Co-Administration of nalbuphine to improve morphine tolerance in mice with bone cancer pain.

BACKGROUND: Kappa-opioid receptor (KOR) agonists are known for having opposite and/or different effects compared with Mu-opioid receptor (MOR) agonists. This study is aimed at clarifying the analgesic effect and tolerance of nalbuphine combined with morphine, and quantifying the mRNA and protein expression of spinal MOR and KOR in a mouse bone cancer pain (BCP) model treated with nalbuphine and morphine. METHOD: BCP model was prepared in C3H/HeNCrlVr Mice by implanting the sarcoma cells into the intramedullary space of the femur. The paw withdrawal thermal latency (PWL) measured by thermal radiometer was used to assess thermal hyperalgesia. PWL testing was performed after implantation and drug administration according to the protocol. Hematoxylin-eosin staining in the spinal cord and x-ray in the femoral intramedullary canal was detected. Real-time PCR and western blot analysis played a role in detecting spinal MOR and KOR expression changes. RESULTS: In tumor-implanted mice, the spinal MOR and KOR protein and mRNA expression was down-regulated when compared to that in sham-implanted mice (p < 0.05). Morphine therapy can lead to a decrease in spinal µ receptor expression. Similarly, the nalbuphine therapy can lead to a decrease in the expression of κ receptor protein and mRNA at the spinal cord level (p < 0.05). Morphine, nalbuphine, or nalbuphine co-administration with morphine all can extend the paw withdrawal thermal latency (PWL) to radiant thermal stimulation in tumor-implanted mice (p < 0.05). Compared with the morphine treatment group, nalbuphine co-administration with morphine delayed the reduction of PWL value again (p < 0.05). DISCUSSION: BCP itself may induce down-regulation of the spinal MOR and KOR expression. A low dose of nalbuphine co-administration with morphine led to the delayed emergence of morphine tolerance. The part of the mechanism may be due to the regulation of spinal opioid receptors expression.

Nalbuphine attenuates morphine-induced scratching by inhibiting PKCß-dependent microglial activation and p38 phosphorylation in male mice.

Morphine-induced scratching (MIS) is a common adverse effect associated with the use of morphine as analgesia after surgery. However, the treatment of MIS is less than satisfactory due to its unclear mechanism, which needs to be enunciated. We found that intrathecal (i.t.) injections of morphine significantly enhanced scratching behavior in C57BL/6J male mice as well as increased the expressions of protein kinase C ß (PKCß), phosphorylated p38 mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK), and ionized calcium-binding adapter molecule 1 (Iba1) within spinal cord dorsal horn. Conversely, using the kappa opioid receptor antagonist nalbuphine significantly attenuated scratching behavior, reduced PKCß expression and p38 phosphorylation, and decreased spinal dorsal horn microglial activation, while PKCδ and KOR expression elevated. Spinal PKCß silencing mitigated MIS and microglial activation. Still, knockdown of PKCδ reversed the inhibitory effect of nalbuphine on MIS and microglial activation, indicating that PKCδ is indispensable for the antipruritic effects of nalbuphine. In contrast, PKCß is crucial for inducing microglial activation in MIS in male mice. Our findings show a distinct itch cascade of morphine, PKCß/p38MAPK, and microglial activation, but an anti-MIS pathway of nalbuphine, PKCδ/KOR, and neuron activation.

Comparison of propofol-nalbuphine and propofol-fentanyl sedation for patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has been increasingly used to treat patients with biliary/pancreatic duct obstruction or stricture outside the operating room. Effective and safe sedation techniques are needed because of painful stimuli and the long duration of the ERCP procedure.Nalbuphine has been shown to cause less respiratory depression during sedation than similar cases without nalbuphine. This study compared the effects of propofol-nalbuphine (PN) and propofol-fentanyl (PF) sedation in patients undergoing ERCP. METHODS: Four hundred patients scheduled for ERCP procedures were divided into two groups: the PF group (receiving PF sedation,n = 199) and the PN group (receiving PN sedation,n = 201). Vital signs, adverse events during surgery, patient movement scores, pain scores, and adverse events one day post-ERCP were recorded. RESULTS: Stable haemodynamics were observed in both groups.Compared to the PF group, the PN group showed significantly decreased respiratory depression (P < 0.0001) and surgical interruptions (P = 0.048).Nalbuphine decreased patient movement by reducing pain from ERCP. CONCLUSION: Nalbuphine, instead of fentanyl, precipitated less respiratory depression while permitting adequate/equivalent sedation for ERCP and therefore provides more efficient and safer sedation. Trial registration ChiCTR, ChiCTR1800016018, Registered 7 May 2018, http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=27085.

