Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 10.917
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Temas
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BMC Cancer ; 24(1): 647, 2024 May 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38802773

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Patient satisfaction is an important indicator of the quality of healthcare. Pain is one of the most common symptoms among cancer patients that needs optimal treatment; rather, it compromises the quality of life of patients. OBJECTIVE: To assess the levels and associated factors of satisfaction with cancer pain treatment among adult patients at cancer centers found in Northern Ethiopia in 2023. METHODS: After obtaining ethical approval, a multi-center cross-sectional study was conducted at four cancer care centers in northern Ethiopia. The data were collected using an interviewer-administered structured questionnaire that included the Lubeck Medication Satisfaction Questionnaire (LMSQ). The severity of pain was assessed by a numerical rating scale from 0 to 10 with a pain score of 0 = no pain, 1-3 = mild pain, 4-6 = moderate pain, and 7-10 = severe pain Binary logistic regression analysis was employed, and the strength of association was described in an adjusted odds ratio with a 95% confidence interval. RESULT: A total of 397 cancer patients participated in this study, with a response rate of 98.3%. We found that 70.3% of patients were satisfied with their cancer pain treatment. Being married (AOR = 5.6, CI = 2.6-12, P < 0.001) and being single (never married) (AOR = 3.5, CI = 1.3-9.7, P = 0.017) as compared to divorced, receiving adequate pain management (AOR = 2.4, CI = 1.1-5.3, P = 0.03) as compared to those who didn't receive it, and having lower pain severity (AOR = 2.6, CI = 1.5-4.8, P < 0.001) as compared to those who had higher level of pain severity were found to be associated with satisfaction with cancer pain treatment. CONCLUSION: The majority of cancer patients were satisfied with cancer pain treatment. Being married, being single (never married), lower pain severity, and receiving adequate pain management were found to be associated with satisfaction with cancer pain treatment. It would be better to enhance the use of multimodal analgesia in combination with strong opioids to ensure adequate pain management and lower pain severity scores.


Assuntos
Dor do Câncer , Satisfação do Paciente , Humanos , Estudos Transversais , Masculino , Feminino , Etiópia/epidemiologia , Dor do Câncer/tratamento farmacológico , Dor do Câncer/psicologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Satisfação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Manejo da Dor/métodos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Qualidade de Vida , Idoso , Neoplasias/complicações , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias/psicologia , Adulto Jovem , Medição da Dor , Institutos de Câncer/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente
2.
J Surg Res ; 300: 199-204, 2024 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38823270

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Veteran satisfaction of care within the Veterans Affairs is typically very high. Yet recommendation ratings of VA medical center (VA) hospitals as measured by Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems are generally lower than non-VA hospitals.Therefore, it was our objective to assess Veteran satisfaction and recommendation scores and then examine whether satisfaction correlates to recommendation. METHODS: We identified all acute care VAs as our primary analytic cohort. As a comparator group, we also included all acute care academic hospitals (non-VAs), as designated by the Centers for Medicare Services. Using data from Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems and Strategic Analytics for Improvement and Learning (SAIL) Value Model, we collated patient satisfaction scores, as well as markers of surgical safety from Hospital Compare. We then analyzed the correlation within VAs and non-VAs, primarily focusing the relationship between the "would you recommend Hospital Rating" and subdomains of the "Overall Hospital Rating," as well as a composite score of patient safety. RESULTS: A total of 133 VAs and 1116 non-VAs were identified. Among VAs, the "Would you Recommend" hospital rating was significantly and positively correlated with markers of patient satisfaction including care transitions (Pearson's r = 0.59, P = 0.03), Nursing communication (Pearson's R 0.79, P = 0.001), and percent of primary care provider wait times less than 30 min (Pearson's r = 0.25, P = 0.01). VA-recommended scores were negatively correlated with factors such as time to emergency department discharge, and the "leaving the emergency department before being evaluated." When looking at non-VAs, correlation directions were similar, albeit with stronger associations at almost every metric. While recommended scores correlated strongly to overall hospital ratings for both groups, VAs had no significant correlation between "would you recommend" and patient safety. However, there was a slight negative correlation between patient safety and "recommend" among non-VAs. CONCLUSIONS: Although satisfiers and dissatisfiers of care appear similar between VAs and non-VAs, "would you recommend" is a far weaker marker of patient perceptions of safety and quality. These seemingly empathetic markers such as "would you recommend" should be used with caution as they may not address the fundamental question being asked.


Assuntos
Hospitais de Veteranos , Satisfação do Paciente , Satisfação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Hospitais de Veteranos/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais de Veteranos/normas , Hospitais de Veteranos/organização & administração , Estados Unidos , Segurança do Paciente/normas , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/organização & administração , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/estatística & dados numéricos , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos/organização & administração
3.
Colorectal Dis ; 26(6): 1214-1222, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38803003

