Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of metabolic syndrome on oncologic outcomes at radical prostatectomy.
Morlacco, Alessandro; Dal Moro, Fabrizio; Rangel, Laureano J; Carlson, Rachel E; Schulte, Phillip J; Jeffrey, Karnes R.
Afiliação
  • Morlacco A; Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Dipartimento di Scienze Chirurgiche, Oncologiche e Gastroenterologiche, Clinica Urologica, Università degli Studi di Padova, Padova, Italy.
  • Dal Moro F; Dipartimento di Scienze Chirurgiche, Oncologiche e Gastroenterologiche, Clinica Urologica, Università degli Studi di Padova, Padova, Italy.
  • Rangel LJ; Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
  • Carlson RE; Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
  • Schulte PJ; Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
  • Jeffrey KR; Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. Electronic address: Karnes.R@mayo.edu.
Urol Oncol ; 36(12): 528.e1-528.e6, 2018 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30446466
PURPOSE: The associations between metabolic syndrome (MetS) and prostate cancer (CaP) outcomes following radical prostatectomy (RP) are not clear. This study aims to understand the role of MetS in influencing oncological outcomes at RP. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent RP for CaP at our institution from 2000 to 2010 were identified; MetS prior to RP was ascertained with a modified version of the IDF-AHA/NHLBI using ICD-9 codes. Histopathological outcomes included surgical margins, pathological stage, and Gleason score (GS) upgrading. Long-term outcomes included biochemical recurrence (BCR), local recurrence, systemic progression, and CaP-specific mortality. Multivariable adjusted logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards regression assessed the association between MetS status and histopathological and long-term outcomes, respectively. RESULTS: Of 8,504 RP patients, 1,054 (12.4%) had MetS at the time of RP. MetS patients were older, had higher biopsy GS, but lower pre-op prostatic specific antigen (PSA), higher pathological GS, and larger prostate volume. Adjusted logistic regression suggested an association between MetS and positive margins (odds ratio [OR] = 1.22, P = 0.025) and GS upgrading (OR = 1.28, P = 0.002). There was evidence of an increased risk of local recurrence (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.33, P = 0.037) and CaP-specific mortality (HR = 1.58, P < 0.001) for MetS patients. There was no evidence to suggest an association with BCR or systemic progression. CONCLUSION: Men with MetS are at higher risk of GS upgrade and positive surgical margins at surgery, local recurrence, and CaP-specific mortality. Pathological stage, BCR, and systemic progression were not associated with MetS. Our data may be useful in patients' counseling, especially when active surveillance is an option.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article