Prospective Evaluation of Results of Reoperation in Zollinger-Ellison Syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the role of reoperation in patients with persistent or recurrent Zollinger-Ellison Syndrome (ZES). BACKGROUND: Approximately, 0% to 60% of ZES patients are disease-free (DF) after an initial operation, but the tumor may recur. METHODS: A prospective database was queried. RESULTS: A total of 223 patients had an initial operation for possible cure of ZES and then were subsequently evaluated serially with cross sectional imaging-computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, more recently octreoscan-and functional studies for ZES activity. The mean age at first surgery was 49 years and with an 11-year mean follow-up 52 patients (23%) underwent reoperation when ZES recurred with imageable disease. Results in this group are analyzed in the current report. Reoperation occurred on a mean of 6 years after the initial surgery with a mean number of reoperations of 1 (range 1-5). After reoperation 18/52 patients were initially DF (35%); and after a mean follow-up of 8 years, 13/52 remained DF (25%). During follow-up, 9/52 reoperated patients (17%) died, of whom 7 patients died a disease-related death (13%). The overall survival from first surgery was 84% at 20 years and 68% at 30 years. Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 status did not affect survival, but DF interval and liver metastases did. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that a significant proportion of patients with ZES will develop resectable persistent or recurrent disease after an initial operation. These patients generally have prolonged survival after reoperation and 25% can be cured with repeat surgery, suggesting all ZES patients postresection should have systematic imaging, and if tumor recurs, advise repeat operation.

Catching the Zebra: Clinical Pearls and Pitfalls for the Successful Diagnosis of Zollinger-Ellison Syndrome.

Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES) results from an ectopic gastrin-secreting tumor leading to peptic ulcer disease, reflux, and chronic diarrhea. While early recognition portends an excellent prognosis with >80% survival at 15 years, symptoms are often nonspecific making the diagnosis difficult to establish. Diagnosis involves a series of tests, including fasting gastrin, gastric pH, chromogranin A, and secretin stimulation. Performing these tests in the correct sequence and at the proper time is essential to avoid inaccurate results. Tumor localization is equally nuanced. Although providers have classically used 111indium-radiolabeled octreotide with somatostatin receptor scintigraphy to evaluate tumor size and metastases, recent studies have shown superior results with newer imaging modalities. In particular, 68gallium (68Ga)-labeled somatostatin radiotracers (i.e., 68Ga-DOTATOC, 68Ga-DOTANOC and 68Ga-DOTATATE) used with positron emission tomography/computed tomography can provide excellent results. Endoscopic ultrasound is another useful modality, particularly in patients with ZES in the setting of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. This review aims to provide clinicians with an overview of ZES with a focus on both clinical presentation and the proper utilization of the various biochemical and imaging tests available.

Management of Primary Lymph Nodal Gastrinoma With Liver Metastases Resulting in Zollinger-Ellison Syndrome.

Primary lymph node gastrinoma has been defined as gastrin-producing tumor present in lymph nodes and predominantly found in well-defined anatomical region known as gastrinoma triangle. They are usually localized preoperatively with imaging, and their surgical resection results in long-term relief. The authors report a case of unresectable primary lymph nodal gastrinoma with liver metastases in a 14-year-old adolescent boy with proven histopathology detected on Ga-DOTANOC whole-body PET/CT scan followed by preoperative multiple Lu-DOTATATE cycles for cytoreduction. Subsequent surgical resection of residual mass resulted in complete response with a follow-up of around 4 years in this unusual case of Zollinger-Ellison syndrome.

Carcinogenic hypergastrinemia: signet-ring cell carcinoma in a patient with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 with Zollinger-Ellison's syndrome.

