Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinical relevance of small copy-number variants in chromosomal microarray clinical testing.
Hollenbeck, Dana; Williams, Crescenda L; Drazba, Kathryn; Descartes, Maria; Korf, Bruce R; Rutledge, S Lane; Lose, Edward J; Robin, Nathaniel H; Carroll, Andrew J; Mikhail, Fady M.
Afiliação
  • Hollenbeck D; Department of Genetics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
  • Williams CL; Department of Genetics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
  • Drazba K; Current address: Children's Health Hospital, Dallas, Texas, USA.
  • Descartes M; Department of Genetics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
  • Korf BR; Department of Genetics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
  • Rutledge SL; Department of Pediatrics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
  • Lose EJ; Department of Genetics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
  • Robin NH; Department of Pediatrics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
  • Carroll AJ; Department of Genetics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
  • Mikhail FM; Department of Pediatrics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Genet Med ; 19(4): 377-385, 2017 04.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27632688
PURPOSE: The 2010 consensus statement on diagnostic chromosomal microarray (CMA) testing recommended an array resolution ≥400 kb throughout the genome as a balance of analytical and clinical sensitivity. In spite of the clear evidence for pathogenicity of large copy-number variants (CNVs) in neurodevelopmental disorders and/or congenital anomalies, the significance of small, nonrecurrent CNVs (<500 kb) has not been well established in a clinical setting. METHODS: We investigated the clinical significance of all nonpolymorphic small, nonrecurrent CNVs (<500 kb) in patients referred for CMA clinical testing over a period of 6 years, from 2009 to 2014 (a total of 4,417 patients). We excluded from our study patients with benign or likely benign CNVs and patients with only recurrent microdeletions/microduplications <500 kb. RESULTS: In total, 383 patients (8.67%) were found to carry at least one small, nonrecurrent CNV, of whom 176 patients (3.98%) had one small CNV classified as a variant of uncertain significance (VUS), 45 (1.02%) had two or more small VUS CNVs, 20 (0.45%) had one small VUS CNV and a recurrent CNV, 113 (2.56%) had one small pathogenic or likely pathogenic CNV, 17 (0.38%) had two or more small pathogenic or likely pathogenic CNVs, and 12 (0.27%) had one small pathogenic or likely pathogenic CNV and a recurrent CNV. Within the pathogenic group, 80 of 142 patients (56% of all small pathogenic CNV cases) were found to have a single whole-gene or exonic deletion. The themes that emerged from our study are presented in the Discussion section. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates the diagnostic clinical relevance of small, nonrecurrent CNVs <500 kb during CMA clinical testing and underscores the need for careful clinical interpretation of these CNVs.Genet Med 19 4, 377-385.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article