Differences in quality of life in patients with cutaneous lupus erythematosus with varying income levels.

BACKGROUND: Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) is an autoimmune photosensitive skin condition. The impact of income on quality of life has been incompletely characterized in CLE. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to assess how annual income affects quality of life among CLE patients. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study of 238 patients with CLE, relationships between predictor variables including annual income and each SKINDEX-29 + 3 subdomain were identified using univariate and multivariable analyses. In addition, answers to individual SKINDEX-29 + 3 questions were compared across income groups. Clinical factors in patients making less than <10,000 USD (N = 85) with worse SKINDEX-29 + 3 scores were also identified by univariate and multivariable analyses. RESULTS: Patients making <10,000 USD annually experienced worse quality of life across multiple SKINDEX-29 + 3 subdomains (p < 0.05). These patients specifically experienced poorer quality of life relating to social isolation and self-consciousness. (p < 0.001). Among those making <10,000 USD, predictors for worse quality of life included females, smokers, and those with higher skin disease activity were identified (p < 0.05).Limitations: This is a single center study. Income was also self-reported and could not be verified. CONCLUSIONS: Lower income is related to poorer quality of life in patients with CLE. Specifically, patients experience limitations regarding social isolation and self-consciousness.

A review of the evidence and cost of therapies for cutaneous lupus erythematosus.

Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE)-a common presentation of lupus erythematosus-may exist independently or as a part of the systemic manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus. The effects of living with and treating a chronic condition such as CLE can be debilitating to a patient's health and finances. The management of patients with CLE is made particularly challenging by poor compliance, limited therapeutic options, scarcity of evidence supporting their use, and significant differences in costs of medications. Effective management of CLE should center on prevention, individualized treatment regimens, and a mutual understanding of the challenges that patients with CLE face. This article seeks to provide an overview of the efficacy, safety, and cost of therapeutic options for CLE.

A multicentre, cross-sectional study on quality of life in patients with cutaneous lupus erythematosus.

BACKGROUND: A study at the University of Pennsylvania (UPenn) Medical Center demonstrated that quality of life in patients with cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) is negatively impacted. Whether patients with CLE in other geographic locations have similar quality of life is unknown. OBJECTIVES: We sought to compare quality of life indicators between patients with CLE at the University of Texas Southwestern (UTSW) Medical Center at Dallas and those at UPenn. METHODS: Patients with CLE (total n=248) at UTSW (n=91) and UPenn (n=157) completed the Skindex-29 +3 and Short Form-36 (SF-36) surveys related to quality of life. Additional information, including demographics, presence of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and disease severity, was collected from UTSW patients with CLE. RESULTS: Most Skindex-29 + 3 and SF-36 subdomain scores between UTSW and UPenn patients with CLE were similar. However, UTSW patients with CLE were significantly more affected in the functioning and lupus-specific Skindex-29 + 3 domains, and physical functioning, role-physical and general health SF-36 subscales than UPenn patients with CLE (P<0·05). Factors related to poor quality of life in UTSW patients with CLE include sex, income, education, presence of SLE, and skin disease activity. CONCLUSIONS: Most quality of life indicators were similar between the two CLE populations. Differences in psychosocial behaviour, and a larger proportion of patients with SLE and females in the UTSW group likely attributed to differences in a minority of Skindex-29+3 and SF-36 subdomains. Capturing data from CLE populations in different locations provides a more thorough picture of the quality of life that patients with CLE experience on a daily basis with special attention to quality of life issues in select patients with CLE.

Willingness-to-pay stated preferences in cutaneous lupus erythematosus: a pilot study.

Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) is a chronic skin disease that significantly impacts quality of life (QOL). This study tested a novel method to measure QOL in CLE using willingness-to-pay (WTP) stated preferences, and aimed to determine which of nine domains of life are most affected by CLE. Twenty-one participants with CLE ranked the domains in order of impact on CLE-related QOL, and then stated how many United States dollars they would be willing to pay for a hypothetical cure for each domain. Eighty-one percent of participants were female; mean age was 42.4 years. Photosensitivity was ranked highest by 71.4% of respondents. Participants were willing to pay the most for a hypothetical cure for CLE specific to photosensitivity (median = $200,000), the least for a cure specific to self-care (median = $0). Participants were willing to pay a median of $1,000,000 for an overall cure for CLE. Limitations include a small sample size for this pilot study and that willingness-to-pay may be influenced by individual perception of money and socioeconomic factors. This study successfully pilot-tested a WTP method and ranking task for health-related QOL. Photosensitivity was the domain of life most affected by CLE, which is a domain unique to our novel tool.

Socioeconomic factors in lupus erythematosus.

For a long time, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) was considered a potentially deadly disease. Since the introduction of immunosuppressive therapy, the life expectancy and the quality of life of patients suffering from lupus erythematosus has been dramatically improved. Today, the 5-year survival rate for SLE varies between 50% and 95%. Still, not all patients benefit equally from medical advances. Ethnic and/or socioeconomic minorities show severely disadvantageous prognosis or outcome in various studies. A substantial reduction in the quality of life as well as unemployment are other frequent side effects of this disease. Vocational handicaps related to discoid lupus erythematodes (DLE) was seen in nearly 45% of the patients. Therefore, the management of lupus erythematosus patients requires interdisciplinary cooperation between physicians, psychologists and social workers. The major aim of this article is to summarize the history of lupus erythematosus on the one and the other hand to consider the role of the socioeconomic factors influencing the prognosis of systemic and cutaneous lupus erythematosus.

Epidemiology and socioeconomic impact of skin disease in lupus erythematosus.

The prevalence rates of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) may vary within 17-48/100,000 population worldwide. Although population-based epidemiological studies are still missing, the cutaneous variants of lupus erythematosus (LE) are 2-3 times more frequent than SLE itself. The most common age of onset is 20-40 y. Overall, cutaneous LE is regarded as a variant with less severe course and better prognosis. However, CDLE and SCLE last for many years and may lead, like SLE, to severe disability for work and limited life quality; also, a small proportion of patients with cutaneous LE develops SLE during the course of their disease. This implies considerable amount of medical management and costs for the community. Early recognition of cutaneous LE patients at risk to develop SLE and preventive measures against disease triggering factors are important tasks for physicians attending with cutaneous LE patients. It seems that signs of nephropathy, elevated ANA-titers and arthralgias may serve as prognostic predictors for transition into SLE. Characteristic features of cutaneous LE are photosensitivity and female predominance. UV light is a major environmental triggering factor in cutaneous LE. Skin lesions may be induced or preexistent lesions may exacerbate due to UV light in up to 80-90% of all patients. Therefore, socioeconomic counseling of the young patients, for example choice of occupation and sun protection, are essentials in compliant patients. Also, since females are 3-6 times more frequently affected than males, the possibility of hormonal influences including pregnancy and estrogen-containing drugs should be discussed. Risk considerations for females wishing to become pregnant are required, and avoidance of estrogen-containing contraceptives should be recommended.