RESUMO
Emissions of organic substances with potential toxicity to humans and the environment are a major concern surrounding the rapid industrial development in the Athabasca oil sands region (AOSR). Although concentrations of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in some environmental samples have been reported, a comprehensive picture of organic contaminant sources, pathways, and sinks within the AOSR has yet to be elucidated. We sought to use a dynamic multimedia environmental fate model to reconcile the emissions and residue levels reported for three representative PAHs in the AOSR. Data describing emissions to air compiled from two official sources result in simulated concentrations in air, soil, water, and foliage that tend to fall close to or below the minimum measured concentrations of phenanthrene, pyrene, and benzo(a)pyrene in the environment. Accounting for evaporative emissions (e.g., from tailings pond disposal) provides a more realistic representation of PAH distribution in the AOSR. Such indirect emissions to air were found to be a greater contributor of PAHs to the AOSR atmosphere relative to reported direct emissions to air. The indirect pathway transporting uncontrolled releases of PAHs to aquatic systems via the atmosphere may be as significant a contributor of PAHs to aquatic systems as other supply pathways. Emission density estimates for the three PAHs that account for tailings pond disposal are much closer to estimated global averages than estimates based on the available emissions datasets, which fall close to the global minima. Our results highlight the need for improved accounting of PAH emissions from oil sands operations, especially in light of continued expansion of these operations.
Assuntos
Meio Ambiente , Poluentes Ambientais/análise , Indústrias Extrativas e de Processamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Modelos Químicos , Petróleo/análise , Hidrocarbonetos Policíclicos Aromáticos/análise , Medição de Risco/estatística & dados numéricos , Alberta , Simulação por Computador , Indústrias Extrativas e de Processamento/legislação & jurisprudência , Medição de Risco/legislação & jurisprudênciaRESUMO
The quality and availability of unconventional oil and gas (O&G) data in the United States have never been compared methodically state-to-state. By conducting such an assessment, this study seeks to better understand private and publicly sourced data variability and to identify data availability gaps. We developed an exploratory data-grading tool - Data Accessibility and Usability Index (DAUI) - to guide the review of O&G data quality. Between July and October 2013, we requested, collected, and assessed 5 categories of unconventional O&G data (wells drilled, violations, production, waste, and Class II disposal wells) from 10 states with active drilling activity. We based our assessment on eight data quality parameters (accessibility, usability, point location, completeness, metadata, agency responsiveness, accuracy, and cost). Using the DAUI, two authors graded the 10 states and then averaged their scores. The average score received across all states, data categories, and parameters was 67.1 out of 100, largely insufficient for proper data transparency. By state, Pennsylvania received the highest average ( = 93.5) and ranked first in all but one data category. The lowest scoring state was Texas ( = 44) largely due to its policy of charging for certain data. This article discusses the various reasons for scores received, as well as methodological limitations of the assessment metrics. We argue that the significant variability of unconventional O&G data-and its availability to the public-is a barrier to regulatory and industry transparency. The lack of transparency also impacts public education and broader participation in industry governance. This study supports the need to develop a set of data best management practices (BMPs) for state regulatory agencies and the O&G industry, and suggests potential BMPs for this purpose.
Assuntos
Coleta de Dados/normas , Monitoramento Ambiental , Indústrias Extrativas e de Processamento , Gás Natural , Petróleo , Acesso à Informação/ética , Acesso à Informação/legislação & jurisprudência , Participação da Comunidade/legislação & jurisprudência , Saúde Ambiental/ética , Saúde Ambiental/legislação & jurisprudência , Saúde Ambiental/estatística & dados numéricos , Monitoramento Ambiental/ética , Monitoramento Ambiental/legislação & jurisprudência , Monitoramento Ambiental/estatística & dados numéricos , Ética Profissional , Indústrias Extrativas e de Processamento/ética , Indústrias Extrativas e de Processamento/legislação & jurisprudência , Indústrias Extrativas e de Processamento/métodos , Regulamentação Governamental , Humanos , Campos de Petróleo e Gás , Pennsylvania , Texas , Revelação da Verdade , Estados UnidosRESUMO
Advances in directional drilling and hydraulic fracturing have sparked a natural gas boom from shale formations in the United States. Regulators face a rapidly changing industry comprised of hundreds of players, operating tens of thousands of wells across 30 states. They are often challenged to respond by budget cuts, a brain drain to industry, regulations designed for conventional gas developments, insufficient information, and deeply polarized debates about hydraulic fracturing and its regulation. As a result, shale gas governance remains a halting patchwork of rules, undermining opportunities to effectively characterize and mitigate development risk. The situation is dynamic, with research and incremental regulatory advances underway. Into this mix, we offer the CO/RE framework--characterization of risk, optimization of mitigation strategies, regulation, and enforcement--to design tailored governance strategies. We then apply CO/RE to three types of shale gas risks, to illustrate its potential utility to regulators.
