Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Competence in the use of supraglottic airways by Australian surf lifesavers for cardiac arrest ventilation in a manikin.
Holbery-Morgan, Lachlan; Angel, Cara; Murphy, Michelle; Carew, James; Douglas, Finn; Murphy, Robert; Hood, Natalie; Rechtman, Andrew; Scarff, Christopher; Simpson, Nicholas; Stewardson, Andrew; Steinfort, Daniel; Radford, Sam; Douglas, Ned; Johnson, Douglas.
Afiliação
  • Holbery-Morgan L; Life Saving Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Angel C; Ambulance Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Murphy M; Ambulance Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Carew J; School of Medicine, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Douglas F; Life Saving Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Murphy R; Ambulance Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Hood N; Life Saving Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Rechtman A; Life Saving Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Scarff C; Life Saving Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Simpson N; Ambulance Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Stewardson A; Surf Life Saving Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Steinfort D; Emergency Department, Monash Medical Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Radford S; Life Saving Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Douglas N; Department of Paediatrics, Albury Base Hospital, Albury, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Johnson D; Life Saving Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Emerg Med Australas ; 29(1): 63-68, 2017 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28078762
OBJECTIVES: Lifesavers in Australia are taught to use pocket mask (PM) rescue breathing and bag valve mask (BVM) ventilation, despite evidence that first responders might struggle with these devices. Novices have successfully used the Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) Supreme and iGel devices previously, but there has been no previous comparison of the ability to train lifesavers to use the supraglottic airways compared to standard techniques for cardiac arrest ventilation. METHODS: The study is a prospective educational intervention whereby 113 lifesavers were trained to use the LMA and iGel supraglottic airways. Comparisons were made to standard devices on plastic manikins. Successful ventilation was defined as achieving visible chest rise. RESULTS: The median time to first effective ventilation was similar between the PM (16 s, 95% confidence interval 16-17 s), BVM (17 s, 16-17 s) and iGel devices (18 s, 16-20 s), but longer for the LMA (36 s, 33-38 s). The iGel frequently failed to achieve ventilation (10%) compared with the PM (1%, P < 0.01) and LMA (3%, P < 0.01) but was not worse than the BVM (3%, P < 0.57). Hands-off time was similar between the BVM, LMA and iGel (10 s for each device), but worse for the PM (13 s, P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Lifesavers using the PM and BVM perform ventilation for cardiopulmonary resuscitation well. There appears to be a limited role for supraglottic airway devices because of limitations in terms of time to first effective ventilation and reliability. Clinical validation of manikin data with live resuscitation performance is required.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Oceania Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Oceania Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article