Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy of Immunotherapy in Patients with Metastatic Mucosal or Uveal Melanoma.
Mignard, Claire; Deschamps Huvier, Aurélie; Gillibert, André; Duval Modeste, Anne Bénédicte; Dutriaux, Caroline; Khammari, Amir; Avril, Marie-Françoise; Kramkimel, Nora; Mortier, Laurent; Marcant, Pierre; Lesimple, Thierry; Gaudy-Marqueste, Caroline; Lesage, Candice; Machet, Laurent; Aubin, François; Meyer, Nicolas; Beneton, Nathalie; Jeudy, Géraldine; Montaudié, Henri; Arnault, Jean-Philippe; Visseaux, Laetitia; Trabelsi, Sabiha; Amini-Adle, Mona; Maubec, Eve; Le Corre, Yannick; Lipsker, Dan; Wierzbicka-Hainaut, Ewa; Litrowski, Noémie; Stefan, Andreea; Brunet-Possenti, Florence; Leccia, Marie-Thérèse; Joly, Pascal.
Afiliação
  • Mignard C; Dermatology Department, Institute for Research and Innovation in Biomedicine, INSERM 1234, Rouen University Hospital, University of Normandie, Rouen, France.
  • Deschamps Huvier A; Dermatology Department, Institute for Research and Innovation in Biomedicine, INSERM 1234, Rouen University Hospital, University of Normandie, Rouen, France.
  • Gillibert A; Department of Biostatistics, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France.
  • Duval Modeste AB; Dermatology Department, Institute for Research and Innovation in Biomedicine, INSERM 1234, Rouen University Hospital, University of Normandie, Rouen, France.
  • Dutriaux C; Department of Dermatology, Oncology Unit, Saint André Hospital, Bordeaux University Hospital, France.
  • Khammari A; Onco-Dermatology Department, CHU Nantes, CRCINA, CIC1413, University Nantes, Nantes, France.
  • Avril MF; APHP, Department of Dermatology, Cochin Hospital and University Paris Descartes, 89 rue Assas, 75006 Paris, France.
  • Kramkimel N; APHP, Department of Dermatology, Cochin Hospital and University Paris Descartes, 89 rue Assas, 75006 Paris, France.
  • Mortier L; Department of Dermatology, Hôpital Huriez, Lille University Hospital, 59045 Lille, France.
  • Marcant P; Department of Dermatology, Hôpital Huriez, Lille University Hospital, 59045 Lille, France.
  • Lesimple T; Department of Medical Oncology, Eugene Marquis Center, Rennes, France.
  • Gaudy-Marqueste C; Department of Dermatology and Skin Cancer, La Timone Hospital, 265 rue St Pierre, 13885 Marseille Cedex 05, France.
  • Lesage C; Department of Dermatology, Montpellier University Hospital, 34295 Montpellier, France.
  • Machet L; Department of Dermatology, CHRU de Tours et Université François Rabelais de Tours, France.
  • Aubin F; Department of Dermatology, EA3181, Besancon University Hospital, France.
  • Meyer N; Department of Dermatology, Toulouse III University - Paul Sabatier, Institut Universitaire du Cancer and Toulouse University Hospital, France.
  • Beneton N; Department of Dermatology, Le Mans hospital, France.
  • Jeudy G; Department of Dermatology, Dijon University Hospital, France.
  • Montaudié H; Department of Dermatology, Nice University Hospital, INSERM, U1065, Centre Méditerranéen de Médecine Moléculaire, Team 12, Nice, France.
  • Arnault JP; Department of Dermatology, Amiens-Picardie University Hospital, 80054 Amiens Cedex 1, France.
  • Visseaux L; Department of Dermatology, Reims University Hospital, France.
  • Trabelsi S; Department of Dermatology, Grenoble University Hospital, France.
  • Amini-Adle M; Department of Dermatology, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon 1 University, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, 69495 Pierre Bénite Cedex, France.
  • Maubec E; APHP, Avicenne Hospital, Department of Dermatology, University Paris 13, Bobigny, France.
  • Le Corre Y; Department of Dermatology, Angers University Hospital, UNAM, France.
  • Lipsker D; Faculty of Medicine, University of Strasbourg and Department of Dermatology, Strasbourg University Hospital, France.
  • Wierzbicka-Hainaut E; Department of Dermatology, Poitiers University Hospital, France.
  • Litrowski N; Department of Dermatology, Monod General Hospital, le Havre, France.
  • Stefan A; Department of Dermatology, Caen University Hospital, France.
  • Brunet-Possenti F; Department of Dermatology, Bichat University Hospital, Paris, France.
  • Leccia MT; Department of Dermatology, Grenoble University Hospital, France.
  • Joly P; Dermatology Department, Institute for Research and Innovation in Biomedicine, INSERM 1234, Rouen University Hospital, University of Normandie, Rouen, France.
J Oncol ; 2018: 1908065, 2018.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30631354
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The objective was to assess the response rate and survival of patients with metastatic mucosal melanoma (MM) and uveal melanoma (UM) treated with anti-CTLA-4 or anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs).

METHODS:

A multicenter retrospective study was performed in 25 dermatology departments in France. All patients with stage III-C to IV MM or UM who were treated with anti-CTLA-4 or anti-PD-1 mAbs between 2008 and 2016 were included and compared after adjustment for main prognostic factors with a second cohort of patients treated with chemotherapy. Tumor response was evaluated according to RECIST v. 1.1 criteria at Week 12.

RESULTS:

Four-hundred-and-thirty-nine patients were included, 229 MM (151 immunotherapy, 78 chemotherapy) and 210 UM (100 immunotherapy, 110 chemotherapy). Response rates of MM patients treated with immunotherapy were 18/151 (11.9%; 95% CI7.2%-18.2%), versus 11/78 (14.1%, 95% CI7.3%-23.8%) in patients treated with chemotherapy (p=0.87). No tumor response was observed in UM patients treated with immunotherapy, versus 4/110 responses (3.6%, 95% CI1.0-9.0%) in patients treated with chemotherapy (p=0.15). The adjusted overall survival (OS) of MM patients treated with immunotherapy was longer than that of patients treated with chemotherapy HR=0.62 (95% CI 0.43-0.91), p=0.014, with an unadjusted median OS of 15.97 months [interquartile range (IQR)=6.89-27.11] and 8.82 months [IQR=5.02-14.92], respectively. The adjusted OS of UM patients treated with immunotherapy was not significantly different from that of patients treated with chemotherapy (HR=0.98, 95% CI 0.66-1.44) p=0.92, with an unadjusted median OS of 13.38 months [IQR=6.03-29.57] and 11.02 months [IQR=6.13-23.93], respectively.

CONCLUSION:

Immunotherapy significantly improves OS for MM. The prognosis of metastatic UM remains poor.

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article