Assuntos
Indústrias Extrativas e de Processamento/legislação & jurisprudência , Gás Natural , Mudança Climática , Poluição Ambiental , Regulamentação Governamental , Risco , Estados UnidosRESUMO
The development of natural gas and oil from unconventional formations in the United States has grown substantially in recent years and has created governance challenges. In light of this recent growth, and increasing attention to global shale gas resources, the successes and failures of governance efforts in this country serve as important lessons for other nations that have their own unconventional petroleum resources and are beginning to move forward with development, thus calling for a more in-depth examination of the laws governing shale gas development and their implementation. Governance includes both the substance of laws and the activities of entities that implement and influence laws, and in the case of oil and gas, states are primarily responsible for risk governance. Nongovernmental actors and industry also work with states to shape and implement regulations and standards. This Policy Analysis introduces the role of various actors in U.S. shale gas governance, explaining why the states are primarily responsible for risk governance, and explores the capacity of states to conduct governance, examining the content of their laws and the strength of their regulatory entities. The Analysis concludes that states are, to a degree, addressing the changing risks of development. Gaps remain in the substance of regulations, however, and many states appear to lack adequate support or policies for training industry in compliance matters, monitoring activity at sites, prioritizing certain types of regulatory violations that pose the highest risks, enforcing laws, and ensuring that the public is aware of inspections and enforcement and can therefore monitor state activity.
Assuntos
Indústrias Extrativas e de Processamento/legislação & jurisprudência , Regulamentação Governamental , Gás Natural , Governo Estadual , Formulação de Políticas , Política Pública , Risco , Estados UnidosRESUMO
State officials responsible for the regulation of hydraulic fracturing (fracking) operations used in the production of oil and gas resources will inevitably confront a key policy issue; that is, to what extent can statewide regulations be developed without reducing land use autonomy typically exercised by local officials? Most state regulators have historically recognized the economic importance of industry jobs and favor the adoption of uniform regulatory requirements even if these rules preempt local policymaking authority. Conversely, many local officials seek to preserve land use autonomy to provide a greater measure of protection for public health and environmental quality goals. This paper examines how public officials in three states-Colorado, Pennsylvania, and Texas-address the question of state control versus local autonomy through their efforts to shape fracking policy decisions. While local officials within Texas have succeeded in developing fracking ordinances with relatively little interference from state regulators, Colorado and Pennsylvania have adopted a tougher policy stance favoring the retention of preemptive oil and gas statutes. Key factors that account for between state differences in fracking policy decisions include the strength of home rule provisions, gubernatorial involvement, and the degree of local experience with industrial economic activities.
Assuntos
Indústrias Extrativas e de Processamento/legislação & jurisprudência , Governo Local , Gás Natural , Formulação de Políticas , Governo Estadual , Colorado , Tomada de Decisões , Regulamentação Governamental , Pennsylvania , Política Pública , TexasRESUMO
During the past decade, technological advancements in the United States and Canada have led to rapid and intensive development of many unconventional natural gas plays (e.g., shale gas, tight sand gas, coal-bed methane), raising concerns about environmental impacts. Here, we summarize the current understanding of local and regional air quality impacts of natural gas extraction, production, and use. Air emissions from the natural gas life cycle include greenhouse gases, ozone precursors (volatile organic compounds and nitrogen oxides), air toxics, and particulates. National and state regulators primarily use generic emission inventories to assess the climate, air quality, and health impacts of natural gas systems. These inventories rely on limited, incomplete, and sometimes outdated emission factors and activity data, based on few measurements. We discuss case studies for specific air impacts grouped by natural gas life cycle segment, summarize the potential benefits of using natural gas over other fossil fuels, and examine national and state emission regulations pertaining to natural gas systems. Finally, we highlight specific gaps in scientific knowledge and suggest that substantial additional measurements of air emissions from the natural gas life cycle are essential to understanding the impacts and benefits of this resource.
