Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Presentation and Outcomes of C4d-Negative Antibody-Mediated Rejection After Kidney Transplantation.
Orandi, B J; Alachkar, N; Kraus, E S; Naqvi, F; Lonze, B E; Lees, L; Van Arendonk, K J; Wickliffe, C; Bagnasco, S M; Zachary, A A; Segev, D L; Montgomery, R A.
Afiliação
  • Orandi BJ; Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
  • Alachkar N; Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
  • Kraus ES; Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
  • Naqvi F; Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
  • Lonze BE; Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
  • Lees L; Department of Pharmacy, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
  • Van Arendonk KJ; Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
  • Wickliffe C; Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
  • Bagnasco SM; Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
  • Zachary AA; Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
  • Segev DL; Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
  • Montgomery RA; Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Am J Transplant ; 16(1): 213-20, 2016 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26317487
The updated Banff classification allows for the diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in the absence of peritubular capillary C4d staining. Our objective was to quantify allograft loss risk in patients with consistently C4d-negative AMR (n = 51) compared with C4d-positive AMR patients (n = 156) and matched control subjects without AMR. All first-year posttransplant biopsy results from January 2004 through June 2014 were reviewed and correlated with the presence of donor-specific antibody (DSA). C4d-negative AMR patients were not different from C4d-positive AMR patients on any baseline characteristics, including immunologic risk factors (panel reactive antibody, prior transplant, HLA mismatch, donor type, DSA class, and anti-HLA/ABO-incompatibility). C4d-positive AMR patients were significantly more likely to have a clinical presentation (85.3% vs. 54.9%, p < 0.001), and those patients presented substantially earlier posttransplantation (median 14 [interquartile range 8-32] days vs. 46 [interquartile range 20-191], p < 0.001) and were three times more common (7.8% vs 2.5%). One- and 2-year post-AMR-defining biopsy graft survival in C4d-negative AMR patients was 93.4% and 90.2% versus 86.8% and 82.6% in C4d-positive AMR patients, respectively (p = 0.4). C4d-negative AMR was associated with a 2.56-fold (95% confidence interval, 1.08-6.05, p = 0.033) increased risk of graft loss compared with AMR-free matched controls. No clinical characteristics were identified that reliably distinguished C4d-negative from C4d-positive AMR. However, both phenotypes are associated with increased graft loss and thus warrant consideration for intervention.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article