Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Switching to coformulated rilpivirine (RPV), emtricitabine (FTC) and tenofovir alafenamide from either RPV, FTC and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) or efavirenz, FTC and TDF: 96-week results from two randomized clinical trials.
Hagins, D; Orkin, C; Daar, E S; Mills, A; Brinson, C; DeJesus, E; Post, F A; Morales-Ramirez, J; Thompson, M; Osiyemi, O; Rashbaum, B; Stellbrink, H-J; Martorell, C; Liu, H; Liu, Y-P; Porter, D; Collins, S E; SenGupta, D; Das, M.
Afiliação
  • Hagins D; Georgia Department of Public Health, Chatham Care Center, Savannah, GA, USA.
  • Orkin C; Grahame Hayton Unit, Royal London Hospital and Queen Mary University, London, UK.
  • Daar ES; Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA.
  • Mills A; Mills Clinical Research, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  • Brinson C; Central Texas Clinical Research, Austin, TX, USA.
  • DeJesus E; Orlando Immunology Center, Orlando, FL, USA.
  • Post FA; King's College Hospital, London, UK.
  • Morales-Ramirez J; Clinical Research Puerto Rico Inc., San Juan, Puerto Rico.
  • Thompson M; AIDS Research Consortium of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA, USA.
  • Osiyemi O; Triple O Research Institute PA, West Palm Beach, FL, USA.
  • Rashbaum B; Capital Medical Associates, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Stellbrink HJ; ICH Study Center, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Martorell C; The Research Institute, Springfield, MA, USA.
  • Liu H; Gilead Sciences Inc, Foster City, CA, USA.
  • Liu YP; Gilead Sciences Inc, Foster City, CA, USA.
  • Porter D; Gilead Sciences Inc, Foster City, CA, USA.
  • Collins SE; Gilead Sciences Inc, Foster City, CA, USA.
  • SenGupta D; Gilead Sciences Inc, Foster City, CA, USA.
  • Das M; Gilead Sciences Inc, Foster City, CA, USA.
HIV Med ; 19(10): 724-733, 2018 11.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30101539
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

The single-tablet regimen rilpivirine, emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide (RPV/FTC/TAF) for treatment of HIV-1-infected adults was approved based on bioequivalence. We assessed the clinical efficacy, safety and tolerability of switching to RPV/FTC/TAF from either RPV/FTC/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) or efavirenz (EFV)/FTC/TDF.

METHODS:

We conducted two distinct randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, noninferiority trials in participants taking RPV/FTC/TDF (Study 1216) and EFV/FTC/TDF (Study 1160). Each study randomized virologically suppressed (HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL) adults (11) to switch to RPV/FTC/TAF or continue their current regimen for 96 weeks. We evaluated efficacy as the proportion with HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL using the Food and Drug Administration snapshot algorithm and prespecified bone and renal endpoints at week 96.

RESULTS:

We randomized and treated 630 participants in Study 1216 (RPV/FTC/TAF, n = 316; RPV/FTC/TDF, n = 314) and 875 in Study 1160 (RPV/FTC/TAF, n = 438; EFV/FTC/TDF, n = 437). In both studies, the efficacy of switching to RPV/FTC/TAF was noninferior to that of continuing baseline therapy at week 96, with respective percentages of patients with HIV RNA < 50 copies/mL being 89.2% versus 88.5% in Study 1216 [difference 0.7%; 95% confidence interval (CI) -4.3 to +5.8%] and 85.2% versus 85.1% in Study 1160 (difference 0%; 95% CI -4.8 to +4.8%). No participant on RPV/FTC/TAF developed treatment-emergent resistance versus two on EFV/FTC/TDF and one on RPV/FTC/TDF. Compared with continuing baseline therapy, significant improvements in bone mineral density and renal tubular markers were observed in the RPV/FTC/TAF groups (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS:

Switching to RPV/FTC/TAF from RPV/FTC/TDF or EFV/FTC/TDF was safe and effective and improved bone mineral density and renal biomarkers up to 96 weeks with no cases of treatment-emergent resistance.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article