Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cost-effectiveness analysis of hepatocellular carcinoma screening by combinations of ultrasound and alpha-fetoprotein among Alaska Native people, 1983-2012.
Gounder, Prabhu P; Bulkow, Lisa R; Meltzer, Martin I; Bruce, Michael G; Hennessy, Thomas W; Snowball, Mary; Spradling, Philip R; Adhikari, Bishwa B; McMahon, Brian J.
Afiliação
  • Gounder PP; Arctic Investigations Program, Division of Preparedness and Emerging Infections, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Disease, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Anchorage, AK, USA; pgounder@cdc.gov.
  • Bulkow LR; Arctic Investigations Program, Division of Preparedness and Emerging Infections, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Disease, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Anchorage, AK, USA.
  • Meltzer MI; Health Economics and Modeling Unit, Division of Preparedness and Emerging Infections, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Disease, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
  • Bruce MG; Arctic Investigations Program, Division of Preparedness and Emerging Infections, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Disease, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Anchorage, AK, USA.
  • Hennessy TW; Arctic Investigations Program, Division of Preparedness and Emerging Infections, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Disease, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Anchorage, AK, USA.
  • Snowball M; Liver Disease and Hepatitis Program, Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium, Anchorage, AK, USA.
  • Spradling PR; Division of Viral Hepatitis, National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
  • Adhikari BB; Health Economics and Modeling Unit, Division of Preparedness and Emerging Infections, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Disease, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
  • McMahon BJ; Arctic Investigations Program, Division of Preparedness and Emerging Infections, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Disease, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Anchorage, AK, USA.
Int J Circumpolar Health ; 75: 31115, 2016.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27197711
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) recommends semi-annual hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) screening using ultrasound (US) in persons with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) virus infection at high risk for HCC such as Asian males aged ≥40 years and Asian females aged ≥50 years.

OBJECTIVE:

To analyse the cost-effectiveness of 2 HCC screening methods in the Alaska Native (AN) health system US-alone, or screening by alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) initially and switching to US for subsequent screenings if AFP >10 ng/mL (AFP→US).

DESIGN:

A spreadsheet-based model was developed for accounting the costs of 2 hypothetical HCC screening methods. We used epidemiologic data from a cohort of 839 AN persons with CHB who were offered HCC screening by AFP/US semi-annually during 1983-2012. We assumed that compared with AFP→US, US-alone identifies 33% more tumours at an early stage (defined as a single tumour ≤5 cm or ≤3 tumours ≤3 cm in diameter). Years of life gained (YLG) attributed to screening was estimated by comparing additional years of survival among persons with early- compared with late-stage tumours. Screening costs were calculated using Medicare reimbursement rates in 2012. Future screening costs and YLG were projected over a 30-year time horizon using a 3% discount rate.

RESULTS:

The total cost of screening for the cohort by AFP→US would have been approximately $357,000 ($36,000/early-stage tumour detected) compared to $814,000 ($59,000/early-stage tumour detected) by US-alone. The AFP→US method would have yielded an additional 27.8 YLG ($13,000/YLG) compared with 38.9 YLG ($21,000/YLG) for US-alone. Screening by US-alone would incur an additional $114,000 per extra early-tumour detected compared with AFP→US and $41,000 per extra YLG.

CONCLUSIONS:

Although US-alone HCC screening might have yielded more YLG than AFP→US, the reduced costs of the AFP→US method could expand access to HCC screening in resource constrained settings.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article