A novel reflex cough testing device.

BACKGROUND: The reflex cough test is useful for detecting silent aspiration, a risk factor for aspiration pneumonia. However, assessing the risk of aspiration pneumonia requires measuring not only the cough reflex but also cough strength. Currently, no reflex cough testing device is available that can directly measure reflex cough strength. We therefore developed a new testing device that can easily and simultaneously measure cough strength and the time until the cough reflex, and verified whether screening with this new instrument is feasible for evaluating the risk of aspiration pneumonia. METHODS: This device consists of a special pipe with a double lumen, a nebulizer, and an electronic spirometer. We used a solution of prescription-grade L-tartaric acid to initiate the cough reflex. The solution was inhaled through a mouthpiece as a microaerosol produced by an ultrasonic nebulizer. The peak cough flow (PCF) of the induced cough was measured with the spirometer. The 70 patients who participated in this study comprised 49 patients without a history of pneumonia (group A), 21 patients with a history of pneumonia (group B), and 10 healthy volunteers (control group). RESULTS: With the novel device, PCF and time until cough reflex could be measured without adverse effects. The PCF values were 118.3 ± 64.0 L/min, 47.7 ± 38.5 L/min, and 254.9 ± 83.8 L/min in group A, group B, and the control group, respectively. The PCF of group B was significantly lower than that of group A and the control group (p < 0.0001), while that of group B was significantly lower than that of the control group (p < 0.0001). The time until the cough reflex was 4.2 ± 5.9 s, 7.0 ± 7.0 s, and 1 s in group A, group B, and the control group, respectively. This duration was significantly longer for groups A and B than for the control group (A: p < 0.001, B: p < 0.001), but there was no significant difference between groups A and B (p = 0.0907). CONCLUSION: Our newly developed device can easily and simultaneously measure the time until the cough reflex and the strength of involuntary coughs for assessment of patients at risk of aspiration pneumonia.

In vivo diagnosis of allergic diseases--allergen provocation tests.

The allergen challenge test has been the mainstay of diagnosis of allergic diseases for a long time since it offers a direct proof of the clinical relevance of a particular allergen for the allergic disease symptoms and severity. Standardisation and availability for daily practice (including safety issues) are still to be refined but most of the challenge tests have safely crossed the border from research tools to diagnostic tests available for daily practice for a well trained clinical staff.

A new tidal breathing measurement device detects bronchial obstruction during methacholine challenge test.

PURPOSE: Bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR), a hallmark of bronchial asthma, is typically diagnosed through a methacholine inhalation test followed by spirometry, known as the methacholine challenge test (MCT). While spirometry relies on proper patients' cooperation and precise execution of forced breathing maneuvers, we conducted a comparative analysis with the portable nanomaterial-based sensing device, SenseGuard™, to non-intrusively assess tidal breathing parameters. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective study, 37 adult participants with suspected asthma underwent sequential spirometry and SenseGuard™ measurements after inhaling increasing methacholine doses. RESULTS: Among the 37 participants, 18 were MCT responders, 17 were non-responders and 2 were excluded due to uninterpretable data. The MCT responders exhibited a significant lung function difference when comparing the change from baseline to maximum response. This was evident through a notable decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1 â€‹s (FEV1) levels in spirometry, as well as in prominent changes in tidal breathing parameters as assessed by SenseGuard™, including the expiratory pause time (Trest) to total breath time (Ttot) ratio, and the expiratory time (Tex) to Ttot ratio. Notably, the ratios Trest/Ttot (∗p â€‹= â€‹0.02), Tex/Ttot (∗p â€‹= â€‹0.002), and inspiratory time (Tin) to Tex (∗p â€‹= â€‹0.04) identified MCT responders distinctly, corresponding to spirometry (∗p â€‹< â€‹0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that tidal breathing assessment using SenseGuard™ device reliably detects clinically relevant changes of respiratory parameter during the MCT. It effectively distinguishes between responders and non-responders, with strong agreement to conventional spirometry-measured FEV1. This technology holds promise for monitoring clinical respiratory changes in bronchial asthma patients pending further studies.

Bronchial allergen challenge using the Medicaid dosimeter.

