The effect of central corneal thickness on intraocular pressure values using various tonometers in the dog.

OBJECTIVE: To compare intraocular pressure readings from three different tonometers, the Tono-Pen AVIA® (TP), TonoVet® (TV) and TonoVet Plus® (TV+) and to determine how measurements from each tonometer are affected by central corneal thickness (CCT). ANIMALS: Ninety dogs. PROCEDURES: Normal dogs and dogs with ocular disease were selected for study inclusion. Central corneal thickness measurements were gathered with the Pachette 4 ultrasonic pachymeter, and IOP measurements were gathered with the three tonometers in random order. ANOVA or Wilcoxon tests were utilized for overall group comparisons. Linear regression analyses were utilized to determine the association between IOP and CCT. RESULTS: When comparing tonometers to each other, for all dogs, readings from the TV+were significantly different compared to the TV (p = <.0001) and TP (p = <.0001); however, there was no significant difference between the TV and the TP (p = .999). Linear regression did not find any significant correlation between corneal thickness and IOP readings with any tonometer when looking at normal dogs or when including dogs with ocular abnormalities. DISCUSSION: This study did not find a significant correlation between an increase in CCT and increase in IOP reading in any tonometer comparison amongst normal and dogs with ocular abnormalities. The TV+produced consistently and significantly higher readings, but measurements did not exceed the expected IOP range in normal dogs. For consistency, the same tonometer should be used when monitoring IOP over time.

Agreement and repeatability of central corneal thickness measurements by four different optical devices and an ultrasound pachymeter.

PURPOSE: To compare the repeatability and agreement of central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT), corneal topography (CT) with a combined Scheimpflug-Placido system, optical biometry (OB), specular microscopy (SM), and ultrasound pachymetry (UP). METHODS: A single observer measured CCT twice in 150 eyes of 150 subjects with each of five devices: Nidek RS-3000 Advance OCT, CSO Sirius combined Scheimpflug-Placido disc system CT, Nidek AL-Scan partial coherence interferometry-based OB, Tomey EM-3000 SM, and Reichert iPac ultrasonic pachymeter. Pachymetry values corrected by the SM device software were also recorded. Levels of agreement between devices were evaluated by Bland-Altman plots with 95% limits of agreement, and repeatability for each device was analysed with intraclass correlation coefficients. RESULTS: The mean CCTs measured by OCT, CT, OB, SM, corrected SM, and UP were 544.60 ± 29.56, 536.19 ± 32.14, 528.29 ± 29.45, 524.88 ± 32.38, 537.88 ± 32.38, and 545.29 ± 30.75 µm, respectively. Mean CCT differed significantly between the devices (p < 0.05) apart from between OCT and UP, and between CT and corrected SM. Mean paired differences between devices ranged between 0.68 and 20.41 µm. Repeatability with all devices was excellent (> 0.99). The range of limits of agreement was the least between OCT and UP. CONCLUSIONS: Different CCT measurement techniques produce quite different results, so CCT evaluation and follow-up should be performed using the same device or devices with close compatibility.

Normative Pentacam anterior and posterior corneal elevation measurements: effects of age, sex, axial length and white-to-white.

PURPOSE: To provide normal corneal elevation data for a large Caucasian population and to determine the impacts on these data of age, sex, axial length (AXL) and horizontal white-to-white (WW). SETTING: Centro Internacional de Oftalmología Avanzada, Madrid, Spain. DESIGN: Retrospective, cross-sectional, observational. METHODS: In this retrospective, cross-sectional, observational study, anterior and posterior corneal elevations were measured in 789 right eyes of subjects with no ocular disease at the thinnest corneal location in relation to a fixed 8-mm best-fit sphere using the Pentacam, and AXL and WW were measured with the IOLMaster. A multiple linear regression model was used to assess the effects of age, sex, AXL and WW on the elevation data. RESULTS: Mean subject age was 50.5 ± 15 years (range 17-93 years); 64% were women. Mean anterior and posterior corneal elevations were 1.99 ± 1.75 µm (- 7 to 10 µm) and 7.70 ± 5.7 µm (- 6 to 28 µm). Anterior corneal elevations were higher by 0.165 µm and 0.033 µm for every mm reduction in AXL and every year reduction in age, respectively. Sex and WW were not significant predictors of anterior elevations (R2 = 7.7%). Posterior corneal elevation increased by 0.186 µm/year of age, 0.707 µm/mm reduction in WW and 0.819 µm/mm reduction in AXL. This variable was also 0.866 µm greater in men (R2 = 34.4%). CONCLUSION: Anterior corneal elevations decrease with age and are higher for shorter AXL but are not influenced by sex or WW. Posterior corneal elevations increase with age, decreasing AXL, decreasing WW and are higher in men.

