doxorubicin. (5) Other adverse events were also less common (hair loss, nausea and vomiting, and neutropenia), while some were more common (palmoplantar erythrodysesthesia, stomatitis and mucitis). Overall, 24% of patients stopped using liposomal pegylated doxorubicin because of adverse events, compared with 11% of patients receiving standard doxorubicin. (6) Unlike liposomal non-pegylated doxorubicin, the liposomal pegylated form is no more difficult than standard doxorubicin to prepare for injection. (7) In practice, when the decision is made to use doxorubicin, the standard form, at an appropriate dose, is suitable for most patients, as long as cardiac function is closely monitored. Differences in the adverse effect profile (especially hair loss) may make liposomal pegylated doxorubicin more attractive to some patients (it costs 20 times more than standard doxorubicin in France).

Liposomal doxorubicin in breast cancer: new preparation. Much ado about nothing.

(1) There is no reference first-line cytotoxic chemotherapy protocol for metastatic breast cancer, but anthracycline combinations are commonly used. In addition to their myelotoxicity, anthracyclines can cause heart failure, both problems during and after treatment. (2) A liposomal formulation of doxorubicin, an anthracycline, has been developed with the aim of reducing this cardiotoxicity. The marketing terms specify that it must be used in combination with cyclophosphamide, in the first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer. (3) According to the current evaluation file, which chiefly includes data from three comparative trials, liposomal doxorubicin is no more effective, in terms of the duration or quality of survival, than standard doxorubicin or epirubicin. (4) During comparative trials of liposomal doxorubicin, alone or in combination with cyclophosphamide, signs of cardiotoxicity, as measured by ultrasound, were slightly less frequent than with standard doxorubicin but no less frequent than with epirubicin. Given the possibility of late cardiac events, which were not studied in these trials, there is no evidence that liposomal doxorubicin is really less cardiotoxic than either standard doxorubicin or epirubicin. As regards other adverse effects, liposomal doxorubicin has no advantages over standard doxorubicin or epirubicin. (5) Liposomal doxorubicin is far more difficult to prepare than standard doxorubicin. (6) In France, liposomal doxorubicin is about 15 times more expensive than standard doxorubicin and 4 times more expensive than epirubicin. (7) In practice, standard doxorubicin can still be used, at doses appropriate for the individual patient and with cardiac monitoring.

New York ADAP to cover new AIDS drugs plus viral load testing.

AIDS: New York State, for the first time and after massive grass-roots lobbying, committed millions of State tax dollars to the local AIDS Drug Assistance Program (ADAP). No State has been hit harder by AIDS than New York. As of September 1, 1996, ADAP began covering HIV protease inhibitors, viral load evaluations, and other crucial anti-HIV and opportunistic infection agents, including nevirapine for HIV, cidofovir for CMV, and DaunoXome for Kaposi's sarcoma. Also, ADAP has now restored some of the most important benefits and coverages of medications that were eliminated in January.^ieng

Evaluación económica del informe GENESIS-SEFH de olaratumab con doxorrubicina en el sarcoma de tejidos blandos en estadios avanzados / Economic evaluation of the GENESIS-SEFH report of olaratumab with doxorubicin in soft tissue sarcoma in advanced stages

Objetivo: Desarrollar la evaluación económica del fármaco olaratumab en el tratamiento del sarcoma de partes blandas. Método: Los datos se analizaron siguiendo las recomendaciones contenidas en el programa MADRE del modelo de informe GENESIS-SEFH. Resultados: Los resultados de supervivencia libre de progresión y supervivencia global publicados en el ensayo clínico pivotal: Tap WD y cols. (2016) fueron: la ganancia en supervivencia libre de progresión (variable principal) en términos absolutos fue de 2,5 meses, HR = 0,672; IC95% (0,442-1,021). La ganancia absoluta en supervivencia global (variable secundaria) fue de 11,8 meses, HR = 0,463; IC95% (0,301-0,710). Se realizó un análisis coste-efectividad considerando dos escenarios; escenario uno: sin aprovechamiento de viales; y escenario dos: sin aprovechamiento de viales y asociando costes no farmacológicos. En ambos casos se consideraron los costes de adquisición de los medicamentos y los datos de eficacia del ensayo clínico pivotal. En el primero determinamos una ratio coste-efectividad-incremental de 28.443,81 euros/mes libre de progresión ganado y 72.560,74 euros/año de vida ganado. En el segundo obtenemos una ratio coste-efectividad incremental de 30.879,79 euros libre de progresión ganado y 78.774,99 euros/año de vida ganado. El impacto económico estatal, por tanto, se situaría entre 61.759.592 millones de euros y 92.639.388 de euros, considerando una población diana de 800-1.200 pacientes a nivel nacional. Conclusiones: Olaratumab es un fármaco que aporta un beneficio significativo en la supervivencia global, no así en la supervivencia libre de progresión. Para poder utilizarse en el sarcoma de partes blancas y que resultase costeefectivo, el coste de adquisición del vial de 500 mg debería situarse entre 101,91 y 506,54 euros y el del vial de 190 mg entre 39,31 y 195,37 euros

Objective: The economic evaluation of the drug olaratumab is carried out in the treatment of soft tissue sarcoma. Method: The data were analyzed following the recommendations contained in the MADRE program of the GENESIS-SEFH report model. Results: Progression free survival and overall survival results published in the pivotal clinical trial; Tap WD et al. (2016) were improvement of 2.5 months in median progression free survival (primary endpoint) HR = 0.672; IC95% (0.442-1.021) and gain of 11.8 months in median OS (secondary endpoint) HR = 0.463; IC95% (0.301-0.710). A cost-effectiveness analyses was performed considering 2 scenarios; scenario 1: with use of whole vials and scenario 2: use of whole vials and associating non-pharmacological costs (day hospital visits, mucositis, neutropenia and dexrazoxane use). In both cases we considered the cost of drugs and the efficacy data of the pivotal clinical trial. In Scenario 1, we would have an Incremental-Cost-Effectiveness-Ratio of €28,443.81/ month of progression-free survival and €72,560.74 per year of life gained and in scenario 2 we would have an incremental-cost-effectivenessratio of €30,879.79/ progression-free survival and €78,774.99/ year of life gained. The budgetary impact of this drug would range from €61,759,592 to €92,639,388 estimated to be 800 to 1,200 patients likely to receive treatment in Spain. Conclusions: Olaratumab is a drug that provides a significant benefit in overall survival but not in progression free survival. To be used in soft tissue sarcoma and to be cost-effective, the acquisition cost of the 500 mg vial should be between €101.91 and €506.54 and that of the 190 mg vial between €39.31 and €195.37