Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Real-World Outcomes and Factors Associated With the Second-Line Treatment of Patients With Gastric, Gastroesophageal Junction, or Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.
Barzi, Afsaneh; Hess, Lisa M; Zhu, Yajun E; Liepa, Astra M; Sugihara, Tomoko; Beyrer, Julie; Chao, Joseph.
Afiliação
  • Barzi A; 1 Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angles, CA, USA.
  • Hess LM; 2 Global Patient Outcomes and Real-World Evidence, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
  • Zhu YE; 2 Global Patient Outcomes and Real-World Evidence, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
  • Liepa AM; 2 Global Patient Outcomes and Real-World Evidence, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
  • Sugihara T; 3 Clinical Solutions, Syneos Health, Raleigh, NC, USA.
  • Beyrer J; 2 Global Patient Outcomes and Real-World Evidence, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
  • Chao J; 4 City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA.
Cancer Control ; 26(1): 1073274819847642, 2019.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31056940
This retrospective observational study was designed to evaluate overall survival in a real-world patient population and to identify predictive factors associated with receipt of second-line therapy. A retrospective analysis of electronic medical records (Flatiron Health, New York) was conducted among patients initiating first-line therapy from January 1, 2013, through April 30, 2018. Eligible patients were diagnosed with advanced gastric, gastroesophageal junction, or esophageal adenocarcinoma and ≥18 years of age at the time of treatment initiation. Patients alive 45 days after discontinuation of first-line therapy were considered potentially eligible for continued therapy and were categorized into those who received and those who did not receive second-line therapy. Survival analyses were conducted using Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test without adjusting for any baseline covariates. Factors associated with further treatment were evaluated using logistic regression. A total of 3850 patients met eligibility criteria. Among the 2516 patients available to receive second-line therapy, 1515 (60.2%) received second-line therapy and 1001 (39.8%) did not receive further therapy. Among those potentially eligible to receive second-line therapy, median survival was 15.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 14.6-16.0) from initiation of first-line therapy for those who received second-line therapy and 10.0 months (95% CI: 9.3-10.7) for those who did not. Longer duration of first-line therapy (≥169 vs ≤84 days), HER2-positive tumors, initially diagnosed with stage IV disease, less weight loss during first-line therapy, and younger age were associated with receipt of second-line therapy (all P < .001). Longer survival was associated with multiple lines of therapy; however, these results should be interpreted with caution, and no causal relationship can be inferred.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article