Agreement and Repeatability of Two Biometers to Measure Anterior Segment Components: Refractive Error Effect.

BACKGROUND To assess the repeatability and agreement between a new high-resolution optical coherence tomographer (OCT) and a Scheimpflug topographer. MATERIAL AND METHODS Sixty phakic and healthy participants were measured in this study, and one eye per participant was analyzed. Depending on their refractive error, each participant was allocated into a myopic, hyperopic, or emmetropic group. The Cirrus HD-OCT 5000 (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany), and the Sirius Scheimpflug topographer (Costruzione Strumenti Oftalmici, Florence, Italy) were used to take all measurements. RESULTS The repeatability of these instruments to measure the anterior chamber depth, angle-to-angle, thinnest pachymetry, and both nasal and temporal angles was smaller than 0.15 mm, 0.40 mm, 10 µm, and 10 degrees, respectively. However, the repeatability of the Scheimpflug instrument to measure the apex pachymetry was about 15 µm, and for the OCT, it was about 4 µm for all groups. On average, the Sirius Scheimpflug instrument measured shallower anterior chamber depth (about 0.10 mm), shorter angle-to-angle (about 0.5 mm), thinner corneas (approximately 10 µm), and narrower angles (around 5 degrees) for all refractive groups. CONCLUSIONS The repeatability of the Cirrus OCT and Sirius Scheimpflug instrument was good and independent of the refractive error. Nevertheless, to judge whether these instruments could be used interchangeable, clinical criteria are needed.

Intrasession Repeatability and Intersession Reproducibility Measurements Using VX120 Multidiagnostic Unit.

OBJECTIVE: The VX120 multidiagnostic unit is a multidiagnostic instrument that combines several functions: autorefraction, keratometry, corneal topography, aberrometry, pachymetry, and noncontact tonometry. The purpose of this study was to determine the intrasession repeatability and the intersession reproducibility of all parameters measured by the VX120 multidiagnostic unit in a sample of normal healthy eyes. METHODS: Three repeated measurements in the right eye of the volunteers were taken with VX120. Repeatability of the sphere, cylinder, axis, anterior corneal powers (K flat and K steep, 3-mm pupil), high- and low-order aberration root mean square (HOA-RMS and LOA-RMS, 3-mm pupil), eccentricity, white-to-white (WTW), anterior chamber depth (ACD), and central corneal thickness (CCT) (2-mm central) was analyzed. Within-subject SD (Sw), precision, repeatability, coefficient of variation (CV), and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were calculated. RESULTS: The CV was low for K flat and K steep, WTW, ACD, and CCT with a range from 0.34% to 1.16%. The CV was higher for sphere, cylinder, HOA-RMS, and LOA-RMS and eccentricity with a range among 6.92% to 54.24%. The ICC showed high values in all parameters except in HOA-RMS (0.720-0.776) and eccentricity (0.889) in first session with moderate agreement. Comparing the intrasession repeatability of first and second session, statistically significant differences (P<0.01) were found between both sessions just to the CV for all parameters (except cylinder values) measured with VX120. However, nonstatistically significant differences (P>0.13) were found for Sw, precision, and repeatability values. CONCLUSIONS: The VX120 multidiagnostic unit provides repeatable measurements in anterior corneal power (K flat and K steep), WTW, ACD, and CCT. However sphere, cylinder, HOA-RMS, LOA-RMS, and eccentricity showed worse repeatability. Intersession reproducibility showed good results with little differences between sessions in healthy subjects.