CONTEXT: Gastric neuroendocrine tumors are rare neoplasms that originate from gastric enterochromaffin-like (ECL) cells in the oxyntic mucosa. Gastrin and its derivates have been reported to regulate epithelial cell proliferation, migration, and differentiation. Mutations in the epithelial cadherin (E-cadherin) gene have been shown to be associated with the occurrence of diffuse gastric carcinomas in affected families. OBJECTIVE: In this study we investigated the histopathological and molecular findings in the gastrointestinal wall of a patient with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 with malignant duodenal gastrinoma and multiple gastric ECL cell tumors, who additionally developed a signet-ring cell carcinoma of the stomach. DESIGN AND PATIENT: Biopsies from the gastrointestinal tract of a patient with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 were immunostained for vesicular monoamine transporter-2 and E-cadherin. Nonamidated gastrin products were measured in the serum of the patient using antibodies that react with progastrin, Gly-extended, and amidated gastrins. Genetic analyses were performed to exclude germ-line mutations within the E-cadherin gene. RESULTS: Immunohistochemical studies of gastric ECL cell tumors showed a largely diminished E-cadherin expression in comparison to gastric surface mucosa cells and a loss of E-cadherin expression in the cells of the signet-ring carcinoma. Detailed biochemical measurements revealed progastrin concentrations that were approximately 20%, and Gly-gastrin concentrations that were approximately 10% the amidated gastrin concentrations in plasma. Molecular analyses revealed no E-cadherin germ-line mutation. CONCLUSION: Our immunohistochemical studies might suggest that the gastrinoma-associated excessive progastrin tissue concentrations led to diminished expression of E-cadherin within the gastric mucosa and promoted tumor development of a signet-ring cell carcinoma.

Métodos de diagnóstico de laboratorio e imagenológicos en el síndrome de Zollinger-Ellison / Laboratory and imaging diagnostic methods in the Zollinger-Ellison syndrome

Introducción: el síndrome de Zollinger-Ellison es un tumor neuroendocrino que produce hipersecreción de ácido gástrico y úlcera péptica. Por lo que se realizó la revisión con el objetivo de describir los principales métodos diagnósticos de laboratorio e imagenológicos en el síndrome de Zollinger-Ellison. Desarrollo: se realizó una revisión bibliográfica con los descriptores en español e inglés síndrome de Zollinger-Ellison, tumor neuroendocrino y gastrinoma, sacados de los descriptores en ciencias de la salud (DeCS/MeSH), en las bases de datos Google Académico, SciELO y National Library of Medicine. Como resultados se obtuvo que los métodos de laboratorio son la gastrina sérica basal en ayunas, la cual no es confiable debido a su alteración en diferentes enfermedades, el pH gástrico, excluye hipergastrinemias secundarias, y la secreción gástrica ácida basal, que diferencia las formas de hipergastrinemia. Estos análisis de laboratorio son complementarios entre sí, y para su realización se debe suspender la toma de los inhibidores de la bomba de protones. Otros estudios son la prueba de estimulación por secretina, que confirma la hipergastrinemia, y la prueba de estimulación por calcio, que diagnostica tumores > 1 mm que expresan receptores de calcio. Los métodos imagenológicos son fundamentales para la localización del tumor. La primera técnica de imagen que se debe realizar debido a su alta sensibilidad y especificidad es la gammagrafía con 111 In-octreótido, esta localiza tumores no detectados con otras exploraciones y permite realizar el diagnóstico diferencial con lesiones hipervascularizadas. Conclusiones: el síndrome de Zollinger-Ellison requiere para un diagnóstico certero la utilización de métodos de laboratorio y de imagen novedosos(AU)

Introduction: Zollinger-Ellison syndrome is a neuroendocrine tumor that produces hypersecretion of gastric acid and peptic ulcer. Therefore, the review was carried out with the objective of describing the main laboratory and imaging diagnostic methods in Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. Development: a bibliographic review was carried out with the descriptors in Spanish and English Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, neuroendocrine tumor and gastrinoma, taken from the descriptors in health sciences (DeCS/MeSH), in Google databases. Academic, SciELO and National Library of Medicine. As results, it was obtained that the laboratory methods are fasting basal serum gastrin, which is not reliable due to its alteration in different diseases, gastric pH, excludes secondary hypergastrinemias, and basal acid gastric secretion, which differentiates the forms of hypergastrinemia. These laboratory tests are complementary to each other, and to perform them, the intake of proton pump inhibitors must be suspended. Other tests include the secretin stimulation test, which confirms hypergastrinemia, and the calcium stimulation test, which diagnoses tumors >1 mm that express calcium receptors. Imaging methods are essential for tumor localization. The first imaging technique to be performed due to its high sensitivity and specificity is 111In-octreotide scintigraphy, which locates tumors not detected with other examinations and allows differential diagnosis with hypervascularized lesions. Conclusions: Zollinger-Ellison syndrome requires the use of novel laboratory and imaging methods for an accurate diagnosis(EU)