Enhancement of Opioid Antinociception by Nicotinic Ligands.

Nicotine has previously been shown to augment the antinociceptive effects of µ-opioid agonists in squirrel monkeys without producing a concomitant increase in behavioral disruption. The present studies were conducted to extend these findings by determining the ability of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) agonist epibatidine and partial α4ß2 nAChR agonist varenicline to selectively augment the antinociceptive effects of the µ-opioid receptor (MOR) full agonist fentanyl, the MOR partial agonist nalbuphine, and the κ-opioid receptor (KOR) agonist U69,593 in male squirrel monkeys. Results indicate that both nAChR ligands selectively increased the antinociceptive effects of nalbuphine and that epibatidine increased the antinociceptive effects of U69,593 without altering effects on operant behavior. However, neither epibatidine nor varenicline enhanced the antinociceptive effects of fentanyl, perhaps due to its high efficacy. The enhancement of nalbuphine's antinociceptive effects by epibatidine, but not varenicline, could be antagonized by either mecamylamine or dihydro-ß-erythroidine, consistent with α4ß2 mediation of epibatidine's effects but suggesting the involvement of non-nAChR mechanisms in the effects of varenicline. The present results support previous findings showing that an nAChR agonist can serve as an adjuvant for MOR antinociception and, based on results with U69,593, further indicate that the adjuvant effects of nAChR drugs may also apply to antinociception produced by KOR. Our findings support the further evaluation of nAChR agonists as adjuvants of opioid pharmacotherapy for pain management and point out the need for further investigation into the mechanisms by which they produce opioid-adjuvant effects. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Nicotine has been shown to augment the antinociceptive effects of µ-opioid receptor analgesics without exacerbating their effects on operant performance. The present study demonstrates that the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) agonist epibatidine and partial α4ß2 nAChR agonist varenicline can also augment the antinociceptive effects of nalbuphine, as well as those of a κ-opioid receptor agonist, without concomitantly exacerbating their behaviorally disruptive effects. These findings support the view that nAChR agonists and partial agonists may have potential as adjuvant therapies for opioid-based analgesics.

Opioid effect on the autonomic nervous system in a fetal sheep model.

PURPOSE: Opioid use during labour can interfere with cardiotocography patterns. Heart rate variability indirectly reflects a fluctuation in the autonomic nervous system and can be monitored through time and spectral analyses. This experimental study aimed to evaluate the impact of nalbuphine administration on the gasometric, cardiovascular, and autonomic nervous system responses in fetal sheep. METHODS: This was an experimental study on chronically instrumented sheep fetuses (surgery at 128 ± 2 days of gestational age, term = 145 days). The model was based on a maternal intravenous bolus injection of nalbuphine, a semisynthetic opioid used as an analgesic during delivery. Fetal gasometric parameters (pH, pO2, pCO2, and lactates), hemodynamic parameters (fetal heart rate and mean arterial pressure), and autonomic nervous system tone (short-term and long-term variation, low-frequency domain, high-frequency domain, and fetal stress index) were recorded. Data obtained at 30-60 min after nalbuphine injection were compared to those recorded at baseline. RESULTS: Eleven experiments were performed. Fetal heart rate, mean arterial pressure, and activities at low and high frequencies were stable after injection. Short-term variation decreased at T30 min (P = 0.02), and long-term variation decreased at T60 min (P = 0.02). Fetal stress index gradually increased and reached significance at T60 min (P = 0.02). Fetal gasometric parameters and lactate levels remained stable. CONCLUSION: Maternal nalbuphine use during labour may lead to fetal heart changes that are caused by the effect of opioid on the autonomic nervous system; these fluctuations do not reflect acidosis.

Antipruritic Effect of Nalbuphine, a Kappa Opioid Receptor Agonist, in Mice: A Pan Antipruritic.

