Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of an Information Technology-Enabled Quality Improvement Initiative on Timeliness of Patient Contact and Scheduling of Screening Mammography Recall.
Giess, Catherine S; Wang, Aijia; Frost, Elisabeth P; Chikarmane, Sona A; Boland, Giles W; Khorasani, Ramin.
Afiliação
  • Giess CS; Department of Radiology, Center for Evidence-Based Imaging, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115.
  • Wang A; Department of Radiology, Center for Evidence-Based Imaging, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115.
  • Frost EP; Department of Radiology, Center for Evidence-Based Imaging, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115.
  • Chikarmane SA; Department of Radiology, Center for Evidence-Based Imaging, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115.
  • Boland GW; Department of Radiology, Center for Evidence-Based Imaging, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115.
  • Khorasani R; Department of Radiology, Center for Evidence-Based Imaging, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 213(4): 880-885, 2019 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31268733
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of an information technology-enabled quality improvement initiative on timeliness of patient contact and scheduling of screening mammography recall. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The study was conducted in a screening practice (two ambulatory centers, A and B; two hospitals, C and D) that uses offline batch results (A, B, C) and same-day results (D) with on-site (A, C, D) or off-site (B) coordinators scheduling recalls. Before the intervention, radiologists at sites A, B, and C conveyed recalls via paper lists to coordinators after batch interpretation. At site D, coordinators received recall lists several times a day. In March 2017 an electronic alert system was implemented to notify coordinators of recall at report signing with required closed-loop acknowledgment once recall was scheduled. Mean time (hours, excluding weekends) to schedule diagnostic evaluation was compared for 4-month periods before and after intervention by two-tailed t test and statistical process control analyses. RESULTS. Recall rates were 9.5% (1356/14,315) before and 8.9% (1432/16,034) after the intervention (p = 0.10). Mean time to schedule screening decreased after the intervention as follows site A from 86 to 65 hours (-24.4%, p = 0.01); site B, 116 to 70 hours (-39.7%, p < 0.0001); site C, 98 to 65 hours (-33.7%, p = 0.002); and site D, 49 to 42 hours (-14.3%, p = 0.21). Statistical process control analysis showed significant sustained improvements at sites A, B, and C in mean time to patient contact and scheduling of diagnostic evaluation. CONCLUSION. An information technology-enabled quality improvement initiative to notify coordinators of screening recalls in real time with required patient contact and scheduling acknowledgment reduced time to diagnostic scheduling in a multisite practice. The greatest impact was found at the site with off-site coordinators, the least at the site performing same-day interpretation.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article