Assuntos
Poluição do Ar , Indústrias Extrativas e de Processamento , Gás Natural , Poluentes Atmosféricos , Poluição do Ar/legislação & jurisprudência , Indústrias Extrativas e de Processamento/legislação & jurisprudência , Regulamentação Governamental , Metano , Compostos Orgânicos VoláteisRESUMO
Intergovernmental responsibility for policy development for shale gas is concentrated primarily at the state level, given multiple statutory and political constraints on potential federal engagement. This opens the question of how a large subset of American states might craft shale policies, amid competing scholarly views on the commitment of states to environmental protection when energy development opportunities arise in the absence of applicable federal authority. The article examines recent trends in state political economy that may shape policy development and capacity, considers the heterogeneous pattern of policy emerging thus far, and draws preliminary lessons from the very small set of states that have enacted far-reaching new state legislation. It also offers early discussion of cross-border issues that may trigger multistate, regional, or ultimately federal engagement as well as growing signs of volatility in policy development in some states.
Assuntos
Indústrias Extrativas e de Processamento/legislação & jurisprudência , Gás Natural , Política , Conservação dos Recursos Naturais , Formulação de Políticas , Governo Estadual , Estados UnidosRESUMO
Petroleum-derived substances are complex and composed of aliphatic (normal-, iso-, and cycloparaffins), olefinic, and/or aromatic constituents. Approximately 400 of these complex substances were evaluated as part of the US Environmental Protection Agency voluntary High Production Volume (HPV) Challenge program. The substances were separated into 13 groups (categories), and all available data were assessed. Toxicology testing was conducted as necessary to fully address the end points encompassed by the HPV initiative. In a broad sense, volatile hydrocarbons may cause acute central nervous system effects, and those that are liquids at room temperature pose aspiration hazards if taken into the lungs as liquids and may also cause skin irritation. Higher boiling substances may contain polycyclic aromatic constituents (PACs) that can be mutagenic and carcinogenic and may also cause developmental effects. Substances containing PACs can also cause target organ and developmental effects. The effects of aliphatic constituents include liver enlargement and/or renal effects in male rats via an α-2u-globulin-mediated process and, in some cases, small but statistically significant reductions in hematological parameters. Crude oils may contain other constituents, particularly sulfur- and nitrogen-containing compounds, which are removed during refining. Aside from these more generic considerations, some specific petroleum substances may contain unusually toxic constituents including benzene, 1,3-butadiene, and/or n-hexane, which should also be taken into account if present at toxicologically relevant levels.
Assuntos
Substâncias Perigosas/toxicidade , Petróleo/análise , Petróleo/toxicidade , Testes de Toxicidade/normas , Animais , Benzeno/análise , Benzeno/toxicidade , Butadienos/análise , Butadienos/toxicidade , Indústrias Extrativas e de Processamento/legislação & jurisprudência , Substâncias Perigosas/análise , Hexanos/análise , Hexanos/toxicidade , Masculino , Hidrocarbonetos Policíclicos Aromáticos/análise , Hidrocarbonetos Policíclicos Aromáticos/toxicidade , Ratos , Estados Unidos , United States Environmental Protection AgencyAssuntos
Meio Ambiente , Exposição Ambiental/efeitos adversos , Indústrias Extrativas e de Processamento/legislação & jurisprudência , Campos de Petróleo e Gás , Saúde Pública , Animais , Confidencialidade , Exposição Ambiental/legislação & jurisprudência , Monitoramento Ambiental , Indústrias Extrativas e de Processamento/economia , Feminino , Humanos , Gado , Ohio , Gravidez , Saúde Pública/legislação & jurisprudência , Vigilância de Evento Sentinela , Estados Unidos , United States Environmental Protection AgencyRESUMO
A comparative analysis of current work practices of occupational health services of international companies of Russian oil & gas industry and provisions of ILO Convention 161 and Recommendation 171 "Occupational Health Services" has been carried out. Proposals for improvement and harmonization of labor legislation related to this problem have been formulated.
