Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Which patients with myelofibrosis should receive ruxolitinib therapy? ELN-SIE evidence-based recommendations.
Marchetti, M; Barosi, G; Cervantes, F; Birgegård, G; Griesshammer, M; Harrison, C; Hehlmann, R; Kiladjian, J-J; Kröger, N; McMullin, M F; Passamonti, F; Vannucchi, A; Barbui, T.
Afiliação
  • Marchetti M; Ospedale Cardinal Massaia, Asti, Italy.
  • Barosi G; IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo Foundation, Pavia, Italy.
  • Cervantes F; Hospital Clinic, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Birgegård G; Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.
  • Griesshammer M; Johannes Wesling Klinikum Minden, Minden, Germany.
  • Harrison C; Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation, London, UK.
  • Hehlmann R; Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
  • Kiladjian JJ; Centre d'Investigations Cliniques - CIC 1427, Paris, France.
  • Kröger N; University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
  • McMullin MF; Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
  • Passamonti F; Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
  • Vannucchi A; Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi, Varese, Italy.
  • Barbui T; Research Foundation, Ospedale Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy.
Leukemia ; 31(4): 882-888, 2017 04.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27740634
ABSTRACT
Ruxolitinib is an oral Janus-activated kinase 1 (JAK1)/JAK2 inhibitor approved for the treatment of patients with myelofibrosis based on the results of two randomized clinical trials. However, discordant indications were provided by regulatory agencies and scientific societies for selecting the most appropriate candidates to this drug. The European LeukemiaNet and the Italian Society of Hematology shared the aim of building evidence-based recommendations for the use of ruxolitinib according to the GRADE methodology. Eighteen patient-intervention-comparator-outcome profiles were listed, each of them comparing ruxolitinib to other therapies with the aim of improving one of the three clinical

outcomes:

(a) splenomegaly, (b) disease-related symptoms, and (c) survival. Ruxolitinib was strongly recommended for improving symptomatic or severe (>15 cm below the costal margin) splenomegaly in patients with an International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS)/dynamic IPSS risk intermediate 2 or high. Ruxolitinib was also strongly recommended for improving systemic symptoms in patients with an MPN10 score >44, refractory severe itching, unintended weight loss not attributable to other causes or unexplained fever. Because of weak evidence, the panel does not recommend ruxolitinib therapy for improving survival. Also, the recommendations given above do not necessarily apply to patients who are candidates for allogeneic stem cell transplant.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article