[Diagnosis and treatment of Zollinger-Ellison syndrome].

In 1970-2005 yrs. 65 patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome were observed and operated on in the clinic. The decisive meaning in diagnosis owes radioimmunological determination of gastrin level in the blood and its changes while conduction of tests with calcium and secretin. Surgical tactics was determined by localization, number and character of gastrinomas. During the first period of work gastrectomy with complete excision of gastrinproducing tumor constituted the operation of choice. Implementation of intraoperative method of ultrasonography have permitted to excise the benign gastrinoma when her localization was favourable with preservation of stomach. Minimal life span after gastrectomy, performed for nonresectable malignant gastrinoma, have constituted 9 years.

Intraoperative Use of a Portable Large Field of View Gamma Camera and Handheld Gamma Detection Probe for Radioguided Localization and Prediction of Complete Surgical Resection of Gastrinoma: Proof of Concept.

BACKGROUND: Surgical management of Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES) relies on localization and resection of all tumor foci. We describe the benefit of combined intraoperative use of a portable large field of view gamma camera (LFOVGC) and a handheld gamma detection probe (HGDP) for indium-111 ((111)In)-pentetreotide radioguided localization and confirmation of gastrinoma resection in ZES. STUDY DESIGN: Five patients (6 cases) with (111)In-pentetreotide-avid ZES were evaluated. Patients were injected with (111)In-pentetreotide for diagnostic imaging the day before surgery. Intraoperatively, an HGDP and LFOVGC were used to localize (111)In-pentetreotide-avid lesions, guide resection, assess specimens for (111)In-pentetreotide activity, and to verify lack of abnormal post-resection surgical field activity. RESULTS: Large field of view gamma camera imaging and HGDP-assisted detection were helpful for localization and guided resection of tumor and removal of (111)In-pentetreotide-avid tumor foci in all cases. In 3 of 5 patients (3 of 6 cases), these techniques led to detection and resection of additional tumor foci beyond those detected by standard surgical techniques. The (111)In-pentetreotide-positive or-negative specimens correlated with neuroendocrine tumors or benign pathology, respectively. In one patient with mild residual focal activity on post-resection portable LFOVGC imaging, thought to be artifact, had recurrence of disease in the same area 5 months after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Real-time LFOVGC imaging and HGDP use for surgical management of gastrinoma improve success of localizing and resecting all neuroendocrine tumor-positive tumor foci, providing instantaneous navigational feedback. This approach holds potential for improving long-term patient outcomes in patients with ZES.

Prospective study of the natural history of gastrinoma in patients with MEN1: definition of an aggressive and a nonaggressive form.

The natural history of pancreatic endocrine tumors (PETs) in patients with MEN1 is largely unknown. Recent studies in patients with sporadic PETs show that in a subset, tumor growth is aggressive. To determine whether PETs in patients with MEN1 show similar growth behavior, we report results from a long-term prospective study of 57 patients with MEN1 and Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. All patients had tumor imaging studies yearly, and the mean follow-up was 8 yr. Only patients with PETs 2.5 cm or larger underwent abdominal surgical exploration. Hepatic metastases occurred in 23%, and in 14% tumors demonstrated aggressive growth. Three tumor-related deaths occurred, each due to liver metastases, and in each, aggressive tumor growth was present. Overall, 4% of the study group, 23% with liver metastases and 38% with aggressive disease, died. Aggressive growth was associated with higher gastrins and larger tumors. Patients with liver metastases with aggressive growth differed from those with liver metastases without aggressive growth in age at MEN1 onset or diagnosis and primary tumor size. Survival was decreased (P = 0.0012) in patients with aggressive tumor growth compared with those with liver metastases without aggressive growth or with no liver metastases without aggressive growth. Based on these results a number of factors were identified that may be clinically useful in determining in which patients aggressive tumor growth may occur. These results demonstrate in a significant subset of patients with MEN1 and Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, aggressive tumor growth occurs and can lead to decreased survival. The identification of prognostic factors that identify this group will be important clinically in allowing more aggressive treatment options to be instituted earlier.