BACKGROUND: Bronchial allergen provocations are well established in asthma research. We evaluated the reproducibility of single-concentration, single-step allergen challenges in volunteers with grass pollen allergy. METHODS: Forty-seven subjects underwent bronchial challenges using the aerosol provocation system nebulizer (Medicaid Sidestream) with incremental doses of grass pollen to define the individual allergen dose that causes a 20% drop in FEV(1) (PD(20)FEV(1)). In 39 subjects this procedure was followed by single-step challenges. Early and late asthmatic responses were monitored, and increases in exhaled nitric oxide were measured before and 24 h after single-step challenges. RESULTS: After the first single-step challenge, the maximum drop in FEV(1) was 21.3% ± 8.0. A comparison of the drop in FEV(1) to the initial incremental challenge (29.7% ± 7.5) revealed an intraclass correlation of -0.30 (p < 0.05). In the second single-step challenge, the mean drop in FEV(1) was 20.9% ± 7.2. Compared with the first single-step challenge, the intraclass correlation was 0.37 (p < 0.05) and the 95% limits of agreement according to Bland and Altman were -17.5 to 18.1%. The increases in exhaled nitric oxide revealed substantial agreement in repeated single-step challenges (26.8 ppb ± 27.8 and 21.8 ppb ± 21.9, ICC 0.62, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The use of aerosol provocation system to calculate the PD(20)FEV(1) allergen is a timesaving procedure and is less prone to errors because only one dilution of the allergen is used. The repeatability in well-defined subjects is excellent to study the mechanisms of allergen-induced airway inflammation and the development of new treatments for allergic diseases.

New methodology for specific inhalation challenges with occupational agents.

BACKGROUND: Inhalation challenges are used for diagnosing occupational asthma (OA). The initial methodology consisted of a "realistic" exposure without monitoring nor controlling exposure. Our aim was to design an equipment, called the GenaSIC, that allows the generation of various agents regardless of the formulation and to assess the feasibility of its use in patients investigated for OA. RESULTS: GenaSIC can generate lactose, flour, malt, isocyanates, formaldehyde and N-butyl acetate with precise and fairly stable concentrations. Using N-butyl-acetate as a control agent and real time measurement, we show that normal breathing has a negligible effect on the concentration. We exposed forty-four different subjects to a control agent and/or to a suspected occupational agent. Nineteen of the subjects were only exposed to N-butyl acetate as a control agent without experiencing any significant irritant effect (no significant changes in spirometry thereafter). Eight subjects who were exposed to both N-butyl acetate and formaldehyde did not show significant reactions. Seven subjects were exposed to dry particles (flour in six instances, malt in the other) and five showed immediate asthmatic reactions which changes in FEV1 from 20% to a maximum of 28%. Finally, ten subjects were exposed to isocyanates, four of whom showed a positive reaction, including one subject with immediate maximum changes in FEV1 of 22%. CONCLUSION: GenaSIC offers the possibility of reliable and safe exposures to dry particles, formaldehyde and isocyanates in the investigation of OA.

Assessing the effectiveness of intubation as a challenge model in contagious bovine pleuropneumonia vaccine experiments.

A study was carried out to assess the effectiveness of a bronchoscope in administering a pathogenic field strain of Mycoplasma mycoides subsp. mycoides (MmmSC) in cattle challenge experiments. Out of 16 animals inoculated using the bronchoscope, 10 (62.2%) showed clinical disease as evidenced by fever and 15 (93.8%) displayed typical lesions of CBPP from which MmmSC was isolated. Serum samples collected weekly were tested by Complement Fixation Test (CFT) and competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (c-ELISA). Antibodies to MmmSC were detected in 10 out of the 16 animals by the CFT and 11 out of the 16 animals by c-ELISA. The onset of clinical disease was as early as 2 days post-inoculation, and most of the animals developed clinical disease 2 to 3 weeks post-infection. These results clearly demonstrate that nasotracheal inoculation of pathogenic strain of MmmSC with the aid of a bronchoscope can lead to early onset of clinical disease; similar to previous studies but with higher numbers of animals showing clinical disease. This is in contrast with previous studies where early clinical disease was observed in as little as 15% of inoculated animals. This nasotracheal inoculation method using a bronchoscope can, therefore, be adopted for use in experimental challenge infections of cattle. This method is found to be a better replacement to the contact transmission method whose drawback includes extra cost of donor animals and unpredictable rate and timing of transmission from intubated to challenge animals.

Correlation of spirometry and body plethysmography during exercise-induced bronchial obstruction.