RESUMO

AIM: Attention is increasingly being turned to functional outcomes as being central to colorectal cancer (CRC) survivorship. The current literature may underestimate the impact of evacuatory dysfunction on patient satisfaction with bowel function after anterior resection (AR) for CRC. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of post-AR symptoms of storage and evacuatory dysfunction on patient satisfaction and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). METHOD: A cross-sectional study was performed at an Australian hospital of patients post-AR for CRC (2012-2021). The postoperative bowel function scores used were: low anterior resection syndrome (LARS), St Mark's incontinence, Cleveland Clinic constipation and Altomare obstructive defaecation syndrome scores. Eight 'storage' and 'evacuatory' dysfunction symptoms were derived. A seven-point Likert scale measured patient satisfaction. The SF36v2® measured HRQoL. Linear regression assessed the association between symptoms, patient satisfaction and HRQoL. RESULTS: Overall, 248 patients participated (mean age 70.8 years, 57.3% male), comprising 103 with rectal cancer and 145 with sigmoid cancer. Of the symptoms that had a negative impact on patient satisfaction, six reflected evacuatory dysfunction, namely excessive straining (p < 0.001), one or more unsuccessful bowel movement attempt(s)/24 h (p < 0.001), anal/vaginal digitation (p = 0.005), regular enema use (p = 0.004), toilet revisiting (p = 0.004) and >10 min toileting (p = 0.004), and four reflected storage dysfunction, namely leaking flatus (p = 0.002), faecal urgency (p = 0.005), use of antidiarrhoeal medication (p = 0.001) and incontinence-related lifestyle alterations (p < 0.001). A total of 130 patients (53.5%) had 'no LARS', 56 (23.1%) had 'minor LARS' and 57 (23.4%) had 'major LARS'. Fifty-seven (44.5%) patients classified as having 'no LARS' had evacuatory dysfunction. CONCLUSION: Postoperative storage and evacuatory dysfunction symptoms have an adverse impact on patient satisfaction and HRQoL post-AR. The importance of comprehensively documenting symptoms of evacuatory dysfunction is highlighted. Further research is required to develop a patient satisfaction-weighted LARS-specific HRQoL instrument.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais , Constipação Intestinal , Incontinência Fecal , Satisfação do Paciente , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Qualidade de Vida , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Estudos Transversais , Idoso , Síndrome , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Satisfação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Constipação Intestinal/etiologia , Constipação Intestinal/fisiopatologia , Neoplasias Colorretais/cirurgia , Neoplasias Colorretais/complicações , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Incontinência Fecal/etiologia , Incontinência Fecal/psicologia , Incontinência Fecal/fisiopatologia , Fenótipo , Protectomia/efeitos adversos , Austrália , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Neoplasias Retais/cirurgia , Defecação/fisiologia , Síndrome de Ressecção Anterior Baixa
4.
World J Surg ; 48(5): 1266-1270, 2024 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38441293

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: One third of South African children live in households with no employed adult. Telemedicine may save patients and the strained public health sector significant resources. We aimed to determine the safety and benefits of telephonic post-operative follow-up of patients who presented for day case surgery at CHBAH from 1 January-31 March 2023. METHODS: A prospective descriptive study on patients undergoing day case surgery was performed. Healthy patients greater than 6 years old whose caregivers spoke English and had access to a smartphone were included. Data on the total number of telephonic follow-ups, operative complications, need for in person review, satisfaction with telephonic follow-up, and savings in transport costs and time by avoiding in person follow-up were collected. RESULTS: A total of 38 telephonic follow-ups were performed. Six (15.8%) patients presented for in person review due to the detection of major complications (2, 5.3%), minor complications (2, 5.3%), and parental concern (2, 5.3%) during telephonic follow-up. All caregivers reported being satisfied with telephonic follow-up. Total savings in transport costs were R4452 (US $ 248.45). The majority of patients (29, 76.3%) had at least one unemployed parent. Seven caregivers (18.4%) avoided taking paid leave and 2 (5.3%) unpaid leave from work due to follow-up being performed telephonically. CONCLUSIONS: Innovation is necessary in order to expand access to safe, affordable, and timely care. In this selected group, telephonic follow-up was a safe, acceptable, and cost-effective intervention. The expansion of such a program has the potential for significant savings for patients and the healthcare system.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios , Telemedicina , Humanos , Projetos Piloto , Estudos Prospectivos , Criança , Feminino , Masculino , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios/economia , África do Sul , Telemedicina/economia , Telefone , Seguimentos , Adolescente , Satisfação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/economia , Assistência ao Convalescente/economia , Assistência ao Convalescente/métodos
5.
BMC Womens Health ; 24(1): 287, 2024 May 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38745273

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The client's satisfaction after abortion care is the key to sustaining abortion care and increasing the health status of those who had complications from abortion. Nevertheless, research conducted in Ethiopia stated that the major problem is the need for post-abortion care for females. One of the ways to improve the qualities involved in post abortion care and decrease the mortality and morbidity rates caused by unsafe abortion is by ensuring client satisfaction with abortion care. Strategy making and policy formulation based on systematic review take on the highest priority in developing countries. However, although some independent studies had been carried out in Ethiopia, their findings might not have been representative and conclusive. The main purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis article is to establish the proportion of abortion clients who are satisfied with their abortion care and the factors that contribute to such satisfaction among clients in Ethiopia. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Only published articles were considered in this review. The main databases included Medline/Pubmed, Web of Science, Embase, Cinael, Med Nar, Google Scholar, Scopus, the Ethiopian University Repository Online, and the Cochrane Library. The review includes cross-sectional studies that meet the requirements and were written in English. A random effects model was used to calculate the pooled prevalence of client satisfaction with abortion care. The study heterogeneity was tested using Cochrane Q-Static and I2. Publication bias was checked using the Eggers test and funnel plot. PRISMA was used to select and direct the selection of articles for this review. Statistical analyses were conducted using STATA version 14. RESULT: A review of ten studies comprised 2740 women. In summary, the pooled prevalence of client's satisfaction with abortion care in Ethiopia was 56.13% [95% CI (42.35; 69.91), I2 = 99.1%, p < 0.001]. In terms of subgroup analysis, Gambella had the highest prevalence of client satisfaction with abortion care at 87.40% [95% CI: 82.38 and 91.82]. However, Amhara had the lowest: 25.00% [95% CI: 21.59, 28.41]. The review also found that client satisfaction with abortion care had a statistical correlation with the type of procedure [OR: 0.25, CI [0.07, 0.42], I2: 76.9%, p-value: 0.041] and the participant's education level [OR: 0.29, CI [0.09, 0.48], I2: 80.4%, p-value: 0.006]. CONCLUSION: This review found that 56% of Ethiopian women were satisfied with their abortion care. Since this requires a boost to the quality of abortion care in the health facility, understanding women's expectations and perceptions, training of health care providers, and strict monitoring of the quality of abortion care services by stakeholders like the Ethiopian government, non-governmental organizations, and high-level management of the health facility would help to improve the level of women's satisfaction with abortion care. Those factors, namely, the type of method to use for the patient and women's educational level, should be changed through improving awareness among the patients about what procedure to conduct and the health education provided to women about abortion care.