False-positive somatostatin receptor scintigraphy due to an accessory spleen.

A patient with previous left caudal pancreatectomy and splenectomy presented with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. Abdominal CT and endoscopic ultrasonography revealed a mass in the splenic area. Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy showed a nodular increase of the uptake corresponding to the lesion detected with conventional imaging. A second laparotomy was performed and the mass was resected. Histological analysis showed that the nodular lesion was an accessory spleen. Since physiologic uptake of 111In-pentetreotide is seen in the spleen, an accessory spleen mimicking a tumor, specially after previous splenectomy, may result in false-positive somatostatin receptor scintigraphy.

Detection of neuroendocrine tumors: 99mTc-P829 scintigraphy compared with 111In-pentetreotide scintigraphy.

UNLABELLED: The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of a new somatostatin analog, 99mTc-P829, compared with that of 111In-pentetreotide. METHODS: Forty-three patients (32 men, 11 women; age range, 24-78 y; mean age, 56 y) with biologically or histologically proven neuroendocrine tumors were prospectively included: 11 patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, 16 patients with carcinoid tumors, and 16 patients with other types of functioning (n = 6) or nonfunctioning (n = 10) endocrine tumors. 111In-Pentetreotide planar images (head, chest, abdomen, and pelvis) were obtained 4 and 24 h after injection of 10 microg somatostatin analog labeled with 148 +/- 17 MBq 111In, and SPECT was performed 24 h after injection. Similar (99m)Tc-P829 planar images were obtained at 1, 4-6, and 24 h after injection of 50 microg peptide labeled with 991.6 +/- 187.59 MBq 99mTc. Abdominal SPECT was performed 4-6 h after injection. RESULTS: 111In-Pentetreotide detected 203 tumoral sites in 39 (91%) of 43 patients, whereas 99mTc-P829 detected 77 sites in 28 (65%) of 43 patients (P < 0.005). In the liver, 129 sites (in 24 patients) were detected by 111In-pentetreotide scintigraphy and 34 sites (in 10 patients) were detected by 99mTc-P829 scintigraphy. CONCLUSION: In patients with endocrine tumors, the detection rate of 99mTc-P829 scintigraphy was lower than that of 111In-pentetreotide scintigraphy, which appeared to be more sensitive, especially for liver metastases.

Specificity of somatostatin receptor scintigraphy: a prospective study and effects of false-positive localizations on management in patients with gastrinomas.

UNLABELLED: Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS) is being increasingly used both for localization and, in some cases, diagnosis of various diseases. There are no prospective studies of its specificity or occurrence of false-positive results and their effects on management. This study was designed to address both of these issues. METHODS: Over a 40-mo period, 146 consecutive patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES) undergoing 480 SRS examinations were studied prospectively. Patients were admitted at least yearly and underwent SRS as well as conventional imaging studies (ultrasonography, CT, MRI) and angiography, if necessary. All admissions were assigned to one of five different clinical categories in which imaging studies had different purposes. SRS localizations were classified as true-positive or false-positive based on preset criteria. A false-positive result was determined to change clinical management based on five preset criteria. RESULTS: Of all SRS examinations, 12% resulted in a false-positive localization for a neuroendocrine tumor or its metastases, resulting in a sensitivity of 71%, specificity of 86% and positive and negative predictive values of 85% and 52%, respectively. Extra-abdominal false-positive localizations (2/3) were more common than intra-abdominal (1/3). Thyroid disease, breast disease and granulomatosis lung disease were the most frequent causes of extra-abdominal false-positive localizations. Accessory spleens, localization to previous operative sites, renal parapelvic cysts and various procedural aspects were the most frequent causes of intra-abdominal false-positive localizations. Of all SRS studies, 2.7% resulted in a false-positive result that altered management. CONCLUSION: False-positive SRS localization occurs in 1 of 10 patients with ZES. By having a thorough understanding of diseases or circumstances that result in false-positive localization and comparing the SRS result with the clinical context, the percentage of patients in whom false-positive localization results in altered management can be reduced to below 3% and the correct diagnosis made in almost every case.