BACKGROUND: The exercise challenge is the gold standard for diagnosing exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB). Airway obstructions appear up to 30 min after the challenge, with a maximum decrease in spirometry and a maximum increase in airway resistance. There is evidence that changes in body plethysmography parameters are more sensitive to the exercise challenge and precede those in spirometry. PURPOSE: To compare changes in body plethysmography and spirometry parameters after exercise challenges and to verify the cut-off values of sReff in EIB. PROCEDURES: In 82 subjects with suspected EIB, a total of 473 lung function tests were measured at baseline and at 5, 10, 15, and 30 min after exercise challenges at different stages of bronchial obstruction. FINDINGS: The maximum changes in the body plethysmography parameter sReff significantly preceded the maximum changes in the spirometry parameter FEV1 (sReff: 12.2 min ±8.8, FEV1: 15.2 min ±9.3, p < 0.005). The parameters of sReff and FEV1 had a strong negative correlation (r = -0.63, p < 0.0001) with a nonlinear, polynomial relationship. Furthermore, sReff and Reff had a strong linear correlation (r = 0.86, p < 0.001), and Reff and Rtot had a perfect linear correlation (r = 0.99, p < 0.001). Based on baseline values and on quantile regression, an increase of 0.25 kPa s in sReff was defined as significant. Using this cut-off value, FEV1 and sReff almost equally detected EIB. CONCLUSION: The changes in sReff were more sensitive and better indicated lung impairment than did the changes in FEV1, which underestimated the degree of hyperinflation.

Methacholine dry powder inhaler as a new tool for bronchial challenge test.

BACKGROUND: The methacholine (MCH) challenge test is performed to detect bronchial hyperresponsiveness in subjects suffering from asthma. It is conducted by inhaling spasmogen substances at increasing doses and measuring FEV1-PD20 variation following the bronchoconstriction evoked. AIM: This paper describes a new method for MCH challenge test using pre-metered respirable powders of MCH at different doses for facilitating test execution. The availability of a series of pre-metered doses gives higher control over aerosolized dose and fine particle fraction (respirable dose), improving the accuracy and repeatability of the test. Dosimetric tests with MCH solution and pre-dosed powder challenge tests were clinically compared. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The inhalation powders were prepared by spray drying of solutions of methacholine, mannitol and hydroxypropylmethylcellulose in which different concentrations of MCH were included. The methacholine powders prepared were carefully characterized in terms of aerodynamic properties. RESULTS: Inhalation powders containing methacholine from 12.5 to 200 microg per metered dose, having a fine particle fraction between 40 and 60%, were prepared using mannitol and cellulose polymer. Eighteen subjects (12 hyperresponsive and six normal) were subjected to both the MCH solution and powder tests in random sequence. No significant differences in FEV1 and PD20 values were found between the challenge tests performed with liquid and powder formulations of methacholine. CONCLUSIONS: Powders of MCH having high respirability of the delivered doses can be prepared by spray drying. They allow for the performance of a challenge test using a dry powder inhaler. The powder dose series can be an alternative to the current dosimetric test with MCH solutions.

Methacholine Challenge: Comparison of Airway Responsiveness Produced by a Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer Versus a Jet Nebulizer.

BACKGROUND: The latest methacholine challenge testing (MCT) guidelines published by the European Respiratory Society recommend the characterization of nebulizers before their use in clinics and research. Such investigations are necessary for accurately determining the provocative dose of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PD20) delivered by a given device. The standard English Wright (Wright) jet nebulizer recommended in the 1999 guidelines by the American Thoracic Society has become difficult to obtain and possesses some characteristics that complicate the calculation of dose delivery from this device (e.g. evaporation). Our objective was to determine if the Aerogen® Solo (Solo) vibrating mesh nebulizer provides similar methacholine challenge test results compared to the currently used Wright jet nebulizer. METHODS: Sixty mild-to-moderate asthmatics were studied across three research sites in a randomized crossover study. Both methacholine challenges were completed at least 24 hours apart within a 2-week period. Testing with the Wright device was performed as per the 2-minute tidal breathing protocol. The Solo study arm followed the same procedure except for a shorter inhalation time of 1 minute. The provocative concentration of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20) and the methacholine PD20 were calculated following each methacholine challenge. RESULTS: The geometric mean methacholine PC20 values for the Solo and the Wright differed statistically (0.65 mg/mL vs. 2.58 mg/mL, respectively, p < 0.00001) and clinically. Between-nebulizer geometric mean methacholine PD20 results are comparable by clinical standards [81.7 µg (Solo) vs. 64.7 µg (Wright)], although the slight difference in dose was statistically significant (p = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: The comparability of PD20 values between the Solo and the Wright validates the importance of reporting airway responsiveness to methacholine in terms of dose and not concentration, as stressed in the latest testing guidelines. This finding along with several benefits associated with the Solo make it a promising nebulizer for performing MCT.