Assuntos
Aborto Induzido , Satisfação do Paciente , Humanos , Etiópia , Feminino , Aborto Induzido/estatística & dados numéricos , Satisfação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Gravidez
6.
BMC Womens Health ; 24(1): 272, 2024 May 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38724930

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Even though childhood vaccination is a common and cost-effective public health intervention in preventing and reducing childhood disease and death, significant numbers of children do not complete vaccination within the first year of life. Studies indicated that user satisfaction influences service utilization and used as a key indicator of quality care. However, evidence on the level of mothers' satisfaction with immunization service are limited in urban and accessible places and not well investigated among remote and pastoral communities. As such, this study aimed to address this gap and investigated mothers' satisfaction towards child vaccination in a pastoralist and agrarian community of the South Omo zone in Southern region of Ethiopia. METHODS: An institution-based cross-sectional study was conducted among 1221 randomly selected mothers with children eligible for childhood vaccination using a structured, pretested, and interviewer-administered questionnaire. Maternal positive evaluations of the overall vaccination service were measured using 5-point Likert scale questions. Data were entered into Epi data version 3.5.1 and analyzed using IBM SPSS statistical package version 25. Exploratory factor analysis was used for Likert scale questions to extract factor scores which facilitate treatment of variables as continuous for further analysis. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analysis was employed to identify factors associated with the outcome variable. A P-value < 0.05 and adjusted odds ratio with 95% CI respectively were used to declare statistical significance and degree of association. RESULT: A total of 849 (69.53%) study participants were satisfied with the vaccination care provided for their children. Factors associated with mother's satisfaction with child vaccination care include maternal age less than 30 years (AOR = 2.12; 95% CI = 1.61-2.79), infants age between 8 and 12 months (AOR = 1.83; 95% CI = 1.28, 2.62), not having history of adverse events following immunization (AOR = 1.57; 95% CI = 1.01-2.45), having 1 child under the age of 5 years (AOR = 1.34; 95% CI = 1.02-1.76), waiting 30 min or less to get the service (AOR = 1.39; 95% CI = 1.05-1.85), traveling 30 min or less to the vaccination center (AOR = 1.46; 95% CI = 1.08-1.98), having poor knowledge about the importance of vaccination (AOR = 1.51; 95% CI = 1.06-2.16), and having moderate knowledge about the importance of vaccination (AOR = 1.52; 95% CI = 1.06-2.18). CONCLUSION: Interestingly, mothers' satisfaction with their children's vaccination service was relatively higher in a predominantly pastoral community compared with most of previous studies conducted in Ethiopia. Maternal and child age, number of children under the age of 5 years, history of adverse events following immunization, distance to the vaccination center, waiting time to get service and maternal knowledge were factors significantly associated with mothers' satisfaction. Proactive measures with focus on increasing access to vaccination service, improving waiting time and raising awareness among mothers were recommended.


Assuntos
Mães , Vacinação , Humanos , Etiópia , Feminino , Mães/psicologia , Mães/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Vacinação/psicologia , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Lactente , Adulto Jovem , Inquéritos e Questionários , Satisfação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Pré-Escolar , Satisfação Pessoal , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/psicologia
7.
J Infect Chemother ; 30(8): 746-751, 2024 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38365064

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Current antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimens are highly effective; therefore, to differentiate between various regimens, considering patient-reported outcomes is essential. This study aimed to assess patient satisfaction with their current ART regimens and investigate factors associated with the Human Immunodeficiency Virus Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire: Status (HIVTSQs) score. METHODS: This cross-sectional, multicenter study was conducted in Japan between April and December 2021. Patient-reported satisfaction with ART was assessed using the Japanese version of the HIVTSQs. Binary logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with a low total HIVTSQs score. RESULTS: A total of 679 patients completed the questionnaire. The median total HIVTSQs score was 58 (interquartile range: 52.5-64). In the multivariable logistic regression analyses, a total HIVTSQs score in the lowest quartile (indicating low satisfaction) was independently associated with twice- or thrice-daily regimens compared with single-tablet, once-daily regimens (adjusted odds ratio: 2.80, 95% confidence interval: 1.29-6.06, p = 0.009) and depression (adjusted odds ratio: 2.30, 95% confidence interval: 1.32-4.01, p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Satisfaction with the current ART regimen was high. Depression and twice- or thrice-daily ART regimen were associated with low HIVTSQ. Switching to a single-tablet, once-daily regimen may improve patient satisfaction in patients receiving twice- or thrice-daily regimens.


Assuntos
Infecções por HIV , Satisfação do Paciente , Humanos , Estudos Transversais , Masculino , Feminino , Japão , Infecções por HIV/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por HIV/psicologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Satisfação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Inquéritos e Questionários , Fármacos Anti-HIV/uso terapêutico , Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente , Idoso
8.
BMC Public Health ; 24(1): 1143, 2024 Apr 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38658881