Ability of somatostatin receptor scintigraphy to identify patients with gastric carcinoids: a prospective study.

UNLABELLED: Gastric carcinoids are of increasing clinical concern because they may develop in hypergastrinemic states, especially with the increased chronic use of potent acid suppressants that can cause hypergastrinemia. However, gastric carcinoids are difficult to diagnose. Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS) has a high sensitivity and specificity for localizing carcinoids in other locations. The purpose of this study was to determine whether SRS could localize gastric carcinoids. METHODS: Two groups of patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES) with hypergastrinemia, each having a different increased risk of developing gastric carcinoids, were studied. One hundred sixty-two consecutive patients with ZES were studied prospectively, with 39 having multiple endocrine neoplasia, type 1 (MEN-1) (high increased risk), and 123 not having MEN-1 (low increased risk). Patients were admitted to the hospital initially and then yearly, undergoing SRS with SPECT, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, and Jumbo Cup biopsies of any gastric abnormalities, as well as random biopsies of the gastric body. Tumor localization studies were also performed. Both the results of the routine SRS interpretation and the results of a masked review, with particular attention to the stomach of high risk MEN-1 patients, were correlated with the gastric biopsy results. RESULTS: Gastric SRS localization was positive in 19 (12%) of 162 patients. Sixteen patients had a gastric carcinoid, and 12 of these patients had SRS localization. The sensitivity of SRS in localizing a gastric carcinoid was 75%, with a specificity of 95%. Positive and negative predictive values were 63% and 97%, respectively. CONCLUSION: SRS is a noninvasive method that can identify patients with gastric carcinoids with a reasonable sensitivity and a high specificity. SRS should prove useful in the treatment of patients with hypergastrinemic states that have an increased incidence of gastric carcinoids. In patients with MEN-1, one must realize that localization in the upper abdomen on SRS may be caused by a gastric carcinoid and not a pancreatic endocrine tumor.

Clinical impact of somatostatin receptor scintigraphy in the management of patients with neuroendocrine gastroenteropancreatic tumors.

UNLABELLED: Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS) has been used for the detection of gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) tumors. This study evaluates the clinical impact of SRS in GEP tumor detection and its therapeutic implications on patient management. METHODS: We prospectively studied 160 patients with biologically and/or histologically proven GEP tumors. Before SRS, patients were classified into three groups: gastrointestinal (Group 1; n = 90) patients without known metastases; (Group 2; n = 59) patients with metastases limited to the liver; (Group 3; n = 11) patients with known extrahepatic metastases. The scintigraphic data were compared to the radiological findings. RESULTS: In Group 1, without known metastases, conventional imaging detected 53 primary sites in 44 patients: SRS was positive in 68% of these sites and discovered 4 additional primary tumors in 3 patients and 16 metastases in 14 patients. Conventional imaging was negative in 46 patients: SRS discovered 47 new sites in 36 patients. In Group 2, SRS confirmed liver metastases in 95% of patients and discovered 45 new sites in 36 of these patients. In Group 3, SRS disclosed 11 new sites in 7 patients. These results modified patient classification in 38 cases (24%). Surgical therapeutic strategy was changed in 40 patients (25%). CONCLUSION: Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy improves tumor detection, has major clinical significance and should be performed systematically for staging and therapeutic decision making in patients with GEP tumors.

Detection of bone metastases in patients with endocrine gastroenteropancreatic tumors: bone scintigraphy compared with somatostatin receptor scintigraphy.