[Environmental exposure chambers (EEC): A novel tool for pathophysiological and pharmaceutical research]. / Les chambres d'exposition environnementale (CEE) : un nouvel outil dans la recherche académique et industrielle.

Airborne allergic diseases (allergic asthma, rhinitis and conjunctivitis) have reached epidemic proportions and are a great burden for both society and individuals. Therefore we need to better understand the physiopathological mechanisms and to increase clinical research in these diseases. However, traditional outpatient studies are difficult and have number of limitations, in particular the variability of allergen exposure. Yet allergen provocation tests, especially bronchial challenges in asthma, are excellent tools to measure the efficiency of anti-allergic therapies. Environmental exposure chambers (EEC) allow the performance of controlled allergen provocation tests on a large scale with remarkable sensitivity, specificity and reproducibility. Moreover, they allow a precise collection of allergic symptoms, making them interesting tools for patho-physiological and clinical studies. During the last thirty years, they have assisted the study of anti-allergic therapies and provided data on their pharmacodynamic characteristics, particularly in allergic rhinitis. However, there are still no EEC tests centered on asthma. The EEC of Strasbourg (ALYATEC®) was developed to fulfill two objectives: to allow standardized allergenic and non-allergenic exposures with better control of the parameters than in other EEC and to offer a place to study asthma and anti-asthmatic therapies safely.

Testing for Exercise-Induced Bronchoconstriction.

Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) is a form of airway hyperresponsiveness that occurs with or without current symptoms of asthma. EIB is an indicator of active and treatable pathophysiology in persons with asthma. The objective documentation of EIB permits the identification of an individual who may be at risk during a recreational sporting activity or when exercising as an occupational duty. EIB can be identified with laboratory exercise testing or surrogate tests for EIB. These include eucapnic voluntary hyperpnea and osmotic stimuli (eg, inhaled mannitol) and offer improved diagnostic sensitivity to identify EIB and improved standardization when compared with laboratory exercise.

A comparison of 2 methods of continuous aerosol administration during methacholine challenge testing.

BACKGROUND: Exposure to the bronchoconstricting agent methacholine is a potential hazard to technical staff during methacholine challenge testing, which remains a useful and frequently performed test. There are several methods of performing the test. One of the 2 methods listed in the American Thoracic Society's guidelines is the 2-min tidal-breathing method. The methacholine can be inhaled using one of several methods. The loosely-fitting-mask method is likely to produce more contamination of the local environment than a filtered exhalation system. METHODS: We tested 2 variations of the tidal-breathing method of measuring the methacholine provocational concentration (PC(20), the dose that produces a 20% decrease in forced expiratory volume in the first second). One involved use of the open-mask technique and the other a T-piece-and-filter system that precluded the release of methacholine-containing droplets into the environment. We performed duplicate methacholine challenge tests with 10 subjects who had a wide range of PC(20). The tests were done in random order, and each subject performed one test using the mask and one using the T-piece/filter system. RESULTS: With the mask system the geometric mean PC(20) was 4.7 mg/mL, versus 5.1 mg/mL with the T-piece-filter system (p = 0.36). These values are very close and would not be substantially different clinically. CONCLUSION: The 2 methods are equivalent, and the low cost of the products used in the T-piece/filter method makes it suitable for reducing technician exposure to methacholine, using potentially completely disposable components.

Is forced oscillation technique useful in the diagnosis of occupational asthma?

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to determine whether the forced oscillation technique (FOT), which does not require active cooperation, may be useful to assess bronchial responsiveness in patients with suspected occupational asthma (OA). METHODS: Changes in resistances evaluated by FOT, and DeltaFEV1 measured during methacholine challenge test were compared in 77 adults referred for suspected OA. Spearman correlations and ROC curves were used. RESULTS: R0 at the final dose of methacholine (R0hmd) and DeltaR0 were strongly correlated with DeltaFEV1 (p < 0.001). The ROC curves showed that R0hmd >or= 240% predicted was the best cut-off value to discriminate subjects with OA from nonasthmatic subjects (sensitivity: 80%, specificity: 76%). CONCLUSION: FOT can be proposed as an alternative method for the assessment of bronchial responsiveness in subjects with suspected OA, unable to correctly perform forced expiratory maneuvers.