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Mental disorders are currently a global public health concern, particularly after the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Mental health services gradually transitioned to teleservices, employing various methods like texting and videoconferencing. This meta-analysis aimed mainly to quantify the acceptability of tele-mental health services among both beneficiaries and providers. Secondary objectives included quantifying the usability of and satisfaction with these services. METHODS: We conducted a systematic search of the following databases PubMed Central, SAGE, Google Scholar, Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed Medline, and EBSCO according to Preferred Reporting Items of the Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines until December 2022. RESULTS: Out of 3366 search results, 39 studies fully met the inclusion criteria. The pooled acceptability of tele-mental health services among beneficiaries was [71.0% with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 63.0 - 78.5%, I2 = 98%]. Using meta-regression, four key factors contributed to this heterogeneity (R2 = 99.75%), namely, year of publication, type of mental disorder, participant category, and the quality of included studies. While acceptability among providers was [66.0% (95%CI, 52.0 - 78.0%), I2 = 95%]. The pooled usability of tele-mental health services among participants was [66.0% (95%CI, 50.0 - 80.0%), I2 = 83%]. Subgroup analysis revealed statistically significant results (p = 0.003), indicating that usability was higher among beneficiaries compared to providers. CONCLUSIONS: The study highlighted a high acceptability of tele-mental health services. These findings suggest a promising outlook for the integration and adoption of tele-mental health services and emphasize the importance of considering user perspectives and addressing provider-specific challenges to enhance overall service delivery and effectiveness.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Serviços de Saúde Mental , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Telemedicina , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Transtornos Mentais/terapia , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/psicologia , Satisfação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos
9.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 24(1): 619, 2024 May 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38734592

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Assessing women's perceptions of the care they receive is crucial for evaluating the quality of maternity care. Women's perceptions are influenced by the care received during pregnancy, labour and birth, and the postpartum period, each of which with unique conditions, expectations, and requirements. In England, three Experience of Maternity Care (EMC) scales - Pregnancy, Labour and Birth, and Postnatal - have been developed to assess women's experiences from pregnancy through the postpartum period. This study aimed to validate these scales within the Iranian context. METHODS: A methodological cross-sectional study was conducted from December 2022 to August 2023 at selected health centers in Tabriz, Iran. A panel of 16 experts assessed the qualitative and quantitative content validity of the scales and 10 women assessed the face validity. A total of 540 eligible women, 1-6 months postpartum, participated in the study, with data from 216 women being used for exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and 324 women for confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and other analyses. The Childbirth Experience Questionnaire-2 was employed to assess the convergent validity of the Labour and Birth Scale, whereas women's age was used to assess the divergent validity of the scales. Test-retest reliability and internal consistency were also examined. RESULTS: All items obtained an impact score above 1.5, with Content Validity Ratio and Content Validity Index exceeding 0.8. EFA demonstrated an excellent fit with the data (all Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin measures > 0.80, and all Bartlett's p < 0.001). The Pregnancy Scale exhibited a five-factor structure, the Labour and Birth Scale a two-factor structure, and the Postnatal Scale a three-factor structure, explaining 66%, 57%, and 62% of the cumulative variance, respectively, for each scale. CFA indicated an acceptable fit with RMSEA ≤ 0.08, CFI ≥ 0.92, and NNFI ≥ 0.90. A significant correlation was observed between the Labour and Birth scale and the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire-2 (r = 0.82, P < 0.001). No significant correlation was found between the scales and women's age. All three scales demonstrated good internal consistency (all Cronbach's alpha values > 0.9) and test-retest reliability (all interclass correlation coefficient values > 0.8). CONCLUSIONS: The Persian versions of all three EMC scales exhibit robust psychometric properties for evaluating maternity care experiences among urban Iranian women. These scales can be utilized to assess the quality of current care, investigate the impact of different care models in various studies, and contribute to maternal health promotion programs and policies.


Assuntos
Serviços de Saúde Materna , Psicometria , Humanos , Feminino , Irã (Geográfico) , Estudos Transversais , Adulto , Gravidez , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Serviços de Saúde Materna/normas , Inquéritos e Questionários/normas , Satisfação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Análise Fatorial , Adulto Jovem
10.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 24(1): 733, 2024 Jun 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38877526

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Patients with fewer socioeconomic and health literacy resources are disadvantaged in their access and use of healthcare, which may give rise to worse experiences with care and thus inequalities in patient experiences. However, only a limited number of studies have examined how socioeconomic and health literacy factors shape inequalities in patients' experiences with cancer care. OBJECTIVE: To examine whether patients' experiences with cancer care differ according to their economic status and health literacy. METHODS: Secondary analysis of data on 2789 adult patients diagnosed with cancer from the Swiss Cancer Patient Experiences-2 (SCAPE-2) study, a cross-sectional survey conducted in eight hospitals across Switzerland from September 2021 to February 2022. Regression analysis was applied to examine the independent effect of patients' economic status and health literacy on various outcomes of experiences with cancer care, covering eight different dimensions of patient-centred care, controlling for confounding factors. RESULTS: Adjusted regression analysis showed that patients with lower economic status reported significantly worse experiences with cancer care in 12 out of 29 specific care experiences, especially in the dimensions of 'respect for patients' preferences' and 'physical comfort' where all items of experiences were associated with economic status. Additionally, lower health literacy was associated with worse patient experiences in 23 specific care experiences. All items in the dimensions of 'respect for patients' preferences', 'physical comfort' and 'emotional support' were associated with health literacy. DISCUSSION: This study revealed significant inequalities in experiences with cancer care shaped by the economic status and health literacy of patients across different dimensions of patient-centred care. It is essential to address the needs of more disadvantaged patients who face obstacles in their access and use of the healthcare system, not only to mitigate inequalities in cancer care but also to avoid inequalities in health outcomes.