UNLABELLED: Scintigraphy with somatostatin analogs is a sensitive method for the staging and therapeutic management of patients with endocrine gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) tumors. The aim of this study was to compare prospectively somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS) using 111n-pentetreotide with bone scintigraphy using 99mTc-hydroxymethylene diphosphonate for the detection of bone metastases. METHODS: One-hundred-forty-five patients with proven endocrine GEP tumors were investigated. Patients were classified according to the presence of bone metastases as indicated by CT, MRI or histologic data. Group I included 19 patients with confirmed bone metastases, and group II included 126 patients without bone metastases. RESULTS: In group I, SRS was positive in all 19 patients with bone metastases, and bone scintigraphy was positive in 17 patients. Bone metastases were found to occur predominantly in patients with liver metastases. In group 11, 5 patients had recent bone surgery for fracture or arthritis. SRS showed bone uptake in 4 of these patients, and bone scanning showed abnormal uptake in 5. In 7 of the remaining 121 group II patients, SRS was negative and bone scanning showed abnormal bone uptake suggesting bone metastases. The detection of bone metastases was of major prognostic value, because 42% of group 1 patients died during a 2-y follow-up. CONCLUSION: In patients with GEP tumors, the accuracy of SRS appears to be similar to that of bone scintigraphy for the detection of bone metastases.

A reappraisal of clinical, roentgenographic, and endoscopic features of the Zollinger-Ellison syndrome.

Recent experience with 40 patients with the Zollinger-Ellison syndrome at all Mayo Clinic suggests that traditional clinical criteria for diagnosis are often absent or invalid. Patients are younger have a shorter duration of symptoms, and often present without prior gastric surgery. Clinical, roentgenographic, and endoscopic findings indistinguishable from those of idiopathic duodenal ulcer or erosive duodenitis were the only presenting features in half of the patients in this series. Therefore, increased diagnostic use of serum levels of gastrin and gastric analysis appears desirable, particularly in patients selected for elective surgical treatment of duodenal ulcer disease, because specific therapeutic approaches may be required.

Prospective study of the need for long-term antisecretory therapy in patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome following successful curative gastrinoma resection.

A long-term cure is now possible in more than 30% of selected patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome who undergo gastrinoma resection. The need, however, for continued gastric acid antisecretory therapy in these patients remains controversial. The current study was designed to determine whether post-operative antisecretory therapy is needed in patients who have undergone successful gastrinoma resection and, if so, to attempt to define criteria with which to identify patients who require therapy. Twenty-eight consecutive patients who had previously undergone curative gastrinoma resection were prospectively studied. When antisecretory therapy was discontinued, 43% (12/28) of these patients developed gastro-oesophageal reflux, diarrhoea, acid-peptic symptoms or endoscopic evidence of acid-peptic disease within 2 weeks and were deemed to have failed a trial of antisecretory drug withdrawal. The remaining 57% (16/28) of patients who successfully discontinued antisecretory therapy were followed for a mean time of 31 months after withdrawal of therapy. Analysis of acid output studies pre-operatively, as well as at the time of drug withdrawal, demonstrated that patients who were unable to discontinue antisecretory therapy exhibited higher pre-operative maximal acid output values and higher basal acid output values at the time of attempted drug withdrawal than patients who were able to discontinue therapy. Despite these findings, there was significant overlap in acid output values between groups so that it was not possible to define specific acid output criteria for successful drug withdrawal. Pre-operative clinical characteristics, such as the presence or absence of gastro-esophageal reflux or acid-peptic disease, or post-operative laboratory values, such as the fasting serum gastrin level, did not correlate with the ability to discontinue antisecretory therapy. We conclude that following successful curative gastrinoma resection, 40% of patients still require antisecretory therapy and that both symptom evaluation as well as upper endoscopy should be used to guide attempted drug withdrawal. Although patients who are not able to discontinue therapy have significantly higher acid output measurements than those who are able to discontinue therapy, neither acid output criteria nor any other laboratory or clinical characteristics are able to predict the need for continued antisecretory therapy in these patients.