Antipruritic effects of kappa opioid receptor (KOR) agonists have been shown in rodent models of acute and chronic scratching (itchlike behavior). Three KOR agonists, nalfurafine, difelikefalin, and nalbuphine, are in clinical studies for antipruritic effects in chronic itch of systemic and skin diseases. Nalfurafine (in Japan) and difelikefalin (in the USA) were approved to be used in the treatment of chronic itch in hemodialysis patients. The FDA-approved nalbuphine has been used in clinic for over 40 years, and it is the only narcotic agonist that is not scheduled. We aimed to study (a) antiscratch activity of nalbuphine against TAT-HIV-1 protein (controls HIV transcription)-, deoxycholic acid (DCA, bile acid)-, and chloroquine (CQ)-induced scratching in a mouse model of acute itch; and (b) whether the effect of nalbuphine is produced via KORs. First, dose-responses were developed for pruritogens. Mice were pretreated with nalbuphine (0.3-10 mg/kg) and then a submaximal dose of pruritogens were administered and the number of scratching bouts was counted. To study if the antiscratch effect of nalbuphine is produced via KOR, we used KOR knock out mice and pharmacologic inhibition of KORs using nor-binaltorphimine, a KOR antagonist. For this aim, we used CQ as a pruritogen. We found that: (a) TAT-HIV-1 protein elicits scratching in a dose-dependent manner; (b) nalbuphine inhibits scratching induced by TAT-HIV-1, DCA, and CQ dose-dependently; and (c) nalbuphine inhibits scratching induced by CQ through KORs. In conclusion, nalbuphine inhibits scratching elicited by multiple pruritogens.

Participation of the opioid receptor - nitric oxide - cGMP - K+ channel pathway in the peripheral antinociceptive effect of nalbuphine and buprenorphine in rats.

The aim of this study was to examine if the peripheral antinociceptive effects of the opioid agonist/antagonist nalbuphine and buprenorphine involve the sequential participation of nitric oxide (NO) and cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) synthesis followed by K+ channel opening in the formalin test. Wistar rats (180-220 g) were injected in the dorsal surface of the right hind paw with formalin (1%). Rats received a subcutaneous (s.c.) injection into the dorsal surface of the paw of vehicles or increasing doses of nalbuphine (50-200 µg/paw) or buprenorphine (1-5 µg/paw) 20 min before formalin injection into the paw. Nalbuphine antinociception was reversed by the s.c. injection into the paw of the inhibitor of NO synthesis (NG-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME)), by the inhibitor of guanylyl cyclase (1H-[1,2,4]oxadiazolo[4,3-a]quinoxalin-1-one (ODQ)), by the Kir6.1-2, ATP-sensitive K+ channel inhibitors (glibenclamide and glipizide), by the KCa2.1-3, small conductance Ca2+-activated K+ channel blocker (apamin), by the KCa1.1, large conductance Ca2+-activated K+ channel blocker (charybdotoxin), and by the KV, voltage-dependent K+ channel inhibitors (4-aminopyridine (4-AP) and tetraethylammonium chloride (TEA)). The antinociceptive effect produced by buprenorphine was blocked by the s.c. injection of 4-AP and TEA but not by L-NAME, ODQ, glibenclamide, glipizide, apamin, or charybdotoxin. The present results provide evidence for differences in peripheral mechanisms of action between these opioid drugs.

Nalbuphine Reduces Opioid-Associated Urinary Retention in Pediatric Patients.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of nalbuphine administration on urine output in critically ill children with opioid-associated urinary retention. DESIGN: Institutional review board approved, single center, retrospective medical chart review. SETTING: Large medical-surgical PICU within a free-standing, tertiary care children's hospital. PATIENTS: Patients admitted to the PICU between October 1, 2014, and February 29, 2016, who received IV nalbuphine after meeting criteria for opioid-associated oliguria (defined as urine output below 1 mL/kg/hr and received at least one dose of opioid therapy within the preceding 12 hr). INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS: Seventeen patients who received 21 doses of nalbuphine were analyzed. The median age and weight of patients were 6 years (interquartile range, 3-11.5 yr) and 18 kg (interquartile range, 12-35 kg), respectively. Two distinct dosing strategies became evident, specifically 0.05 mg/kg (n = 11 doses) and 0.1 mg/kg (n = 10 doses). Urine output increased significantly from baseline (median, 0 mL/kg/hr; interquartile range, 0-0.53 mL/kg/hr) to 6 hours post nalbuphine administration (median, 1.48 mL/kg/hr; interquartile range, 0-2 mL/kg/hr; p = 0.0002). Patients who received 0.1 mg/kg/dose had a greater urine output response compared with those who received 0.05 mg/kg/dose. Five patients (29%) had a catheter inserted into their bladder after administration of nalbuphine. Pain scores (grouped 6 hr before and after nalbuphine administration and single pain scores documented immediately before and after nalbuphine administration) were unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: Nalbuphine administration, at a dose of 0.1 mg/kg, improved urine output in a cohort of children with opioid-associated urinary retention. Pain control did not appear influenced by the provision of nalbuphine. Additional studies are needed to determine the influence of nalbuphine on urinary catheter insertion rates and catheter-associated urinary tract infections.

