Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Randomised clinical trial: Efficacy of strategies to provide oral hygiene activities to nursing home residents with dementia who resist mouth care.
Jablonski, Rita A; Kolanowski, Ann M; Azuero, Andres; Winstead, Vicki; Jones-Townsend, Corteza; Geisinger, Maria L.
Afiliação
  • Jablonski RA; School of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
  • Kolanowski AM; Memory Disorders Clinic, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
  • Azuero A; College of Nursing, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
  • Winstead V; School of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
  • Jones-Townsend C; School of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
  • Geisinger ML; Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Gerodontology ; 35(4): 365-375, 2018 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30004139
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to test the efficacy of MOUTh (Managing Oral Hygiene Using Threat Reduction), a nonpharmacologic, relationship-based intervention vs. control on 2 primary outcomes for nursing home (NH) residents with dementia who resisted mouth care: (i) reduction in the occurrence and intensity of care-resistant behaviours (CRBs) and (ii) improvement in oral health. Two secondary outcomes were also examined: (i) the duration of mouth care and (ii) the completion of oral hygiene activities. BACKGROUND: Persons with dementia who exhibit CRBs are at risk for inadequate mouth care and subsequent systemic illnesses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study used a randomised repeated measures design. Recruitment occurred in 9 nursing homes that varied in size, ownership, reimbursement patterns and location. One hundred and one nursing home residents with dementia were randomised at the individual level to experimental (n = 55) or control groups (n = 46). One hundred participants provided data for the analyses. RESULTS: Compared to the control group, persons in the experimental group had twice the odds of allowing mouth care and completing oral hygiene activities; they also allowed longer duration of mouth care (d = 0.56), but showed only small reductions in the intensity of CRBs (d = 0.16) and small differential improvements in oral health (d = 0.18). CONCLUSION: The data suggest that this intervention facilitates mouth care among persons with dementia. The management of refusal behaviour may be a clinically more realistic approach than reducing or eradicating refusals.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article