Assuntos
Letramento em Saúde , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Neoplasias , Humanos , Letramento em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias/terapia , Neoplasias/psicologia , Feminino , Masculino , Estudos Transversais , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Suíça , Idoso , Adulto , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Satisfação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Assistência Centrada no Paciente , Inquéritos e Questionários , Status Econômico
11.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 24(1): 572, 2024 May 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38698426

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Patient-centredness has become a central quality indicator for oncology care. Elements include shared decision-making, patient navigation and integration of psychosocial care, which impact patient-reported and clinical outcomes. Despite efforts to promote patient-centred care in Germany in recent decades, implementation remains fragmented. Further, research on patient experiences with cancer care and its determinants is limited. Therefore, this study examines which patient- and facility-specific factors are associated with patient-centred quality care delivery. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 1,121 cancer patients in acute treatment, rehabilitation, and aftercare for different cancer entities across Germany. A participatory developed questionnaire was used. Outcome measures were the quality of physician-patient interaction and provision of psychosocial care during acute care. Predictors comprised patient-specific characteristics and treatment facility-specific factors. Multiple linear regression and multivariate binary logistic regression analyses were performed. In addition, a content analysis of open-ended comments on the patients' overall cancer care needs was applied. RESULTS: Multiple linear regression analysis showed recent diagnosis (ß=-0.12, p = < 0.001), being male (ß=-0.11, p = 0.003), and having a preference for passive decision-making (ß=-0.10, p = 0.001) to be significantly associated with higher interaction quality, but not age, education and health insurance type. An overall low impact of patient characteristics on interaction quality was revealed (adj. R2 = 0.03). Binary logistic regression analysis demonstrated the availability of central contact persons (OR = 3.10, p < 0.001) followed by recent diagnosis (p < 0.001), having breast cancer (p < 0.001) and being female (OR = 1.68, p < 0.05) to significantly predict offering psycho-oncological counselling to patients in acute care facilities. The availability of peer support visiting services (OR = 7.17, p < 0.001) and central contact persons (OR = 1.87, p < 0.001) in the care facility, breast cancer diagnosis (p < 0.001) and a higher level of education (p < 0.05) significantly increased the odds of patients receiving information about peer support in the treatment facility. Despite relatively satisfactory quality of physician-patient interactions in cancer care (M = 3.5 (± 1.1)), many patients expressed that better patient-centred communication and coordinated, comprehensive cancer care are needed. CONCLUSION: The findings reflect effective developments and improvements in cancer care and suggest that patients' social characteristics are less decisive for delivering patient-centred quality care than systemic factors surrounding the care facilities. They can serve to inform oncology care in Germany.


Assuntos
Neoplasias , Assistência Centrada no Paciente , Relações Médico-Paciente , Humanos , Estudos Transversais , Alemanha , Feminino , Masculino , Neoplasias/terapia , Neoplasias/psicologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto , Satisfação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde
12.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 24(1): 514, 2024 Apr 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38658951

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The measurement of patient satisfaction is a vital metric that enhances stakeholders to take proactive steps in improving the quality of healthcare services within medical care systems. This study assessed patient satisfaction receiving pharmaceutical services from primary health care centers in the Palestinian Ministry of Health (PMoH) governorate directorates in the West Bank. METHODS: A total of 938 patients, all aged 18 years or older, completed a self-administered questionnaire. The assessment of general satisfaction was based on selected questions. Analyses were conducted to explore demographic characteristics. Mean and standard deviation (S.D.) were reported. Likert method was used to average scale satisfaction. To examine statistically significant differences, Chi-square analysis and binary logistic analysis were employed. RESULTS: 56.8% of the survey respondents were women, 57.2% were 40 years or older, and 63.2% had graduated from high school. The general satisfaction score averaged 4.10 ± 0.77 indicating good satisfaction. Patients were satisfied with interpersonal relationships, with a mean score of 4.19 ± 0.70. However, satisfaction with therapy management was lower, with a mean score of 3.99 ± 0.77 indicating moderate satisfaction. A significant factor can affect patient's satisfaction such as the location of the pharmacy (OR = 1.720, P = 0.012), the waiting area (OR = 1.671, P = 0.002) and the cleanness of pharmacy (OR = 2.307, P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: This study underlines the main components of patient satisfaction who receive pharmaceutical services in PMoH. It is highly recommended that PMoH must address patient dissatisfaction points in a total quality management plan.


Assuntos
Satisfação do Paciente , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem , Oriente Médio , Satisfação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Assistência Farmacêutica/normas , Atenção Primária à Saúde/normas , Inquéritos e Questionários
13.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 24(1): 579, 2024 May 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38702670

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: In middle-income countries, poor physician-patient communication remains a recognized barrier to enhancing healthcare quality and patient satisfaction. This study investigates the influence of provider-patient communication skills on healthcare quality and patient satisfaction in the rural primary healthcare setting in China. METHODS: Data were collected from 504 interactions across 348 rural primary healthcare facilities spanning 21 counties in three provinces. Using the Standardized Patient method, this study measured physician-patient communication behaviors, healthcare quality, and patient satisfaction. Communication skills were assessed using the SEGUE questionnaire framework. Multivariate linear regression models and multivariate logistic regression models, accounting for fixed effects, were employed to evaluate the impact of physicians' communication skills on healthcare quality and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: The findings indicated generally low provider-patient communication skills, with an average total score of 12.2 ± 2.8 (out of 24). Multivariate regression models, which accounted for physicians' knowledge and other factors, demonstrated positive associations between physicians' communication skills and healthcare quality, as well as patient satisfaction (P < 0.05). Heterogeneity analysis revealed stronger correlations among primary physicians with lower levels of clinical knowledge or more frequent training. CONCLUSION: This study emphasizes the importance of prioritizing provider-patient communication skills to enhance healthcare quality and patient satisfaction in rural Chinese primary care settings. It recommends that the Chinese government prioritize the enhancement of provider-patient communication skills to improve healthcare quality and patient satisfaction.