Assuntos
Indústrias Extrativas e de Processamento/organização & administração , Serviços de Saúde do Trabalhador/organização & administração , Adulto , Indústrias Extrativas e de Processamento/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos , Serviços de Saúde do Trabalhador/legislação & jurisprudência , Federação Russa , Recursos HumanosAssuntos
Conservação dos Recursos Naturais , Cooperação Internacional , Regiões Árticas , Conservação dos Recursos Naturais/tendências , Dissidências e Disputas , Indústrias Extrativas e de Processamento/legislação & jurisprudência , Indústrias Extrativas e de Processamento/tendências , Cooperação Internacional/legislação & jurisprudência , Formulação de PolíticasAssuntos
Conservação dos Recursos Naturais/economia , Política Ambiental/economia , Indústrias Extrativas e de Processamento/legislação & jurisprudência , Alberta , Conservação dos Recursos Naturais/legislação & jurisprudência , Política Ambiental/legislação & jurisprudência , Indústrias Extrativas e de Processamento/economia , Campos de Petróleo e GásAssuntos
Conservação de Recursos Energéticos/tendências , Indústrias Extrativas e de Processamento , Gás Natural/provisão & distribuição , Campos de Petróleo e Gás , Congressos como Assunto , Meio Ambiente , Poluição Ambiental/estatística & dados numéricos , Indústrias Extrativas e de Processamento/ética , Indústrias Extrativas e de Processamento/legislação & jurisprudência , Indústrias Extrativas e de Processamento/tendências , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Águas Residuárias/toxicidadeAssuntos
Vazamento de Resíduos Químicos , Desastres , Indústrias Extrativas e de Processamento , Petróleo , Poluentes Químicos da Água , Animais , Vazamento de Resíduos Químicos/economia , Vazamento de Resíduos Químicos/prevenção & controle , Desastres/economia , Desastres/prevenção & controle , Indústrias Extrativas e de Processamento/legislação & jurisprudência , Indústrias Extrativas e de Processamento/métodos , Humanos , Oceanos e Mares , Petróleo/toxicidade , Estados Unidos , Poluentes Químicos da Água/toxicidadeRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The hunt for oil and gas has taken workers into new more distant locations including those offshore. The remoteness of the offshore platforms and vessels coupled with the potential risk of being cut off by bad weather presents particular challenges for medical emergency response (MER). AIMS: Firstly to define the challenges for MER in terms of locations, population and epidemiology of injuries and illnesses in the offshore environment. Secondly to give examples of legal requirements and industry standards to manage MER. Thirdly to look at existing and emerging practice to manage these challenges. METHODS: A review of published literature was supplemented with a summary of current practice in the industry. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Medical professionals (medics) working offshore on installations and vessels are primarily responsible for the medical care of the workers. The medics have clinics with suitable medical equipment for managing emergencies as well as providing limited primary care. Some countries have legislation that stipulate minimum requirements. Where there is no national legislation, industry and company guidance is used to define the MER standards. Supervision of the offshore medics is often provided by doctors on shore via radio and phone links. These methods of communication are now being augmented with more sophisticated telemedicine solutions such as the Internet and live video links. These newer solutions allow for prompt high-quality care and provide the scope for a variety of new treatment options to be available for the offshore workforce.
Assuntos
Serviços Médicos de Emergência/organização & administração , Indústrias Extrativas e de Processamento/organização & administração , Serviços de Saúde do Trabalhador/organização & administração , Petróleo , Telemedicina/organização & administração , Acidentes de Trabalho/legislação & jurisprudência , Acidentes de Trabalho/estatística & dados numéricos , Emergências , Indústrias Extrativas e de Processamento/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos , Doenças Profissionais/epidemiologia , Serviços de Saúde do Trabalhador/legislação & jurisprudência , Serviços de Saúde do Trabalhador/provisão & distribuição , Telemedicina/tendências , Transporte de Pacientes/legislação & jurisprudência , Transporte de Pacientes/organização & administraçãoAssuntos
Exposição Ambiental/efeitos adversos , Indústrias Extrativas e de Processamento/ética , Indústrias Extrativas e de Processamento/legislação & jurisprudência , Gás Natural , Campos de Petróleo e Gás , Saúde Pública/ética , Saúde Pública/legislação & jurisprudência , Revelação da Verdade , Exposição Ambiental/ética , Exposição Ambiental/legislação & jurisprudência , Indústrias Extrativas e de Processamento/economia , Indústrias Extrativas e de Processamento/métodos , Saúde Global , Humanos , Gás Natural/efeitos adversos , Gás Natural/provisão & distribuição , Pennsylvania , Revelação da Verdade/ética , Estados UnidosAssuntos
Indústrias Extrativas e de Processamento/legislação & jurisprudência , Notificação de Abuso , Saúde Ocupacional/legislação & jurisprudência , Poluição por Petróleo/prevenção & controle , Gestão da Segurança/métodos , Meio Ambiente , Monitoramento Ambiental/legislação & jurisprudência , Poluição Ambiental/legislação & jurisprudência , Poluição Ambiental/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Capacitação em Serviço , Auditoria Administrativa , Petróleo , Poluição por Petróleo/legislação & jurisprudência , Gestão da Segurança/legislação & jurisprudência , Estados UnidosRESUMO
The extractive industries play a central role in determining the social determinants of global health yet may not be a core subject of global health studies. This article describes how an undergraduate seminar in global health takes on questions and examples related to the "causes of causes" and challenges instructors to find a place for discussion of extraction of wealth, development, and health in their curricula.