Effectiveness of nalbuphine, a κ-opioid receptor agonist and µ-opioid receptor antagonist, in the inhibition of INa , IK(M) , and IK(erg) unlinked to interaction with opioid receptors.

Nalbuphine (NAL) is recognized as a mixer with the κ-opioid receptor agonist and the µ-opioid receptor antagonist. However, whether this drug causes any modifications in neuronal ionic currents is unclear. The effects of NAL on ionic currents in mHippoE-14 hippocampal neurons were investigated. In the whole-cell current recordings, NAL suppressed the peak amplitude of voltage-gated Na+ current (INa ) with an IC50 value of 1.9 µM. It shifted the steady-state inactivation curve of peak INa to the hyperpolarized potential, suggesting that there is the voltage dependence of NAL-mediated inhibition of peak INa . In continued presence of NAL, subsequent application of either dynorphin A1-13 (1 µM) or naloxone (30 µM) failed to modify its suppression of peak INa . Tefluthrin (Tef; 10 µM), a pyrethroid known to activate INa , increased peak INa with slowed current inactivation; however, further application of NAL suppressed Tef-mediated suppression of peak INa followed by an additional slowing of current inactivation. In addition, NAL suppressed the amplitude of M-type K+ current [IK(M) ] with an IC50 value of 5.7 µM, while it slightly suppressed erg-mediated and delayed-rectifier K+ currents. In the inside-out current recordings, NAL failed to modify the activity of large-conductance Ca2+ -activated K+ channels. In differentiated NG108-15 neuronal cells, NAL also suppressed the peak INa , and subsequent addition of Tef reversed NAL-induced suppression of INa . Our study highlights the evidence that in addition to modulate opioid receptors, NAL has the propensity to interfere with ionic currents including INa and IK(M) , thereby influencing the functional activities of central neurons.

Effect of three doses of nalbuphine on reversal of sedation and cardiopulmonary effects of morphine-acepromazine in healthy dogs.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of three doses of nalbuphine in reversing sedative and cardiopulmonary effects of morphine-acepromazine in dogs. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, randomized experimental trial. ANIMALS: A group of eight healthy Beagle dogs, aged 5-6 years and weighing 12.5 ± 2.1 kg. METHODS: Dogs were administered morphine (0.5 mg kg-1) and acepromazine (0.05 mg kg-1) intravenously (IV). After 20 minutes, dogs were administered one of four treatments IV: saline (control); or nalbuphine (0.3 mg kg-1; treatment N0.3), (0.6 mg kg-1; treatment N0.6) or (1.0 mg kg-1; treatment N1.0), in random order separated by 1 week. Sedation was scored using a numeric descriptive scale (NDS) and simple numerical scale (SNS). Heart rate, systolic arterial pressure (SAP), respiratory rate (fR) and rectal temperature (RT) were recorded before (BL), 20 minutes after morphine-acepromazine (T0), then 10 (T10), 30, 60 and 90 minutes after saline or nalbuphine. Arterial blood gases were measured at BL, T0 and T10. Values were compared with BL, T0 and among treatments using anova (p < 0.05) and the Bonferroni correction (p < 0.008). RESULTS: NDS for N0.6 and SNS for N0.6 and N1.0 at T30, and both scores for all nalbuphine treatments at T60-T90 were lower compared with T0 (p < 0.05). Sedation scores were not different among nalbuphine treatments. SNS scores were lower than control at T10 for N0.3 and N0.6 (p < 0.05). SAP and fR were lower than BL for all treatments at some time points (p < 0.05). RT was higher than control at T60 in the nalbuphine treatments (p < 0.001). PaO2 was lower in N0.3 at T0 compared with BL (p = 0.036). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: All nalbuphine doses decreased the degree of sedation, without differences among them. Administration of nalbuphine resulted in minimal changes in measured cardiopulmonary variables.