Assuntos
Comunicação , Satisfação do Paciente , Relações Médico-Paciente , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Humanos , China , Satisfação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Atenção Primária à Saúde/normas , Feminino , Masculino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inquéritos e Questionários , Serviços de Saúde Rural/normas , População Rural , Competência Clínica
14.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 24(1): 807, 2024 Jul 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38997715

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Patient satisfaction is a critical measure of the quality of healthcare services provided by healthcare facilities. However, very few studies, particularly in Ethiopia, which includes the study area, have specifically examined these discrepancies among people who use outpatient care. In this study, satisfaction levels and associated factors were compared between insured and uninsured patients receiving outpatient services at public health institutions in Hadiya Zone, southern Ethiopia. METHODS: A facility-based comparative cross-sectional study design was employed on 630 patients using multistage and systematic random sampling. Data were collected using a pretested and structured interviewer-administered questionnaire. Results of the analysis were presented in text, tables, and graphs as appropriate. Multivariable logistic regression was used to predict associations between predictors and the outcome variable. Statistical significance was declared at p-value < 0.05. RESULTS: Overall, 344(55.48%) patients were satisfied with the service they received, of which 206(65.8%) out of 313 with a 95% CI [60.7-71.2%] were insured and 138(44.95%) out of 307 with a 95% CI [39.4-5.1%] were uninsured. Among insured patients, factors associated with higher satisfaction included having a family size less than five members [AOR = 3.3, 95% CI; 1.5, 7.4], perceived fair waiting time to be seen[AOR = 2.35, 95% CI; 1.02, 5.5], perceived short waiting time to be seen[AOR = 8.12, 95% CI; 1.6, 41.3], having all ordered laboratory tests available within the facility[AOR = 7.89, 95% CI; 3.5, 17.5], having some ordered laboratory tests within the facility[AOR = 2.97, 95% CI; 1.25, 7.01] having all prescribed medications available within the facility[AOR = 16.11, 95% CI; 6.25, 41.5], having some prescribed medications available within the facility[AOR = 13.11, 95% CI; 4.7, 36.4]. Among non-insured patients, factors associated with higher satisfaction included urban residency, a fair and short perceived time to be seen, having ordered laboratory tests within the facility, and having prescribed drugs within the facility. CONCLUSION: This study identified lower overall satisfaction, particularly among uninsured patients. Enrollment in the CBHI program significantly impacted satisfaction, with both groups reporting lower levels compared to enrollment periods. Access to essential services, wait times, and socio-demographic factors identified as associated factors with patient satisfaction regardless of insurance status.


Assuntos
Seguro Saúde , Pessoas sem Cobertura de Seguro de Saúde , Satisfação do Paciente , Humanos , Estudos Transversais , Etiópia , Feminino , Masculino , Satisfação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Pessoas sem Cobertura de Seguro de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Seguro Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inquéritos e Questionários , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Assistência Ambulatorial/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto Jovem , Adolescente , Cobertura do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos
15.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 24(1): 614, 2024 May 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38730420

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Patients who have had a negative experience with the health care delivery bypass primary healthcare facilities and instead seek care in hospitals. There is a dearth of evidence on the role of users' perceptions of the quality of care on outpatient visits to primary care facilities. This study aimed to examine the relationship between perceived quality of care and the number of outpatient visits to nearby health centers. METHODS: A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted in two rural districts of northeast Ethiopia among 1081 randomly selected rural households that had visited the outpatient units of a nearby health center at least once in the previous 12 months. Data were collected using an interviewer-administered questionnaire via an electronic data collection platform. A multivariable analysis was performed using zero-truncated negative binomial regression model to determine the association between variables. The degree of association was assessed using the incidence rate ratio, and statistical significance was determined at a 95% confidence interval. RESULTS: A typical household makes roughly four outpatient visits to a nearby health center, with an annual per capita visit of 0.99. The mean perceived quality of care was 6.28 on a scale of 0-10 (SD = 1.05). The multivariable analysis revealed that perceived quality of care is strongly associated with the number of outpatient visits (IRR = 1.257; 95% CI: 1.094 to 1.374). In particular, a significant association was found for the dimensions of provider communication (IRR = 1.052; 95% CI: 1.012, 1.095), information provision (IRR = 1.088; 95% CI: 1.058, 1.120), and access to care (IRR = 1.058, 95% CI: 1.026, 1.091). CONCLUSIONS: Service users' perceptions of the quality of care promote outpatient visits to primary healthcare facilities. Effective provider communication, information provision, and access to care quality dimensions are especially important in this regard. Concerted efforts are required to improve the quality of care that relies on service users' perceptions, with a special emphasis on improving health care providers' communication skills and removing facility-level access barriers.


Assuntos
Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , População Rural , Humanos , Estudos Transversais , Etiópia , Feminino , Masculino , Adulto , População Rural/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Assistência Ambulatorial/normas , Assistência Ambulatorial/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Atenção Primária à Saúde/normas , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Adulto Jovem , Satisfação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Pacientes Ambulatoriais/psicologia , Pacientes Ambulatoriais/estatística & dados numéricos
16.
Spinal Cord ; 62(7): 396-405, 2024 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38806626

RESUMO

STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. OBJECTIVES: Appropriate and timely lifelong access to healthcare following a spinal cord injury (SCI) is critical, yet unmet healthcare needs in this population are common. Poor experiences with healthcare providers can be a barrier to health-seeking behaviour, and we hypothesised that there would be an association between unmet healthcare needs and care experiences. This study aimed to: (1) describe healthcare provider utilisation in the past year, unmet care needs and satisfaction with healthcare services; (2) explore the association between experiences with healthcare providers and unmet healthcare needs; and (3) explore the association between healthcare provider utilisation and participant characteristics, including unmet healthcare needs. SETTING: Community. METHODS: Analysis of data for 1579 Australians aged ≥ 18, who were ≥ 1-year post-SCI and living in the community. Bayesian penalised regression was used to model six binary outcomes: unmet healthcare needs; the use of general practitioners (GPs), allied health practitioners, rehabilitation specialists; medical specialists; and hospitalisations in the past 12-months. RESULTS: Unmet needs were reported by 17% of participants, with service cost the common deterrent. There was evidence of an effect for provider experiences on unmet healthcare needs, but no evidence that unmet healthcare needs was associated with the use of GPs, allied health practitioners, and rehabilitation or medical specialists. CONCLUSIONS: Unmet healthcare needs were reported in the context of high healthcare use and large proportions of secondary conditions in a cohort with long-term SCI. Improved health access for people with SCI include better primary-secondary care collaboration is needed.


