Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Role of Epstein-Barr Virus DNA Load and Serology as Screening Tools for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.
Tay, Joshua K; Chan, Soh Ha; Lim, Chwee Ming; Siow, Chor Hiang; Goh, Han Lee; Loh, Kwok Seng.
Afiliação
  • Tay JK; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, National University Health System, Singapore Department of Cancer Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA joshua_tay@nuhs.edu.sg.
  • Chan SH; Department of Microbiology, National University of Singapore, Singapore World Health Organisation Immunology and Training Research Centre, Singapore.
  • Lim CM; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, National University Health System, Singapore.
  • Siow CH; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, National University Health System, Singapore.
  • Goh HL; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, National University Health System, Singapore.
  • Loh KS; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, National University Health System, Singapore.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 155(2): 274-80, 2016 08.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27143706
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Screening for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) among family members has been advocated in endemic populations in view of significantly increased risks. We aimed to compare the role of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA load and EBV IgA serology as tools for screening patients with a first-degree family history of NPC. STUDY

DESIGN:

Case-control study.

SETTING:

Tertiary referral center. SUBJECTS AND

METHODS:

Serum samples were compared from 293 newly diagnosed NPC patients and 475 individuals with a first-degree family history of NPC. EBV DNA load was measured by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction, while EBV viral capsid antigen (VCA) IgA and EBV early antigen (EA) IgA titers were measured by immunofluorescence assays.

RESULTS:

NPC patients had a significantly higher median EBV DNA load as compared with unaffected family members (835.4 vs 18.8 copies/mL; P < .001). At 100 copies/mL, EBV DNA load demonstrated a sensitivity of 76.8% and a specificity of 85.6%. A positive EBV-EA IgA titer (≥110) gave a sensitivity of 85.0% and a specificity of 96.4%. There was good correlation between EBV DNA load and EBV serology titers (Spearman's ρ = .536 and .594 for EBV-VCA IgA and EBV-EA IgA, respectively; P < .001). Receiver operating characteristic analysis demonstrated that EBV-VCA IgA and EBV-EA IgA were better classifiers than EBV DNA load (areas under the curve 0.942, 0.926, and 0.880, respectively) in distinguishing NPC patients and unaffected family members.

CONCLUSION:

EBV DNA load and EBV IgA serology demonstrate good sensitivity and specificity as screening tools. EBV-EA IgA gave the best sensitivity and specificity profile as a screening tool for NPC among high-risk family members.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article