Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Acupuncture for breast cancer-related lymphedema: a randomized controlled trial.
Bao, Ting; Iris Zhi, Wanqing; Vertosick, Emily A; Li, Qing Susan; DeRito, Janice; Vickers, Andrew; Cassileth, Barrie R; Mao, Jun J; Van Zee, Kimberly J.
Afiliação
  • Bao T; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1429 First Avenue, New York, NY, 10021, USA. baot@mskcc.org.
  • Iris Zhi W; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1429 First Avenue, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
  • Vertosick EA; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1429 First Avenue, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
  • Li QS; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1429 First Avenue, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
  • DeRito J; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1429 First Avenue, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
  • Vickers A; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1429 First Avenue, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
  • Cassileth BR; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1429 First Avenue, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
  • Mao JJ; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1429 First Avenue, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
  • Van Zee KJ; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1429 First Avenue, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 170(1): 77-87, 2018 Jul.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29520533
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Approximately 20% of breast cancer survivors develop breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL), and current therapies are limited. We compared acupuncture (AC) to usual care wait-list control (WL) for treatment of persistent BCRL.

METHODS:

Women with moderate BCRL lasting greater than six months were randomized to AC or WL. AC included twice weekly manual acupuncture over six weeks. We evaluated the difference in circumference and bioimpedance between affected and unaffected arms. Responders were defined as having a decrease in arm circumference difference greater than 30% from baseline. We used analysis of covariance for circumference and bioimpedance measurements and Fisher's exact to determine the proportion of responders.

RESULTS:

Among 82 patients, 73 (89%) were evaluable for the primary endpoint (36 in AC, 37 in WL). 79 (96%) patients received lymphedema treatment before enrolling in our study; 67 (82%) underwent ongoing treatment during the trial. We found no significant difference between groups for arm circumference difference (0.38 cm greater reduction in AC vs. WL, 95% CI - 0.12 to 0.89, p = 0.14) or bioimpedance difference (1.06 greater reduction in AC vs. WL, 95% CI - 5.72 to 7.85, p = 0.8). There was also no difference in the proportion of responders 17% AC versus 11% WL (6% difference, 95% CI - 10 to 22%, p = 0.5). No severe adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our acupuncture protocol appeared to be safe and well tolerated. However, it did not significantly reduce BCRL in pretreated patients receiving concurrent lymphedema treatment. This regimen does not improve upon conventional lymphedema treatment for breast cancer survivors with persistent BCRL.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article