Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cryosurgery combined with topical interventions for actinic keratosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Heppt, M V; Steeb, T; Ruzicka, T; Berking, C.
Afiliação
  • Heppt MV; Department of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Frauenlobstraße 9-11, 80337, Munich, Germany.
  • Steeb T; Department of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Frauenlobstraße 9-11, 80337, Munich, Germany.
  • Ruzicka T; Department of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Frauenlobstraße 9-11, 80337, Munich, Germany.
  • Berking C; Department of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Frauenlobstraße 9-11, 80337, Munich, Germany.
Br J Dermatol ; 180(4): 740-748, 2019 04.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30447074
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Actinic keratoses (AKs) are early in situ carcinomas of the skin caused by cumulative sun exposure. Cryosurgery is an easy and practicable lesion-directed approach for treatment of isolated lesions.

OBJECTIVES:

To investigate whether an upfront combination of cryosurgery with a topical intervention is superior to cryosurgery alone for treatment of AK.

METHODS:

We performed a systematic literature search in MEDLINE, Embase and CENTRAL and hand searched pertinent trial registers for eligible randomized controlled trials until 17 July 2018. Results from individual studies were pooled using a random effects model. The risk of bias was estimated with the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and the quality of evidence of the outcomes with the GRADE approach.

RESULTS:

Out of 1758 records initially identified, nine studies with a total sample size of 1644 patients were included. Cryosurgery in combination with a topical approach showed significantly higher participant complete clearance rates than monotherapy [risk ratio (RR) 1·74, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1·25-2·43, I2 = 73%, eight studies]. The participant partial clearance rate was not statistically different (RR 1·64, 95% CI 0·88-3·03, I2 = 77%, three studies). The number of patients who completed the study protocol and did not withdraw due to adverse events was equal in both groups (RR 0·98, 95% CI 0·95-1·01, I2 = 75%, seven studies). The studies were estimated to have high risk for selective reporting bias.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our results suggest the superiority of a combination regimen for AK clearance, with equal tolerability. This study highlights the importance of a field-directed approach in patients with multiple AKs or field cancerization.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article