Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A phase 1 study combining the HER3 antibody seribantumab (MM-121) and cetuximab with and without irinotecan.
Cleary, James M; McRee, Autumn J; Shapiro, Geoffrey I; Tolaney, Sara M; O'Neil, Bert H; Kearns, Jeffrey D; Mathews, Sara; Nering, Rachel; MacBeath, Gavin; Czibere, Akos; Sharma, Sunil; Korn, W Michael.
Afiliação
  • Cleary JM; Early Drug Development Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
  • McRee AJ; University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
  • Shapiro GI; Early Drug Development Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Tolaney SM; Early Drug Development Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
  • O'Neil BH; University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
  • Kearns JD; Indiana University Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
  • Mathews S; Merrimack Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA.
  • Nering R; Merrimack Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA.
  • MacBeath G; Merrimack Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA.
  • Czibere A; Merrimack Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA.
  • Sharma S; Merrimack Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA.
  • Korn WM; Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Invest New Drugs ; 35(1): 68-78, 2017 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27853996
Background HER3/EGFR heterodimers have been implicated as a mode of resistance to EGFR-directed therapies. Methods This Phase 1 trial assessed the tolerability, maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and pharmacokinetic (PK) properties of the HER-3 antibody seribantumab in combination with cetuximab (Part I) or cetuximab and irinotecan (Part II) in patients with EGFR-dependent cancers. In Part I, escalating doses of seribantumab and cetuximab were administered. In Part II of the trial, escalating doses of seribantumab/cetuximab were combined with irinotecan 180 mg/m2 administered every two weeks. Results 34 patients were enrolled in Part I (seribantumab/cetuximab) and 14 patients were enrolled in Part II (seribantumab/cetuximab/irinotecan). Common toxicities of seribantumab/cetuximab included acneiform rash, diarrhea, stomatitis, and paronychia. The MTD of Part I was seribantumab 40 mg/kg bolus, then 20 mg/kg weekly combined with cetuximab 400 mg/m2 bolus, then 250 mg/m2 IV weekly. Common toxicities reported in the seribantumab/cetuximab/irinotecan combination were similar to the Part I portion. However, toxicities were more frequent and severe with the triplet combination. There was one treatment-related death in Part II secondary to Grade 4 neutropenia and grade 3 diarrhea. Other dose-limiting toxicities in Part II were Grade 3 mucositis and Grade 3 diarrhea. A cholangiocarcinoma patient, previously untreated with EGFR-directed therapy, had a confirmed partial response (PR). One colorectal cancer patient, previously treated with EGFR-directed therapy, had an unconfirmed PR. Conclusions Seribantumab/cetuximab was well tolerated and patients experienced toxicities typical to EGFR inhibition. Unlike the seribantumab/cetuximab doublet, seribantumab/cetuximab/irinotecan was difficult to tolerate in this heavily pretreated population. There was limited efficacy of the combination therapy.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article