Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Influence of needle size and injection angle on the distribution pattern of facial soft tissue fillers.
Pavicic, Tatjana; Mohmand, Humayun M; Yankova, Mariya; Schenck, Thilo L; Frank, Konstantin; Freytag, David L; Green, Jeremy B; Hamade, Hassan; Cassuto, Daniel; Cotofana, Sebastian.
Afiliação
  • Pavicic T; Private Practice, Munich, Germany.
  • Mohmand HM; Academy of Aesthetic Medicine and Surgery, Islamabad, Pakistan.
  • Yankova M; Private Practice, Munich, Germany.
  • Schenck TL; Department for Hand, Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, Munich, Germany.
  • Frank K; Department for Hand, Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, Munich, Germany.
  • Freytag DL; Department for Hand, Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, Munich, Germany.
  • Green JB; Skin Associates of South Florida, Coral Gables, FL, USA.
  • Hamade H; Division of Anatomy, Department of Medical Education, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY, USA.
  • Cassuto D; Private Practice, Milan, Italy.
  • Cotofana S; Division of Anatomy, Department of Medical Education, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY, USA.
J Cosmet Dermatol ; 18(5): 1230-1236, 2019 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31282607
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Soft tissue filler injections are performed using either sharp-tip needles or blunt-tip cannulas. Product can change planes in an uncontrolled manner during needle injections, potentially leading to unintentional intra-arterial placement. There is a paucity of data on the influence of injection angle on the dispersion patterns of soft tissue fillers. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

A total of 126 injection procedures were conducted in seven Caucasian body donors (four males, three females) with a mean age of 75.29 ± 4.95 years and a mean body mass index of 23.53 ± 3.96 kg/m2 . Injection procedures were performed in various facial regions (forehead, scalp, zygomatic arch, mandibular angle), utilizing different needle sizes (25G, 27G, 30G) and different angles (90°, 45°, 10°). Layer-by-layer dissections were performed to verify the location of the injected product. Dissections were facilitated by the colored material.

RESULTS:

Utilizing a 30G needle (compared to a 25G needle) reduces the superficial spread with OR 0.70 (95% CI, 0.48-0.99) and P = 0.049, whereas injecting at 90° (vs 10° with the bevel down) increases the odds for superficial spread with OR 10.0 (95% CI, 7.11-14.09) and P < 0.001.

CONCLUSION:

Precision during soft tissue filler injections, defined as the product remaining in the plane of intended implantation, can be enhanced by changing the needle size and the injection angle. Utilizing a 30G needle and injecting at a 10° angle with bevel facing down reduces the uncontrolled product distribution into superficial fascial layers.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article