Comparison of central corneal thickness with four different optical devices.

BACKGROUND: To compare the consistency between the average scores of the contact central corneal thickness measurements from ultrasound pachymetry devices still gold standard, such as iPac® and Echoscan US-500, and noncontact measurements via Pentacam HR and Sirius topography. METHODS: This prospective study, subsequently admitted to the ophthalmology department, 76 healthy individuals were performed. The measurements were repeated three times for each eye, and average scores were statistically analyzed on the same day and almost at the same time. While measuring the eyes, Pentacam HR, Sirius topography, iPac®, and Echoscan US-500 were used, respectively. The inter-rater agreement of measurements from the devices was assessed with intraclass correlation coefficient, and 95% Confidence Interval and p values demonstrating statistically significance were also presented. In the graphical assessment of the agreement, the Bland-Altman graph was used. RESULTS: Among 76 study participants, 43 (56.6%) were composed of women, and age level was 38.6 ± 12.5 years, ranging between 18 and 69. It was observed that the highest agreement was between the measurements obtained from Echoscan US-500 and iPac® devices, but the agreement between the measurements of different devices was higher than 0.90. Bland-Altman graphics were also investigated; the results of four different devices were seen to be consistent with one another. CONCLUSIONS: Therefore, the devices we compared in the study can be used as alternatives to one another due to the higher consistency between CCT measurements provided with through UP devices of Echoscan US-500 and iPac®, and Pentacam HR and Sirius topography devices. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: 2016/112.

Intrasession repeatability of ocular anatomical measurements obtained with a multidiagnostic device in healthy eyes.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the intrasession repeatability of anterior chamber depth (ACD), central (CCT) and peripheral corneal thickness (PCT), white-to-white diameter (WTW), and irido-corneal angle (IA) measurements obtained with a multidiagnostic device in healthy eyes. METHODS: A total of 107 eyes of 107 patients ranging in age from 23 to 65 years were examined with the VX120 system (Visionix-Luneau Technologies). Three consecutive measurements were obtained with this device to assess the intrasession repeatability of ACD, CCT, PCT at different nasal and temporal locations, WTW, and nasal and temporal IA. Data analysis included the calculation of within-subject standard deviation (Sw), intrasubject precision (1.96xSw), coefficient of variation (CV) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: The Sw and CV for ACD was 0.03 mm and 1.16%, respectively, with an ICC of 0.992. The Sw values for central and peripheral pachymetric measurements were below 9 µm, with CV of less than 1.6% and ICC of 0.976 or higher. For IA measurements, Sw values of 0.84 or lower were found, with a CV between 1 and 2%, and an ICC of more than 0.970. The Sw for WTW was 0.24 mm and the CV was 1.95%. No statistically significant correlations were found between any anatomical parameter evaluated and their Sw and CV values associated (-0.220 ≤ r ≤ 0.204, p ≥ 0.125). CONCLUSIONS: The VX120 system is able to provide repeatable measurements of anatomical parameters in healthy eyes. Inter-observer repeatability should be evaluated in future studies.

Reproducibility and repeatability of central corneal thickness measurement in healthy eyes using four different optical devices.

AIM: The aim of the study is to compare the measurements of central corneal thickness (CCT) performed by two examiners with four different methods at different times inter- and intra-individually. METHODS: Thirty healthy people were included in the study. In these measurements, an optical low-coherence reflectometry (OLCR), an optic coherence tomography (OCT), a specular microscopy (SM), and a corneal topography (CT) were used. Two examiners performed the measurements in a consecutive manner. After 1-7 days of the first measurements, the second measurements were performed again consecutively. The mean of three measurements was taken in each session for all devices. RESULTS: In OCT measurements, there was a significant difference between two examiners in both sessions (p < 0.001), while no significant differences were found between two examiners in first and second sessions in SM, CT, and OLCR measurements. When each examiner's measurements were compared to two sessions, there were no significant differences (p > 0.05, for all) except the SM measurements of the first examiner (p = 0.041). When the first measurements of two examiners were compared, the smallest values were of OCT. At the first session of two examiners, there was a significant difference between OCT and CT measurements, and between OCT and OLCR (p < 0.001, p = 0.002 for the first examiner and p < 0.001 for the second examiner, respectively). CONCLUSION: Our study showed that CCT measurements made by CT and OLCR methods were almost same and highly correlated for both the examiners' measurements. CCTs measured by OCT were on average 30 µm thinner than CT and OLCR.