Assuntos
Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal , Humanos , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/terapia , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/epidemiologia , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Feminino , Austrália , Estudos Transversais , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoal de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto Jovem , Idoso , Adolescente , Satisfação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos
17.
J Med Internet Res ; 26: e52992, 2024 Jul 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38954461

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In the era of the internet, individuals have increasingly accustomed themselves to gathering necessary information and expressing their opinions on public web-based platforms. The health care sector is no exception, as these comments, to a certain extent, influence people's health care decisions. During the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, how the medical experience of Chinese patients and their evaluations of hospitals have changed remains to be studied. Therefore, we plan to collect patient medical visit data from the internet to reflect the current status of medical relationships under specific circumstances. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to explore the differences in patient comments across various stages (during, before, and after) of the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as among different types of hospitals (children's hospitals, maternity hospitals, and tumor hospitals). Additionally, by leveraging ChatGPT (OpenAI), the study categorizes the elements of negative hospital evaluations. An analysis is conducted on the acquired data, and potential solutions that could improve patient satisfaction are proposed. This study is intended to assist hospital managers in providing a better experience for patients who are seeking care amid an emergent public health crisis. METHODS: Selecting the top 50 comprehensive hospitals nationwide and the top specialized hospitals (children's hospitals, tumor hospitals, and maternity hospitals), we collected patient reviews from these hospitals on the Dianping website. Using ChatGPT, we classified the content of negative reviews. Additionally, we conducted statistical analysis using SPSS (IBM Corp) to examine the scoring and composition of negative evaluations. RESULTS: A total of 30,317 pieces of effective comment information were collected from January 1, 2018, to August 15, 2023, including 7696 pieces of negative comment information. Manual inspection results indicated that ChatGPT had an accuracy rate of 92.05%. The F1-score was 0.914. The analysis of this data revealed a significant correlation between the comments and ratings received by hospitals during the pandemic. Overall, there was a significant increase in average comment scores during the outbreak (P<.001). Furthermore, there were notable differences in the composition of negative comments among different types of hospitals (P<.001). Children's hospitals received sensitive feedback regarding waiting times and treatment effectiveness, while patients at maternity hospitals showed a greater concern for the attitude of health care providers. Patients at tumor hospitals expressed a desire for timely examinations and treatments, especially during the pandemic period. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic had some association with patient comment scores. There were variations in the scores and content of comments among different types of specialized hospitals. Using ChatGPT to analyze patient comment content represents an innovative approach for statistically assessing factors contributing to patient dissatisfaction. The findings of this study could provide valuable insights for hospital administrators to foster more harmonious physician-patient relationships and enhance hospital performance during public health emergencies.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Hospitais , Internet , Pandemias , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Humanos , China/epidemiologia , Satisfação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , SARS-CoV-2 , Pesquisa Empírica
18.
J Med Internet Res ; 26: e51931, 2024 Jul 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38976870

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Online appointment booking is a commonly used tool in several industries. There is limited evidence about the benefits and challenges of using online appointment booking in health care settings. Potential benefits include convenience and the ability to track appointments, although some groups of patients may find it harder to engage with online appointment booking. We sought to understand how patients in England used and experienced online appointment booking. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to describe and compare the characteristics of patients in relation to their use of online appointment booking in general practice and investigate patients' views regarding online appointment booking arrangements. METHODS: This was a mixed methods study set in English general practice comprising a retrospective analysis of the General Practice Patient Survey (GPPS) and semistructured interviews with patients. Data used in the retrospective analysis comprised responses to the 2018 and 2019 GPPS analyzed using mixed-effects logistic regression. Semistructured interviews with purposively sampled patients from 11 general practices in England explored experiences of and views on online appointment booking. Framework analysis was used to allow for comparison with the findings of the retrospective analysis. RESULTS: The retrospective analysis included 1,327,693 GPPS responders (2018-2019 combined). We conducted 43 interviews with patients with a variety of experiences and awareness of online appointment booking; of these 43 patients, 6 (14%) were from ethnic minority groups. In the retrospective analysis, more patients were aware that online appointment booking was available (581,224/1,288,341, 45.11%) than had experience using it (203,184/1,301,694, 15.61%). There were deprivation gradients for awareness and use and a substantial decline in both awareness and use in patients aged >75 years. For interview participants, age and life stage were factors influencing experiences and perceptions, working patients valued convenience, and older patients preferred to use the telephone. Patients with long-term conditions were more aware of (odds ratio [OR] 1.43, 95% CI 1.41-1.44) and more likely to use (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.63-1.67) online appointment booking. Interview participants with long-term conditions described online appointment booking as useful for routine nonurgent appointments. Patients in deprived areas were clustered in practices with low awareness and use of online appointment booking among GPPS respondents (OR for use 0.65, 95% CI 0.64-0.67). Other key findings included the influence of the availability of appointments online and differences in the registration process for accessing online booking. CONCLUSIONS: Whether and how patients engage with online appointment booking is influenced by the practice with which they are registered, whether they live with long-term conditions, and their deprivation status. These factors should be considered in designing and implementing online appointment booking and have implications for patient engagement with the wider range of online services offered in general practice.