The effects of lidocaine-prilocaine cream on responses to intravenous catheter placement in cats sedated with dexmedetomidine and either methadone or nalbuphine.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the reaction to cephalic intravenous (IV) catheter placement with or without lidocaine-prilocaine cream in cats sedated with dexmedetomidine and methadone or nalbuphine. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, blind study. ANIMALS: A group of 24 female mixed breed cats. METHODS: Cats were randomly allocated to one of the two sedation protocols: dexmedetomidine (0.01 mg kg-1) and methadone (0.3 mg kg-1; DEXMET) or dexmedetomidine (0.01 mg kg-1) and nalbuphine (0.3 mg kg-1; DEXNALB). Sedation was scored 30 minutes later using a visual analog scale. Subsequently, a 2 × 3.5 cm area of the antebrachium over the cephalic vein was clipped, and half the cats within each protocol were randomly assigned for topical lidocaine-prilocaine cream (treatment), whereas no cream was applied to other cats (control). After 20 minutes, an attempt was made to place a 24 gauge catheter into the cephalic vein and the reaction of the cats to this procedure was scored using a numeric scale 0-3. Sedation and catheterization reaction scores were compared between sedation protocols and whether cats were administered lidocaine-prilocaine cream or not using the Friedman test followed by the Bonferroni procedure. A p value < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Sedation scores were not different between sedation protocols or between treatment and control cats within each protocol. All cats administered lidocaine-prilocaine cream showed no reaction to IV catheter placement. Among the control cats, no response was observed in one cat in DEXNALB. Catheterization reaction score was lower in the treatment cats in both the sedation protocols when compared with their respective controls. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Lidocaine-prilocaine cream applied for 20 minutes abolished the reaction to catheterization in cats sedated with dexmedetomidine and nalbuphine or methadone. Facilitation of IV catheter placement occurred within 20 minutes of lidocaine-prilocaine application.

Additive and subadditive antiallodynic interactions between µ-opioid agonists and N-methyl D-aspartate antagonists in male rhesus monkeys.

µ-Opioid agonists are clinically effective analgesics, but also produce undesirable effects such as sedation and abuse potential that limit their clinical utility. Glutamatergic systems also modulate nociception and N-methyl D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists have been proposed as one useful adjunct to enhance the therapeutic effects and/or attenuate the undesirable effects of µ-opioid agonists. Whether NMDA antagonists enhance the antiallodynic effects of µ-agonists in preclinical models of thermal hypersensitivity (i.e. capsaicin-induced thermal allodynia) are unknown. The present study determined the behavioral effects of racemic ketamine, (+)-MK-801, (-)-nalbuphine, and (-)-oxycodone alone and in fixed proportion mixtures in assays of capsaicin-induced thermal allodynia and schedule-controlled responding in rhesus monkeys. Ketamine, nalbuphine, and oxycodone produced dose-dependent antiallodynia. MK-801 was inactive up to doses that produced undesirable effects. Ketamine, but not MK-801, enhanced the potency of µ-agonists to decrease rates of operant responding. Ketamine and nalbuphine interactions were additive in both procedures. Ketamine and oxycodone interactions were additive or subadditive depending on the mixture. Furthermore, oxycodone and MK-801 interactions were subadditive on antiallodynia and additive on rate suppression. These results do not support the broad clinical utility of NMDA receptor antagonists as adjuncts to µ-opioid agonists for thermal allodynic pain states.

Dual κ-agonist/µ-antagonist opioid receptor modulation reduces levodopa-induced dyskinesia and corrects dysregulated striatal changes in the nonhuman primate model of Parkinson disease.