Central Corneal Thickness Reproducibility among Ten Different Instruments.

PURPOSE: To assess agreement between one ultrasonic (US) and nine optical instruments for the measurement of central corneal thickness (CCT), and to evaluate intra- and inter-operator reproducibility. METHODS: In this observational cross-sectional study, two masked operators measured CCT thickness twice in 28 healthy eyes. We used seven spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) devices, one time-domain OCT, one Scheimpflug camera, and one US-based instrument. Inter- and intra-operator reproducibility was evaluated by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), coefficient of variation (CV), and Bland-Altman test analysis. Instrument-to-instrument reproducibility was determined by ANOVA for repeated measurements. We also tested how the devices disagreed regarding systemic bias and random error using a structural equation model. RESULTS: Mean CCT of all instruments ranged from 536 ± 42 µm to 577 ± 40 µm. An instrument-to-instrument correlation test showed high values among the 10 investigated devices (correlation coefficient range 0.852-0.995; p values <0.0001 in all cases). The highest correlation coefficient values were registered between 3D OCT-2000 Topcon-Spectral OCT/SLO Opko (0.995) and Cirrus HD-OCT Zeiss-RS-3000 Nidek (0.995), whereas the lowest were seen between SS-1000 CASIA and Spectral OCT/SLO Opko (0.852). ICC and CV showed excellent inter- and intra-operator reproducibility for all optic-based devices, except for the US-based device. Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated low mean biases between operators. CONCLUSIONS: Despite highlighting good intra- and inter-operator reproducibility, we found that a scale bias between instruments might interfere with thorough CCT monitoring. We suggest that optimal monitoring is achieved with the same operator and the same device.

Comparison of pachymetry measurements between the Alcon Wavelight EX500 and Sonogage Corneo-Gage plus platforms.

PURPOSE: To compare the agreement of intraoperative central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements of the Wavelight EX500 (Alcon Laboratories, Fort Worth, TX) that uses optical low coherence reflectometry to the Corneo-Gage Plus ultrasound pachymetry device (Sonogage, Cleveland, OH). METHODS: In this retrospective study, 50 eyes of 26 patients undergoing LASIK were evaluated. Following LASIK flap creation, each eye was measured by both optical low coherence reflectometry and ultrasound pachymetry immediately prior to flap lifting and then again after flap lifting. RESULTS: The mean CCT value before lifting the flap was 556.9 and 557.78 µm as measured by ultrasound pachymetry and optical low coherence reflectometry, respectively. After lifting the flap, the mean ultrasound pachymetry value was 440.96 µm and the mean optical low coherence reflectometry value was 441.7 µm. A two-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test demonstrated that the ultrasound pachymetry and the optical low coherence reflectometry distribution of measurements were the same. A Shapiro-Wilk test of normality could not be rejected. Bland-Altman plots showed strong agreement. The correlation between the two tests was 0.98 before flap lifting and 0.97 after flap lifting, both with a 95% confidence interval. CONCLUSIONS: The pachymetry measurements by the optical low coherence reflectometry correlated with those of the ultrasound pachymetry device. The Wavelight EX500 optical low coherence reflectometry may be used in place of the ultrasound pachymetry device for measuring CCT.

Accutome PachPen handheld ultrasonic pachymeter: intraobserver repeatability and interobserver reproducibility by personnel of different training grades.

