Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Magnetic resonance imaging of pelvic floor dysfunction - joint recommendations of the ESUR and ESGAR Pelvic Floor Working Group.
El Sayed, Rania Farouk; Alt, Celine D; Maccioni, Francesca; Meissnitzer, Matthias; Masselli, Gabriele; Manganaro, Lucia; Vinci, Valeria; Weishaupt, Dominik.
Afiliação
  • El Sayed RF; Genitourinary & Pelvic Floor MR Imaging Unit, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University Hospitals, Cairo, Egypt. rania729.re@gmail.com.
  • Alt CD; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, Duesseldorf, Germany.
  • Maccioni F; Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Sapienza University Rome, Viale Regina Elena, Rome, Italy.
  • Meissnitzer M; Department of Radiology, University Hospital Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
  • Masselli G; Department of Radiology Dea, Umberto I Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale del Policlinico, Rome, Italy.
  • Manganaro L; Department of Radiological Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale Regina Elena, Rome, Italy.
  • Vinci V; Department of Radiological Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale Regina Elena, Rome, Italy.
  • Weishaupt D; Institute of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Triemli Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Eur Radiol ; 27(5): 2067-2085, 2017 May.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27488850
OBJECTIVE: To develop recommendations that can be used as guidance for standardized approach regarding indications, patient preparation, sequences acquisition, interpretation and reporting of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for diagnosis and grading of pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD). METHODS: The technique included critical literature between 1993 and 2013 and expert consensus about MRI protocols by the pelvic floor-imaging working group of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) and the European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) from one Egyptian and seven European institutions. Data collection and analysis were achieved in 5 consecutive steps. Eighty-two items were scored to be eligible for further analysis and scaling. Agreement of at least 80 % was defined as consensus finding. RESULTS: Consensus was reached for 88 % of 82 items. Recommended reporting template should include two main sections for measurements and grading. The pubococcygeal line (PCL) is recommended as the reference line to measure pelvic organ prolapse. The recommended grading scheme is the "Rule of three" for Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP), while a rectocele and ARJ descent each has its specific grading system. CONCLUSION: This literature review and expert consensus recommendations can be used as guidance for MR imaging and reporting of PFD. KEY POINTS: • These recommendations highlight the most important prerequisites to obtain a diagnostic PFD-MRI. • Static, dynamic and evacuation sequences should be generally performed for PFD evaluation. • The recommendations were constructed through consensus among 13 radiologists from 8 institutions.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article