OBJECTIVE: Effective medical management of levodopa-induced dyskinesia (LID) remains an unmet need for patients with Parkinson disease (PD). Changes in opioid transmission in the basal ganglia associated with LID suggest a therapeutic opportunity. Here we determined the impact of modulating both mu and kappa opioid receptor signaling using the mixed agonist/antagonist analgesic nalbuphine in reducing LID and its molecular markers in the nonhuman primate model. METHODS: 1-Methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine-treated macaques with advanced parkinsonism and reproducible LID received a range of nalbuphine doses or saline subcutaneously as: (1) monotherapy, (2) acute coadministration with levodopa, and (3) chronic coadministration for 1 month. Animals were assessed by blinded examiners for motor disability and LID severity using standardized rating scales. Plasma levodopa levels were determined with and without nalbuphine, and postmortem brain samples were subjected to Western blot analyses. RESULTS: Nalbuphine reduced LID in a dose-dependent manner by 48% (p < 0.001) without compromising the anti-PD effect of levodopa or changing plasma levodopa levels. There was no tolerance to the anti-LID effect of nalbuphine given chronically. Nalbuphine coadministered with levodopa was well tolerated and did not cause sedation. Nalbuphine monotherapy had no effect on motor disability. Striatal tissue analyses showed that nalbuphine cotherapy blocks several molecular correlates of LID, including overexpression of ΔFosB, prodynorphin, dynorphin A, cyclin-dependent kinase 5, and increased phosphorylation of DARPP-32 at threonine-34. INTERPRETATION: Nalbuphine reverses the molecular milieu in the striatum associated with LID and is a safe and effective anti-LID agent in the primate model of PD. These findings support repurposing this analgesic for the treatment of LID.

Nalbuphine and butorphanol reverse opioid-induced respiratory depression but increase arousal in etorphine-immobilized goats (Capra hircus).

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate and compare the efficacy of two opioid agonist-antagonists, nalbuphine and butorphanol, in reversing etorphine-induced respiratory depression in immobilized goats. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, crossover, experimental trial conducted at 1753 m.a.s.l. ANIMALS: Eight adult female Boer goats (Capra hircus). METHODS: Eight minutes following immobilization with an intramuscular injection of 0.1 mg kg(-1) etorphine, goats were given one of nalbuphine (0.8 mg kg(-1) ), butorphanol (0.1 mg kg(-1) ) or sterile water intravenously, in random order in three trials. Respiratory rate (fR ), ventilation, tidal volume, oxygen consumption (V˙O2 ) and carbon dioxide production (V˙CO2 ) were measured continuously. Arterial blood samples to determine PaO2 and PaCO2 were taken 2 minutes before and at 5 minute intervals after etorphine administration for 25 minutes. RESULTS: Both nalbuphine and butorphanol increased mean PaO2 from 44 mmHg (5.9 kPa) to 63 mmHg (8.4 kPa) after etorphine administration. Butorphanol, but not nalbuphine, also corrected hypopnea and hypoventilation such that fR increased from 13 ± 4 to 21 ± 7 breaths minute(-1) (compared with 16 ± 6 breaths minute(-1) following nalbuphine) and ventilation increased from 4.69 ± 3.04 to 6.91 ± 4.42 L minute(-1) following butorphanol administration. Despite decreases in PaCO2 following nalbuphine and butorphanol, PaCO2 remained elevated compared with pre-immobilization values [nalbuphine: 34 ± 3 mmHg (4.5 ± 0.3 kPa); butorphanol: 34 ± 2 mmHg (4.5 ± 0.3 kPa)] throughout the immobilization. Both agents also decreased the level of immobilization, and increased V˙O2 and V˙CO2 . CONCLUSIONS: Nalbuphine and butorphanol significantly improved respiratory function in immobilized goats, with butorphanol eliciting a greater positive response than nalbuphine. However, both opioid agonist-antagonists partly reversed etorphine-induced immobilization. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Butorphanol and nalbuphine can be used to improve respiratory parameters in etorphine-immobilized wildlife, with butorphanol being more effective, but unwanted arousal can occur.

Commonly used excipients modulate UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2b7 activity to improve nalbuphine oral bioavailability in humans.