Assuntos
Agendamento de Consultas , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Humanos , Atenção Primária à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Feminino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Inglaterra , Idoso , Adulto Jovem , Adolescente , Internet , Inquéritos e Questionários , Satisfação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos
19.
J Med Internet Res ; 26: e48092, 2024 Jun 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38833695

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Asynchronous outpatient patient-to-provider communication is expanding in UK health care, requiring evaluation. During the pandemic, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary in Scotland expanded its outpatient asynchronous consultation service from dermatology (deployed in May 2020) to gastroenterology and pain management clinics. OBJECTIVE: We conducted a mixed methods study using staff, patient, and public perspectives and National Health Service (NHS) numerical data to obtain a rounded picture of innovation as it happened. METHODS: Focus groups (3 web-based and 1 face-to-face; n=22) assessed public readiness for this service, and 14 interviews with staff focused on service design and delivery. The service's effects were examined using NHS Grampian service use data, a patient satisfaction survey (n=66), and 6 follow-up patient interviews. Survey responses were descriptively analyzed. Demographics, acceptability, nonattendance rates, and appointment outcomes of users were compared across levels of area deprivation in which they live and medical specialties. Interviews and focus groups underwent theory-informed thematic analysis. RESULTS: Staff anticipated a simple technical system transfer from dermatology to other receptive medical specialties, but despite a favorable setting and organizational assistance, it was complicated. Key implementation difficulties included pandemic-induced technical integration delays, misalignment with existing administrative processes, and discontinuity in project management. The pain management clinic began asynchronous consultations (digital appointments) in December 2021, followed by the gastroenterology clinic in February 2022. Staff quickly learned how to explain and use this service. It was thought to function better for pain management as it fitted preexisting practices. From May to September 2022, the dermatology (adult and pediatric), gastroenterology, and pain management clinics offered 1709 appointments to a range of patients (n=1417). Digital appointments reduced travel by an estimated 44,712 miles (~71,956.81 km) compared to the face-to-face mode. The deprivation profile of people who chose to use this service closely mirrored that of NHS Grampian's population overall. There was no evidence that deprivation impacted whether digital appointment users subsequently received treatment. Only 18% (12/66) of survey respondents were unhappy or very unhappy with being offered a digital appointment. The benefits mentioned included better access, convenience, decreased travel and waiting time, information sharing, and clinical flexibility. Overall, patients, the public, and staff recognized its potential as an NHS service but highlighted informed choice and flexibility. Better communication-including the use of the term assessment instead of appointment-may increase patient acceptance. CONCLUSIONS: Asynchronous pain management and gastroenterology consultations are viable and acceptable. Implementing this service is easiest when existing administrative processes face minimal disruption, although continuous support is needed. This study can inform practical strategies for supporting staff in adopting asynchronous consultations (eg, preparing for nonlinearity and addressing task issues). Patients need clear explanations and access to technical support, along with varied consultation options, to ensure digital inclusion.


Assuntos
Grupos Focais , Satisfação do Paciente , Humanos , Escócia , Masculino , Adulto , Feminino , Satisfação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Encaminhamento e Consulta/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Internet , Medicina Estatal , COVID-19 , Dermatologia/métodos , Dermatologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Assistência Ambulatorial/estatística & dados numéricos , Assistência Ambulatorial/métodos , Manejo da Dor/métodos , Manejo da Dor/estatística & dados numéricos , Gastroenterologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Gastroenterologia/métodos , Idoso
20.
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) ; 64(3): 102076, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38527733

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Transitions of care (TOC) is the coordination and continuity of health care as a patient transfers between different settings. This can include a wide range of services, such as medication reconciliation, patient counseling, bedside delivery of medications, and others that meet individual patient needs. In the pediatric population, patients are at increased risk of potential medication errors and subsequent harm owing to reduced patient and caregiver health literacy, limited dosage form availability, and errors in medication administration. The use of TOC services at the time of hospital discharge in this population has the potential to make a positive impact on patient safety and the treatment of medical conditions. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study was to determine whether patient-perceived understanding of home-going medications was greater in patients and/or caregivers who received medication bedside delivery and education from a pharmacy-led TOC service at a large pediatric academic medical center. The secondary objective was to determine whether the primary practice area of the pharmacist providing medication education led to changes in understanding of home-going medication(s). METHODS: Using institution-wide, patient satisfaction surveys from January 1, 2021, to December 31, 2021, patient and caregiver responses were queried for 2 questions about home-going medications, relating to the understanding of administration and the potential adverse effects. Patients were divided into 2 groups depending on TOC services received, as documented in the electronic medical record (EMR). Survey responses for each of the 2 questions were categorized as top-box percentage by study group. Hypothesis testing between study groups for the primary and secondary outcomes were conducted using chi-squared tests at an alpha of 0.05. Statistical analyses were conducted using SAS version 9.4. RESULTS: Of the 1159 patients included in the study, 441 received TOC services, deemed the intervention group, and 718 did not receive TOC services, deemed the control group. When the intervention and control group were asked about understanding of medication administration, 96.37% versus 93.18% of patients (P = 0.007) gave the most favorable response of "yes, definitely," respectively. Furthermore, 78.51% versus 77.44% of patients (P = 0.053) gave the most favorable response when asked about understanding potential medication adverse effects, respectively. CONCLUSION: Patients receiving TOC services by a member of the pharmacy team had a greater score for understanding of both medication administration and adverse effects. Furthermore, this greater score was consistent among the education provided by the inpatient and outpatient pharmacist.


Assuntos
Erros de Medicação , Reconciliação de Medicamentos , Farmacêuticos , Humanos , Farmacêuticos/organização & administração , Farmacêuticos/estatística & dados numéricos , Erros de Medicação/prevenção & controle , Criança , Feminino , Satisfação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Continuidade da Assistência ao Paciente , Inquéritos e Questionários , Alta do Paciente , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Transferência de Pacientes , Hospitais Pediátricos , Adolescente , Percepção , Papel Profissional , Cuidadores/psicologia , Letramento em Saúde , Pré-Escolar
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA