Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The value of ADC, T2 signal intensity, and a combination of both parameters to assess Gleason score and primary Gleason grades in patients with known prostate cancer.
Nowak, Johannes; Malzahn, Uwe; Baur, Alexander D J; Reichelt, Uta; Franiel, Tobias; Hamm, Bernd; Durmus, Tahir.
Afiliação
  • Nowak J; Department of Radiology, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Germany Department of Radiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany.
  • Malzahn U; Institute for Clinical Epidemiology and Biometry, Universität Würzburg, Germany.
  • Baur AD; Department of Radiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany.
  • Reichelt U; Institute for Pathology, Vivantes Klinikum am Urban Dieffenbachstrasse, Berlin, Germany.
  • Franiel T; Department of Radiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany Department of Radiology, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Germany.
  • Hamm B; Department of Radiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany.
  • Durmus T; Department of Radiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany tahir.durmus@charite.de.
Acta Radiol ; 57(1): 107-14, 2016 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25505225
BACKGROUND: The ability to non-invasively analyze tumor aggressiveness is an important predictor for individual treatment stratification and patient outcome in prostate cancer (PCA). PURPOSE: To evaluate: (i) whether apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), the T2 signal intensity (SI), and a combination of both parameters allow for an improved discrimination of Gleason Score (GS) ≥7 (intermediate and high risk) and GS <7 (low risk) in PCA; and (ii) whether ADC may distinguish between 3 + 4 and 4 + 3 PCA (primary Gleason grades [pGG]). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prostatectomy specimens of 66 patients (mean age, 63 ± 5.6 years; 104 PCA foci) with a preceding multiparametric 1.5 T endorectal coil magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were included. ADC (b values = 0, 100, 400, 800 s/mm(2)), standardized T2 (T2s), and the ADC/T2s ratio were tested for correlation with GS applying multivariate analysis. ADC cutoff values were calculated for prediction of GS and pGG, and logarithm of the odds (LOGIT) was used to express the probability for GS and pGG. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed by ROC analysis. RESULTS: We found an almost linear negative relationship of ADC for GS ≥7 (P = 0.002). The effect of ADC for GS ≥7 (adjusted odds ratio = 0.995) was almost identical for peripheral and transition zone PCA (P = 0.013 and P < 0.001, respectively). ADC showed an AUC of 78.9% for discrimination between GS <7 and GS ≥7. An ADC cutoff of <1.005 × 10(-3 )mm(2)/s indicated a GS ≥7 (90.5% sensitivity, 62.5% specificity). Within the group of GS = 7 PCA, an ADC > 0.762 × 10(-3 )mm(2)/s indicated a pGG of 3 (AUC = 69.6%). CONCLUSION: T2s and the ADC/T2s ratio do not provide additional information regarding prediction of GS. ADC values have a good discriminatory power to distinguish tumors with GS ≥7 from GS <7 and to predict pGG in GS = 7 PCA.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article