PURPOSE: Nalbuphine (NAL) is a potent opioid analgesic, but can only be administered by injection. The major aim of this study was to develop an oral NAL formulation employing known excipients as UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2B7 (UGT2B7) inhibitors to improve its oral bioavailability. METHODS: Twenty commonly used pharmaceutical excipients were screened in vitro by using liver microsomes to identify inhibitors of UGT2B7, the major NAL metabolic enzyme. Tween 20 and PEG 400 were potent UGT2B7 inhibitors and both were co-administered (Tween-PEG) with NAL to rats and humans for pharmacokinetic and/or pharmacodynamic analyses. RESULTS: In animal studies, oral Tween-PEG (4 mg/kg of each) significantly increased the area under the plasma NAL concentration-time curve (AUC) and the maximal plasma concentration (Cmax) by 4- and 5-fold, respectively. The results of the pharmacodynamic analysis were in agreement with those of the pharmacokinetic analysis, and showed that Tween-PEG significantly enhanced the analgesic effects of orally administered NAL. In humans, oral Tween-PEG (240 mg of each) also increased NAL Cmax 2.5-fold, and AUC by 1.6-fold. CONCLUSIONS: Tween-PEG successfully improved oral NAL bioavailability and could formulate a useful oral dosage form for patient's convenience.

[Nalbuphine in pediatric anesthesia]. / Nalbuphin in der Kinderanästhesie.

Efficient and safe pediatric perioperative pain therapy in the context of a multimodal pain therapy concept requires a slight to moderate opioid analgesic. Nalbuphine is a nearly ideal opioid for this purpose due to its unique pharmacological properties as a µ-receptor antagonist/κ-receptor agonist and a high safety profile. Nalbuphine is used clinically primarily in postoperative pain therapy administered as a bolus, continuous infusion and patient-controlled analgesia. Furthermore, it is administered in different regimens for pediatric diagnostic and interventional sedation.

Butorphanol-Azaperone-Medetomidine Is as Safe and Effective as Nalbuphine-Azaperone-Medetomidine for Immobilization of Juvenile American Black Bears (Ursus americanus).

Immobilization kits including butorphanol-azaperone-medetomidine (BAM) and nalbuphine-azaperone-medetomidine can provide effective, safe, and easy-to-use protocols in bears. Nalbuphine-azaperone-medetomidine is not commercially available but may be useful for wildlife agencies because it does not contain controlled substances. This study directly compared BAM to nalbuphine-azaperone-medetomidine immobilization in 10 juvenile healthy black bears (10 mo old; four females, six males) undergoing prerelease examinations after rehabilitation. Bears were immobilized via remote delivery of 1 mL of BAM (n=5) or nalbuphine-azaperone-medetomidine (n=5) intramuscularly in the shoulder during December (randomized, blinded trial). Bears were intubated, monitored with an electrocardiogram, pulse oximeter, capnograph, noninvasive blood pressure cuff, and rectal thermometer, and underwent physical examination, sample collection, morphometrics, and ear-tag placement. Induction, physiologic, and recovery parameters were recorded, including arterial blood gas analysis. The anesthetic agents were antagonized with atipamezole and naltrexone. There were no differences between protocols in induction or recovery times. There were no differences between protocols in heart rate, respiratory rate, temperature, oxygen saturation, end-tidal CO2, mean arterial pressure, or blood gas analysis or any differences between male and female bears in any parameters. Bears were hypertensive and normoxemic with low oxygen saturation via pulse oximeter, but all recovered smoothly and were released within 2 h of recovery. This study supports that nalbuphine-azaperone-medetomidine is clini-cally as safe and effective as BAM in American black bears.

Comparison of Ketamine-Xylazine, Butorphanol-Azaperone-Medetomidine, and Nalbuphine-Medetomidine-Azaperone for Raccoon (Procyon lotor) Immobilization.

