Toxicity of phenolic compounds to entomopathogenic nematodes: A case study with Heterorhabditis bacteriophora exposed to lentisk (Pistacia lentiscus) extracts and their chemical components.

Insects show adaptive plasticity by ingesting plant secondary compounds, such as phenolic compounds, that are noxious to parasites. This work examined whether exposure to phenolic compounds affects the development of insect parasitic nematodes. As a model system for parasitic life cycle, we used Heterorhabditis bacteriophora (Rhabditida; Heterorhabditiade) grown with Photorhabdita luminescens supplemented with different concentrations of plant phenolic extracts (0, 600, 1200, 2400 ppm): a crude ethanol extract of lentisk (Pistacia lentiscus) or lentisk extract fractionated along a scale of hydrophobicity with hexane, chloroform and ethyl acetate; and flavonoids (myricetin, catechin), flavanol-glycoside (rutin) or phenolic acids (chlorogenic and gallic acids). Resilience of the nematode to phenolic compounds was stage-dependent, with younger growth stages exhibiting less resilience than older growth stages (i.e., eggs < young juveniles < young hermaphrodites < infective juveniles < mature hermaphrodites). At high concentrations, all of the phenolic compounds studied were lethal to eggs and young juveniles. The nematodes were able to survive in the presence of medium and low concentrations of all studied compounds, but very few of those treatments allowed for reproduction beyond the infective juvenile stage and, at low concentrations, the crude 70% ethanol extract, chloroform and hexane extracts, and myricetin were associated with some impaired reproduction. The ethyl-acetate fraction and gallic acid were extremely lethal to the young stages and allowed almost no development beyond the infective juvenile stage. We conclude that exposure of infective juveniles to phenolics before they infect insects and post-infection exposure of other nematode developmental stages may affect the initiation of the infection, suggesting that the chemistry of dietary phenolics may limit H. bacteriophora's infection of insects.

In vitro and in vivo evaluation of the genotoxic and antigenotoxic potential of the major Chios mastic water constituents.

Chios mastic products are well-known for their broad applications in food industry, cosmetics, and healthcare since the antiquity. Given our recent finding that Chios mastic water (CMW) exerts antigenotoxic action, in the present study, we evaluated the genotoxic as well as the antigenotoxic potential of the four major compounds of CMW, namely, verbenone, α-terpineol, linalool, and trans-pinocarveol. The cytokinesis block micronucleus (CBMN) assay in cultured human lymphocytes and the Drosophila Somatic Mutation And Recombination Test (SMART), also known as the wing spot test, were employed. None of the four major CMW's constituents or their mixtures showed genotoxic or recombinogenic activity in either of the assays used. Co-treatment of each of the constituents with MMC revealed that all except trans-pinocarveol exerted antigenotoxic potential. Moreover, co-administration of verbenone with linalool or α-terpineol presented statistically significant reduction of MMC-induced mutagenicity. In conclusion, the major CMW constituents were shown to be free of genotoxic effects, while some exerted antigenotoxic activity either alone or in combinations, suggesting synergistic phenomena. Our results provide evidence on the key antigenotoxicity effectors of the plant extract CMW.