To assess the intra-observer repeatability and inter-observer reproducibility of central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements of PachPen (Accutome, Inc., Pennsylvania, USA), a hand-held, portable ultrasonic pachymeter when used by an ophthalmic nurse compared to an ophthalmologist. Ophthalmology Clinic, University of Malaya Medical Center In this prospective study, CCT was measured in 184 eyes of 92 healthy subjects, first by a corneal surgeon experienced in ultrasound pachymetry (Observer 1) followed by an ophthalmic nurse new to the procedure (Observer 2). Nine measurements were obtained from each eye by each observer, independently. Measurements were compared between the observers. Coefficients of repeatability and reproducibility were calculated. The Bland-Altman plot was used to assess agreement between observers. Mean age of the study population was 54.3 ± 15.2 years old and consisted of 43.5% male. Mean CCT as measured by Observers 1 and 2 were 528.3 ± 32.9 and 530.7 ± 33.3 µm, respectively. Observer 1 showed higher repeatability of measurements compared to that of Observer 2 (coefficient of repeatability 3.46 vs. 5.55%). The measurements by both observers showed high correlation (0.96) and good agreement (mean difference -2.4 µm; 95% limits of agreement -21.4, 16.7 µm). Coefficient of reproducibility of measurements between observers was 5.08%. Accutome PachPen hand-held ultrasound pachymeters gives excellent intra-observer repeatability and inter-observer reproducibility by personnel of different training grades.

Investigation of the human anterior segment in normal Chinese subjects using a dual Scheimpflug analyzer.

PURPOSE: To investigate anterior segment parameters in normal Chinese subjects and study factors influencing these parameters, such as age, gender, and laterality. DESIGN: A prospective observational case series. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 291 normal subjects (582 eyes) were included. METHODS: The anterior segment data were determined with a dual Scheimpflug analyzer. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The corneal thinnest-point thickness (CTPT), corneal thinnest-point distribution (CTPD), central corneal thickness (CCT), corneal thickness (CT) in the central 10 mm diameter, pupil diameter (PD), pupil center distribution (PCD), anterior chamber depth (ACD), and anterior chamber volume (ACV, 8-mm diameter) were measured. RESULTS: The mean distance between the thinnest point and the corneal vertex was 0.70 ± 0.32 mm in the right eyes and 0.42 ± 0.25 mm in the left eyes; the thinnest point was located in the inferior temporal region in 71.1% of the right eyes and 55% of the left eyes. The CCT values were thicker than the CTPT values, and they were positively correlated (right eyes r = 0.994, P<0.001; left eyes r = 0.997, P<0.001). The distance between the pupillary center and the corneal vertex was approximately 0.39 ± 0.27 mm in the right eyes and 0.37 ± 0.24 mm in the left eyes. Furthermore, the percentage of pupillary centers located in the superior regions was 72.2% in the right eyes and 73.5% in the left eyes. Age was negatively correlated with the peripheral CT (7-10 mm diameter), PD, ACD, and ACV of both eyes and the mid-peripheral CT (4-7 mm diameter) of the right eye. Laterality correlated with CTPT (P<0.001) and PD (P<0.001), whereas gender correlated with ACD (P<0.001) and ACV (P = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of the thinnest corneal points were located in the inferior temporal quadrant, and the pupillary center was located in the superior region of the cornea; both differed substantially from the corneal vertex. The CT increased gradually from the center to the periphery. Age, gender, and laterality correlated with some indexes.

Corneal thickness in keratoconus: comparing optical, ultrasound, and optical coherence tomography pachymetry.

