Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinical and radiological outcomes of concomitant endoscopic gastrocnemius release with scarf osteotomy.
Lai, Mun Chun; Chen, Jerry Yongqiang; Ng, Yeong Huei; Chong, Hwei Chi; Koo, Kevin Oon Thien; Rikhraj, Inderjeet Singh.
Afiliação
  • Lai MC; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore. Electronic address: cmunchun2001@yahoo.com.
  • Chen JY; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
  • Ng YH; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
  • Chong HC; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
  • Koo KOT; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
  • Rikhraj IS; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Foot Ankle Surg ; 24(4): 291-295, 2018 Aug.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29409247
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Studies showed patients with hallux valgus also have tight gastrocnemius concomitantly. This study aims to investigate (1) prevalence of tight gastrocnemius in symptomatic hallux valgus (2) clinical and radiological outcomes of concomitant endoscopic gastrocnemius release with scarf osteotomy.

METHODS:

Between January 2011 to December 2013, 224 patients underwent hallux valgus surgery were evaluated. They were categorized into 2 groups scarf osteotomy (n=195), scarf and endoscopic gastrocnemius release (combine, n=29). Clinical outcome measures assessed included VAS, AOFAS Hallux MTP-IP and SF-36 scores. Radiological outcomes included HVA, IMA, HVI and TSP. All patients were prospectively followed up for 6 and 24 months.

RESULTS:

The prevalence of ipsilateral gastrocnemius tightness in symptomatic hallux valgus is 12.9%. No significant difference in preoperative clinical outcomes between the two groups (all p>.05). Although AOFAS was 6±2 points poorer in the combine group compared to the scarf group at 6 months follow up (p=0.021), at 24 months, all clinical outcomes were comparable between the two groups (all p>0.05). Significant difference in the HVA change between the groups were observed but comparable radiological outcomes in IMA, TSP and HVI at 24 months follow up.

CONCLUSIONS:

We conclude clinical and radiological outcomes of concomitant endoscopic gastrocnemius release and scarf osteotomy are comparable with scarf osteotomy alone at 24 months.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article