Aerosol Use in the Pulmonary Function Lab.

Aerosolized medications are frequently used in the pulmonary function laboratory. The 2 most common implementations are bronchodilators and bronchial challenge agents. Bronchodilator administration is not well standardized, largely because of the various methods of delivery available for clinical practice. Metered-dose inhalers used with spacer devices are the most common route for bronchodilator administration, but many laboratories use small-volume nebulizers. Interpretation of pre- and post-bronchodilator studies is confounded by the definitions of airway obstruction and bronchodilator responsiveness. Protocols for administering bronchial challenge aerosols (methacholine, mannitol, hypertonic saline) are well defined but are susceptible to some of the same problems that limit comparison of bronchodilator techniques. Bronchial challenges with inhaled aerosols are influenced not only by the delivery device but by the patient's breathing pattern, particularly in protocols that include deep inspiratory efforts.

Cold air inhalation challenge in the diagnosis of asthma in children.

A study was designed to determine the usefulness of cold air inhalation challenge testing in children with asthma and to determine the magnitude and duration of the response. A total of 17 children with asthma, mean age 11.7 years (range 6 to 16 years) and eight nonasthmatic children, mean age 11.5 years (range 7 to 15 years) were studied. The average response to isocapneic hyperventilation with cold air in the asthmatic children was a decrease in vital capacity of 10%, a decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) of 19%, a decrease in peak flow rate (PFR) of 24%, and a decrease in maximal midexpiratory flow rate (MMFR) of 36%. This was significantly different from the response to the same level of hyperventilation with warm, fully saturated air. The response to isocapneic hyperventilation with cold air in nonasthmatic children was significantly different from the asthmatic children's response with a mean decrease in vital capacity of 0.9%, a decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1 second of 2.5%, a decrease in peak flow rate of 7%, and a decrease in maximal midexpiratory flow rate of 10%. The response in the asthmatic children occurred four to eight minutes after challenge and resolved in eight to 12 minutes. Although the response was highly significant, none of the children developed respiratory distress. It was concluded that isocapneic hyperventilation with cold air is a safe and simple test for diagnosing asthma in children.

Hyperresponsiveness of cough receptors in patients with bronchial asthma.

The hyperresponsiveness of cough receptors was evaluated using the acetic acid inhalation test in healthy adults, patients with bronchial asthma, and children with or without cough. The concentration of acetic acid inducing cough was more than 20% in all 16 healthy adults and 18 children in the control group. There were two groups of asthmatic patients: Those in group 1 showed normal response to more than 20% acetic acid (n = 46), and those in group 2 showed a sensitive reaction to less than 10% (n = 11). Mean age was 9.0 +/- 4.2 years in group 1 and 15.1 +/- 7.6 years in group 2 (statistical significance, P less than .001). Six of 11 asthmatic patients in group 2 were classified as nonallergic asthmatics, whereas only five of 46 patients in group 1 were nonallergic (P less than .01). Bronchoconstriction was not induced in any case, in spite of the production of cough. It is suggested that the hyperresponsiveness of individual cough receptors without the stimulation of irritant receptors be evaluated.

Importance of evaporative water losses during standardized nebulized inhalation provocation tests.

Evaporative water losses from jet nebulizers produce temperature drop, reduction in total nebulizer output with increased nebulization time, and increasing concentration of solute remaining in the nebulizer. These were documented and quantitated for the Wright nebulizer which is used for one histamine/methacholine inhalation test method. Indirect determination of nebulizer aerosol output, made by estimation of total sodium lost from the nebulizer, was about 25 percent of total output as determined by weight change. A similar tendency was seen for a De Vilbiss 40 nebulizer for both reduction in total nebulizer output with increasing duration of nebulization, and increased solute concentration remaining in the nebulizer. These data must be taken into account when standardizing inhalation provocation tests. Nebulizers should be calibrated under the same conditions that they are used during the test. Histamine and methacholine solutions should be discarded after a single use in the 2-min tidal breathing Wright nebulizer method.