PURPOSE: To compare the central and peripheral pachymetry measurements determined using Orbscan IIz (Bausch & Lomb, Rochester, NY), Visante optical coherence tomography (OCT; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA), and RTVue OCT (Oculus Technologies, Wynwood, WA) with ultrasound pachymetry in eyes with established keratoconus and to evaluate the agreement between them. DESIGN: Evaluation of diagnostic technologies. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred six eyes of 67 consecutive patients with a clinical diagnosis of keratoconus ranging in age from 12 to 40 years. METHODS: Central corneal thickness (CCT) was determined by all the 4 techniques. Peripheral corneal thicknesses were determined using Orbscan IIz, Visante OCT, and RTVue at 8 points (superior, inferior, temporal, nasal, superior-temporal, inferior-temporal, superior-nasal, and inferior-nasal) all in the 5.0- to 7.0-mm arcuate zone. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Central and peripheral keratoconus thickness. RESULTS: Ultrasound pachymetry determined significantly higher CCT values than Orbscan IIz (P<0.001), Visante (P<0.001), and RTVue (P = 0.037), with a mean ± standard deviation difference of 14±3 µm, 13±2 µm, and 5±3 µm, respectively. The mean CCT difference was minimal (1±3 µm; P = 0.69) between the Orbscan IIz and Visante. A strong correlation was found (r>0.80) between all the CCT measurement techniques. Orbscan IIz significantly overestimated the peripheral thickness compared with the rest, and the mean differences ranged between 21 and 60 µm. Mean peripheral thickness differences between RTVue and Visante OCT always remained less than 20 µm. Weak correlations and larger limits of agreement were found between the techniques in thinner and peripheral zones. CONCLUSIONS: Orbscan IIz, Visante, RTVue, and ultrasound pachymetry show high correlation, although Orbscan IIz and Visante significantly underestimated CCT measurements compared with ultrasound pachymetry in keratoconus. Orbscan IIz significantly overestimated peripheral corneal thickness compared with RTVue and Visante.

Comparison of artemis 2 ultrasound and Visante optical coherence tomography corneal thickness profiles.

PURPOSE: To compare corneal thickness profiles of cross-sections of cornea determined by arc-scanned immersion ultrasound and optical coherence tomography (OCT). METHODS: Corneas of 28 eyes from 14 participants were scanned in triplicate using the Artemis 2 high-frequency arc-scanned ultrasound system (ArcScan Inc) and the Visante OCT system (Carl Zeiss Meditec). Corneal thickness and reproducibility were compared within 3.5 mm of central cornea in the horizontal plane. RESULTS: Although highly correlated, Visante central and peripheral corneal thickness values were systematically thinner than Artemis 2 values. Within the central 0.5 mm, the difference was approximately 8 µm, but the difference increased with distance from the center. Reproducibility for each instrument was comparable, measuring <4 µm centrally and increasing peripherally. CONCLUSIONS: Visante OCT measurements of corneal thickness are thinner than Artemis 2 ultrasound values centrally with an increasing difference with peripheral position. Measurement reproducibility was comparable for the two techniques.

Repeatability and comparability of corneal thickness measurements obtained from Dual Scheimpflug Analyzer and from ultrasonic pachymetry.

BACKGROUND: To assess the repeatability and comparability of central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements obtained from the Galilei Dual Scheimpflug Analyzer (Galilei-DSA) and from ultrasonic pachymetry (USP) in normal eyes and in eyes following laser refractive surgery. METHODS: In this prospective observational study, 77 eyes of 39 patients with normal corneas and 39 eyes of 20 patients with prior laser refractive surgery were enrolled. All 116 eyes had three repeated measurements of central CCT with the Galilei-DSA first and then with USP by the same examiner. Reliability of both devices was assessed statistically, and CCT measurements by each were compared. RESULTS: The mean CCT measurement of normal eyes was 549.2 ± 30.5 µm and 548.5 ± 33.1 µm by the Galilei-DSA and USP respectively; the difference between the two modalities was -0.7  ± 7.1 µm (P = 0.365). In post-refractive surgery eyes, the mean CCT measured by the Galilei-DSA and USP was 500.4 ± 44.8 and 494.3 ± 50.3 respectively; the difference between the two devices was -6.2 ± 9.9 µm (P < 0.001). For the three repeated measurements, the mean standard deviation was 2 µm with the Galilei-DSA and 1.8 µm with USP in normal eyes, and 2.4 µm with the Galilei-DSA and 1.9 µm with USP in post-refractive surgery eyes. CONCLUSION: The Galilei-DSA has high repeatability and excellent to moderate agreement with ultrasonic pachymetry when measuring CCT in normal and post-refractive surgery eyes.

Improving interobserver variation in corneal sublayer pachymetry using ConfoScan4 with z ring.

