Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A predictive model combining human epididymal protein 4 and radiologic features for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer.
Stiekema, A; Lok, C A R; Kenter, G G; van Driel, W J; Vincent, A D; Korse, C M.
Afiliação
  • Stiekema A; Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Center for Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, The Netherlands. Electronic address: anna.stiekema@gmail.com.
  • Lok CA; Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Center for Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, The Netherlands.
  • Kenter GG; Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Center for Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, The Netherlands.
  • van Driel WJ; Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Center for Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, The Netherlands.
  • Vincent AD; Department of Biometrics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Korse CM; Department of Clinical Chemistry, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Gynecol Oncol ; 132(3): 573-7, 2014 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24418200
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Ovarian cancer is the leading cause of death in women with gynecologic cancer. CA125 is the commonly used biomarker in the diagnosis of ovarian cancer, but has limitations in both sensitivity and specificity. Human Epididymal secretory protein (HE4) is a promising biomarker and is included in the Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm (ROMA) score, which is suggested to further increase the diagnostic accuracy than either marker alone. However, information from ultrasound and CT-scan is not included in this algorithm. This study evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of HE4 in the pre-operative diagnosis of ovarian cancer and the predictive values of biomarkers, ultrasound and CT-scan and combinations hereof.

METHODS:

HE4 and CA125 were measured in 361 subjects (34 benign, 147 ovarian cancer and 180 controls). Sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve (AUC) for CA125, HE4, ROMA and RMI scores were calculated using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) methodology. The additional predictive value of ultrasound or CT-scan to the individual markers was analyzed using logistic regression.

RESULTS:

The sensitivity in predicting ovarian cancer of CA125 was 91% and of HE4 90%. The specificity was 65% and 97% respectively. HE4 demonstrated the highest discrimination (ROC-AUC=0.96), compared to ROMA, RMI and CA125 (AUC=0.95, 0.89 and 0.90 respectively). ROMA did not improve when it was combined with different ultrasound factors. The presence of intra-abdominal metastasis on CT-scan improved the discriminative potential of HE4 (p=0.0004).

CONCLUSION:

HE4 in combination with CT-scan may be incorporated in the diagnostic work-up in women with a pelvic mass.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article