Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A review of optimal prostate biopsy: indications and techniques.
Streicher, Justin; Meyerson, Brian Lee; Karivedu, Vidhya; Sidana, Abhinav.
Afiliação
  • Streicher J; University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
  • Meyerson BL; University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
  • Karivedu V; Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, USA.
  • Sidana A; Division of Urology, University of Cincinnati Cancer Institute, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, 231 Albert Sabin Way, ML 0589, Cincinnati, OH 45267, USA.
Ther Adv Urol ; 11: 1756287219870074, 2019.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31489033
Prostate biopsy is the gold standard diagnostic technique for the detection of prostate cancer. Patient selection for prostate biopsy is complex and is influenced by emerging use of prebiopsy imaging. The introduction of the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) fusion prostate biopsy has clear advantages over the historical standard of care. There are several biopsy techniques currently utilized with unique advantages and disadvantages. We review and summarize the current body of literature pertaining to when and how a prostate biopsy should be performed. We discuss current recommendations regarding patient selection for biopsy and discuss future directions regarding prebiopsy imaging. We offer a description of the MRI-TRUS fusion biopsy technique and a comparison of many of the currently available fusion software platforms. Articles pertaining to the title were obtained via PubMed index search with relevant keywords supplemented with personal collection of related publications. Prostate biopsy should be considered for patients with gross digital rectal exam (DRE) abnormality, patients with a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) greater than 4 ng/ml, and concomitant risk factors for prostate cancer or patients with lesions identified on multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System 2 (PI-RADS2) score of 4 or 5. MRI-TRUS fusion biopsy has demonstrated advantages in cancer detection when compared with TRUS-guided biopsy. There are currently several fusion software platforms available with a variety of biopsy approaches. Future efforts should detail the role of prebiopsy imaging as a triage tool for prostate biopsy. Consensus should be sought regarding the preferred modality of fusion biopsy. Additional data describing each fusion software platform would enable a more rigorous comparison of platform sensitivities.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article