OBJECTIVES: To observe and improve the interobserver variation of corneal sublayer pachymetry using ConfoScan4 (CS4) z ring. METHODS: Right corneas of 34 normal subjects were scanned using CS4 (z ring) (Nidek Technologies, Padova, Italy). Corneal sublayer pachymetry was performed by two masked observers based on the written frame selection criteria from literature. The full stromal thickness (FST), epithelial and Bowman layer thickness (Epi+BT), endothelial thickness (EndoT), and total corneal thickness (CT) were obtained. Upon completion of the measurements (measurement 1), the frame selection criteria were reviewed between the observers by going through some corneal frames together. Eight subjects were excluded and corneal sublayer pachymetry was re-evaluated by the two observers using the revised criteria (measurement 2). RESULTS: Corneal thickness showed significant interobserver difference in measurement 1 (n=34), but no significant difference in measurement 2 (n=26). Endothelial thickness remained significant difference between observers throughout the study. Interobserver difference significantly reduced using the revised criteria in CT (1.93 ± 3.23 µm to 0.28 ± 1.75 µm) and EndoT (4.01 ± 4.82 µm to 0.86 ± 1.81µm). There was no significant difference between observers in Epi+BT and FST for the two measurements. Interobserver variation and the 95% confidence limits between observers for CT and corneal sublayers were reduced at least by half in measurement 2. CONCLUSIONS: The interobserver variation in corneal sublayer pachymetry could be improved by having the observers going through some corneal frames together rather than just following the written criteria. The use of CS4 (z ring) to measure CT, FST, and Epi+BT is suitable for monitoring corneal changes clinically.

Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements with Four Different New Devices and Ultrasound Pachymetry.

Objectives: To assess the central corneal thickness (CCT) with 5 different devices, evaluate the repeatability of the devices, and determine the possible relationship between thickness values and sex. Materials and Methods: The study included 308 eyes of 154 patients (76 women, 78 men) between the ages of 18-30 who presented to the Ophthalmology Clinic of Mugla Sitki Koçman University Training and Research Hospital. Autorefractor (Topcon, Japan), ultrasound pachymetry (UP) (Ceniscan, USA), high-resolution Pentacam (Oculus, USA), anterior segment-optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) (Optovue, USA), and Spectralis AS-OCT (Heidelberg, Germany) measurements were assessed. Results: The mean age of the study participants was 23.2±0.2 years and the mean CCT was 540±14.1 µm, with no statistically significant difference in CCT between sexes (p>0.05). Mean CCT values were 557.0±26.7 µm with the autorefractor, 543.6±32.9 µm with UP, 533.8±30.2 µm with the Oculus Pentacam, 519.8±30.1 µm with Optovue AS-OCT, and 547.5±31.6 µm with Heidelberg AS-OCT. Pairwise comparisons between devices showed that the Optovue AS-OCT gave significantly lower CCT measurements than the autorefractor and Heidelberg AS-OCT device (p=0.027 and p=0.033, respectively). The coefficient of repeatability for autorefractor, UP, high-resolution Pentacam, Optovue AS-OCT, and Heidelberg AS-OCT CCT measurements were 1.51%, 2.46%, 3.72%, 2.57%, and 3.34%, respectively. Conclusion: Measurements made with five different devices showed that CCT was comparable and clinically usable. However, it was determined that the Optovue AS-OCT showed lower CCT values compare to other devices. When compared in terms of repeatability, it was found to be lower in the Pentacam than other devices.