Raccoons (Procyon lotor) are frequently handled using chemical immobilization in North America for management and research. In a controlled environment, we compared three drug combinations: ketamine-xylazine (KX), butorphanol-azaperone-medetomidine (BAM), and nalbuphine-medetomidine-azaperone (NalMed-A) for raccoon immobilization. In crossover comparisons, raccoons received a mean of the following: 8.66 mg/kg ketamine and 1.74 mg/kg xylazine (0.104 mL/kg KX); 0.464 mg/kg butorphanol, 0.155 mg/kg azaperone, and 0.185 mg/kg medetomidine (0.017 mL/kg BAM); and 0.800 mg/kg nalbuphine, 0.200 mg/kg azaperone, and 0.200 mg/kg medetomidine (0.020 mL/kg NalMed-A). Induction time was shortest with KX (mean±SE, 10.0±0.7 min) and longest with NalMed-A (13.0±1.3 min). A sampling procedure was completed on 89% (16/18), 72% (13/18), and 89% (16/18) of the raccoons administered KX, BAM, and NalMed-A, respectively. Reasons for incomplete sampling included inadequate immobilization (one KX and one NalMed-A), responsive behaviors (one each with KX, BAM, NalMed-A), or animal safety (four BAM). Mean recovery time for KX was 32.8±7.1 min without antagonizing and 28.6±5.2 min following delivery of an antagonist. Mean recovery time was 6.2±0.8 min for BAM and 5.1±0.5 min for NalMed-A after antagonizing. Only with KX were raccoons observed to recover without use of an antagonist. Supplemental oxygen was provided to 23% (3/13), 72% (13/18), and 71% (12/17) of raccoons immobilized with KX, BAM, and NalMed-A, respectively. Hypoxemia at <80% oxygen saturation occurred in 0% (0/17), 27% (4/15), and 6% (1/16) of the raccoons administered KX, BAM, and NalMed-A, respectively; all raccoons fully recovered from chemical immobilization. All combinations could be used for raccoon immobilization; however, the need for delivery of supplemental oxygen to a majority of raccoons immobilized with BAM and NalMed-A may limit broader use of these agents for certain field studies involving capture, sample, and release of free-ranging animals from a practical standpoint.

Immobilization of Raccoons (Procyon lotor) with Nalbuphine, Medetomidine, and Azaperone.

Chemical immobilization is widely used by wildlife and veterinary professionals for the safe handling of animals. A combination of nalbuphine (40 mg/mL), azaperone (10 mg/mL), and medetomidine (10 mg/mL), known as NAM, is a low-volume combination with field immobilization practicality and fewer regulations restricting its use in the US than some other drug combinations. We evaluated the safety and effectiveness of NAM as an immobilizing agent for raccoons (Procyon lotor). From May 2021 to February 2022, 16 adult raccoons were captured in cage traps and immobilized with 0.3 mL NAM intramuscularly (12 mg nalbuphine, 3 mg medetomidine, and 3 mg azaperone, regardless of body weight). After administration, time to sedation was measured; body temperature, heart rate, respiratory rate, and oxygen saturation were monitored and recorded every 5 min for 20 min. Each raccoon was weighed; the dose administered was calculated (range 2.2-4.1 mg/kg, mean 3 mg/kg). Mean induction time was 6 min (4-17 min); time to recovery following administration of 15 mg atipamezole, 7.5 mg naltrexone for reversal, was 10 min (6-18 min). Heart rate, oxygen saturation, and respiration rate remained steady during immobilization. Rectal temperature steadily declined. Overall, NAM appeared to be a practical option for raccoon immobilization, providing rapid induction and reversal as well as adequate sedation for short-term handling and minimally invasive sampling.

A MIXTURE OF NALBUPHINE, AZAPERONE, AND MEDETOMIDINE FOR IMMOBILIZING RINGTAILS (BASSARISCUS ASTUTUS).

We evaluated a combination of nalbuphine HCl (40 mg/mL), azaperone tartrate (10 mg/mL), and medetomidine HCl (10 mg/mL), a combination known as NAM or NalMed-A, in 23 ringtails (Bassariscus astutus) during 29 handling events for a radio-collaring study in southern Oregon, US, from August 2020 to March 2022. The combination was delivered to ringtails by hand injection at 0.075 mL NAM per estimated 1 kg body mass. The mean (± standard deviation, SD) dosage calculated post hoc was 3.366 (±0.724) mg/kg nalbuphine, 0.841 (±0.181) mg/kg medetomidine, and 0.841 (±0.181) mg/kg azaperone. All captured ringtails were effectively immobilized with a mean (SD) induction time of 13.24 (±3.57) min. The medetomidine and nalbuphine components were antagonized with a combination of atipamezole and naltrexone HCl with a mean (SD) recovery time of 2.48 (±1.94) min. This combination appeared to be safe and effective for immobilizing ringtails with a low volume dose, smooth antagonism, and rapid recovery. In addition, NAM does not contain any drugs that are US Drug Enforcement scheduled, which makes it useful for immobilization procedures by wildlife professionals in the US.