The Interday Repeatability of Parameters for the Assessment of Progressive Disease in Subjects With Less Advanced Keratoconus.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the interday repeatability in the measurement of parameters used for the detection of progression of keratoconus by prediction limits (PL) for single measurements, and the repeatability coefficient (RC) for the mean of replicate measurements. DESIGN: Prospective reliability analysis for cases and control eyes. METHODS: Twenty-five eyes in 25 subjects with KC and 25 eyes in 25 healthy controls were included. Four consecutive measurements were made, 3 days apart, with a Pentacam HR tomographic instrument (denoted the Pentacam) and a Nidek ARK 560-A auto-keratometer (denoted the keratometer). Main outcome measures were the intra- and interday RC of parameters used in the detection of progression of keratoconus. RESULTS: The most repeatable parameter obtained with the Pentacam was the curvature power of the central flat meridian (K1, 0.44 D [RC], -0.55 to 0.60 diopter [D] [PL]), followed by the central steep meridian (K2, 0.72 D [RC], -0.90 to 0.94 D [PL]). The interday repeatability of K1 and K2 was similar when using the keratometer (K1, 0.32 D [RC], -0.66 to 0.57 D [PL], K2, 0.93 D [RC], -1.36 to 1.08 D [PL]). The interday repeatability of the curvature power of the steepest point (Kmax, 0.84 D [RC], -0.90 to 1.11 D [PL]) would benefit from being stratified: RC = 0.44 D and PL = -0.49 to 0.67 D for Kmax < 49.0 D, and RC = 1.08 D and PL = -1.19 to 1.42 D for Kmax ≥ 49.0 D. CONCLUSIONS: The interday repeatability of measurements, single or replicate, in subjects with keratoconus should be considered when diagnosing progressive disease. K1 exhibited the best intraday repeatability. Kmax benefits from being stratified according to disease severity.

The architecture of corneal stromal striae on optical coherence tomography and histology in an animal model and in humans.

The purpose of this study was to use a portable optical coherence tomography (OCT) for characterization of corneal stromal striae (CSS) in an ovine animal model and human corneas with histological correlation, in order to evaluate their architectural pattern by image analysis. Forty-six eyes from female adult sheep (older than 2 years), and 12 human corneas, were included in our study. The eyes were examined in situ by a portable OCT, without enucleation. All OCT scans were performed immediately after death, and then the eyes were delivered to a qualified histology laboratory. In the ovine animal model, CSS were detected with OCT in 89.1% (41/46) of individual scans and in 93.4% (43/46) of histological slices. In human corneas, CSS were found in 58.3% (7/12) of cases. In both corneal types, CSS appeared as "V"- or "X"-shaped structures, with very similar angle values of 70.8° ± 4° on OCT images and 71° ± 4° on histological slices (p ≤ 0.01). Data analysis demonstrated an excellent degree of reproducibility and inter-rater reliability of measurements (p < 0.001). The present study demonstrated that by using a portable OCT device, CSS can be visualized in ovine and human corneas. This finding suggests their generalized presence in various mammals. The frequent observation, close to 60%, of such collagen texture in the corneal stroma, similar to a 'truss bridge' design, permits to presume that it plays an important structural role, aimed to distribute tensile and compressive forces in various directions, conferring resilience properties to the cornea.

Corneal thickness evaluation in healthy eyes: Comparison between two different Scheimpflug devices.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the correlation between corneal thickness (CT) measurements obtained with two Scheimpflug devices, Pentacam HR and Precisio, and to elaborate, if necessary, a regression formula which could make these results comparable. DESIGN: Retrospective, Comparative, Observational study. SETTING: Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, "Scuola Medica Salernitana" University of Salerno, Italy. METHODS: One hundred twenty four healthy eyes of 124 volunteers (65 males; range: 20-32 years; mean age of 24.8 ± 1.7) were included in this study. CT was measured using Pentacam HR and Precisio in three different points: the pupil center (PC), the corneal apex (CA) and the thinnest point (TP). RESULTS: CT obtained with both devices at the PC, at the CA and at the TP showed a good correlation (r = 0.97, r = 0.97, r = 0.97, respectively), but Pentacam HR measurements were significantly thicker than those provided by Precisio (p < 0.01). The differences between Pentacam HR and Precisio were 21.9 ± 8.8 µm at the PC, 21.9 ± 8.9 µm at the CA, 19.1 ± 9.0 µm at the TP. The calculated regression formulas were: y = 0.9558x + 2.3196 for the PC, y = 0.9519x + 4.5626 for the CA, y = 0.9364x + 15.436 for the TP, where x is the CT measured with Pentacam HR and y is the Precisio measurement. CONCLUSIONS: The findings provided by this study highlight that Precisio measures thinner corneas compared to Pentacam HR. The identified regression formulas could be utilized to make interchangeable the results obtained with these two devices.